ECOLITASTER: Cellular Biosensor Valencia iGEM 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design and Testing of a Bacteriological Timer Device Herman Armstrong Morgan Schiermeier Rachel Klapper Jackie Schneider.
Advertisements

Pattern Formation in Synthetic Bacterial Colonies Fran Romero and Karima Righetti Research Fellow School of Computer Science University of Nottingham Nottingham.
A SYNTHETIC GENE- METABOLIC OSCILLATOR Reviewed by Fei Chen.
IGEM 2007 ETH Zurich ETH Zurich iGEM Team 2 ETH Zurich team.
Repressilator Presentation contents: The idea Experimental overview. The first attemp. The mathematical model. Determination of the appropiate parameters.
Microbial Therapy (Steph, Alex, Sammy) Pathway Engineering - make product body needs (possibly sense deficiency) - Synthetic Symbiosis (E. coli natural.
DUKE iGEM Aakash Indurkhya, Peter Fan, and Alyssa Ferris.
Combinatorial Synthesis of Genetic Networks Guet et. al. Andrew Goodrich Charles Feng.
Computer-Aided Rational Design of the phosphotransferase system for enhanced glucose uptake in Escherichia coli. CARD.
ECOLITASTER Making E. Coli tasting flavors Valencia iGEM 2006.
Figure 4.2 from Royal Academy of Engineering report (June, 2009) “What comes to mind when I say ‘synthetic biology’?”
Recombinant DNA Introduction to Recombinant DNA technology
Programming Biological Cells Ron Weiss, George Homsy, Radhika Nagpal Tom Knight, Gerald Sussman, Nick Papadakis MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
Bacterial Physiology (Micr430) Lecture 15 Bacterial Physiological Adaptation (Text Chapter: 18.1; 18.5; 18.7) Note: we are switching the order of topics.
CS 374, Algorithms in Biology. Florian Buron Transforming cells into automata Genetic Circuit Building Blocks for Cellular Computation (Gardner, Cantor.
IGEM2009 SHORT COURSE Lesson1 Introduction to iGEM and Synthetic Biology.
Synthetic Biology Crash Course DAY ONE. Pre-Assessment 1:00-1:10.
Yeast & Cloning Sergio Peisajovich Lim Lab June 2007.
Preparing a cyanobacterial chassis for H 2 production: a synthetic biology approach Catarina Pacheco Cell and Applied Microbiology Group IBMC, INEB E4.
Introduction to Synthetic Biology Dannenberg and Purdy 2012 (Tokos edits 2012)
IGEM 101: Session 1 2/12/15Jarrod Shilts 2/15/15Ophir Ospovat.
A systems biology approach to the identification and analysis of transcriptional regulatory networks in osteocytes Angela K. Dean, Stephen E. Harris, Jianhua.
Synthetic biology: New engineering rules for emerging discipline Andrianantoandro E; Basu S; Karig D K; Weiss R. Molecular Systems Biology 2006.
Synthetic Biology Presentation by Brown iGEM Team.
Wits_CSIR iGEM 2011/iGEM experience Presenter: Gloria Hlongwane School of Molecular and Cell Biology/ School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering,
Igor Ulitsky.  “the branch of genetics that studies organisms in terms of their genomes (their full DNA sequences)”  Computational genomics in TAU ◦
Back to the Basics Purdue iGEM The Biomakers.
BACTO-ART A Multicomponent Inducible Expression System for Teaching and Discovery Project Goals To create a multicomponent, inducible expression system.
The Programming of a Cell By L Varin and N Kharma Biology and Computer Engineering Departments Concordia University.
Combinatorial State Equations and Gene Regulation Jay Raol and Steven J. Cox Computational and Applied Mathematics Rice University.
Module-Based Analysis of Robustness Tradeoffs in the Heat Shock Response System Using module-based analysis coupled with rigorous mathematical comparisons,
Systems Biology ___ Toward System-level Understanding of Biological Systems Hou-Haifeng.
Genetic Circuit Challenge Workshop Thursday 24 Nov 2011 Bentham seminar room 1.
Why synthetic Biology? Reverse Engineering vs. Forward engineering: »Synthetic replicas of natural genetic circuits.
