Www.i95coalition.org I-95 Corridor Coalition: Traffic Monitoring – Beyond Boundaries George Schoener Executive Director ITS Florida March 20, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Advertisements

San Diego I-15 Integrated Corridor Management Project Update Caltrans External Advisory Liaison (CEAL) July 16, 2014.
I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project Project Overview I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project AASHTO SSOM Rick.
I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project 1 I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project Agency Reflections AASHTO SSOM
I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project 1 The Validation Process I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project AASHTO SSOM -
INRIX Data Evaluation I-95 Corridor Coalition – Vehicle Probe Project (VPP) I-95 Corridor Coalition – Vehicle Probe Project (VPP) January 3, 2012.
A Better & Safer US Highway 90 along the Mississippi Gulf Coast By Mike Stokes Intelligent Transportation Systems Manager MDOT – Traffic Engineering.
North Carolina’s Integration of 511 and Workzone Information Jo Ann Oerter State Technology Implementation and Maintenance Engineer North Carolina Department.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
Rick Via Statewide Incident Management Program Manager Office: Leveraging Technology & ITS to Enhance Traffic.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Culture Change: Operations and Surface Transportation Weather ITS America – Executive Session Tuesday, May 3, 2005 Jeffery F. Paniati Associate Administrator.
Advanced Traveler Information System ATIS. What are Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) ? The application of advanced sensor, computer, electronics,
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
October 6, :30 – 11:00. MPM Team Agenda Review of MPM program and team MAP-21 and other updates Mobility performance measures reporting On-going.
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
National VII Architecture – Data Perspective Michael Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office US Department of Transportation TRB 2008 Annual Meeting Session.
Integrated Corridor Analysis Tool (ICAT) William W. Stoeckert I-95 Corridor Coalition.
RCOC’s Real-Time Traffic Web Site Enhancements Ahmad Jawad Road Commission of Oakland County Qingyan (Ken) Yang, Preeti Agarwal, Jeff Manring Iteris Inc.
Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison The Wisconsin DOT.
Arizona 511 Model Deployment Matt Burt – Battelle Talking Operations Webcast Rural Issues: 511 and Traveler Information July 27, 2005.
June 2005 Intelligent Transportation Systems 101 June 21, 2005.
Incorporating Management and Operations and the Congestion Management Process into Metropolitan Transportation Planning FHWA/FTA Webinar June 24, 2008.
Fast Forward Full Speed Ahead Presented at the Joint ITS Georgia / Tennessee Annual Meeting September 25, 2006 by Carla W. Holmes, P.E., PTOE Georgia Department.
Transpo 2012 The Future of Traffic Incident Management, October 30, 2012 Javier Rodriguez, P.E., ITS Operations Engineer Joe Snyder, TMC Manager FDOT District.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
1 -+. Part of the Q-Free Family 2 CORPORATE OVERVIEW.
Outline Project Background ITS Architecture Overview GVMC ITS Architecture Deployment Plan.
July 29, 2009 George Saylor, PE ODOT Senior ITS Engineer.
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII) FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 20, 2008 George Gilhooley.
Smart Cars + Smart Roads Safety, Mobility, Telematics and Operations ITS Oregon Annual Meeting February 1 st, 2005 Jim Wright, American Association Of.
A Model for Improving Operations through Archived Data 2005 ITS America Annual Meeting Mark Carter – SAIC Robert Haas - SAIC May 2 nd, 2005 i Florida’s.
Think Less. Live More Think Less. Live More. How to Accelerate How to AccelerateDeployment SIS 09 Shelley Row, P.E., PTOE Shelley Row.
