Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - May 2, 2007 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute

Preliminary questions Why was Korea divided? What is the impact of division of Korea? Why does South Korea try to engage with North Korea? What does the two Koreas mean to Northeast Asia, particularly Japan?

The Korean peninsula

Flags of ROK and DPRK

Two Koreas in Northeast Asia: Facts Country Space (1,000 km2) Population (Million)Capital GDP (Million US dollars) GDP/capita (US dollars) Japan Tokyo4,326,40034,010 China9,5971,300.0Beijing1,130, North Korea Pyongyang22,260*1,000* South Korea9947.4Seoul447,6989,400

Division and its impact (sum) “Division of Korea” “Korean peninsula as the last remaining Cold War zone” Division of Korea and Korean War - division by international agreement (Germany, Korea, and Vietnam) - experience of war (Korea and Vietnam) Divergent development path and competition in the Cold War era - North: socialist and autarchic economy, father-son monolithic power - South: export-oriented market economy, dependence on US, democratization WMD development by North Korea in the Post-Cold War era - end of regime competition between two Koreas - two nuclear crises ( and 2002-present) and the nuclear test (Oct. 2006)

Koreans celebrating the liberation (1945)

Division of Korea (documentary) For the comments, see separate sheet.

State Building in the North Soviet influence for the early establishment of leadership - Selection of the leader: Kim Il Sung - Why Kim? (1) no experience of engagement in the factional division in communist movement in Korea in 1920s and 1930s; (2) Soviet’s familiarity with Kim who served in the Far Eastern Russia army - Soviet helped Kim by blocking of entry of armed forces from foreign territory, especially from China In addition to Soviet influence, there were other factors for the rapid formation of state, centered around Kim Il Sung - existence of segments of communists in Korea during the Japanese colonial rule - ideological similarity among the factions after arrest of nationalists

North Korean leader, Kim Il Sung (1945)

State Building in the South Strong US influence and support for Rhee Syngman, but relatively confrontational process in the state formation - Despite no allowance of political organizations by the Military Government led by US forces, there were severe confrontations among political factions of different ideological orientations. - The factions included communists, nationalists, Shanghai interim government leaders, and social democrats. - With the oppression made by the Military Government, the communist escaped to the North, and interim government faction and social democrats were driven out from the political scene. - In the end, Rhee Syngman prevailed in politics.

South Korean leader, Rhee Syngman (1948)

Origins of Korean War ( ) Theories on the origin of the war - Kim Il Sung’s initiative - Stalin’s rollback strategy - internal war between two conflicting communities (North and South Koreas) The Korean War, mixture of domestic and international factors. - Rhee Syngman's “unification through marching to the North” vs. Kim Il Sung’s “complete domination based on democratic base in the North” - Severe military conflicts around the 38 th parallel since June It was not all-out struggle, but the war started a year ago. - international support by the Soviet union and China, on the one hand, and the United States, on the other hand.

Consequences of the Korean War Total death toll reached around 2,500, ,316,579 North Korean soldiers and civilians - 595,000 South Korean soldiers and civilians - 36,940 US soldiers - 500,000 Chinese soldiers The human disaster of the Korean War outnumbered that of the Vietnam War (death toll 1,900,000). Unlike the nominal goal of “unification,” presented by the two Koreas, the Korean War contributed to the consolidation of the division. - increase in armed forces: 600,000 in the South vs. 1,100,000 in the North - emergence of dictatorship: Rhee and Park in the South vs. Kim and his son, Kim Jong-il, in the North - divergent path of development: South’s reliance on the United States vs. North’s self-reliance

Korean War ( )

Park Chung-hee after military coup (1961)

Inter-Korean relations: from confrontation to engagement Confrontation, 1950s-1960s - anti-communism vs. military adventurism Competition, 1970s-1980s - July 4 th Joint Declaration - regime competition accompanied by several conflicts Gradual engagement, 1990s-present - Basic Agreement in st nuclear crisis in Kim Dae-jung’s Sunshine Policy for engagement with the North - 2 nd nuclear crisis since 2002

Inter-Korean relations: confrontation in 1950s-1960s South Korea The military regime, led by ex-general Park Chung-hee, took an intense anti-communism policy for obtaining legitimacy from the United States. - Law for Anti-Communism passed in The law prohibits not only association with communists but also aids to them. This is a kind of special law of the existing National Security Law that defines general anti-national activities. North Korea In the process of the consolidation of Kim’s power and the implementation of self-reliance policy, the status of military rose, and in turn, this resulted in an adventurism provoking to the South. - North Korean armed spy (special forces) infiltrations in 1968 targeting Blue House, South Korean presidential house.

