New Intercity Bus Funding Approach Stephen Abernathy, AICP Intercity Bus Program Manager Public Transportation Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Needs in the Intercity Bus and Rail Transportation Industry Chapter 28 Research Methodologies.
Advertisements

West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Regional Service Planning for East Texas Texas Department of Transportation Tyler District Thursday, October 6, :30 PM.
Intercity Bus Program: Alternative Strategy for Rural Transport
Transportation Planning for Washington State’s Aging Population.
2012 Florida TD Conference -- Orlando National Transit Database The Federal Transit Administration collects operating data from rural agencies receiving.
Regional Rural Transit Strategy Prepared for: Kern Council of Governments Prepared by: Nelson Nygaard Consulting Associates August 2003.
Partnering with Greyhound 2009 CalACT 25 th Anniversary Spring Conference & EXPO Greyhound Lines, Inc. March 18, 2009.
Ohio DOT Greyhound Lines, Inc. February 8, 2008 Intercity Bus Consultation.
Virginia Statewide Intercity Bus Study: Final Report and Next Steps 0.
TPB Human Service Transportation Coordination Program 1 Key Elements of the Update to the Coordinated Human Service Transportation Plan Human Service Transportation.
New Charter School Audit Requirements for all Indiana Charter Schools
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
CTAA Expo 2009 CTAA Expo 2009 State DOT Roundtable Kimberly A. Gayle, Office Chief Federal Transit Grants Programs Division of Mass Transportation June.
OHIO & LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL CLEVELAND HUB STUDY Ohio Rail Development Commission TMACOG Annual Transportation Summit September 29, 2003.
Calaveras Transit Intercity Service Feasibility Study Draft Alternatives Presented by: Gordon Shaw, PE, AICP and Genevieve Evans, AICP LSC Transportation.
Stephen R. Abernathy, AICP Intercity Bus Program Manager Paula Hammond, PE Secretary of Transportation Brian Lagerberg, MbA Director, Public Transportation.
1 Business Model TRAIN OPERATIONS NEC INFRASTRUCTURE GOVERNMENT PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND OVERSIGHT.
Bill Brannan Northwestern Trailways National Bus Traffic Assn. The Intercity Bus Industry.
TPB Human Service Transportation Coordination Program 1 Key Elements of the Update to the Coordinated Human Service Transportation Plan Human Service Transportation.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
Recent Changes in Intercity Service Delivery in Minnesota 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity Bus Transportation Gerry Weiss, State.
Designated by US DOT Publication of Draft PFN for Comments - Spring 2013 Initial Designation of the PFN – Fall 2013 National Freight Network Primary Freight.
MAP Washington State Public Transportation Symposium August 26, 2013.
Opportunities for Better Special Needs Transportation Coordination House Transportation Committee Work Session February 8, 2007 Paula Hammond WSDOT Mike.
Tribal Participation in State Public Transportation Programs: The Washington State Story Thursday, May 31, 2007 Cathy Silins Acting Director, Public Transportation.
TRB – Omaha, NE National Conference on Rural Public & Intercity Bus Transportation October 20, 2008 Connecting The Dots Northwestern Trailways – Bill Brannan.
1 18 th National Conference on Rural Public & Intercity Bus Transportation Conference Kimberly Gayle Office of Federal Transit Grants Programs Division.
1 18 th National Conference on Rural Public & Intercity Bus Transportation Conference Kimberly Gayle Office of Federal Transit Grants Programs Division.
Travel Options Online Trip Planner For Statewide Mobility Paula Hammond, P.E. Secretary Washington State Department of Transportation Kathryn Taylor Director.
TCRP Project J-6, Task 71 Rural Transit Achievements: Assessing the Outcomes of Increased SAFETEA-LU Funding for Rural Transit INTERIM FINDINGS – TOWN.
Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.
Public Transportation & Persons With Special Transportation Needs House Transportation Committee February 12, 2013 Tom Hingson Transportation Services.
Connecting with Greyhound CalACT Conference April 15, 2015.
Funding Opportunity: Supporting Local Community Health Improvement Sylvia Pirani Director, Office of Public Health Practice New York State Department of.
April 29,  Investment in new and improved services, with a strong focus on customer experience  Investment focused on improving efficiency  Shorter.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Keeping Harris County Moving.. Background Transit needs study in Commissioned by H-GAC and Harris County Transportation Coordinated Council.
Arizona Rural Transit Needs Study Arizona Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division November 2007.
SAFETEA-LU Elderly & Persons with Disabilities (5310) Job Access Reverse Commute (5316) New Freedom (5317)
State of Connecticut Nutmeg Network Statement of Direction 9/10/
WSDOT Consolidated Grants Program Rural and Special Needs Public Transportation.
Innovations in Transit Planning and Financing Presentation to the 2003 MPO Conference, Muncie IN October 16, 2003.
“Modoc (Rural) Mobility Management Center” Pam Couch, Executive Director Modoc Transportation – Alturas, CA
Professionalizing Mobility Management: Developing Standards and Competencies Julie Dupree, Easter Seals Association of Travel Instruction Conference August.
Morgan County Transit Discussion UTA Corporate Staff Presentation November 19, 2013.
2008 National Rural Public and Intercity Bus Transportation Conference Nebraska Statewide Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Transforming Transit in California October 22, 2015 CalACT Fall Conference and Bus Show Rohnert Park, CA Tony Brasil, Chief Heavy Duty Diesel Implementation.
Brian Cronin Federal Transit Administration ITSA Annual Conference May 4, 2005 Mobility Services for All Americans (MSAA) Foundation Research and Next.
For Presentation at 28 th APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting Vancouver, Canada Walter Kulyk Director, Office of Mobility Innovation Federal Transit.
1 Section 5317: New Freedom Program (NFP) David Schneider Federal Transit Administration ESPA National Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2007.
1 Section 5310: Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration SAFETEA-LU.
Active Transportation Program California Transportation Commission Mitch Weiss 01/14/141.
Keeping Harris County Moving A Coordinated Approach.
ITS Coordination Tools: Perspectives from a Rural California Region Pam Couch, Executive Director Modoc Transportation - Alturas, CA
SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 JENNIFER MACARTHY BUTTE COUNTY ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Butte County Regional Economic Development Strategy.
Public Transit & Transportation Network Companies
Los Angeles – San Diego – San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Update
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
California’s Rural Intercity Bus System: 2018 Update
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Technology In Action Session: An On-Demand Sunday Transit Application
Intercity Bus Consultation
RTC RIDE Service Improvement Recommendations
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Minnesota Intercity Bus Program Industry Consultation
Travel Washington 18th Biennial State Programs Meeting and
Best Practices and Promising Implementations
Presentation transcript:

New Intercity Bus Funding Approach Stephen Abernathy, AICP Intercity Bus Program Manager Public Transportation Division

Separate FTA 5311(f) funds from the WSDOT Consolidated Grant Process. Provide more flexibility to meet identified needs Request for Proposals (RFP) for specific routes within the identified corridor for open competitive process Select best operator for each project Competition between providers, not projects Intercity Bus Program

RFP Process (No Grant Applications!) RFP’s Issued on Corridor Basis. Purchase of Service Contract, rather than operating assistance grant. Provides more control. Sets expectations in advance. Ensures provider is tied in with Greyhound schedule, ticketing (MAX) and web-site.

Greyhound Rural Feeder Service Program How Local In-kind Match Pilot Project works: 5311(f) Formula Local Match Option $100,000 Actual Operating Cost $100,000 $100,000Project Cost $150, ,000less Fares - 50,000 50,000 Deficit 100, ,00050% 5311(f) - 50,000 $ 25,00050% local match $ 50,000* * At about $2.00 per mile (50% of Greyhound’s total operating cost), the project would need 25,000 annual Greyhound miles to match the project. * Greyhound agrees in writing to make this in-kind donation to the project.

WSDOT collaborates with area stakeholders to identify intercity transportation needs and levels of service for each route. Each RFP is drafted for a specific route. RFP is published statewide for maximum response potential. Providers respond to the RFP with their proposals for meeting specified service criteria. Pre-proposal conference held prior to final review. A diverse panel of regional stakeholders reviews each of the proposals, scores each to select the one which meets the service criteria, and reflects the best overall public interest value. RFP Process and Contract Award

RFP Criteria Realistic schedule connections with interstate, regional and local providers. A sound and sustainable business plan which includes marketing, revenue recovery from fares, freight handling and contracts. ADA compliant service vehicles and accommodations for bicycles. Interline agreements with Greyhound, Amtrak & other intercity carriers. FMCSA authority to connect with interstate carriers. Federal certifications and assurances regarding insurance and drug/alcohol compliance.

Project funded with FTA 5311(f) funding and local “in-kind” match provided by Greyhound’s unsubsidized capital costs Definition includes rural feeder service segments to interstate trunk- line Greyhound service in Washington. The service schedules will help meet regional travel needs in addition to making the Greyhound connections. Initial three rural feeder routes are: Travel Washington Intercity Bus Travel Washington Grapeline- Walla Walla to Tri-Cities Travel Washington Dungenessline- Port Angeles to SeaTac Travel Washington Appleline- Omak to Ellensburg (October 2008)

Travel Washington Grapeline

With the Greyhound Rural Feeder Service program and FTA local in-kind match pilot in place: WSDOT established the model process for creating feeder service to/from Walla Walla to the Tri-Cities. The project was designed to meet all FTA requirements for the 5311(f) program, including scheduled connections with Greyhound. WSDOT & Greyhound staff cooperated on the development of service schedules. WSDOT held numerous local and regional public meetings to obtain input in service design.

Travel Washington Grapeline Project Status: WSDOT completed the RFP process and selected a service provider July The provider completed all the steps for service start up in September Provider has schedule connections with Greyhound, Amtrak and two local transit agencies.

Travel Washington Grapeline WSDOT conducted a competitive RFP process that clearly presented service requirements, including: –Prescribed routing & scheduling –Service name: Travel Washington Grapeline –Days of service: 7 days per week, 365 days per year –Obtain NBTA membership for revenue sharing –Secure FMCSA and Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission (WUTC) authority –Ensure Greyhound ticketing capability for service –Aggressively market the service under Travel Washington brand

Travel Washington Intercity Bus Customer ticketing: All Travel Washington customers are able to buy a one-way or round trip ticket in several ways: –Greyhound’s toll-free telephone information center –Online through –By phone (or in person) through Travel Washington providers, using Greyhound-supplied software and ticket printer (MAXX system) Customers buy tickets in advance or on the day of travel Tickets, issued in multiple parts, will include travel on Travel Washington and Greyhound (to their final destination)

Travel Washington Intercity Bus Reconciling ticket revenues: Travel Washington providers & Greyhound both sell tickets. If Travel Washington provider sells the ticket, they will collect the fare for all segments of the trip including Greyhound segments. If Greyhound sells the ticket, Greyhound will collect the fare for all segments of the trip including Travel Washington provider segments. At the end of each month, Travel Washington providers and Greyhound reconcile ticket revenue collected by both and reimburse the other for any ticket revenue owed.

Travel Washington Intercity Bus Unique marketing of statewide intercity bus service. Standardized branding of vehicles.

Travel Washington Intercity Bus Network

The Result Consistent and sustainable high quality service Increased community and regional awareness of services More regional interconnectivity and mobility Increased coordination amongst interstate and regional providers