Summer Vacation 2003 – ASF Spatial Mapping in CO, AR, FL, and CA 32 nd Annual Technical Symposium International Loran Association 5 Nov 2003 Boulder, CO
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Authors CAPT Richard Hartnett US Coast Guard Academy Gregory Johnson John J. McMullen Assoc. Inc. Dr. Peter Swaszek University of Rhode Island LT Todd Moyer University of Rhode Island Ruslan Shalaev John J. McMullen Assoc. Inc.
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Outline Introduction and Goals Experiment Description Measurement system BALOR model ASF Gradients near airports Model vs actual Flights Ground locations Conclusions / Future Work
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Introduction LORAN-C as “the” backup for GPS Accuracy, availability, integrity, continuity Accuracy: Needs: Aviation: NPA – RNP 0.3 (309 meters) Maritime: HEA (8-20 meters) Limitations: Spatial and temporal variations in TOA (ASF) observed by the receiver and presented to the position solution algorithm
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Loran Multi-station, multi-chain, all-in-view receiver TOA vs. TD measurements Separate “errors” into spatial, temporal, and directional components DSP-based receivers H-field vs. E-field antennas Single ASF value for airport As long as ASF gradient is within bounds
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Current Research USCGA/JJMA activities: Explore ways to mitigate TOA variation Current approach: Model the ASF sources Spatial effects Temporal effects Model the directional effects (H-field) Estimate parameters/values for the models “Correct” the TOA observations using the models Of interest today
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA ASF Variation Model Assume that the variation in the observed TOAs can be decomposed into 3 independent, additive terms: Spatial term: Due to differences in the Loran signal propagation path Temporal term: For short term TOA variability on a local region Directional term: Based on the relative bearing of the Loran tower to the vessel Key assumptions
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Experiment Description Flight Data Collect flight data to measure ASF variations in vicinity of airports Fly approaches for later post-processing with ASFs Ground Mobile Data Collect ASF data at static locations around the airport out to 25 NM to assess ASF gradients and flight measurement performance Ground Reference Station Collect ASF data at fixed location during all other testing in order to factor out temporal ASF variations
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Experiment Locations 4 States 10 Airports Colorado Grand Junction – Walker Field (GJT) Montrose Regional (MTJ) Rifle – Garfield County Regional (RIL) Arkansas Little Rock – Adams Field (LIT) Hot Springs Memorial (HOT) Florida Pensacola Regional (PNS) Panama City (PFN) California Monterey Peninsula (MRY) Salinas Municipal (SNS) Watsonville Municipal (WVI)
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Flight tracks
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Pictures of Locations Little Rock, ARGrand Junction, CO Pensacola, FLMonterey, CA
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA FAA Convair 580
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA ASF Mapping System (Flight) Aircraft H-field antenna Novatel OEM-4 WAAS GPS USCGA DDC Rcvr ICS Buffer swap signal DS-345 Signal Generator 10 MHz 25.6 MHz 2 Channels RF Save to disk: TIC, RAW TOA, ECD, SNR, GPS info, etc. Event time and GPS Data Heading Sensor Heading Frequency Devices 90IP
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA DDC and SatMate Rcvrs
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA ASF Mapping System (Mobile) H-field antenna BrandyWine Synchclock Board With Astech DG16 Receiver ICS 652 board ICS Buffer swap signal GPS-stabilized 25.6 MHz 2 Channels RF Save to disk: TIC, RAW TOA, ECD, SNR, GPS info, etc. Event time and GPS Data Heading Sensor Heading RF board CPU
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Ground Mobile
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Static ASF Measurement System (Monitor) E-field antenna LRS-IIID Rcvr NovAtel OEM4 GPS rcvr 10 MHz RF Gate Event time, GPS data Laptop running LocusNovAtel program Save to disk: ASFs, ECD, SNR, signal status, GPS info TOAs, ECD, SNR
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Reference Station
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Working round the clock!
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Model University of Wales, Bangor developed model – BALOR Uses Monteath Method, integral solution Terrain effects using DTED level 1 FCC Conductivity map Coastline vectors
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA BALOR Fixed Locations BALOR used to calculate predicted ASF values for selected locations Same locations where JJMA team collected ASF data Modeled using small 4-point grids by degree area Airborne ASF data BALOR used to calculate a grid over flight area grid resolution set to 0.01 degree
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA © Paul Williams, University of Wales, Bangor
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA TOA ASFs Define TOA ASF as the additional propagation delay due to a non-seawater path due to terrain and conductivity differences Difference between measured and predicted (PFSF) TOA is ASF + time offsets
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Relative ASFs Use fixed reference station to eliminate system timing errors from the ASF value So the measured values are actually relative ASFs – relative to the fixed monitoring site Although not TRUE ASFs, still valid for assessing gradients in airport area To compare to model must apply a fixed correction to all ASF values so that model and measurements are relative to same value
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA BALOR Model for Montrose
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA BALOR Model for Montrose
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Montrose 0 and 9700ft elev
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Measured Data Locations
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Fixed Locations vs Model
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Fixed Locations vs Model
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Fixed Locations vs Model
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Point Piños Area
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Flights vs Model Grid
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Flights vs Model Grid
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Flights vs Model Grid
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Flights vs Model Grid
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Conclusions / Future Work Model appears to perform reasonably well; needs some tweaking however Comparison to ground level points pretty good Altitude performance…. Still need to assess bias in model Model can be used to assess gradients in the vicinity of an airport Continue to analyze data to assess position performance using single set of ASF values for each airport
11/5/03USCGA-JJMA Presentation for ILA Acknowledgements Mitch Narins, FAA AND FAA Technical Center JJMA Team Christian Oates George Sanders Tim Waldie Ken Dykstra
Questions?