Source: Class Slides for the MPG Illusion These slides may be used without copyright approval Please acknowledge

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The One Tonne Challenge Government of Canada. One Tonne Challenge - Overview A challenge to Canadians to reduce their GHG emissions by one tonne or by.
Advertisements

Linking PEVs with Sustainability & Building Benchmarking Goals.
Mitigation Strategies What and Why?. What is mitigation? To decrease force or intensity. To lower risk. Earthquake mitigation Flood mitigation Climate.
Energy: Can We Get More? Can We Use Less Amy Myers Jaffe Wallace S. Wilson Fellow for Energy Studies James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy Houston.
1 Overview of carbon related taxation in OECD countries Presentation at the AFDC 2010 Biennial Forum on Fiscal and Financial Policies for Low-carbon Economic.
Sustainable Consumption Asya Akchurin Alyssa Altamirano William Cartwright.
Mitigation Strategies Review LP Mitigation Strategy #1: Transportation Efficiency A car that gets 30 mpg releases 1 ton of carbon into the air.
Cake B. Smart Grid Description –Communication between grid and appliances –Peak load shaving and elimination of vampire loads CO 2 savings from distribution.
MITIGATING CLIMATE CHANGE. WHAT WE KNOW The level of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere have increased, causing the Earth’s temperature to rise. One greenhouse.
Problems with the proposed CAFE Standards for 2020 Dennis Silverman Physics and Astronomy UC Irvine.
Promoting Clean Vehicles in a Sustainable South Bay Local Use Vehicles and other Electric Vehicles June 2011.

Learning to Drive A Marketing Machine Ted Mitchell.
SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT GPS FLEET TRACKING.
Transportation choices and CO 2 emissions By: Dayanara Veliz & Abel Adam.
Transportation 1. Learning Objectives Understand that gasoline combustion moves the vehicle as well as emit greenhouse gases. Understand that carbon emissions.
1 Calculating Mode Shift and Congestion Relief-Related Greenhouse Gas Displacement For the Current Year (see last slide for contact information)
 Introduction  3. All About Us  4. Personal uses of natural resources  5. Our impact-CO2 Calculator  6-8. Energy use-CO2, transportation, and electricity.
MSJC 4/10s Cost Analysis Aug. ’08 - Rev. Feb. ‘09 Compiled by MSJC R&P Dept. – XCJH Rev
Slope Is a Rate of Change
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY REPORT 2009 Antioch University Seattle.
Our Carbon Footprint Team Ecomeeco May 25, All About Ecomeeco… Age group : years young Occupation : Students Class: Middle working class Origin:
Greening of Fort Wayne, IN Partners for Pollution Prevention June 6, 2007.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
A carbon footprint is a measure of the impact our activities have on the environment, and in particular climate change. It relates to the amount of greenhouse.
Foot Solo Wednesday May 25, 2011 Vincent Carter
University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Cash For Clunkers: What is it & What Happened? Drew Christensen Jared Farmer Laurelyn Wieseman Eric Jamelske Department.
Development and Evaluation of Feebate Policies for California’s Effort to Limit Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Light-duty Vehicles David L. Greene Corporate.
2009 Greenhouse Gas Inventory The American College and University President’s Climate Commitment.
Fuel Economy Standards and Risk in the Auto Industry Irene Berry Virginia Tech ASME WISE Intern August 2, 2006 [
Transportation Services Budget February 4, 2010 Josh Davis, Director 1.
Office of Sustainability Anti-idling Guideline Presentation 2010.
THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD By: Drew Sandage. THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD Identify the problem Collect information Make a hypothesis or guess Test the hypothesis.
EPA Activities - Tires Lois Platte September 19, 2002.
VICS Empty Miles Time Is UP! Production growth will eventually stop and production will peak. Production is already past its peak in 54 of the 65 largest.
Global Warming By: Ryan Collins and Nguyet Luong.
Finding a Linear Model Section 2.4. Lehmann, Intermediate Algebra, 4ed Section 2.4 A company’s profit was $10 million in 2005 and has increased by $3.
Objectives: 1. TSWBAT analyze relationship between environmental factors and community health 2. TSWBAT compare fueling efficiency of different model cars.
Math Pacing Solving Equations and Formulas. Some equations such as the one on the previous slide contain more than one variable. At times, you will.
The MPG Illusion. Fuel Efficiency Ace drives a car that averages 10 mpg and is considering trading it in on a new car that averages 12 mpg. Buddy drives.
Danielle Piazza & Gabby Elliott BAGS FULL OF GREEN Our product that will be transported is the reusable grocery shopping bags.
Alameda County Transportation Services – CCBA Panel Reducing Our Carbon Footprint from Transportation Phillip Kobernick, Alameda County General Services.
2012 ZEV Amendments Benefits of Small Battery PHEVs – Toyota January 2012.
Introduction to Sustaining Ecosystems September 16, 2011.
ALGEBRA READINESS LESSON 8-6 Warm Up Lesson 8-6 Warm-Up.
An example of in-text citation Climate Change Mr. Tilt.
Copyright © 2015, 2008, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 2.4, Slide 1 Chapter 2 Modeling with Linear Functions.
By: Brian Kaufman.  the total set of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions caused by an organization, event, product or person.  Greenhouse gases can be emitted.
Carbon Footprint Dem Two: Enlly Bugarin Narciso Arevalo December 14, 2015.
Objectives: 1. TSWBAT analyze relationship between environmental factors and community health 2. TSWBAT compare fueling efficiency of different model cars.
Energy Efficiency and Conservation
Eco Moms Stephanie Brandt Susana Garcia December 14, 2015 Exploring Our Impact on the Planet.
Car Activity Air Pollution Lesson Objectives: 1. TSWBAT compare fueling efficiency of different model cars to determine the effect of auto emissions. 2.
By: Christina Nahar Conservation Transport.  An effective strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must include: -Improved fuel economy -Reduce carbon.
 Transportation choices and CO 2 emissions By: Dayanara Veliz & Abel Adam.
CARBON FOOTPRINT. REMEMBER THE CARBON CYCLE… LIST THE VARIOUS WAYS YOU DEPEND ON ENERGY IN A TYPICAL DAY.
Transportation and Climate Initiative’s Cassie Powers, Georgetown Climate Center May 17, 2013.
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Vehicle Efficiency Committee Report Summary John Boesel Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop.
03/31/2010 v.20 DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion Only 1 Summary of Demand Perspective Hard Truths provided evaluation of baseline.
SAUSALITO COMMUNITY GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY Years 2005 and 2010.
GLEC methodology to calculate emissions in road transport
The Florida Energy and Climate Commission (FECC)
Mitigation Strategies Review
Mitigation Strategies Review
Vehicle Project Student Name.
Matt Stewart Reducing Idling in the City Fleet
Steps for Multiplying Decimals
Do Now: Transportation (B)
Carbon Foot Print Personal Ecological Impact / Carbon Footprint……..
Thursday Morning: Decision Making
Presentation transcript:

