Drug Treatment Courts – Basic Principles Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress 2009 Marriott Harbour front Hotel Halifax Nova Scotia October 28-31,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of State Health Services (DSHS) House Human Services Committee August 8, 2006.
Advertisements

Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Public Safety and Domestic Security Policy Committee Policy Committee October 6, 2009.
Harold Pollack, Co-Director. Founded in 2008 to partner with Chicago and other jurisdictions to carry out randomized experiments to learn more about.
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Indianapolis, Indiana Offender Notification Meetings.
What is the term that defines the men and women we supervise? Parolee Probationer Offender Supervised Releasee Restored Citizen Returning Citizen Client.
Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Presentation.
Mentor Courts, Training Curriculum, & Legislation Brian Clubb Project Director National Drug Court Institute.
Drug Treatment Courts: The Canadian Experience
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
Role of Drug Court Defense Attorneys and Prosecutors Presented by Mike Loeffler and Liesl Nelson.
Tribal Juvenile Wellness Courts
Community-Oriented Defense Performance Indicators A Conceptual Overview Michael Rempel Center for Court Innovation Presented at the Community-Oriented.
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change Nov. 10, 2010 Lecture James M. Byrne, Professor.
Introduction to Kenosha County Behavioral Health Courts Kenosha County Division of Aging & Disability Jim Truchan (LMFT,LPC,LCSW) Human Services Manager.
Persistent Offender Project Persistent Offender Project Joint Partnership between Glasgow Addiction Service & Strathclyde Police Funded by Glasgow Community.
REALIGNING RESOURCES TO FUND YOUR DTC CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROFESSIONALS – NATIONAL CONFERENCE BANFF, ALBERTA OCTOBER 24 – 27,
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
EXCELLENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY BUILDING COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS.
National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Dennis Mondoro Strategic Community Development Officer Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Downtown Community Court Canadian Criminal Justice Association CONGRESS 2009 Halifax, Nova Scotia October 30, 2009 Honourable Judge Tom Gove Provincial.
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change James M. Byrne, Professor March 26,2015.
Elmore County Drug and DUI Court
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
The 10 Key Components of Veteran’s Treatment Court Presented by: The Honorable Robert Russell.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
Canada’s Drug Strategy. 2 Purpose Provide an overview of Canada’s renewed National Drug Strategy  Historical context  Impetus for change  Renewed National.
Outcomes of Public Health
Front End Juvenile Justice System Reform Population of Focus Offenders ages 7 through 15 who come into contact with the juvenile justice system through.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Joe Vesowate Assistant Commissioner.
By Jacqueline Gallegos ……to  Chaired by Judge Wells  Invited Executive Level Management  Working toward Local Implementation ◦ Local government.
1 1 Bureau of Justice Assistance: Resources for Tribal Justice Systems October 19, 2012.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
PREPARED BY NPC RESEARCH PORTLAND, OR MAY 2013 Florida Adult Felony Drug Courts Evaluation Results.
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF ADDING THE RECLAIMING FUTURES APPROACH TO JUVENILE TREATMENT DRUG COURTS: RECLAIMING FUTURES/JUVENILE DRUG COURT EVALUATION Josephine.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
A Framework to Guide Full Service Partnerships for Adults Maria Funk, Ph.D. Mental Health Clinical District Chief ASOC Countywide Programs Los Angeles.
4380 SW Macadam Ave., Ste. 530 Portland, OR Informing policy, improving programs Implementation of the Ten Key Components: Variations.
National Association of Drug Court Practitioners Anaheim, CA June 2009.
Adult Drug Courts: The Effect of Structural Differences on Program Retention Rates Natasha Williams, Ph.D., J.D., MPH Post Doctoral Fellow, Morgan State.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Coordinator 101 Rose M. Ewing. Drug Court History First Drug Court was implemented in Miami, Florida in Today, there are approximately 2,500 therapeutic.
RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Bill Hogan, Commissioner Alaska Department of Health and Social Services.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Compliance Promotion Formalizing an Approach to Support Stakeholder Compliance.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
Drug Courts Prepared by Sheri Heffelfinger Montana Legislative Services Division For the Law and Justice Interim Committee February 2008.
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CRIMINAL MENTAL HEALTH PROJECT Miami-Dade County, Florida.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
Drug Treatment Court Funding Program CCJA Conference Halifax, Nova Scotia October 30, 2009.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
1 Center Mission Statements SAMHSA ? CSAT Improving the Health of the Nation by Bringing Effective Alcohol and Drug Treatment to Every Community CMHS Caring.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
 First drug court opened in Miami-Dade, FL in 1989  Goal is to reduce recidivism by using graduated sanctions and incentives combined with treatment.
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
Jail Diversion Programs
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry
Bigger. Bolder..
National Framework Collaborative Police Action on Intimate
Drug Treatment Court.
The View from Ottawa.
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
Role of Drug Court Defense Attorneys and Prosecutors
Problem-Solving Courts
Presentation transcript:

Drug Treatment Courts – Basic Principles Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress 2009 Marriott Harbour front Hotel Halifax Nova Scotia October 28-31, 2009 The Hon. Mr. Justice Kofi Barnes

A drug addict’s poem n A young woman caught in the deep depths of drug addiction and seemingly inextricably embedded in the unrelenting cycle of drug abuse, addiction and crime once wrote a poem about her addiction

A drug addict’s poem n This young woman is a graduate of the Durham Drug Treatment and Mental Health Court. n She called the poem “Breaking the Chains”

Breaking the chains n Facing this battle is accepting the fact n I’m a cocaine addict, addicted to crack n It’s nothing I’m proud of, this I swear n There’s things I’ve done I can hardly bare n You’ll sell your possessions, your life, your soul n Just for another hit, it’s your only goal.

