Epidemiology (Schneider) Effect of Temperature in Salmonella Growth Number of Salmonella per gram Days 21 45 3 95 o F (35 o C) 50 o F (10 o C) 44 o F (6.7.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Public Health Surveillance Denise Koo, MD, MPH Epidemiology Program Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Advertisements

FOODBORNE OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH FRIED RICE, HARDIN COUNTY, MAY 2006 ASHOKA INDUKURI EPIDEMIOLOGIST LINCOLN TRAIL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPT.
A Houston area church organization notified the Texas Department of State Health Services of gastrointestinal illness among attendees at its annual bazaar.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Principles of Surveillance Jonathan Samet, MD, MS Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Detect and Confirm an Outbreak FETP Foodborne Outbreak Investigation, 2 June David T. Dennis, MD, MPH Medical Epidemiologist US Centers Disease Control.
Food Safety Jeopardy Game Rules
Role of Laboratory in a Foodborne Outbreak Vietnam FETP Foodborne Outbreak Training Course Hanoi, Vietnam June 4, 2009.
Our vision: Healthier communities, Excellence in healthcare Our values: Teamwork, Honesty, Respect, Ethical, Excellence, Caring, Commitment, Courage Descriptive.
Investigating an Outbreak
Shifting Paradigms in Epidemiology: The Expanded Role of the Public Health Laboratory Linda Gaul, PhD, MPH Epidemiologist Infectious Disease Epidemiology.
An Outbreak of Gastrointestinal Illness Following a Church Supper
Overview of Uses for Public Health Surveillance Daniel M. Sosin, M.D., M.P.H. Division of Public Health Surveillance and Informatics Epidemiology Program.
Surveillance: An Overview
What Are Some Important Foodborne Pathogens? 1 Cause of Foodborne Illness Infection—Ingested pathogen cells grow in the gastro-intestinal tract Toxin—Pathogen.
A Brief Introduction to Epidemiology - VII (Epidemiologic Research Designs: Demographic, Mortality & Morbidity Studies) Betty C. Jung, RN, MPH, CHES.
Disease Detectives Elementary Science Olympiad. Your Description Goes Here 1.What is wrong with these cutting board photos? (1 point) 2.Be sure to name.
OUTBREAK! Portrait of an Epidemic
Shawn Kise BSN, RN, MS Student.   Have a general knowledge base for the Norovirus.  Understand the process and steps taken in the outbreak investigation.
Global surveillance of communicable diseases Summary of presentations for weeks 1 and 2 Seminar PubHlth 796, Fall 2006 Friday 11:15-12:05 Section A 12:15-1:05.
Surveillance Dona Schneider, PhD, MPH.  Surveillance is the ongoing, systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of health data essential to.
BIOSTATISTICS 5.5 MEASURES OF FREQUENCY BIOSTATISTICS TERMINAL OBJECTIVE: 5.5 Prepare a Food Specific Attack Rate Table IAW PEF 5.5.
Chapter 6: Food Safety & Sanitation Sources of Food Bourne Illness.
Epidemiology of Foodborne Disease ENVR 421 Mark D. Sobsey.
1 Risk Surveillance and Assessment of Food Safety in Shanghai.
Public Health Surveillance
Epidemiology Tools and Methods Session 2, Part 1.
5-min Experts: Data Collection and Analysis 2010 KSTA Conference Lisa Devillez Marshall County High School.
Providing Safe Food. Foodborne Illness Illness carried or transmitted to people by food Foodborne-Illness Outbreak Incident in which two or more people.
BBQ Event at Senior Community First case (HUS) reported by provider Multiple illnesses reported from community Online survey link distributed via .
1 Keeping Food Safe Chapter Number 1. Learning Objectives After this presentation, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes 1.0.
Public Health Surveillance
Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Module 3 Surveillance & Outbreaks.
Food Safety Module C: Lesson 4 Grade 12 Active, Healthy Lifestyles.
Investigation and Control of Outbreaks of Foodborne Illness Ralph Cordell, PhD.
FOOD SAFETY. What are some food safety concerns? Food spoiled by bacteria Contamination of food Hazardous items in food.
Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Module I Introduction.
FOOD POISONING (c) PDST Home Economics. FOOD POISONING Food poisoning is caused by eating food containing harmful substances. There are 3 types of food.
Outbreak Investigation. Objectives  Determine if an outbreak is occurring  Characterise the outbreak  Identify additional cases  Identify causative.
MLAB Microbiology Keri Brophy-Martinez Public Health & The Microbiology Lab.
HEPATITIS A INCUBATION DAYS SYMPTOMS - MILD ILNESS OF SUDDEN ONSET, FEVER, TIREDNESS, LOS OF APPETITE, STOMACH DISCOMFORT DURATION WEEKS.
Trends of Foodborne Diseases at Dubai 2006 – 2010 Dr. Fatma Al Attar M.D,ABFM,MRCGP Head of Preventive Services Section.
Basics of Study Design in Foodborne Illness Outbreak Investigations Instructor Name Job Title Organization.
Basics of Study Design in Foodborne Illness Outbreak Investigations Instructor Name Job Title Organization.
ANNETTE SILVIA PhD PUBLIC HEALTH, EPIDEMIOLOGY WALDEN UNIVERSITY PUBH 8165–2 DR. FREDERICK GRANT SUMMER QUARTER, 2013 Introduction to Foodborne Illness.
Data Needed to Measure HACCP Impacts on Public Health Jack Guzewich, R.S., M.P.H. Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 2 May 6, 2002.
Disease Outbreak Maria del Rosario, MD, MPH Infectious Disease Epidemiology Program WVDHHR/BPH/DSDC February
Cooking for Crowds. Objectives Provide the reasons why food safety is important to your event Show practical ways to purchase, prepare, and serve foods.
BB#5 - Identifying Variables Controlled variables: Manipulated variable: Responding variable:
Lesson 4Page 1 of 27 Lesson 4 Sources of Routinely Collected Data for Surveillance.
Is for Epi Epidemiology basics for non-epidemiologists.
Food Borne Illness Foods 2. Estimates Food Borne Illness Each Year in the United States 76 million people become ill 5,000 people die.
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 24 Public Health Surveillance.
A Foodborne outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis following a birthday party in Podgorica, Montenegro, 2014 Laušević Dragan, Djuravčaj A, Nikolić A, Galić.
“What’s Bugging You?” Food Science. People get sick each year from the food they eat. They may have diarrhea, vomiting, an upset stomach, fever, or cramps.
1. I can recognize the risk factors for foodborne illness. 2. I can define FAT TOM. 3. I can understand the important prevention measures for keeping.
Epidemics and endemic diseases ll Prof. Hamed Adetunji.
What is Foodborne Illness?. Foodborne Illness AKA – foodborne disease What is it? – illness resulting from the consumption of food – commonly known as.
Outbreak Investigation
ACUTE GASTROENTERITIS
Descriptive Epidemiology According to Person, Place, and Time
Understanding Basic Food Safety
What Are Some Important Foodborne Pathogens?
What Are Some Important Foodborne Pathogens?
Chapter 1: Providing Safe Food
What is Foodborne Illness?
Chapter 4: Food Hazard Analysis
Disease Detective Team!
Outbreak Investigation
Public Health Surveillance
Presentation transcript:

Epidemiology (Schneider) Effect of Temperature in Salmonella Growth Number of Salmonella per gram Days o F (35 o C) 50 o F (10 o C) 44 o F (6.7 o C) 42 o F (5.5 o C)

Incubation Periods Contaminated by carrier, not foodborne Shigella* hours Raw fish, shellfish Vibrio parahemolyticus* 12 hours Canned foods, smoked fish Clostridium botulinum hours Meat, poultry, eggsSalmonella* hours Cooked meats, gravy Clostridium perfringens 12 hours Cooked ham, meat, eggs, sauces and gravies Staphylococcus aureus 2-4 hours * Fever

National Data on Etiology of Foodborne Illness 7.3% Chemicals (28 agents) 12.3% Fish (28 agents) - Plants (36 agents) 1.8% Fungal (16 agents) 0.5% Parasites (31 agents) 9.4% Viral (11 agents) 9.5% Clostridium botulinum 10.0% Clostridium perfringens 12.7% Staph. aureus 25.0% Salmonella 68.7% Bacteria (40 agents) Agent

On April 19, 1940, the local health officer in the village of Lycoming, Oswego County, New York, reported the occurrence of an outbreak of acute gastrointestinal illness to the District Health Officer in Syracuse. Dr. A. M. Rubin, epidemiologist-in-training, was assigned to conduct an investigation. When Dr. Rubin arrived in the field, he learned from the health officer that all persons known to be ill had attended a church supper the previous evening, April 18. Family members who had not attended the church supper had not become ill. Accordingly, the investigation was focused on the circumstances related to the supper. Investigating an Epidemic: Oswego, NY

Epidemiology (Schneider) Interviews regarding the presence of symptoms, including the day and hour of onset, and the food consumed at the church supper, were completed on 75 of the 80 persons known to have been present. A total of 46 persons who had experienced gastrointestinal illness were identified. Q: Is this an Epidemic? Endemic for the region? Due to seasonal variation? Due to random variation?

Select the correct case definition and find the error in the others: 1.All participants in the Oswego church supper held in the basement of the church in Lycoming, Oswego County, New York, on April 18, 1940, between 6:00 PM and 11:00 PM; whether they attended church or not; whether they participated in food preparation, transport, or distribution or not; whether they ate or not. 2.Persons who developed acute gastrointestinal symptoms within 72 hours of eating supper on April 18, 1940, and who were among attendees of the Lycoming, Oswego Church supper. 3.Church members who developed acute gastrointestinal symptoms within 72 hours of the church supper held in Lycoming, Oswego on April 18, 1940.