Imperial College iGEM Jamboree MIT – Nov 4th 2006.
SYNBIOLOGY - An Analysis of Synthetic Biology Research in Europe and North America 4,5/4,5 CM SYNBIOLOGY: An Analysis of Synthetic Biology Research in.
Anita Nguyen & Harriet Gliddon.  A good characterisation for a part is: “The minimum amount of information someone needs to reuse the part without any.
A Genetic Differential Amplifier: Design, Simulation, Construction and Testing Seema Nagaraj and Stephen Davies University of Toronto Edward S. Rogers.
Harvard iGEM 2007 Introduction Cling-E. coli : Bacteria on target Harvard iGEM 2007 Ellenor Brown Stephanie Lo Alex Pickett Sammy Sambu Kevin Shee Perry.
Cling-E. coli : Bacteria on target Harvard iGEM 2007 Ellenor Brown Stephanie Lo Alex Pickett Sammy Sambu Kevin Shee Perry Tsai Shaunak Vankudre George.
Class 23, 2001 CBCl/AI MIT Bioinformatics Applications and Feature Selection for SVMs S. Mukherjee.
Kaifeng Chen Institute for Theoretical Physics Synthetic Biology with Engineering Tools 1 Francis Chen.
Toward in vivo Digital Circuits Ron Weiss, George Homsy, Tom Knight MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
Molecular Cloning.
Characterization of the Hrp Regulatory System Project 1 of the Imperial iGEM 2007 team.
Fan-out in Gene Regulatory Networks Kyung Hyuk Kim Senior Fellow Department of Bioengineering University of Washington, Seattle 2 nd International Workshop.
Cling-E. coli : Bacteria on target Harvard iGEM 2007 Ellenor Brown Stephanie Lo Alex Pickett Sammy Sambu Kevin Shee Perry Tsai Shaunak Vankudre George.
Fusion Protein Want to Coat Bacteria with Proteins of Interest Surface Display: Fusions to Membrane Proteins Strept Binding Peptides Histidine Tag Random.
Standardization in Engineering Parts –Categorization –Community agrees on properties –Characterization of function –Quality control Assembly –Creates efficiencies.
Cling-E. coli : Bacteria on target Harvard iGEM 2007 Ellenor Brown Stephanie Lo Alex Pickett Sammy Sambu Kevin Shee Perry Tsai Shaunak Vankudre George.
Brown iGEM international genetically engineered machines competition August Update 1/55.
Encapsulation for Drug Delivery Encapsulation for Drug Delivery 31 st July iGEM Team 2009 Charles Dave Dineka James Kun Nuri Royah Tianyi.
Cling-E. coli : Bacteria on target Harvard iGEM 2007 Ellenor Brown Stephanie Lo Alex Pickett Sammy Sambu Kevin Shee Perry Tsai Shaunak Vankudre George.
Combinatorial Synthesis of Genetic Networks Calin C. Guet, Michael B. Elowitz, Weihong Hsing, Stanislas Leibler Amit Meshulam Bioinformatics Seminar Technion,
Directed Evolution of a Genetic Circuit 15 February 2008 George McArthur This presentation is primarily based on content taken from the paper “Directed.
Sticky Bacteria… Bacteri-adhesive… Cling-E. coli… A working title Perry Tsai June 25, 2007.
Hetmann Hsieh Jeffrey Lau David Ramos Zhipeng Sun.
The little oscillator that could. and could…
2007 Brown iGEM Team 7 undergraduates 7 grad student advisors
Project Overview Landing Pads Divide-by two Circuit Modeling
Addressable Bacterial Conjugation
Distributed computation: the new wave of synthetic biology devices
Outline Introduction : computational method used Paper discussion
What is Synthetic Biology
Standard biological parts for synthetic biology
Standard biological parts for synthetic biology
A User’s Guide to GO: Structural and Functional Annotation
Subhayu Basu et al. , DNA8, (2002) MEC Seminar Su Dong Kim
HKUSTers Jean and Winnie
The Baccelerator: Back on track…
Presentation transcript:

ECOLITASTER: Cellular Biosensor Valencia iGEM 2006

Outline Introduction Parts Design Systems Design Experimental work Conclusions “To have success in science, you need some luck. Without it, I would never have become interested in genetics”. J.D. Watson.