Breaking the chains n I still don’t understand how it got this bad n I’ve lost any sense or self worth I’ve ever had. n I’ve hurt people that I love so dear n It’s been going on now for over a year. n Why I ever tried it I still don’t know. n Why is it so hard to just say no?

The revolving door n It is this perpetual cycle of drug addiction and criminal behavior that Drug Treatment Courts were formed to solve.

The objective n Drug Treatment Courts were established from a desire to find a way to break the link between criminal behavior and crime and in so doing, save the lives of the persons caught in the unrelenting bondage of drug addiction and crime.

The objective n The objective is to do all of this without compromising public safety n The marriage of the criminal justice process and the substance abuse treatment process creates a Drug Treatment Court.

Where it began n The first court was born in Miami, Florida in 1989, since then, Drug Treatment Courts have sprung up all across the globe with the vast majority in the United States.

A new Canadian Experience n Drug Treatment Courts are relatively new in Canada. The first Drug Treatment Court was established by Judge Paul Bentley in Toronto in

We have eight n In 2001, the Drug Treatment Court of Vancouver was established. n Since 2006, additional Drug Treatment Courts have been established in Ottawa, Oshawa, Winnipeg, Regina, Calgary and Edmonton

DTCs work n We have learned some lessons from Canada’s relatively short experience with Drug Treatment Courts. n We have learned that Drug Treatment Courts can save lives,

DTCs work n Drug Treatment Courts can increase public safety, n Help participants reduce or eliminate their drug use, n Help participants reduce or eliminate criminal behavior,

DTCs work n Drug Treatment courts help re- unite participants with their families, n Help participants become productive members of society and… n experience overall improvements in personal well being.

Just ask the graduates n ………just ask Peter Lyle, Paulette Walker and Pamela Spurvey who are graduates of the Toronto and Edmonton Drug Treatment Courts

Just ask the graduates n …just ask the many Drug Treatment Court participants who have successfully completed the Drug Treatment Court programs in Canada’s eight Drug Treatment Courts n ….just look at the some of the evaluation results below……

Benefits 66 Drug Treatment Court Programs in the United States Canada and Australia were reviewed. (Research and Statistics Division, Department of Justice 2006)

Benefits Evaluation Results: In comparison to traditional criminal justice responses, Drug Treatment Courts were 14% more effective in reducing recidivism rates (Research and Statistics Division, Department of Justice 2006)

Benefits n 57% of the participants in drug treatment courts were not charged with a new criminal offence compared to 43% of offenders within the control/comparison group. (Research and Statistics Division, Department of Justice, 2006)

Decrease In Criminal Recidivism* n 95.5% of drug treatment court graduates attribute the cessation of their criminal activity to participation in the program. n 59.5% of participants who were unable to complete the drug treatment court program attribute the reduction of their criminal activity to their participation in the program. * “ Toronto Drug Treatment Court Evaluation Project, Interim Evaluation Report, Executive Summary”, Gliksman, Newton- Taylor, Greenaway, Patra, Samant, December, 2003 p.1

Reduction or elimination of drug use* n 95.8% of drug treatment court graduates attribute their elimination of substance abuse to the drug treatment court program. n 59.5% of drug treatment participants who were unable to complete the program attribute the reduction in their substance abuse to the program. n * “Toronto Drug Treatment Court Evaluation Project, Interim Evaluation Report, Executive Summary, Gliksman, Newton-Taylor, Greenaway, Patra, Samant, December, 2003 p.9

Increase in the well being of participants n 95.7% of Drug Treatment Court graduates say participation in the program improved their lives

Increase in the overall well being of participants* Toronto study continued: n 61.4% of Drug Treatment Court participants who did not complete the program say the program improved their lives. *Toronto Drug Treatment Court Evaluation Project, Interim Evaluation Report, Executive Summary”, Gliksman, Newton- Taylor, Greenaway,,Patra, Samant, December, 2003 p.9

Drug Treatment Courts helps drug addicts stay in treatment* Canadian Study continued: n 95.7% of Drug Treatment Court graduates say participation in the program helped them stay in treatment. n 77.3% of Drug Treatment Court participants who did not complete the program say the program helped them stay in treatment. *“Toronto Drug Treatment Court Evaluation Project, Interim Evaluation Report, Executive Summary”, Gliksman, Newton- Taylor, Greenaway, Patra, Samant, December, 2003 p.9

General Principles n Certain general principles are characteristic of problem solving courts. n The principles are applied in varying degrees depending on the objective and structure of a particular problem solving court.