Pueblo Incident (1968) Inter-Korean confrontation heightened by the abduction of US spy ship, Pueblo, in January The crew members were detained in North Korea for 11 months and returned in December 1968.

Inter-Korean relations: competition in 1970s-1980s regime competition instead of confrontation, because of changes in international environment and domestic needs - July 4 th Joint Declaration for inter-Korean reconciliation Background (1): international environment changes - changes in security environment in East Asia, particularly because of rapprochement of US-China and Japan-China relations - Feb. 1972, president Nixon visited China, Shanghai Joint Communiqué - Sept. 1972, Prime Minister Tanaka visited China, Tanaka-Cho Enlai Joint Declaration Background (2): domestic power consolidation and stability - in North Korea, preparation for father-to-son power transfer - “Kimilsungism” by Kim Jong-il in in South Korea, Park’s ambition of prolonging his power - Yushin (literally meaning renovation) in October 1972

July 4 th Joint Declaration in 1972 The declaration was the culmination of inter-Korean reconciliatory gestures in this phase of regime competition. Main points 1. principle of unification: independence, peace, grand national integration 2. end of denunciation and military provocation, and attempts for prevention of military conflict 3. multi-dimensional exchanges between two Koreas 4. facilitating of Red Cross meetings 5. establishment of hot line between Pyongyang and Seoul 6. operation of North-South Coordination Committee 7. swear for the full implementation of the agreements in front of all nation people

Inter-Korean regime competition accompanied by severe conflicts

Gradual engagement, 1990-present Two Koreas joined UN at the same time in Sept The first formal international recognition of two states in Korean Peninsula. - This was one of the most meaningful events that happened in the post-Cold War era. Basic Agreement between two Koreas in Dec This agreement was followed by Joint Declaration of the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula in Feb st nuclear crisis in Despite the two agreements between two Koreas, the disclosure of North Korea’s nuclear weapon development represented that Korean peninsula was still in the age of Cold War. - Geneva Agreed Framework, signed by US and North Korea in Oct. 1994, for freezing the nuclear facilities ended the crisis.

Inter-Korean relations,

1994 and 2000

Engagement with the North: Kim and Roh Kim Dae-jung’s “Sunshine Policy” “buying peace with economy,” or “investment in the peace” - collusive coalition between government and Hyundai cooperation for the 2000 summit Roh Moo-hyun’s “Peace and Prosperity Policy” 2003-present - institutionalization of economic exchanges (investment guarantee, double- taxation exemption, dispute arbitration, payment through South and North Korean banks) - construction of Kaesong Industrial Complex since factories started to produce products since 2004 Nuclear crisis, nuclear test, and international engagement, 2002-present - North Korea’s confession of developing of HEU project to US Assistant Secretary of the State Department James Kelly in Oct th Six-Party Talks adopted Joint Declaration (dismantlement of North Korean nuclear development, denuclearization of Korean peninsula, economic assistance, U.S.-North Korea normalization)

Trend of inter-Korean trade

Trend of inter-Korean visits

Kaesong-Seoul

Kaesong Industrial Complex The first major industrial complex that was constructed by South Korean companies in North Korean territory Total 65.7 km 2 About 6,400 North Korean workers are employed by Korean factories, as of March 5, For the operation of factories, South Korean managing staff commutes the industrial complex by crossing the border (DMZ).

International engagement (Six- Party Talks) for the resolution to the nuclear crisis Sept Joint Statement - denuclearization of the Korean peninsula - economic support - “commitment to commitment, action to action” Oct underground nuclear test in North Korea UN Security Council resolution for the sanction of North Korea Feb Joint Statement: Initial Actions for the Implementation of the Joint Statement - shut down and seal of nuclear facilities - disablement of the facilities - oil aid up to 1 million tons

Conclusion The division of Korea and the establishment of two Koreas have become the central source of contradictions in the region, as well as the source of confrontation between two Koreas. - The division resulted in the war (the biggest one after the WWII); The Korean peninsula had been the locus of East-West confrontation in the region. (US, Japan, and South Korea vs. Russia, China, and North Korea) The Korean peninsula is the last remaining island of the Cold War: See U.S.-North Korea and Japan-North Korea relations. It is necessary to find a solution to the division by peaceful coexistence between two Koreas. - The peaceful coexistence between two Koreas requires North Korea’s dismantlement of nuclear weapons program and also needs the development of the relationship between the U.S. and North Korea. There are limitations in the South Korea’s economic engagement policy toward North Korea. - The development of the U.S.-North Korea relationship will facilitate the normalized relationship between Japan and North Korea and will contribute to the solution of pending issues, including adduction issue. There is a vision for regional cooperation through the peaceful Korean peninsula. - in transportation (Trans-Siberian and Trans-Korean linkage to Japan) and energy (oil and gas: Eastern Pipeline).