Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Seattle, June 2014 Configuration Backlog Reduction – There and Back Again Susan Atkin, Wolf Creek N.O.C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
Advertisements

2007 CMBG Conference Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna, LLC June 17-20, 2007 Charleston, SC Engineering Change Impact Evaluation Process.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
University of Florida Academic Activities Reporting (Formerly IWF)
Class 9 – April 27, 2012 An Abbreviated but Typical System Conversion Plan for a Medium-Sized Enterprise.
Project Management Process. Project Complexity means that: a team of people are needed to supply expertise the work needs to be broken into manageable.
M. White – June 28, 2004 LCLS Requirements Meeting In a project, we live or die by the schedule. After we’re “baselined” it is our plan for what we will.
Software Development Problems Range of Intervention Theory Prevention, Treatment and Maintenance Planning, Development and Use Cost of Intervention.
Are You Really Ready? Review the School Readiness Checklist Examples of Readiness that are Sustainable and Unsustainable Vermont PBS “Bringing out the.
Systems Engineering Management
Pre-Project Planning Lessons from the Construction Industry Institute Construction Industry Institute Michael Davis, P. Eng, PMP Ontario Power Generation.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Update on Transportation Activities in Fairfax County Transportation Roundtable Dulles Area Transportation.
Process Engineer’s Role in Project Management Dr Abdullah Malik.
Change Advisory Board COIN v1.ppt Change Advisory Board ITIL COIN June 20, 2007.
“Here’s why you need the new wheels, too…” Shawn and Steve Image from
Component 10 – Fundamentals of Workflow Process Analysis and Redesign Unit 10 – Process Change Implementation and Evaluation This material was developed.
Server Virtualization: Navy Network Operations Centers
From Research Prototype to Production
Risk-Informed In- Service Inspection (RI-ISI) Ching Guey.
1. Infection Control Risk Assessment Terrie B. Lee, RN, MS, MPH, CIC Director, Infection Prevention & Employee Health Charleston Area Medical Center Charleston,
Finishing the Project and Realizing the Benefits Chapter 15 Contemporary Project Management Kloppenborg © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May.
Project Tracking. Questions... Why should we track a project that is underway? What aspects of a project need tracking?
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
Mapping and Implementing a Safe Medicines Pathway Jennifer Dorey Pharmaceutical Adviser, NHS South --- South Central.
2007 CMBG Conference David Hembree Institute of Nuclear Power Operations June 20, 2007 Charleston, SC INPO Perspective on Configuration Management.
Save a Tree: Use an eForm Automating IT Change Request Management Processes (Concurrency IT Department)
Software Development Process and Management (or how to be officious and unpopular)
Final Documents Brendan S. Duffy. 1. Scope 2. Communication: Gantt Chart 3. Cost Estimate 4. Procurement 5. Data Access Workflow 6. Risk Management 7.
1 © The Delos Partnership 2004 Project Management Organisation and Structure.
Items Required for Process Hand-off
2006 CMBG Conference Sam Melton Supervisor, Configuration Management Brunswick Nuclear Plant Progress Energy June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA CM04 Facility.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Characteristics of a Good Calculation Program Presented.
Slide 1 Project Management Chapter 4. Slide 2 Objectives ■ Become familiar with estimation. ■ Be able to create a project workplan. ■ Become familiar.
AP-1 5. Project Management. AP-2 Software Failure Software fails at a significant rate What is failure? Not delivering it on time is an estimation failure.
MyFloridaMarketPlace MyFloridaMarketPlace Change Review Board January 31, 2008.
CORE Executive Board January 27, 2010 Next CEB February 17, 2010.
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Key Steps to Delivering Project 1.Lead agency submits final project scope, budget and schedule to MTC 2.MTC.
Chapter 3 Strategic Information Systems Planning.
Transmission Outage Process April Purpose In compliance with the Protocols and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) Operating Guides,
1 LHC-DFBX Fabrication Oversight Plan Joseph Rasson LBNL Presented at the DFBX Production Readiness Review October 2002, LBNL Brookhaven - Fermilab.
Response to TAC8 and Annual Review Recommendations John Haines Head of Target Division April 2, 2014.
January 2013 Action Plan Skills Building: Module 4 Implementing and Evaluating the Action Plan.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Diablo Canyon NPP Probabilistic Risk Assessment Program Workshop Information.
JD Edwards Support & Tools Gillian Boshell Product Service Advisor, Oracle Australia.
Information Technology Service Availability Metrics March 2008.
1 Software Maintenance and Evolution CSSE 575: Session 4, Part 2 Software Maintenance Process Steve Chenoweth Office Phone: (812) Cell: (937)
Information Technology Update Aaron Smallwood Manager, IT Business & Customer Services.
6/6/ SOFTWARE LIFE CYCLE OVERVIEW Professor Ron Kenett Tel Aviv University School of Engineering.
Project Life Presented by Chuck Ray, PMP ITS Project Manager.
Standard Design Process Overview
Pass CMRP - Certified Maintenance & Reliability Professional exam in just 24 HOURS! 100% REAL EXAM QUESTIONS ANSWERS CMRP - Certified Maintenance & Reliability.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Pipeline Safety Management Systems
DNP Initiative ENG-003 Standard Design Process Overview Configuration Management Benchmarking Group June 12, 2017.
Maintenance Scheduling
Change Management V.N.Bhaskar Rao Engineering & Construction Director Amec Foster Wheeler India Operations.
Software Configuration Management
NEI Configuration Control Benchmark – Palo Verde
JTAMS PRE-MILESTONE B ANALYSIS
Ryan Cox, Mitigation Planning Supervisor, NC Risk Management
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
ROADMAP TO ISO/TS REGISTRATION
Results of Design Reviews
Margin Management Configuration Management Benchmarking Group
Workshop 1: Processing Facility Configuration Information
Vendor Technical Information
Configuration Management Operating Experience
CR-GR-HSE-302 Management of change
Management of Change GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-302)
Presentation transcript:

Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Seattle, June 2014 Configuration Backlog Reduction – There and Back Again Susan Atkin, Wolf Creek N.O.C.