source: Class Slides for the MPG Illusion These slides may be used without copyright approval Please acknowledge as the sourcehttp://

source: MPG Quiz Assume that a person drives 10,000 miles per year and is contemplating changing from a current vehicle to a new one. Rank the following five pairs of old and new vehicles in order of their benefit to the environment (i.e., which new car would reduce gas consumption the most compared to the original car). Use 1 for the largest savings and 5 for the smallest savings.

source: MPG Quiz Change in Vehicle Pairs (Old Vehicle to New Vehicle) Rank in Gas Savings? A) 18 MPG to 28 MPG B) 16 MPG to 20 MPG C) 34 MPG to 50 MPG D) 22 MPG to 24 MPG E) 42 MPG to 48 MPG Rank the gas savings from MPG improvements for a car driven 10,000 miles (1 = largest, 5 = smallest)

source: MPG Quiz – Typical Ranks Change in Vehicle Pairs (Old Vehicle to New Vehicle) Rank in Gas Savings? A) 18 MPG to 28 MPG2 B) 16 MPG to 20 MPG4 C) 34 MPG to 50 MPG1 D) 22 MPG to 24 MPG5 E) 42 MPG to 48 MPG3 Rank the gas savings from MPG improvements for a car driven 10,000 miles (1 = largest, 5 = smallest)

source: MPG Quiz – Actual Ranks Change in Vehicle Pairs (Old Vehicle to New Vehicle) Perceived Rank in Gas Savings (Mean) Actual Rank in Gas Savings Actual Reduction in Gas Consumption per 10,000 miles A) 18 MPG to 28 MPG B) 16 MPG to 20 MPG C) 34 MPG to 50 MPG D) 22 MPG to 24 MPG E) 42 MPG to 48 MPG Rank the gas savings from MPG improvements for a car driven 10,000 miles (1 = largest, 5 = smallest)

source: Alernative Quiz

source: Judgments of Car Fuel Efficiency Standard measure in US – Miles per gallon (MPG) What does it measure? – Useful for knowing range of gas tank What question do you want to answer when buying a car? – How much gas you’re going to use » Cost of gas » Greenhouse gases (burning 1 gallon of gas releases 20 pounds of carbon)

source: The Problem with MPG Consider three people who each drive 100 miles per week. Their current vehicles have the following fuel efficiency: – Person A: 10 MPG – Person B: 16.5 MPG – Person C: 33 MPG

source: The Problem with MPG Each driver trades in his or her car for a more efficient car – Person A: 10 MPG -> 11 MPG – Person B: 16.5 MPG -> 20 MPG – Person C: 33 MPG -> 50 MPG Who saves the most gas over 100 miles? Result: Each trade-in reduces gas consumption by the same amount – In each case, the new car saves 1 gallon per 100 miles – The new car eliminates 1 ton of carbon per 10,000 miles

