Working with Cataloging in Publication metadata in the RDA environment What the CIP Program is recommending Camilla Williams CIP Program Specialist June 29, 2013

Statements of responsibility Provide more information: – All creators and contributors, and their affiliations – For shorter statements of responsibility, provide access points for all names

Statements of responsibility

Relationship designators Core element for children’s illustrators Encourage the use of relationship designators

Date of publication LC-PCC PS gives catalogers the option to use the source of information as data view or the galley – Prefer to use the date from the galley and bracket the date in the 264 field if only the Copyright date is found

Contents Notes Add the Table of Contents, especially those with statements of responsibility

ISBN Record all ISBNs available in galley

CIP Data

Expanding the ECIP Cataloging Partnership Program 2013 American Library Association Annual Conference Chicago, Illinois Cataloging in Publication Advisory Group June 29 th, 2013 Karl E. Debus-López Chief U.S. Programs, Law, and Literature Division

Current Participants Brigham Young UniversityUniversity of Chicago Cornell UniversityUniversity of Florida Duke UniversityUniversity of Hawaii Frick Art GalleryUniversity of Pennsylvania Getty InstituteUniversity of Wisconsin National Agricultural Library National Library of MedicineTwo new participants: Northwestern UniversityGeorgetown University Ohio State UniversityNew York University Law Library Pennsylvania State University Queens Public Library, New York Stanford University Texas A&M University

ECIP Records Created FY2009 FY2010 Total ECIPs Processed: Total ECIPs Processed: ECIP Partners: 3495 (7%)ECIP Partners: 4320 (8%) FY2011 FY2012 Total ECIPs Processed:51870 Total ECIPs Processed: ECIP Partners: 4572 (9%) ECIP Partners: 4428 (9%) FY2013 (through May 31 st, 2013) Total ECIPs Processed:33215 ECIP Partners: 3386 (10%)

Trends Since October of 2009, LC USASH and USPRLL divisions have lost approx. 20% of their staff Many long-term subject specialists have retired Fewer ECIPs being processed by LC; however, LC wants to increase its acquisition of materials through CIP Slow increase in the proportion of ECIPs processed by partner libraries vs. LC Partner libraries have similar pressures as LC in terms of loss of staff and long-term experts retiring

Current ECIP Backlogs at LC As of June 2 nd, 2013: 3,296 ECIPS are in the Library of Congress backlog. Some areas have very large backlogs: Literature Political Science Religion Science Technology

Results of Backlogs Publishers expressing concern about delays In some subject areas, books are published before CIP data is created due to delays Publishers abandoning CIP for PCN program Pre-publication metadata for libraries, vendors, and bibliographic utilities is less available CIP Program put at risk at the very time when it is needed most by overall library community New initiatives such as the CIP e-book program are compromised

Benefits of ECIP Distribution Greater distribution of ECIP workload benefits everyone: Partake of diversity of subject expertise throughout the nation Partners see latest research to build their own collections Libraries outside of LC more likely to submit subject proposals to enhance LCSH Partners can communicate directly with publishers and authors in areas of interest

Call to Action! The Library of Congress would like to increase the participation of the ECIP Cataloging Partners to 50% of the total number of ECIPs cataloged by 2020.

How can we reach this goal? What the Library of Congress will do: Program for Cooperative Cataloging currently reaching out to NACO/BIBCO members that are likely candidates to join Continued promotion of the ECIP program by the LC CIP staff members through articles, newsletters and presentations at conferences Outreach to individuals whenever possible

What can you do as partners? Be an Ambassador for CIP! Increase your coverage if you are able to Promote the benefits of the program whenever you can Give presentations at your local, state, and regional conferences and ask your partners to join Write articles about the program, why you participate, what you like about it, and why you think others could benefit by joining Get the word out as to how CIP metadata is critical to our future linked data environment

Discussion: What are your thoughts on ways to expand the ECIP Cataloging Partnership Program? our coverage if you are able to.

THANK YOU!