Introduction Objectives: Design a genetic system consisting on few genes that is able to give a graded response according to a concentration of an input. Modular project. Different devices. Use a biological mechanism to connect the membrane receptor with the genetic network, obtaining a cellular biosensor. Use new synthetic parts.

Project Design This project is formed by two devices: a sensor and an actuator. We use OmpR-P as input in order to assemble them. We use a vanillin receptor (design in silico) as a sensor. Our genetic circuit (actuator) is based on Weiss’ group work (Basu, Nature 2005) in order to obtain a graded response versus the concentration of a given input. Incoherent circuit. Semi-digital interpretation. RFP & GFPVanillin

Actuator Behavior

Vanillin Receptor: mechanism pdb 2DRI 271 res V P PBP GN E. coli

Parts Design Promoters are critical elements designing those networks. We focus our interest in binary promoters, i.e., promoters regulated by two transcription factors. Integrating two signals. Reduce the number of genes of the circuit. Small size device. Different implementations exhibiting logic behaviors, but not necessarily. Computational protein design.

Vanillin Receptor: DESIGNER methodology

Systems Design System and expected behavior. Model and simulations. Sensitivity analysis. Robustness analysis. Our biological system.

System and Expected Behavior

Model and Simulations We use an effective model, modeling only protein concentrations: We consider generic parts to make these simulations. Thus, we take common values for the parameters from the literature. However we expect a similar behavior:

Sensitivity Analysis The well working of the circuit depends on the promoters upstream of the two branches: pOmpR and pOmpRm.

Robustness Analysis We study the robustness of the gene circuit when there are oscillations in the sensing device. To perform that, we introduce a white noise in the input (OmpR-P). OmpR-P RFP GFP RFP GFP RFP GFP time

Our Biological System

Experimental Work Parts construction. Where are the parts? Repositories. E. coli genome. Built from scratch. Making our BioBricks. pAND. Vanillin receptor. Fusion protein. FACS results. Our Registry.

Where are the parts? (I) Repositories: pOmpR pOmpRm pLac pTetR GFP RFP TetR cI Tar-EnvZ

Where are the parts? (II) E. coli genome: Trg CRP

Where are the parts? (III) Built from scratch: pAND Vanillin PBP

Making our BioBricks (I) pAND: -93,5-42 XbaI [Joung, Science 1994]

Making our BioBricks (I) pAND: 5’ 3’ F0F32F71 R0R16R51R91 -93,5-42 XbaI [Joung, Science 1994]

Making our BioBricks (I) pAND: 5’ 3’5’ 3’ DNA ligase 5’ 3’ F0F32F71 R0R16R51R91 -93,5-42 XbaI [Joung, Science 1994]

Making our BioBricks (I) pAND: 5’ 3’5’ 3’ DNA ligase 5’ 3’ F0F32F71 R0R16R51R91 DNA polimerase & R91 + F71PCR 5’ 3’5’ 3’ 5’ 3’5’ 3’ 5’ 3’5’ 3’ -93,5-42 XbaI [Joung, Science 1994]

Making our BioBricks (II) Vanillin receptor: aa sequence: KDTIALVVETLNKPDNVSLKDGAQKEADKLGYNLV VLDSQNNPAKELANVQDLTVRGTKILLIVPTDSDA VGNAVKMANQANIPVITLKRQATKGEVVSHIAADN VLGGKIAGDYIAKKAGEGAKVIELQGKAGTSAARE LGEGFQQAVAAHKFNVLASQPADEDRIKGLNVMQN LLTAHPDVQAVFAQQDEMALGALRALQTAGKSDVM VVGDVGTPDGEKAVNDGKLAATIAELPDQIGAKGV ETADKVLKGEKVQAKYPVDLKLVVKQ pBSKValencia $$ or €€ Computational design: Combinatory optimization DESIGNER

Making our BioBricks (III) NdeI trg NdeI tarenvZ Fusion protein Trz. [Baumgartner, J. Bact. 1993]. chemoreceptor Trg: periplasmic and transmembrane domains. osmosensor EnvZ: cytoplasmic kinase/phosphatase domain.