source: Calculating Gas Savings To know gas consumption and gas savings, one needs to divide the distance one drives by MPG – Gas consumption = Distance / MPG – Conclusions Gas savings are not a linear function of MPG The relationship between gallons consumed and MPG is curvilinear Gallons consumed can be abbreviated “Gallons per Mile” or “GPM” for short The following graph and tables illustrate the relationship

source: Gas Consumption as a Function of MPG

source: Miles Per GallonGallons Per 100 Miles Gallons Per 10,000 Miles Converting MPG to GPM – Equal MPG This table displays total gas consumption based on equal increases in MPG

source: Miles Per GallonGallons Per 100 Miles Gallons Per 10,000 Miles Converting MPG to GPM – Equal GPM This table displays MPG improvements that yield equal decreases in gas consumption (1 gallon per 100 miles or 100 gallons per 10,000miles)

source: Summary of Research The following slides summarize the results of research published by Larrick & Soll (Science, 2008)

source: Study 1: Ranking Improvements (n = 77, Larrick & Soll, Science, 2008) Task: Rank gas savings from MPG improvements for a car driven 10,000 miles (1 = largest, 5 = smallest) Change in Vehicle Pairs (Old Vehicle to New Vehicle) 34 MPG to 50 MPG 18 MPG to 28 MPG 42 MPG to 48 MPG 16 MPG to 20 MPG 22 MPG to 24 MPG Perceived Rank in Gas Savings (Mean)

source: Study 1: Ranking Improvements (n = 77, Larrick & Soll, Science, 2008) Change in Vehicle Pairs (Old Vehicle to New Vehicle) Perceived Rank in Gas Savings (Mean) Actual Rank in Gas Savings Actual Reduction in Gas Consumption per 10,000 miles 34 MPG to 50 MPG MPG to 28 MPG MPG to 48 MPG MPG to 20 MPG MPG to 24 MPG Task: Rank gas savings from MPG improvements for a car driven 10,000 miles (1 = largest, 5 = smallest)

source: Study 3: Fleet Decision (n = 171 in a national survey, Larrick & Soll, Science, 2008) A town maintains a fleet of vehicles for town employee use. It has two types of vehicles. – Type A gets 15 miles per gallon. – Type B gets 34 miles per gallon. The town has 100 Type A vehicles and 100 Type B vehicles. Each car in the fleet is driven 10,000 miles per year. They can afford to replace one type of vehicle with a hybrid (H) option. – Type AH gets 19 miles per gallon. – Type BH gets 44 miles per gallon.

source: Study 3: Fleet Decision (n = 171 in a national survey, Larrick & Soll, Science, 2008) They can afford to replace one type of vehicle with a hybrid (H) option. GPM frame: Participants saw both MPG and “Gallons per 100 miles” 1) Replace the Type A vehicles (6.67 gpm) with Type AH that gets 5.26 gpm 2) Replace the Type B vehicles (2.94 gpm) with Type BH that gets 2.27 gpm MPG Frame 1) Replace the Type A vehicles (15 mpg) with Type AH that gets 19 mpg 2) Replace the Type B vehicles (34 mpg) with Type BH that gets 44 mpg

source: Study 3: Fleet Decision (n = 171 in a national survey, Larrick & Soll, Science, 2008) They can afford to replace one type of vehicle with a hybrid (H) option. GPM frame: Participants saw both MPG and “Gallons per 100 miles” 1) Replace the Type A vehicles (6.67 gpm) with Type AH that gets 5.26 gpm 2) Replace the Type B vehicles (2.94 gpm) with Type BH that gets 2.27 gpm MPG Frame 1) Replace the Type A vehicles (15 mpg) with Type AH that gets 19 mpg 2) Replace the Type B vehicles (34 mpg) with Type BH that gets 44 mpg Result: 75% of participants incorrectly favored Option 2 Result: 64% of participants correctly favored Option 1

source: Specific Policy Implications For car purchase decisions, provide a measure of efficiency that is volume of gas divided by distance – Europe and Canada use liters per 100 kilometers – United States What should the US use as a basic “gallons per mile” measure? Where should it be reported? Example of an online GPM calculator for new cars –

source: Improving Decision Making How can psychology be used to improve a range of decisions? – “Choice architecture” principles from Nudge (Thaler & Sunstein, 2008): Set defaults to encourage people to make more prudent choices. Provide explicit feedback to help people recognize when they are doing well and when they are making mistakes. Help people see the connection between their options and what choices will actually make them better off. Design incentives so that benefits and costs are clear. Design “forgiving” systems that take into account the fact that people will make mistakes. Structure complex choices so they are easier for people to understand.

source: Improving GHG Decisions What can psychology contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions? – Car choice – Car use – Other transportation What new tools could help people make decisions that reduced greenhouse gas emissions in general?

source: Useful Links and References Larrick, R. P., & Soll, J. B. (2008). The MPG Illusion, Science, 320, Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge. New Haven: Yale.