US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® What to Expect When You’re Expecting a Charette Pre-Charette Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Risk CHAPTER SEVEN Student Version Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Advertisements

Risk Analysis Fundamentals and Application Robert L. Griffin International Plant Protection Convention Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN.
3-Year Implementation Schedule. What is the 3-Year Implementation Schedule? A list of prioritized projects for implementers with a time frame to complete.
The Department of Energy Enterprise Risk Management Model
Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints.
Risk and RACI: Defining Clear Roles
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG and Taking Care of People! Ecosystem Restoration Along the Los Angeles River: Creativity within Concrete Dan.
PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT
PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG ® Planning Associates 2012 Practicum: The Economics of Planning: Making Good Decisions with Less Information Team 1.5 Idris.
Project Management Risk Management. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Definition of Risk 3.Tolerance of Risk 4.Definition of Risk Management 5.Certainty, Risk,
2006 TEA Conference Terry Berends, PE Assistant State Design Engineer Washington State Department of Transportation Risk Based Estimating Tools at WSDOT.
Project Management.
Degree and Graduation Seminar Scope Management
CERP Guidance Memorandum
Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute.
US Army Corps of Engineers PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG ® Project Planning with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Presenter Name Presenter Title.
Project Risk Management
SMART Feasibility Study Process
PRM 702 Project Risk Management Lecture #28
Introduction to RUP Spring Sharif Univ. of Tech.2 Outlines What is RUP? RUP Phases –Inception –Elaboration –Construction –Transition.
Project Risk and Cost Management. IS the future certain? The future is uncertain, but it is certain that there are two questions will be asked about our.
Managing Risk. Objectives  To Describe Risk Management concepts and techniques  To calculate and analyze a project using Probability of completion 
BUILDING STRONG SM Plan Formulation: General Module G-1: What is plan formulation?
Theodore A. Brown, P.E., SES Chief Planning and Policy Division
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Grant Writing Basics. Topics of This Session Matching funding to your objective Telling your story Writing the budget.
1 Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Ch 2 Mod 5 Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines
1 TenStep Project Management Process ™ PM00.7 PM00.7 Project Management Preparation for Success * Manage Risk *
Chapter 7 Managing risk and quality. Learning objectives discuss the importance of risk in a project and how it can be managed explain the processes of.
OREGON IDAHO WYOMING COLORADO NEVADA NEW MEXICO TEXAS UTAH ARIZONA CALIFORNIA US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® And Taking Care Of People! Arroyo.
Civil Works Transformation Foundations of SMART Planning
1 C E T A S Purpose and Need Presentation Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
Project Charters Module 3
Briefing to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board June 28, 2013 Status of State-Led Basin-Wide Feasibility Studies.
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
Welcome To: PCC4: Economic Analysis In Planning U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Planners Core Curriculum.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
M4 - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Multi-Purpose Projects Module M4: Telling the Plan Formulation Story.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
Managing Risk CHAPTER SEVEN Student Version Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Introducing Project Management Update December 2011.
Flood Risk Management Cosgrove Creek Section 205 Planning Basics.
1 Identify Preferred Alternative and Finalize Plan Planning Steps 7 & 8.
The Risk Management Process
BUILDING STRONG ® TELLING THE PLANNING STORY Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Preliminaries Federal/Corps Planning Process PA Program Plan Formulation Supplement - FY 08.
Stand Up Comedy Project/Product Management
US Army Corps of Engineers PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG ® U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CIVIL WORKS TRANSFORMATION: SMART PLANNING AND RESCOPING CHARETTES.
Forecasting for Water Resources Planning. Learning Objective(s):  The student will:  Understand the need for forecasts.  Be able to describe what a.
Connecting Capitals Identifying and Using Local Assets to Support Your SET Plan Session Three.
David Moser USACE Chief Economist
PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG ® Planning Associates 2012 Practicum: What to Expect When You’re Expecting a Charette Team 1.0 Marty Kuhn Heather Morgan.
US Army Corps of Engineers PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG ® SMART PLANNING TO SUPPORT FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT USACE Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets.
Outlines Overview Defining the Vision Through Business Requirements
Continual Service Improvement Methods & Techniques.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Step 6: Selection Of The Recommended Plan Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part II Project Planning.
P3 Business Analysis. 2 Section F: Project Management F1.The nature of projects F2. Building the Business Case F4. Planning,monitoring and controlling.
Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines 1 Ch 2 Mod 5
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Miles City, Montana Section 205 Gwyn M. Jarrett - Project Manager Omaha District April 27, 2016.
Managing Project Risk – A simplified approach Presented by : Damian Leonard.
Iterative Risk Management Workflow Tool
STUDY TITLE Presenter Name Presenter Title Duty Location
ITPD ISSUE MANAGEMENT PROCESS SEPTEMBER 5, 2008
Part II Project Planning © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Engineering design is the process of devising a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. It is a decision-making process in which the basic.
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® What to Expect When You’re Expecting a Charette Pre-Charette Workshop

BUILDING STRONG ® 2 Civil Works Transformation Planning Modernization Why are we here? Infrastructure Management Methods of Delivery Budget Prioritization

BUILDING STRONG ® Purpose of the Charette Is to help the PDT move forward toward completing a SMART feasibility study and ensure that the Vertical Team is aligned with the proposed direction.

BUILDING STRONG ® Seven Pieces of Paper Tell the Story… of the Study based on EXISTING data only. Must be developed with the whole PDT. The Seven Pieces of Paper form the heart of the decision document. 1. Problems & Opps 2. Objectives & Constraints 3. Decision Criteria 4. Key Uncertainties 5.Without Project Condition 6. Measures 7. Formulated Plans

BUILDING STRONG ® Charette Expectations & Outcomes Typical Products Include: A Decision Management Plan A Risk Register Report Synopsis Other Outcomes May Include: Clear Planning Objectives A focus on the Tentatively Selected Plan and the Locally Preferred Plan only The charette is not just an exercise!!

BUILDING STRONG ® S pecific, M easurable, A ttainable, R isk-informed, T imely SMART Planning Basics Decision based planning Focused on making the next decision while scoping for the decision after that. Managing uncertainty (and budgets and schedules) to allow for making planning decisions with uncertainty. Decisions under uncertainty. The Goal is 3x3x3

BUILDING STRONG ® SMART Planning Decision Point Milestones

BUILDING STRONG ® 6 Step Planning Process

BUILDING STRONG ® Step 1 – Identifying Problems and Opportunities Problems: Existing, negative conditions Example: Flood damages in the commercial section of Glendive, Montana. Opportunities: Focus on desirable, future conditions. Example: Restore native fish species in the lower Yellowstone River. Objectives: Statements that describe the results you want to get by solving the problems and taking advantage of the opportunities you identified. Example – Reduce (effect) flood damages (subject) in the City of Glendive (location) through the year 2030 (time/duration). Constraints: Statements about things you want to avoid doing, or things you cannot change, while meeting your objectives. Example – Avoid effects on habitat of the Federally endangered pallid sturgeon in the lower Yellowstone River.

BUILDING STRONG ® Step 2 – Inventory and Forecast Inventory: Describe historic and existing conditions. Forecast: Informed guess about the future, a future condition or scenario. Used to define the base condition, future without project condition and the future with project condition.

BUILDING STRONG ® Step 3 – Formulating Alternative Plans Management Measure : Feature or activity that can be implemented to address one or more planning objective. Examples: Levee, fish passage, flood proofing homes, recreation trail Alternative Plan : One or more management measures functioning together to address one or more objectives.

BUILDING STRONG ® Step 4 – Evaluating Alternative Plans How do you evaluate plans? Forecast the most likely with-project condition Compare each with-project condition to the without- project condition Characterize effects (difference between with and without project conditions) Magnitude, location, timing/duration, appraisal (good/bad) Qualify plan for further consideration (pass/fail)

BUILDING STRONG ® Step 5 – Comparing Alternative Plans Compare plans against each other Benefit Cost Ratio Cost Effectiveness/ Incremental Cost Analysis Trade-off Analysis

BUILDING STRONG ® Step 6 – Selecting a Plan What are your choices? No Action NED/Most Cost Effective Locally Preferred Plan Other?

