Plot Scale © Oregon State University Isotope Hydrology Shortcourse Prof. Jeff McDonnell Richardson Chair in Watershed Science Dept. of Forest Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydrology Rainfall - Runoff Modeling (I)
Advertisements

Spatial classification data are of minimal value to support model representation because the uncertainty associated with parameterization is too high.
PROCESS-BASED, DISTRIBUTED WATERSHED MODELS New generation Source waters and flowpaths Physically based.
A Model for Evaluating the Impacts of Spatial and Temporal Land Use Changes on Water Quality at Watershed Scale Jae-Pil Cho and Saied Mostaghimi 07/29/2003.
4 th International Symposium on Flood Defence Generation of Severe Flood Scenarios by Stochastic Rainfall in Combination with a Rainfall Runoff Model U.
One of many papers from the Coos Bay Experiments —Anderson S.P. & Dietrich W.E. (2001) Chemical weathering and runoff chemistry in a steep headwater catchment.
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
Runoff and Streamflow P Q
Runoff Processes Slides from Venkatesh Merwade and Suzanne Anderson Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 5.1 and 5.2.
Hydrological Modeling for Upper Chao Phraya Basin Using HEC-HMS UNDP/ADAPT Asia-Pacific First Regional Training Workshop Assessing Costs and Benefits of.
Lecture 21 Runoff (1) Sources and Components
Runoff Processes Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 5.6 to 5.8 and Chapter 6 for Tuesday of next week.
Physical factors in the generation of runoff
Runoff Pathways Slide from Mike Kirkby, University of Leeds, AGU Chapman Conference on Hillslope Hydrology, October 2001.
Runoff Processes Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 5.6 to 5.8 and Chapter 6 for Thursday.
4 th International Symposium on Flood Defence, 6 th – 8 th May 2008, Toronto, Canada Efficiency of distributed flood mitigation measures at watershed scale.
Lecture 22 Runoff (2) Event-based Hydrographs
The Hillslope-Stream Continuum Wed 4/22/2009. "The El Nino-Southern Oscillation and Global Precipitation Patterns: A View from Space" Dr. Scott Curtis.
Catchment Scale Streamflow Response to Climate Variability in the Rain-Snow Transition Zone of California's Sierra Nevada Mountains T.C. Harmon [1,2] and.
Digital Elevation Model based Hydrologic Modeling Topography and Physical runoff generation processes (TOPMODEL) Raster calculation of wetness index Raster.
Hydrologic Mixing Models Ken Hill Andrew McFadden.
Reed Maxwell 1,2,3 Ian Ferguson 1,3 Shadi Moqbel 1,3 John Williams 1,2,3 Steven Meyerhoff 1,2,3 Erica Siirila 1,2,3 1 Department of Geology and Geologic.
Hydrologic/Watershed Modeling Glenn Tootle, P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Biological and Environmental Engineering Soil & Water Research Group Hydrological pathways in a glaciated watershed in the Catskill Mountains Adrian Harpold.
Hydrology and Water Resources Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept. Physically-based Distributed Hydrologic Modeling.
CE 3372 – Lecture 10. Outline  Hydrology Review  Rational Method  Regression Equations  Hydrographs.
Hydrology & Water Resources Engineering
April James Canada Research Chair – Watershed Analysis and Modeling Department of Geography Nipissing University Contributions from: C. Dreps, K. Kuntukova,
Toby’s & Jake’s notes combined
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
Watershed Management Water Budget, Hydrograph Analysis
Routing GenRiver 1.0 Distributed process-based model spatial scale: ha,temporal scale: daily Can be used as a tool to explore our understanding.
ASSESSING HILLSLOPE RESPONSE MECHANISMS USING STABLE ISOTOPES C. Freese, SA Lorentz, J van Tol & PAL le Roux 1 Centre for Water Resources Research, University.
HEC-HMS Runoff Computation.
Seifu A Tilahun School of Civil & Water Resources Engineering,BDU Storm Runoff and soil erosion processes on the Ethiopian highland.
Sources of streamflow from hillslopes Baseflow streamflow maintained by groundwater contributions Stormflow Augmented by direct precipitation on saturated.
Evaluating hydrological model structure using tracer data within a multi-model framework Hilary McMillan 1, Doerthe Tetzlaff 2, Martyn Clark 3, Chris Soulsby.
VFR Research - R. Hudson Basic Hydrology Streamflow: Hydrographs; Case studies of logging effects on streamflow; Peak flow.
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES IN THE LANDSCAPE
Source waters and flow paths in an alpine catchment, Colorado, Front Range, United States Fengjing Liu, Mark W. Williams, and Nel Caine 2004.
Virtual Experiment © Oregon State University Models as a communication tool for HJA scientists Kellie Vache and Jeff McDonnell Dept of Forest Engineering.
Surface Water Surface runoff - Precipitation or snowmelt which moves across the land surface ultimately channelizing into streams or rivers or discharging.
Runoff Overview Tom Hopson.
Introduction to Urban Hydrology
1 DETERMINATION OF SOURCES AND FLOWPATHS USING ISOTOPIC AND CHEMICAL TRACERS, GREEN LAKES VALLEY, ROCKY MOUNTAINS Fengjing Liu and Mark Williams Department.
Surface Water Applied Hydrology. Surface Water Source of Streamflow Streamflow Characteristics Travel Time and Stream Networks.
6. Drainage basins and runoff mechanisms Drainage basins Drainage basins The vegetation factor The vegetation factor Sources of runoff Sources of runoff.
DEVELOPMENT OF A CELL BASED MODEL FOR STREAM FLOW PREDICTION IN UNGAUGED BASINS USING GIS DATA P B Hunukumbura & S B Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering,
Project 4: hydrologic subsystems in hillslopes What are the key controls on and the key interactions between the soil, ecology, geomorphology and biogeochemistry.
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology Lecture 2: Surface and Groundwater Hydrologic Systems.
Hydrology & Water Resources Engineering ( )
Modeling Source-water Contributions to Streamflow
TOPMODEL and the role of topography and variable contributing areas in runoff production Learning objectives Be able to define and compute the topographic.
Simulation of stream flow using WetSpa Model
What physical factors affect runoff terms in the water balance?
Water supply Flood prediction and forecasting. Water quality
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
Isotope Hydrology Shortcourse
Distributed modelling
PROCESS-BASED, DISTRIBUTED WATERSHED MODELS
Physical factors in the generation of runoff
Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 5.1 and 5.2
Streamflow Processes Watershed – area of land draining into a stream at a given location Streamflow – gravity movement of water in channels Surface and.
Digital Elevation Model based Hydrologic Modeling
Digital Elevation Model based Hydrologic Modeling
SCS Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph
Hydrology and drainage
SCS Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
HEC-HMS Runoff Computation Modeling Direct Runoff with HEC-HMS Empirical models Empirical models - traditional UH models - traditional UH models - a.
Presentation transcript:

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Isotope Hydrology Shortcourse Prof. Jeff McDonnell Richardson Chair in Watershed Science Dept. of Forest Engineering Oregon State University Hydrologic Models Isotopes in Hydrological Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Outline  Day 1 Morning: Introduction, Isotope Geochemistry Basics Afternoon: Isotope Geochemistry Basics ‘cont, Examples  Day 2 Morning: Groundwater Surface Water Interaction, Hydrograph separation basics, time source separations, geographic source separations, practical issues Afternoon: Processes explaining isotope evidence, groundwater ridging, transmissivity feedback, subsurface stormflow, saturation overland flow  Day 3 Morning: Mean residence time computation Afternoon: Stable isotopes in watershed models, mean residence time and model strcutures, two-box models with isotope time series, 3-box models and use of isotope tracers as soft data  Day 4 Field Trip to Hydrohill or nearby research site Catchment Scale Isotope Basics Concluding Statements Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Example 1 Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Svartberget Sweden  Isotopes in model validation

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Svartberget Sweden  Isotopes in model validation

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Example 2 Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Maimai New Zealand  Isotopes in model calibration

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Catchment Scale Maimai Watershed in New Zealand Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Process Study Findings  Channel stormflow is usually 85-90% old water (Pearce et al., 1986 WRR)  Most subsurface stormflow is via soil pipes at the soil bedrock interface (Mosley, 1979 WRR; McDonnell, 1990 WRR).  Riparian zone, hillslopes and hollows have distinct 18-O (McDonnell et al., 1991 WRR and base cation concentration (Grady et al., in review).  Mean age of baseflow is 3 mo (Stewart and McDonnell, 1991 WRR). …process experimental work at Maimai for past 25 yr Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Hillslope Riparian Zone Hollow Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University A Three Box Model Seibert and McDonnell, 2002 WRR Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Na  mol/L) K (  mol/L) Stream Rain Riparian Zone Soil-Ridge Soil-Hollow Riparian Zone Hollow Hillslope Geochemical End Members Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University McDonnell et al.,1991; WRR) Hillslope Hollow Riparian Cluster Analysis of Deuterium Concentration in Subsurface Water Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University A Three Box Model Hillslope type discussed earlier… Seibert and McDonnell, 2002 WRR Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University The hollow box   <0        dZ dS  dZ       Storm Rainfall             Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University The time series Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University ….but does it work for the right reasons??? Model efficiency 0.93 Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University But does this agree with our conceptual picture of the how the watershed works based on our isotope information???? Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Model performance with hard data calibration Increasing soft data Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Soft Data: Qualitative knowledge from the experimentalist that cannot be used directly as exact numbers (e.g. % new water, soil depth, reservoir volume, macropore flow, etc Bypass flow and mixing Pipeflow of old water Rainfall/snow How can we use the process knowledge Soils Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Type of soft data  New water contribution to peak runoff  Range of groundwater levels, min/max, fraction of saturated soil  Frequency of groundwater levels above a certain level  Parameter values Fraction of riparian, hillslope, hollow Porosity of riparian, hillslope, hollow Soil depth of riparian, hillslope, hollow Threshold level in hollow zone Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Dialog between the experimentalist and modeler ExperimentalistModeller Evaluation rules Values for evaluation rules (a i ) a1a1 a2a2 a3a3 a4a4 0 1 Model value or parameter “Degree of acceptability” Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Different ways of evaluating model acceptability Acceptability according to:ExampleMeasure A 1 Fit between simulated and Runoff Efficiency observed data A 2 Agreement with process New water Percentage of (qualitative) knowledge contribution peak flow A 3 Reasonability of parameter Spatial extension Fraction of values according to of riparian zone catchment area experimentalist Combined objective function: Seibert and McDonnell, 2002 AGU Monograph Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Soft data discussions a1a1 a2a2 a3a3 a4a4 Fuzzy Rules - new water at peak - reservoir volumes, K sat etc - range of gw levels - hollow threshold level (30/9/87 event, McDonnell et al. 91; WRR) Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Improvement of model performance with soft data Increasing soft data e.g. from Seibert and McDonnell, 2002 WRR Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University ….but does it work for the right reasons??? Model efficiency 0.93 Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Model efficiency 0.92 ….maybe not? Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Model efficiency 0.93 ….maybe not???!! Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Improvement of model performance with soft data Increasing soft data e.g. from Seibert and McDonnell, 2002 WRR Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Example 3 Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Brugga Basin, Germany  Isotopes in model structure

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Beyond a 1km 2 research watershed  Obtain as much map info as possible  Do synoptic survey of stream flow (if possible, temp, pH, EC etc)  Gauge trib junctions  Measure mean age of water  Dominant runoff generation processes Example Rietholzbach catchment  Translation into model elements Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Topography Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Soils and Geology Soil Regosol Saure Braunerde Braunerde Kalkbraunerde Verbraunter u. Bunter Gley Fahler gley Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Digital Elevation Model Topo Index TopographySlope Curvature Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Hortonian Overland Flow Saturation Overland Flow Sub- surface Flow Process Identification Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Dominant Runoff Processes Horton rarely saturated sometimes saturated Frequently saturated Often saturated Always saturated Subsurface flow Drained areas No runoff Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University MRT and watershed modeling.... following Uhlenbrook et al. (2002) WRR Discharge Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Conceptualization of Runoff Processes.... following Uhlenbrook et al. (2002) WRR Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Runoff Generation.... following Uhlenbrook et al. (2002) WRR Catchment Scale Hydrologic Models

Plot Scale © Oregon State University Summary  Day 1 Morning: Introduction, Isotope Geochemistry Basics Afternoon: Isotope Geochemistry Basics ‘cont, Examples  Day 2 Morning: Groundwater Surface Water Interaction, Hydrograph separation basics, time source separations, geographic source separations, practical issues Afternoon: Processes explaining isotope evidence, groundwater ridging, transmissivity feedback, subsurface stormflow, saturation overland flow  Day 3 Morning: Mean residence time computation Afternoon: Stable isotopes in watershed models, mean residence time and model strcutures, two-box models with isotope time series, 3-box models and use of isotope tracers as soft data  Day 4 Field Trip to Hydrohill or nearby research site Catchment Scale Isotope Basics Concluding Statements Hydrologic Models