Enhanced 511: Beyond the Basics Jerry Woods Florida DOT – District 5 iFlorida - Automated Message Generation Based on Travel Times.
Dallas ICM Pioneer Site Stage 1 Lessons Learned Webinar July 24, 2008.
US DOT Planning for Operations Initiative – An Update AASHTO SCOH Annual Meeting June 14-17, 2009 Manchester, NH Rick Backlund – FHWA Office of Operations.
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
Southwest Washington ITS Traffic Data Collection & Analysis: A Tale of 3 Projects Jill MacKay ITE Traffic Simulation Roundtable October 4, 2012.
GUIDANCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF TIM PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT Kelley Klaver Pecheux, PhD U.S. Department of Transportation T3 Webinar Program December 16,
1 Operations Academy Senior Management Program Next Offering September 16-26, 2008.
Georgia’s Intelligent Transportation System
Cellular Probes Kansas City Evaluation Cellular Probe Feasibility Study Cellular Probe Feasibility Study.
Orange County Traffic Signal System Consolidation of Services Study Commission Meeting September 8, 2005.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
Regional Concept of Transportation Operations: The Hampton Roads Experience Presented by: Camelia Ravanbakht, PhD Talking Technology & Transportation (T3)
Draft 2008 Congestion Management Process (CMP) Technical Report Andrew J. Meese COG/TPB Staff TPB Technical Committee June 6, 2008 Item # 8.
Clay Packard, PE ITS GC Software Project Manager Florida Department of Transportation WAZE – FDOT Integration.
1 Operations Academy Senior Management Program Next Offering October 5-15, 2010.
1 Florida Department of Transportation ITS Performance Measures Breakout Session 2 – Elizabeth Birriel, P.E.
1 Update on the Congestion Management Process (CMP) and Related Data Activities Wenjing Pu COG/TPB Staff Travel Management Subcommittee Meeting May 26,
December 16, :00 – 2:45. MPM Team Agenda 1.Review of MPM Program and Team 2.Consensus items document 3. Upcoming activities 4. Discussion.
A case–driven comparison of Freeway Performance Measurement Systems by Shailesh Deshpande.
TRAVEL TIME ANALYSIS Use of Data IN-KY-OH Traffic Incident Management Conference October 9, 2015 Dayton, OH.
1 National Governors Association Roundtable Presentation April 2, 2001 Dr. Christine Johnson Director, ITS Joint Program Office Program Manager, FHWA Operations.
Integration of PASER & GIS WLIA March 4, 2004 Presentation Outline Road Centerlines –Overview –Creating –Attribute –Uses –Paser Geocoding Process –Overview.
For Presentation at 28 th APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting Vancouver, Canada Walter Kulyk Director, Office of Mobility Innovation Federal Transit.
U.S. Department of Education (ED) Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education (OCTAE) Division of Academic and Technical Education (DATE) December.
Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) February 5, 2003.
Keeping the Economy Moving. 2 Our Issues  The worldwide economy is expanding and economic expansion will depend on efficient mobility  Deployments of.
ITS Virginia Annual Conference April 20, 2012 Sensys Networks and the Sensys Networks logo are trademarks of Sensys Networks, Inc. Other product and company.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Transportation Technology: An Inevitable Solution to Climate Change Cascadia Discovery Institute September 4, 2008 Scott Belcher President and CEO Intelligent.
FDOT D5 – Integrated Corridor Management Program
Nevada Next Generation 511 System 9 months to design, test and deploy
Project Overview – Phase 1
Multi-state Corridor Pooled Fund Program
2010 Regional Intelligent Transportation Systems Plan: 2017 Progress Report on Implementation The Florida-Alabama, Okaloosa-Walton, and Bay County Transportation.
Intelligent Transportation Society of Virginia: The Next Generation VDOT’s New 511 Traffic Information Program Transportation Video & Data (TVD) Status.
Florida Transportation Commission FY 2009
Presentation transcript:

I-95 Corridor Coalition: Traffic Monitoring – Beyond Boundaries George Schoener Executive Director ITS Florida March 20, 2008

I-95 Corridor Coalition 2008 Annual Meeting Orlando, FL - May 12 to 14, 2008 l Agency Organization & Operations: ÜFlorida Transportation’s Program uGov. Crist (invited) and Sec. Kopelousos ÜA 21 st Century Organization – FL’s Turnpike Enterprise ÜLong Range Vision for the I-95 Corridor ÜOperations Academy – Training Session ÜTurnpike Traffic Management Center Tour l Innovative Projects: ÜVehicle Probe Data Collection Demonstration ÜOrlando: Commuter Rail ÜCongestion Pricing: Miami HOT Lanes ÜCSX’s Integrated Logistics Center ÜAAA & NASCAR – Safety Initiatives

I-95 Corridor Coalition 2008 Annual Meeting Orlando, FL - May 12 to 14, 2008 l Tolling & Electronic Payment Systems: ÜIntegrated Electronic Payment Services ÜToll Operations Center (Florida SunWatch) Tour l Freight and Ports: ÜEast Coast Ports Summit ÜKennedy Space Center Tour l Incident Management Coordination ÜQuick Clearance Workshop (May 12) ÜCoordinated Incident Management Annual Meeting (May 15-16) Program & Registration Information at

Multi-State Vehicle-Probe Based Traffic Monitoring

“In one of the biggest rollouts yet for technology designed to help motorists avoid traffic jams, the I-95 Corridor Coalition will announce plans today to disseminate real-time data on traffic flows and accidents along the East Coast using a satellite network by Inrix, Inc.” The Wall Street Journal January 29, 2008

Background l Multi-state traffic monitoring project ÜRFP developed starting in 2006 ÜBased on vehicle probe technology ÜIncludes freeways and arterials ÜRFP Released 4/27/2007 l Traffic speed and travel time data service ÜA three year initial project ÜOptions to extend up to an additional 7 years (10 year total) ÜIndividual members can purchase additional coverage, consulting services and extend project duration

Objectives l Advance the timeframe within which regional travel time and speed information is available to the Coalition and its members l Applications Ü511 ÜTravel time on signs ÜSupport of ICAT and ISN ÜSupport management of major incidents ÜProvide data to members for planning, engineering and operations ÜInform members of conditions in neighboring jurisdictions ÜProvide a contract vehicle for expansion of traffic monitoring coverage ÜImproved regional performance measurement

Technical Specs & Details l Travel Time and Speed Data ÜMaximum average absolute error of 10 MPH in each of the following speed ranges: 0-30 MPH, MPH, MPH and > 60 MPH (space-mean-speed) ÜFor flows exceeding 500 VPH ÜMaximum latency of 8 minutes l INRIX … ÜProvides update every five minutes ÜBased primarily on fleet GPS data, though any source data can be integrated ÜINRIX also includes an expected/predicted speed based on historical data

Data Rights and Data Licensing l Vendor Retains Ownership of Data l Coalition and Member Organizations ÜFull Rights for all internal applications ÜAccess to Data Archive ÜExternal apps supported Travel time on CMS, Web, 511 Limits on granularity of data displayed l See section 6.0 of RFP

Timeline l History ÜRFP released : 4/27/2007 ÜReceived proposals : 6/22/07 ÜProposal evaluation : 8/07 – 11/07 ÜRecommendation for award : 11/6/07 ÜContract award : 12/14/07 l Projected Implementation ÜNTP (initial task order) : 2/1/08 ÜCore System Data Available : 7/1/08 ÜAccuracy evaluation complete : 10/1/08

Network Coverage Summary l Initial Coverage Ü~1500 miles of Freeway, ~1000 Arterials ÜSpans New Jersey to North Carolina ÜResults of member survey l Expansion of Coverage ÜStates can utilize contract to expand coverage ÜImplemented through task orders ÜCoordinate through University of Maryland ÜConsulting services also available

Initial Network Coverage

Contact information: l I-95 Corridor Coalition Bill Stoeckert l University of Maryland (COTR) Center for Advanced Trans Technology Stan Young

INRIX Confidential — 14 March 20, 2008 Vehicle Probe Project Rick Schuman, INRIX Vehicle Probe Project Rick Schuman, INRIX