BUILDING STRONG ® Decision Management Plan Waiting for feedback from Charlie Yoe 1.The Planning Decision to be Made 2.Sequence of Events Required 3.Criteria for Deciding 4.Decision Makers 5.Schedule for Decision 6.Decision Summary (to be completed when decision is made) 1-5 are done at charette, 6 when decision is made The DMP belongs to the entire Vertical Team not just the PDT

BUILDING STRONG ® Risk Register Grades risk in terms of: Likelihood of occurrence Seriousness of impact on study/project Considers uncertainty around risk. Risk = Probability x Consequence

BUILDING STRONG ® Risk Register Identifies: Risks the PDT and Corps are willing to tolerate Ways the PDT will manage risk Documents mitigation strategies Grades mitigation strategies in terms of likelihood and consequence.

BUILDING STRONG ® Exercise

BUILDING STRONG ® Purpose of Island of Modernania Exercise?

BUILDING STRONG ® STEPS of Exercise: one iteration of the bee hive Steps of Exercise: For the purpose of the exercise we will just go through one iteration of the 6 Step Planning Process We also discuss the DMP and the Risk Register Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 DMP Risk Register

BUILDING STRONG ® Island of

BUILDING STRONG ® Island of Dangerous Species on the island: Genius: Climate Species: change Climate change Aggressive and unpredictable Genius: Project Species: backlog Project backlog Thorny to touch, but is plentiful in the coral Genius: Sea Level Species: rise Sea Level rise Aggressive and agile and strong Genius: National Species: debt National debt Illusive, deadly can cause paralysis

BUILDING STRONG ® Beneficial Species on the island: Genius: Budget Species: prioritization Budget prioritization Intelligent, great swimmer, can be used to cover great distance Genius: Methods of Species: delivery Methods of delivery Food source to be managed Genius: Asset Species: management Asset management Food source to be managed Genius: Infrastructure Species: strategy Infrastructure strategy Large, massive, great resource but hard to handle

BUILDING STRONG ® Elements on the Island: Pirates of Global Trade and Commerce Genius: Rare Species: bird Rare bird Cannot touch, cannot fly… Critical to NEPA Waterlines on Trees…

BUILDING STRONG ® Problems and Opportunities…

BUILDING STRONG ® Island of Objectives and Constraints…

BUILDING STRONG ® Island of Inventory and Forecasting…

BUILDING STRONG ® Island of Formulating Alternative Plan…

BUILDING STRONG ® Island of Evaluating Alternative Plans…

BUILDING STRONG ® Comparing Alternative Plans Island of

BUILDING STRONG ® Island of Selecting a Plan…

BUILDING STRONG ® Island of Develop a DMP…

BUILDING STRONG ® Risk Register Uncertainty Rating High: there is little to no concrete evidence available Medium: there is some good evidence and some significant data gaps Low: good evidence is available, data gaps are not significant None: all relevant facts are known HighMediumLowNone High MediumNone MediumHighMediumLowNone LowMediumLow None Determination of Risk Rating Consequence Factor Likelihood Rating High : the probability of this undesirable result is unacceptable based on evidence. Medium : the probability of this undesirable result is borderline tolerable/unacceptable based on evidence. Low : the probability of this undesirable result is tolerable/acceptable based on evidence. None: the probability of undesirable results is zero or so low as to be effectively treated as a zero based on evidence. Consequence Rating High : the consequence of this undesirable result is unacceptable based on evidence. Medium: the consequence of this undesirable result is borderline tolerable/unacceptable based on evidence. Low : the consequence of this undesirable result is tolerable/acceptable based on evidence. None : there are no undesirable consequences based on evidence.. Probability

BUILDING STRONG ® Logistics for Your Charette Dates: Location: Building Access: Start Time: Who will be there: What to bring:

BUILDING STRONG ® Lessons Learned Feedback from Previous Charettes Feedback Forms for this Charette