Configuration Backlog Reduction In May 2013, there were 1521 packages open. –319 in Development phase –506 with Fieldwork, in phases of Planning, Implementation, and Program Updates –528 Document Change Only, released from Engineering and waiting for Closeout to begin –151 in Engineering Closeout phase –9 held at Document Services due to problems –8 “ongoing” packages

Configuration Backlog Reduction Of 1521 packages, 1202 packages had drawings, manuals, and calculations that potentially did not match the plant configuration (packages released from Engineering) If we estimate approximately 10 documents affected per package on average, then… 1202 packages = 12,020 documents with fidelity uncertainty

Configuration Backlog Reduction Essential Control Room Drawings are revised within 24 Normal Working Hours Significant Drawings (Clearance Orders/ Personnel Safety) are revised within 15 days Document Backlog DID NOT include these. Document Backlog DID include –Calculations, Vendor Manuals, Design Drawings, Specifications

Configuration Backlog Reduction Culture in which Design Engineering wasn’t allowed to say “no” created: –No appetite suppression –319 packages in Development phase (May 2013) –30 Design Engineers –Approximately 300 packages developed per year –Each engineer had over a year’s worth of work waiting for him/her (packages, CR evaluations, training, level of effort work) –No time for “low priority” work like Closeouts

Configuration Backlog Reduction Money allocated for Closeouts was re-directed to special projects yearly Design Change Process excludes Engineering from post-implementation turnover to Operations (engineer didn’t know when modification was implemented) Maintenance had heavy workload implementing 300 packages/ year on top of PMs and broke/fix work Engineering and Maintenance Supervisors didn’t schedule time for Closeouts

Configuration Backlog Reduction How did we get there? Culture

Configuration Backlog Reduction How do we get back again?

Configuration Backlog Reduction Remedial –Close packages at all stages, end goal of 100 open –Create Closeout Team –Make Closeout process easier Preventive –Create a front-end filter to say “No” –20/40 List –Revise Development process –Stakeholders process –Communicate and Hold Accountable

Configuration Backlog Reduction Remedial, Close packages at all stages –Design Engineering provided list of packages from Development through Planning to System Engineering –System Engineering force ranked packages by system –Maintenance, Operations, Design, and Systems culled the list of packages (Managers) –Packages cancelled or approved –Packages approved for development prioritized Need to work now vs. Nice to have eventually dropped 304 to 161

Configuration Backlog Reduction Remedial, Close packages at all stages –Packages in Planning, Implementation stages Scheduled Work –Packages in Program Updates stage (Implementation Complete) Maintenance Closeout Team (3 coordinators) –Packages in Engineering Closeout Engineering Closeout Team (3 coordinators, 6 drafters, 2 checkers, 3 engineers, 1 project manager, 1 supervisor) Configuration Management Drafters working Closeout exclusively 1 week/month each

Configuration Backlog Reduction Remedial, Make Closeout process easier –Procedure changes Allow up to 5 DDCNs per document Allow up to 5 Final CCNs per calculation Created Closeout Procedure Engineers trained on new procedure –Closeout Coordinators helping with forms

Configuration Backlog Reduction Preventive, Front End Filter –Managers as front-end filter Packages must have manager approval before being initiated –PHC as front-end filter Non-Emergent Fieldwork Packages must have PHC approval before being initiated Funding must be committed before Engineering work is initiated Modification Impact Summary created to help PHC make informed decisions

Configuration Backlog Reduction Preventive, 20/40 List 20 Outage / 40 Online Fieldwork Packages Current 20/40 List has 161 Packages Strategy: Attrition and Front-end Filter

Configuration Backlog Reduction Preventive, Revise Development Process * 36 Procedures changing, mid-July roll out * Changes include moving activities from end of Design Change Process to Development stage PM development Procedure change identification Fieldwork Spare parts levels Simulator changes RWO reviews Identification of problems or concerns Post Mod Testing Training ERDS data points

Configuration Backlog Reduction Preventive, Stakeholders Process –Design Change Packages Function, failure mode, bounding parameters 10%, 30%, 50%, 90% meetings Impacts form required for mandatory stakeholders for meetings

Configuration Backlog Reduction Preventive, Communicate & Hold Accountable notices twice monthly to engineers –Packages in Closeout –Packages ready for Closeout – NFW –Packages with Implementation Complete, currently in Program Updates stage – FW Escalate as needed, CRs after 90 days at AP7

Configuration Backlog Reduction So how are we doing so far?

Configuration Backlog Reduction 13Q113Q213Q313Q414Q114Q2GOAL Development Implementation FW Ready for Closeout NFW Closeout Complete Ongoing TOTAL

Configuration Backlog Reduction

Questions? Comments? Thank you.