S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November 2002 1 ATLAS Group, University of Oxford, UK S. M. Gibson, P. A. Coe, A. Mitra, D. F. Howell, R. B. Nickerson Geodetic Grids.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
X-Ray Survey of The ATLAS SCT. The ATLAS Semi-Conductor Tracker.
Advertisements

X-ray Survey of the ATLAS SCT Hardware Overview Nick Brett and Jim Loken
Update of ILC Tracker Alignment Based on Frequency Scanned Interferometry University of Michigan ILC Group (Hai-Jun Yang, Alexander Harvey Nitz, Eui Min.
Frequency Scanning Interferometry (FSI) measurements
Stephen Gibson, ATLAS Offline Alignment, 2 nd July Incorporating FSI with the Offline Alignment Overview ATLAS Group, University of Oxford Stephen.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
MONALISA: Interferometric Position Monitor at the Nanometre Scale David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
22-Nov-2004 © Renishaw plc Not to be reproduced without written permission from Renishaw Laser & Calibration Products Division Slide 1 Laser.
Metrology and pre-alignment of the components of CLIC in the PACMAN project S. W. Kamugasa, V. Vlachakis CLIC Workshop January 2015 CERN, Geneva,
The LiCAS FSI Subsystem Current Status and Initial Measurements John Dale for the LiCAS Collaboration IOP HEP April 2008.
X-Ray Survey of The ATLAS SCT. The ATLAS Semi-Conductor Tracker.
ILC roles Interferometry Results 2009 / 2010 Mon 20 Apr :00 JST (01:00 UTC) MDI TILC09 – Tsukuba OXFORD MONALISA 1.
The Linear Collider Alignment and Survey (LiCAS) Project Richard Bingham*, Edward Botcherby*, Paul Coe*, Grzegorz Grzelak*, Ankush Mitra*, Johannes Prenting.
LiCAS Project: FSI Overview Richard Bingham, Edward Botcherby, Paul Coe, John Green, Grzegorz Grzelak, Ankush Mitra, John Nixon, Armin Reichold University.
Initial Calibration and Stability Results from the LiCAS RTRS FSI System John Dale for the LiCAS Collaboration IWAA February 2008.
Use of a commercial laser tracker for optical alignment James H. Burge, Peng Su, Chunyu Zhao, Tom Zobrist College of Optical Sciences Steward Observatory.
Sta bilization of the F inal F ocus : Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision.
QA for the Fibre Tracker 28 October 2004Brunel QA for fibre bundling Dr Paul Kyberd and Dr Peter Hobson School of Engineering & Design Brunel University,
25/06/2015Robert King, Oxford University - Graduate Seminar Series 1 Electronic speckle pattern interferometry at the SLHC.
Warsaw University LiCAS Linear Collider Alignment & Survey IWAA08, G. Moss 1 The LiCAS LSM System First measurements from the Laser Straightness.
Runtime alignment system SOFTWARE DESIGN IDEAS Wed 4 th May 2005 P Coe.
StaFF: Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision Proposed experiment conducted within framework of StaFF (Stabilization of Final Focus for ILC). Funded.
S. M. Gibson, P. A. Coe, Photon02, 5 th September Coordinate Measurement in 2-D and 3-D Geometries using FSI Overview ATLAS Group, University of.
X-Ray Survey of The ATLAS SCT. The ATLAS Semi-Conductor Tracker.
Frequency Scanning Interferometry in detail 3 Oxford contributions to IWAA 2002 Multiple, simultaneous length measurements S. M. Gibson et al (After the.
S. Gibson FSI Offline Analysis 9 th October FSI Alignment: Offline Analysis Overview ATLAS Group, University of Oxford Stephen Gibson, Danny Hindson,
Solenoid Magnetic Field Mapping Paul S Miyagawa University of Manchester Introduction Mapper machine Mapper software - Simulation - Corrections - Fitting.
ATLAS: SCT detector alignment and B field map. Steve Snow New Year 2005 This title describes work that has been growing from low priority at the start.
Lessons from the ATLAS SCT alignment system for LC detector and MDI alignment and new technology developments DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold1 Armin.
MONALISA David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
MUON_EDR-06 (Alignment) Enrique Calvo Alamillo February 28-March 1, 2002 Link Mechanics: Status.
Offline Data Analysis Software Steve Snow, Paul S Miyagawa (University of Manchester) John Hart (Rutherford Appleton Laboratory) Objectives + requirements.
The barrel reference system1 THE BARREL REFERENCE SYSTEM C.Guyot (Saclay) Goal: Provide a geometrical survey of the whole barrel muon spectrometer.
1 StaFF Progress Report David Urner University of Oxford.
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
LASER AND ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