General Principles n The general principles were complied in relation to Drug Treatment Courts (United Nations Expert Working Group, 2000) n DTCs represent the most formalized application of these principles.

Key DTC Principles – “the list”* n Drug Treatment Courts reflect the following internationally recognized Drug Treatment Court principles, tailored to the needs of individual jurisdictions: n Drug Treatment Courts integrate addiction treatment services with justice system case processing. n * Source: United Nations Expert Working Group

Key DTC Principles – “the list” n Using a non-adversarial approach, prosecution and defence counsel promote public safety while protecting participants’ Charter rights; n Eligible participants are identified early and placed in the Drug Treatment Court program as promptly as possible.

Key DTC Principles – “the list” n Drug Treatment Courts provide access to a continuum of drug, alcohol and other related treatment and rehabilitative services; n Compliance is objectively monitored by frequent substance testing; n A coordinated strategy governs Drug Treatment Court response to participants’ compliance and non- compliance;

Key DTC Principles – “the list” n Swift, certain and consistent sanctions or rewards for non-compliance or compliance; n Ongoing judicial interaction with each Drug Treatment Court participant is essential; n Monitoring and evaluation processes measure the achievement of program goals and gauge effectiveness ;

Key DTC Principles – “the list” n Continuing interdisciplinary education promotes effective Drug Treatment Court planning implementation, and operations; n Forging partnerships among courts, treatment and rehabilitation programs, public agencies and community based organizations generates local support and enhances program effectiveness; n Ongoing case management providing the social support necessary to achieve social reintegration;

Key DTC Principles – “the list” n Appropriate flexibility in adjusting program content, including incentives and sanctions to better achieve program results with particular groups such as women, indigenous people and minority ethnic groups; n In practical terms program content should continually be adjusted to meet the needs of all components of the target population

Lessons learned n We have also learned that successful Drug Treatment Courts do not operate in a vacuum.. n Successful Drug Treatment Courts work in collaboration with various community services and agencies to provided specialized

Lessons learned n ….these specialized services include: drug addiction treatment, psychiatric and medical treatment, job training, housing, employment etc. n It is clear that a holistic rehabilitative approach yields the best long term results

Lessons Learned n We have learned that to be successful, Drug Treatment Court programs must continually be flexible and innovative to ensure that their programs continue to address the needs of their targeted populations..

Lessons learned n We have also learned that effective Drug Treatment Court programs utilize Drug Treatment Court systems that are designed to obtain the best rehabilitative results without compromising public safety

A prerequisite for success n In Canada’s short history with Drug Treatment Courts, we have learned that adhering to the twelve key principles of Drug Treatment Courts is an essential ingredient of a successful Drug Treatment Court program

CADTCP n This is one of the reasons why the Canadian Association of Drug Treatment Court Professionals (CADTCP) was formed. n

CADTCP n The CADTCP is a non profit corporation made of judges, lawyers, substance abuse treatment providers, law enforcement officers, academics etc

DTC Training/Education n The CADTCP forms partnerships with governmental and non governmental organizations to provide ongoing training for Drug Treatment Court professionals and anyone interested in Drug Treatment Courts[1]. [1] To date, the Department of Justice of Canada has been the main government partner in this effort.[1]

DTC Training/Education n The CADTCP provides a forum for the dissemination of technical assistance, using various media such as: n the CADTCP Electronic Bulletin, n the CADTCP National Drug Treatment Court conferences

DTC Training/Education n …and the CADTCP Drug Treatment Court practitioner focused workshops. n We have learned that effective adherence to the key DTC principles is an essential perquisite to a successful DTC program n We have learned that these principles should be tailored to address local circumstances and needs.

Effective Evaluation Processes n We have learned that we need effective and consistent Drug Treatment Court evaluation systems, which are preferably centered on the twelve key principles of Drug Treatment Courts.

Effective Evaluation Processes n ….. These principles are the building blocks of Drug Treatment Courts and are crucial to the success of any Drug Treatment Court.

Effective Evaluation Processes n Developing process and outcome evaluation bench marks, around the key principles of Drug Treatments Courts, is an effective way of measuring the varied and complex forms of participant successes Drug Treatment Court programs produce..

Effective Evaluation Processes n Process evaluations developed in this manner will also allow various Drug Treatment Court programs to evaluate their own processes against the crucial twelve key principles

Evaluation “Think Tank” n To that end, the CADTCP seeks to establish an Academic Review Committee, a” Think Tank “of academics and program evaluation experts, to help it achieve this objective.

A global challenge n Drug Treatment Courts are part of a global effort to find innovative solutions to the revolving door of drug addiction and criminal behavior. n The Drug Treatment Court method seeks to achieve this objective without compromising public safety.

Difficult but achievable n It is a difficult, challenging but exciting journey. n The goal is a challenging but achievable one. n Drug Treatment Courts are one of the innovative approaches that have shown tremendous promise in achieving this objective.