INRIX Confidential — 15 INRIX Overview Initial Task Overview Project Team/Options Thinking About Applications

INRIX Confidential — 16 Deliver Solutions Connected Services Analyze & Process Traffic Fusion Engine Aggregate Content Smart Dust Network Customers & Partners Broadband HD Cellular Data Cellular Voice Satellite Data over Voice Networks RDS

INRIX Confidential — 17 Coverage Real-Time CoverageFuture Real-Time Coverage

INRIX Confidential — 18 Coverage Real-Time CoverageFuture Real-Time Coverage

INRIX Confidential — 19

INRIX Confidential — 20 Data Files Content Real-time Speed, Travel Time, Confidence level Expected Speed, Free Flow Speed Road Segments “TMC” location codes Update Rate/Latency Agencies access ~ every 2 mins Up to date data returned via XML files Monitoring Site Agency Access Only View data in real-time Access to data archive Coverage ~ 1530 “freeway” miles (“fee”) Subject to RFP performance metrics <= 1000 arterial miles (“free”) Arterial test bed

INRIX Confidential — 21 Site centers on State accessing it State dropdown lists coalition States Select state to pan to it Panning and zooming control Select all roads, only freeways or only arterials for display TMC details bubble shown on specific segment click

INRIX Confidential — 22 TMC = “Traffic Message Channel” Tele Atlas and Navteq jointly created and maintain/expand a common set of codes Uniform way of identifying “where” on the major roads in the U.S. Leverages approach first taken in Europe Segments basically are: Freeways/limited access roads: at and between interchanges, boundaries, toll plazas Arterials: between other major arterials, freeways, boundaries

INRIX Confidential — 23 Coverage Core Freeway coverage finalized Core Arterial coverage finalized by end of March Documentation Data Access, Format, Location Referencing Due to Coalition April 1 Possibly a “Webinar” in April or May to review in detail Monitoring Site Requirements completed by end of March Demonstration at I-95 CC Annual Meeting, May

INRIX Confidential — 24

INRIX Confidential — 25 INRIX is Prime Contractor Data Options – Additional source data SpeedInfo DTS Note: agency sensor data always welcomed! Consulting Team PBS&J (lead) Enterinfo (MD minority firm) Open Roads Tele Atlas Berkeley Transportation Systems U. of Washington Transportation Research Center

INRIX Confidential — 26 Maker/operator of low cost radar sensor network Agencies can task us to add sensors to project Optional enhancement Agencies pick how many and where SpeedInfo O&M’s the sensors $200/month per sensor to SpeedInfo All resulting data added to the dust network

INRIX Confidential — 27 Leader in traffic count station consulting, O&M Have statewide contracts for VDOT and FDOT Have converted VDOT count stations to “dual-use” This contract makes VDOT terms available to Coalition/members Options for agencies to build, upgrade count stations to get data to us

INRIX Confidential — 28 RFP Requirements Offerors shall provide consulting services to assist… Consulting Services will be provided solely on an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity basis… Such services may encompass but are not limited to: Integration GIS Web site Analysis Tools PBS&J Lead Consultant Strong in all areas Open Roads Consulting Integration of feeds ATMS and ATIS experience EnterInfo (MD DBE) System integration and testing GIS Website development Berkeley Transportation Systems Decision support systems Traffic forecasting Tele Atlas TMC code assistance UW TRAC Overall traffic data and travel time advisor/ national expert Decision support Performance measures

INRIX Confidential — 29 DATA Coverage Expansion “Core” states adding coverage New states adding coverage Per mile costs: $150 startup, $750 annual Adding Source Data SpeedInfo sensors DTS – add/upgrade count stations Add data to existing coverage Add data with coverage expansion Additional Data Feeds Slowdown Alerts Weather Alerts Incidents CONSULTING Applications planning System design/development Integration GIS Applications Data Analysis Evaluation Etc. If interested, contact Rick, Stan, Bill, Phil or Karen (We will coordinate)

INRIX Confidential — 30 Rick Schuman