Select the correct case definition and find the error in the others: 1.All participants in the Oswego church supper held in the basement of the church in Lycoming, Oswego County, New York, on April 18, 1940, between 6:00 PM and 11:00 PM; whether they attended church or not; whether they participated in food preparation, transport, or distribution or not; whether they ate or not. 2.Persons who developed acute gastrointestinal symptoms within 72 hours of eating supper on April 18, 1940, and who were among attendees of the Lycoming, Oswego Church supper. 3.Church members who developed acute gastrointestinal symptoms within 72 hours of the church supper held in Lycoming, Oswego on April 18, 1940.

Select the correct case definition and find the error in the others: 1.All participants in the Oswego church supper held in the basement of the church in Lycoming, Oswego County, New York, on April 18, 1940, between 6:00 PM and 11:00 PM; whether they attended church or not; whether they participated in food preparation, transport, or distribution or not; whether they ate or not. Missing definition of sickness 2.Persons who developed acute gastrointestinal symptoms within 72 hours of eating supper on April 18, 1940, and who were among attendees of the Lycoming, Oswego Church supper. CORRECT 3.Church members who developed acute gastrointestinal symptoms within 72 hours of the church supper held in Lycoming, Oswego on April 18, Did not specify that they went to the dinner

Incidence of Cases of Diarrhea Among People Attending Lycoming,Oswego Church Supper, June 1940

Epidemiology (Schneider) The supper was held in the basement of the village church. Foods were contributed by numerous members of the congregation. The supper began at 6:00 PM and continued until 11:00 PM. Food was spread out upon a table and consumed over a period of several hours.

Epidemiology (Schneider) Main Dishes Baked ham Spinach Mashed potatoes Cabbage salad Fruit Salad Side Dishes Jello Rolls Brown Bread Desserts Cakes Vanilla Ice Cream Chocolate Ice Cream Beverages Milk Coffee Water Church Supper Menu

Epidemiology (Schneider) Which menu item(s) is the potential culprit? To find out, calculate attack rates. The foods that have the greatest difference in attack rates may be the foods that were responsible for the illness.

Attack Rates by Items Served: Church Supper, Oswego, New York; April Fruit salad Ice cream (choc) Ice cream (van) Cakes Water Coffee Milk Brown bread Rolls Jello Cabbage salad Mashed potato Spinach Baked ham Attack rate % Total WellIll Attack rate (%) Total Well Ill Number of persons who did not eat specified item Number of persons who ate specified item

Attack Rates by Items Served: Church Supper, Oswego, New York; April Fruit salad Ice cream (choc) Ice cream (van) Cakes Water Coffee Milk Brown bread Rolls Jello Cabbage salad Mashed potato Spinach Baked ham Attack rate %TotalWellIll Attack rate (%) Total Well Ill Number of persons who did not eat specified item Number of persons who ate specified item

Fruit salad Ice cream (choc) Ice cream (van) Cakes Water Coffee Milk Brown bread Rolls Jello Cabbage salad Mashed potato Spinach Baked ham Attack rate %Total WellIll Attack rate (%) Total Well Il l Number of persons who did not eat specified item Number of persons who ate specified item Attack Rates by Items Served: Church Supper, Oswego, New York; April 1940

Attack Rate by Consumption of Vanilla Ice Cream, Oswego, New York; April Total No Yes Ate vanilla ice cream? Attack Rate (%) TotalWellIll The relative risk is calculated as 79.6/14.3 or 5.6 The relative risk indicates that persons who ate vanilla ice cream were 5.6 times more likely to become ill than those who did not eat vanilla ice cream

Epidemiology (Schneider) Conclusion An attack of gastroenteritis occurred following a church supper at Lycoming The cause of the outbreak was most likely contaminated vanilla ice cream

Epidemiology (Schneider) Surveillance Ongoing systematic collection, collation, analysis and interpretation of data; and the dissemination of information to those who need to know in order that action may be taken. World Health Organization

Epidemiology (Schneider) Purposes of Public Health Surveillance Estimate magnitude of the problem Determine geographic distribution of illnesses Portraying the natural history of disease Detect epidemic / Define a problem Generate hypotheses and stimulate research Evaluate control measures Monitor changes in infectious agents Detect changes in health practice Facilitate planning CDC

Epidemiology (Schneider) Passive Surveillance Physicians, laboratories, and hospitals are given forms to complete and submit with the expectation that they will report all of the cases of reportable disease that come to their attention Advantages: Inexpensive Disadvantages: Data are provided by busy health professionals. Thus, the data are more likely to be incomplete and underestimate the presence of disease in the population

Epidemiology (Schneider) Active Surveillance Involves regular periodic collection of case reports by telephone or personal visits to the reporting individuals to obtain the data Advantages: More accurate because it is conducted by individuals specifically employed to carry out the responsibility Disadvantages: Expensive

Epidemiology (Schneider) Sentinel Surveillance Monitoring of key health events, through sentinel sites, events, providers, vectors/animals Case report indicates a failure of the health care system or indicates that special problems are emerging Advantages: Very inexpensive Disadvantages: Applicable only for a select group of diseases

Epidemiology (Schneider) Some Surveillance Programs National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Cancer Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result (SEER)

Epidemiology (Schneider) “ Good surveillance does not necessarily ensure the making of right decisions, but it reduces the chances of wrong ones. ” Alexander D. Langmuir NEJM 1963;268: