Calculus and Elementary Analysis 1.2 Supremum and Infimum Integers, Rational Numbers and Real Numbers Completeness of Real Numbers Supremum and Infimum.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Is it rational or irrational?
Advertisements

The Comparison Test Let 0 a k b k for all k.. Mika Seppälä The Comparison Test Comparison Theorem A Assume that 0 a k b k for all k. If the series converges,
The Exponential Function
Mathematical Induction
Introduction to Proofs
Chapter 3 Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof.
Section 11 Direct Products and Finitely Generated Abelian Groups One purpose of this section is to show a way to use known groups as building blocks to.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 5 SEQUENCES, MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION, AND RECURSION SEQUENCES, MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION, AND RECURSION.
Supremum and Infimum Mika Seppälä.
Basic properties of the integers
Lecture 6 Hyperreal Numbers (Nonstandard Analysis)
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
MULTIPLE INTEGRALS Double Integrals over General Regions MULTIPLE INTEGRALS In this section, we will learn: How to use double integrals to.
Theorem 1-a Let be a sequence: L L a) converges to a real number L iff every subsequence of converge to L Illustrations 0 0.
Index FAQ Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers 2013 Sequences of Real Numbers Limits through Definitions The Squeeze Theorem Using the Squeeze Theorem Monotonous.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Cardinality of a Set “The number of elements in a set.” Let A be a set. a.If A =  (the empty set), then the cardinality of A is 0. b. If A has exactly.
Partially Ordered Sets (POSets)
Set Notation.
Chapter 3 Limits and the Derivative
The Integers and Division
Index FAQ Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers Sequences of Real Numbers Limits through Rigorous Definitions The Squeeze Theorem Using the Squeeze Theorem.
Homework Review notes Complete Worksheet #2. Homework State whether the conditional sentence is true or false 1.If 1 = 0, then 1 = – 1 True F F T.
The Complex Numbers The ratio of the length of a diagonal of a square to the length of a side cannot be represented as the quotient of two integers.
Introduction to Proofs
Numbers, Operations, and Quantitative Reasoning.
MATH 224 – Discrete Mathematics
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 4 ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY AND METHODS OF PROOF ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY AND METHODS OF PROOF.
CS 173, Lecture B August 27, 2015 Tandy Warnow. Proofs You want to prove that some statement A is true. You can try to prove it directly, or you can prove.
The Integers. The Division Algorithms A high-school question: Compute 58/17. We can write 58 as 58 = 3 (17) + 7 This forms illustrates the answer: “3.
Chapter 5 Existence and Proof by contradiction
Introduction to Real Analysis Dr. Weihu Hong Clayton State University 8/21/2008.
Chapter 7 Logic, Sets, and Counting Section 2 Sets.
Chapter 2: Basic Structures: Sets, Functions, Sequences, and Sums (1)
CPSC 411 Design and Analysis of Algorithms
Copyright © Zeph Grunschlag, Induction Zeph Grunschlag.
Introduction to Real Analysis Dr. Weihu Hong Clayton State University 8/19/2008.
12 INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES. In general, it is difficult to find the exact sum of a series.  We were able to accomplish this for geometric series.
Week 4 - Monday.  What did we talk about last time?  Divisibility  Quotient-remainder theorem  Proof by cases.
2.1 Functions.
Introduction to Real Analysis Dr. Weihu Hong Clayton State University 8/27/2009.
Copyright © Zeph Grunschlag, Induction Zeph Grunschlag.
RelationsCSCE 235, Spring Introduction A relation between elements of two sets is a subset of their Cartesian products (set of all ordered pairs.
Date: 1.2 Functions And Their Properties A relation is any set of ordered pairs. The set of all first components of the ordered pairs is called the domain.
Week 4 - Wednesday.  What did we talk about last time?  Divisibility  Proof by cases.
Department of Statistics University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh
Section 1.7. Definitions A theorem is a statement that can be shown to be true using: definitions other theorems axioms (statements which are given as.
CDC Relative Entropy Applied to Optimal Control of Stochastic Uncertain Systems on Hilbert Space Nasir U. Ahmed School of Information Technology.
Section 2.5. Cardinality Definition: A set that is either finite or has the same cardinality as the set of positive integers (Z + ) is called countable.
CS 173, Lecture B August 27, 2015 Tandy Warnow. Proofs You want to prove that some statement A is true. You can try to prove it directly, or you can prove.
Properties of Integrals. Mika Seppälä: Properties of Integrals Basic Properties of Integrals Through this section we assume that all functions are continuous.
Section 1.7. Section Summary Mathematical Proofs Forms of Theorems Direct Proofs Indirect Proofs Proof of the Contrapositive Proof by Contradiction.
Infinite sets We say that a set A is infinite if a proper subset B exists of A such that there is a bijection It is easy to see that no set with a finite.
Math 3121 Abstract Algebra I Lecture 6 Midterm back over+Section 7.
3.3 Mathematical Induction 1 Follow me for a walk through...
INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES In general, it is difficult to find the exact sum of a series.  We were able to accomplish this for geometric series and.
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Indirect Argument: Contradiction and Contraposition
Do Now (Today: Sort numbers into number sets)
Chapter 2 Sets and Functions.
Chapter 3 The Real Numbers.
Fixpoints and Reachability
Chapter 5 Limits and Continuity.
Chapter 3 The Real Numbers.
Elementary Number Theory & Proofs
Field.
2.1 Functions.
Chapter 7 Logic, Sets, and Counting
2.1 Functions.
Examples of Mathematical Proof
Presentation transcript:

Calculus and Elementary Analysis 1.2 Supremum and Infimum Integers, Rational Numbers and Real Numbers Completeness of Real Numbers Supremum and Infimum Characterizations of Sup and of Inf

Calculus and Elementary Analysis Integers, Rational and Real Numbers Integers Notations Natural Numbers Rational Numbers This condition means that p and q have no common factors. Theorem There are no rational numbers r such that r 2 =2. Real Numbers Real numbers consist of rational and of irrational numbers. Notation

Calculus and Elementary Analysis Integers, Rational and Real Numbers Assume the contrary. This means that p 2 =2q 2. Proposition There are not rational numbers r such that r 2 =2. Proof Then there are positive integers p and q such that p 2 /q 2 =2 and p and q do not have common factors. Hence the area of a square with side length p is twice the area of the square with side length q. Furthermore p and q are smallest such numbers since they do have common factors. Graphically: Now p and q are integers so that B=p 2 =2q 2 =2G. I.e. the area B of the large brown square is twice the area G of the green square. p q G B

Calculus and Elementary Analysis Integers, Rational and Real Numbers Theorem There are not rational numbers r such that r 2 =2. Proof (cont’d) p q p-q A A I Furthermore, p and q are smallest integers such that the area B of the large brown square is twice the area G of the smaller green square, B=2G. p q Now move a copy of the green square to the upper right hand corner of the larger square. The two squares marked by A in the picture have the same area A. Furthermore, by the assumptions, I=2A. This is impossible, since B and G were the smallest squares with integer side lengths such that B=2G. The intersection I of the two copies of the green square is the square I with the area I.

Calculus and Elementary Analysis Upper and Lower Bounds Let A be a non-empty set of real numbers. Definition A set A need not have neither upper nor lower bounds. The set A is bounded from above if A has a finite upper bound. The set A is bounded from below if A has a finite lower bound. The set A is bounded if it has finite upper and lower bounds.

Calculus and Elementary Analysis Bounds of Integers, Rationals and Reals Observations Any non-empty bounded set of integers has the largest (and the smallest) element which is also an integer. 1 2 Consider the set of rational numbers r such that r 2 ≤ 2. This set is clearly bounded both from the above and from below. Observe that the set of rational upper bounds for the elements of this set does not have a smallest element. This follows from the previous considerations showing that is not rational. This means that the set of rational numbers is not complete in the sense that the set of rational upper bounds of a bounded set does not necessarily have the smallest rational upper bound.

Calculus and Elementary Analysis Supremum Definition The set A has finite upper bounds. An important completeness property of the set of real numbers is that the set A has a unique smallest upper bound. The smallest upper bound of the set A is called the supremum of the set A. Notation sup(A) = the supremum of the set A. Example Completeness of Real Numbers

Calculus and Elementary Analysis Infimum Definition The set A has finite lower bounds. As in the case of upper bounds, the set of real numbers is complete in the sense that the set A has a unique largest lower bound. The largest lower bound of the set A is called the infimum of the set A. Notation inf(A) = the infimum of the set A. Example

Calculus and Elementary Analysis Characterization of the Supremum (1) Proof Theorem

Calculus and Elementary Analysis Characterization of the Supremum (2) Theorem Proof Cont’d For a non-empty set A:

Calculus and Elementary Analysis Characterization of the Infimum Theorem The proof of this result is a repetition of the argument the previous proof for the supremum. For a non-empty set A:

Calculus and Elementary Analysis Usage of the Characterizations Example Claim Proof of the Claim and