Making our BioBricks (III) BioBrick PCR Genomic PCR NdeI trg NdeI tarenvZ Fusion protein Trz. [Baumgartner, J. Bact. 1993]. chemoreceptor Trg: periplasmic and transmembrane domains. osmosensor EnvZ: cytoplasmic kinase/phosphatase domain.

Making our BioBricks (III) NdeI digestion NdeI digestion & dephosphorilation BioBrick PCR Genomic PCR NdeI trg NdeI tarenvZ Fusion protein Trz. [Baumgartner, J. Bact. 1993]. chemoreceptor Trg: periplasmic and transmembrane domains. osmosensor EnvZ: cytoplasmic kinase/phosphatase domain.

Making our BioBricks (III) NdeI digestion NdeI digestion & dephosphorilation mix + ligate BioBrick PCR Genomic PCR NdeItrgenvZ NdeI trg NdeI tarenvZ Fusion protein Trz. [Baumgartner, J. Bact. 1993]. chemoreceptor Trg: periplasmic and transmembrane domains. osmosensor EnvZ: cytoplasmic kinase/phosphatase domain.

Making our BioBricks (III) NdeI digestion NdeI digestion & dephosphorilation mix + ligate BioBrick PCR Genomic PCR NdeItrgenvZ NdeI trg NdeI tarenvZ Fusion protein Trz. [Baumgartner, J. Bact. 1993]. chemoreceptor Trg: periplasmic and transmembrane domains. osmosensor EnvZ: cytoplasmic kinase/phosphatase domain.

Making our BioBricks (IV) From wild type to BioBrick, a powerful screening method: S P pTetR-RFP E X Trg-envZ S P E X

Making our BioBricks (IV) From wild type to BioBrick, a powerful screening method: S P pTetR-RFP E X Trg-envZ S P E X EcoRI + PstI digestion & dephosphorilation EcoRI + PstI digestion

Making our BioBricks (IV) From wild type to BioBrick, a powerful screening method: S P pTetR-RFP E X Trg-envZ S P E X EcoRI + PstI digestion & dephosphorilation EcoRI + PstI digestion mix & ligate & transformation

Making our BioBricks (IV) From wild type to BioBrick, a powerful screening method: S P pTetR-RFP E X Trg-envZ S P E X EcoRI + PstI digestion & dephosphorilation EcoRI + PstI digestion mix & ligate & transformation pTetR-RFP trg-envZ

FACS results (I) Promoter pOmpR with GFP as reporter: Negative control: XL1-Blue Positive control: Green fluorophore Set: pOmpR-RBS-GFP-T

FACS results (II) Characterization of pOmpR and pOmpRm. Negative control: XL1-Blue Positive control: Green fluorophore Set: pOmpR-RBS-GFP-T Set: pOmpR-RBS-GFP-T

Our Registry Parts submited by Valencia:

Conclusions We have designed a genetic system consisting on 7 genes, expected to give a graded response according to vanillin concentration. We use the phosphorilation mechanism to connect the membrane receptor with the genetic network, obtaining a cellular biosensor. Our use of a two-regulator promoter allows to integrate signals and reduce the number of genes required for a device. Computational design of a PBP-vanillin receptor.

Acknowledgements EU FP6 NEST SYNBIOCOMM project (financial support). Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales (Universidad Politécnica de Valencia). Instituto de Ciencia Molecular (Universitat de València). E. O’Connor (FACS services). A. Moya and A. Latorre (Cavanilles).

UPV-UV Valencia iGEM 2006

Our team