ATF2 meeting LAPP; David Urner 1 David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Geoffrey Rayner MPhys alumnus MONALISA Monitoring, Alignment.
Alignment Strategy for ATLAS: Detector Description and Database Issues
ATLAS Pixel Detector Discussion of Tolerances November 12, 1998 Pixel Mechanics D. Bintinger, LBNL E. Anderssen, LBNL/CERN.
ATLAS Inner Detector Magnetic Field I am responsible for providing the magnetic field map for the ATLAS Inner Detector.  6m long x 2m diameter cylindrical.
ALCPG Tracking Session 1/11/03 K. Riles - U. Michigan1 Status Report on Michigan Group Tracker Alignment R&D Keith Riles, Jin Yamamoto, Haijun Yang University.
Frequency Scanned Interferometer Demonstration System Tim Blass, Jason Deibel, Sven Nyberg, Keith Riles, Haijun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Alignment Bars Requirements Strategy Layout Length Prediction Shape Prediction Readout Scheme Model to predict bar shape in the experiment Calibration.
First Reconstruction Results on the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment at CERN S. Guragain, G. Baksay, M. Hohlmann Florida Tech 74.
A. Behrens BE-ABP-SU-EM 1 Forum on Tracking Detector Mechanics 04 July 2012 Survey and Large Scale Metrology of Tracking Detectors for LHC Experiments.
21 Jun 2010Paul Dauncey1 First look at FNAL tracking chamber alignment Paul Dauncey, with lots of help from Daniel and Angela.
Welcome to MONALISA A brief introduction. Who we are... David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Electronics support from CEG Central Electronics.
TPC ExB distortion at LHC-ALICE experiment Yasuto Hori for the ALICE-TPC collaboration Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo 1.
The stabilisation of the final focus (StaFF) system Sun 12 th March 2006 MDI – LCWS06 at I I Sc Bangalore David Urner, Paul Coe, Armin Reichold.
Kaori Maeshima (FNAL), Alignment Workshop at CERN: May 17-18, Endcap Alignment Status of Offline Software Alignment CERN 17, 18 May 2001.
CLIC Beam Physics Working Group CLIC pre-alignment simulations Thomas Touzé BE/ABP-SU Update on the simulations of the CLIC pre-alignment.
MONALISA David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Monitoring, Alignment & Stabilisation with high Accuracy.
November 11 SESAPS 2006 Samir Guragain 1 Calibration, Installation & Commissioning of Sensors for the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment.
Charles University Prague Charles University Prague Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Absolute charge measurements using laser setup Pavel Bažant,
09:40 – 10:00 (JST) Wed 5 Mar 2008 MONALISA : JAI Oxford MDI ATF2 TILC08 Sendai Japan 1 / 26 MONALISA Laser based alignment and stability monitoring.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai, Kazuhiko Hara (Univ. of.
Printing: This poster is 48” wide by 36” high. It’s designed to be printed on a large-format printer. Customizing the Content: The placeholders in this.
MONALISA Update David Urner ATF2 Meeting Dec
Laser Alignment System for LumiCal and BeamCal Arkadiusz Moszczyński, Wojciech Wierba, Leszek Zawiejski Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Cracow 22nd FCAL.
P. Brückman de Renstrom Alignment Strategy for ATLAS Vertex 2006 Perugia, September 2006 p1p1 Alignment Strategy for the ATLAS Tracker Pawel Brückman.
9th October 2003Danny Hindson, Oxford University1 Inner Detector Silicon Alignment Simple approach -Align in stages + rely on iteration Barrel to Barrel.
Track-based alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector Sergio Gonzalez-Sevilla Instituto de Física Corpuscular (IFIC) On behalf of the ATLAS Inner Detector.
1 Research on laser tracker measurement accuracy and data processing Liang Jing IHEP,CHINA
Simulation: Editing Non-Native Geometry. © 2016 Autodesk Design Academy Editing Non-Native Geometry How to edit CAD models using Autodesk® SimStudio Tools.
11/25/03 3D Model Acquisition by Tracking 2D Wireframes Presenter: Jing Han Shiau M. Brown, T. Drummond and R. Cipolla Department of Engineering University.
TE-MSC. 07/04/2016 Jose Ferradas TE-MSC-MDT Alejandro Carlon TE-MSC-MDT Juan Carlos Perez TE-MSC-MDT On behalf to MSC-MDT section and Coil working group.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
1 GSI, Darmstadt Goethe Universität Frankfurt Ph.D Committee meeting 16 th of August 2011 Grzegorz Kalicy Development and Test of a Prototype for the PANDA.
David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University
Frequency Scanned Interferometer for ILC Tracker Alignment
Presentation transcript:

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November ATLAS Group, University of Oxford, UK S. M. Gibson, P. A. Coe, A. Mitra, D. F. Howell, R. B. Nickerson Geodetic Grids for the continuous, quasi real time alignment of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Overview Motivation – the alignment of ATLAS The ATLAS SCT alignment system Demonstration system Square Grid Tetrahedral Grid Large grids for ATLAS Grid simulations Check with FEA

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Motivation – the alignment of ATLAS Inner detector: Physics requires shape variations to be measured to <10  m 7m

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Solution – FSI geodetic grids Barrel SCT grid Forward SCT grid SemiConductor Tracker monitored using a geodetic grid of 800 length measurements.

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November The ATLAS SCT alignment system Frequency Scanning Interferometry (as shown earlier) will be used to simultaneously measure all lines of sight in the geodetic grids. Benefits:  Continuous alignment during ATLAS operation.  An understanding of the detector shape on day one of physics.  Corrections of short time scale motions that degrade track-based alignment.  Corrections of complex distortions, that cannot be corrected with tracks alone.

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Alignment system layout Surface building ground level ATLAS cavern Fibre Splitter Tree Crate APD read out crate Detector Cavern ATLAS SCT grid of 800 grid-line- interferometers Equipment Cavern Lasers Reference Interferometer System Surface building fibre coupling optics

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Demonstration System ‘equipment cavern’ ‘detector cavern’ Splitter Tree and APD readout box 250mm Fibres Power Square Grid

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Demonstration system: Square Grid 6 simultaneous length measurements made between four corners of the square. +7th interferometer to measure stage position. Displacements of one corner of the square can then be reconstructed.

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Square Grid

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Model Degrees of Freedom Node A defines the origin Node B defines the X axis Node C is free in X and Y Node D is free in X and Y

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Node Reconstruction A B C D 1m1m 1m1m 50  m 1m1m Node A Node B Node D Node C

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Reconstruction of Jewel C Translation (Square Grid) Std Dev = 400 nm

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Square Grid Tetrahedral Grid Jewel C raised up by 100mm Now sensitive to Z coordinate, allowing three dimensional coordinate reconstruction

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Node C Three Dimensional Coordinate Reconstruction (Stationary Stage) RMS scatter = 640nm

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Node C Three Dimensional Coordinate Reconstruction (Stage translated in X)

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Reconstruction of Jewel C Translation (Tetra Grid)

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Grids for ATLAS The grid for ATLAS will contain eight hundred lines of sight in a complex geometry. A quarter of the Barrel grid: One of the two Endcap grids: The error propagation through these grids has been simulated.

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Barrel Grid Simulations Lines of sight for one quadrant of Alignment Grid FEA model of carbon fibre support structure  m0m0m Simulgeo ref1 model of Alignment Grid nodes (jewels) ASSUME: end flanges are rigid rings & central jewels constrained in rotation Z X Y

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Single Barrel Grid Simulation Results NB: rigid end flanges assumed – currently repeating with increased number of degrees of freedom. 1 micron precision assumed throughout. Fixed inner barrel. Central jewels constrained in rotation Result without radial lines

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November FEA model of SCT structure Barrel SCT is normally supported at four points

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Torsional behaviour: 4 point to 3 point support Loss of contact with this point

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Future work: Cross-check of Grid Simulations Take FEA model of perfect barrel  Extract lengths from geodetic grid  (add random errors to lengths)  Pass to reconstruction software for calibration of model Distort FEA model eg, twist and/or multipole distortions  Extract new lengths  (add random errors to lengths)  Pass to reconstruction software  Reconstruct nodes co-ordinates and compare with those in FEA model Compare with predicted errors

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November Conclusions A novel alignment system, based on FSI, is under construction for the ATLAS SCT. Prototype geodetic grid nodes can be reconstructed to well within the ATLAS requirements (<1ppm). Error propagation through the final SCT grid has been simulated. Future work: cross-check simulations using distorted FEA models. References ref1 used with kind permission of the author: L. Brunel, ‘SIMULGEO: Simulation and reconstruction software for opto- geometrical systems’, CERN CMS Note 1998/079.