Miranda v. Arizona.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christina Ascolillo.  Who was involved: Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona.  When:  Where: Phoenix, Arizona  Why: Arrested and charged.
Advertisements

Chapter 14, Section 3 THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED
CJ305: Legal Foundations of Criminal Evidence Welcome to Unit 6! Instructor: K. Austin Zimmer, J.D. Make sure you adjust your speakers and audio settings.
ADMISSIONS & CONFESSIONS FOR STREET OFFICERS Portland – October 24, 2013 Bangor – October 30,
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1.7 SIXTH AMENDMENT. Sixth Amendment In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial,
What would society look like if Eric Cartman was a police officer.
The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.
Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
POP QUIZ How did the Courts increase the political power of people in urban areas and those accused of a crime? GIVE AN EXAMPLE.
Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?
BY: KATIE LOSINIECKI Miranda v. Arizona. Facts Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1966 for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old woman After being interrogated.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.
Miranda v Arizona Escobedo v Illinois By Austin Lallier.
Miranda vs. Arizona 1966.
Plain View Doctrine 1.Item is positioned easily in an officer’s sight. 2.Officer is legally in a position to notice. 3.The discovery of the item is inadvertent.
The Courts and the Constitution
Objective 29L Analyze he rights of the accused as set forth in the 4 th,5 th,6 th,8 th, and 14 th Amendments, including but no limited to such cases as.
1 Chapter 12 Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence.
Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.
5th/6th/7th Amendments (Due Process) By: Sam A Chris Koo Ethan Ng Paul Novak.
 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS—aka “Writ of liberty”  Demands the person being held is brought before the court  The officer must show cause to hold the person.
Rights When Arrested Objective 2.01 Recognize types of courts. Business Law.
An Overview of The Mapp, Gideon, Escobedo, and Miranda cases. Copyright 2010; The Nichols Law Firm, PLLC; By Atty. Brendon G. Basiga.
Interrogations and Confessions The Trial Pages
Chapter 1 The Pursuit of Justice Unit #1 Notes Packet.
Rights of the Accused Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Right Against Self Incrimination Right Against Self Incrimination Right to Counsel Right to Counsel.
Civil Liberties.  It is often said in the American justice system that it is better to allow ten guilty people to go free than to let one innocent person.
Miranda v Arizona Rights of the Accused. Citations 384 U.S. 436 (1966) oDocket # 759 oArgued February 28, 1966 o Decider June 13, 1966.
Chapter 22 Rights of the Accused. A. Protections 1.Nothing can protect you against being accused of a crime 2.5 th, 6 th and 8 th Amendments help protect.
CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 4 Seminar Trial options and the Defendants Rights Or I am in trouble, I need a good attorney, fast Who will decide my fate?
Call To Order Complete the following statement: You have the right to remain silent… And take out your homework!!!
Promptbook  During our last class, we discussed Marbury v. Madison and the idea of judicial review. This will be the topic of your essay assignment. 1.In.
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
Ashley Nine March 25, 2010 Period 7.  Poor living immigrant from Mexico living in Arizona.  He was charged with rape and kidnapping.  He was arrested.
Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona
Homework: Read/OL 14.3 for Monday FrontPage: Have 3 worksheets on your desk.
SELF-INCRIMINATION “No person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself[.]” The 5 th Amendment “I plead the Fifth!”
Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.
Criminal Trial Rights Tanner Powell and Eric Tate.
The 5th 6th and 7th Amendments Zone Andrew Kwak..……….Mehek Desai Lena Gavenas………….Sharon Bae Benny Feldmann……..Mariela Carrillo.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 3.
 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.
Essential Questions: What rights are guaranteed to all Americans who are accused of crimes?
The Warren Court ( ) Appointed by Eisenhower Liberal period in court’s history Protected Civil Liberties & First Amendment Rights Malapportionment.
Miranda V. Arizona By: Elise Kloppenburg. Facts of the Case Phoenix, Arizona 1963 Ernesto Miranda, 23 years old Arrested in his home Taken to the police.
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
Supreme Court Cases of the 60s. Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 What happened? - illegal search of home found “obscene materials”. Mapp was convicted. Brought to court.
Miranda: Its Meaning and Application Chapter 6 Basic Criminal Procedures, 3/E by Edward E. Peoples PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle.
The Warren Court and judicial activism “The biggest damn fool mistake I ever made”, Dwight D. Eisenhower on Earl Warren, quoted in 1977 Chief Justice,
 Dates: Debated: Feb. 28, March 1 and 2, 1966 Decided: June 13, 1966  Ruling: The prosecution could not use Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal.
Tracing Our Rights
TUTORIAL #3 FIFTH AMENDMENT &CONFESSIONS. RIGHT NOT TO BE WITNESS AGAINST SELF Cannot be compelled to testify Cannot be compelled to testify At trial.
Unit 4 Seminar. Tell me what the Miranda warning is and what it means to you.
Miranda v. Arizona.
Warm-up Has anyone tried to get you to confess to something you didn’t do? How did this happen? Have you ever confessed to something and then regretted.
By Michael Cleary Period 8 10/3/13 College Business Law Mr. Como
Amendments in ACTION: The Fifth Amendment
Miranda Warnings.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966.
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) The Warren Court.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
October 18, 2018 Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda:
Ch. 3-2 The Fifth Amendment Right to Remain Silent
Miranda Rights You have the right to remain silent…
Amendments in ACTION: The Fifth Amendment
Amendments in ACTION: The Fifth Amendment
Ap u.s. government & politics
5th, 6th, 7th Amendment Rights
Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.
Presentation transcript:

Miranda v. Arizona

Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours

Facts of the Case Miranda confesses to charges of rape and kidnapping. At trial, the prosecutor uses confession to obtain conviction. Miranda is sentenced to 20-30 yrs on each count.

Question Before Court What is the role of the police in protecting the rights of the accused, as guaranteed by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the Constitution?

5th & 6th Amendments Fifth Amendment: no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. . . ." Sixth Amendment: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the assistance of counsel for his defense."

Legal Precedents Fifth Amendment protects individuals from forced confessions. (Brown v Mississippi, 1936) Persons accused of felonies have a fundamental right to an attorney (Gideon v Wainwright, 1963) When an accused person is denied the right to consult with his attorney, his/her Sixth Amendment right to counsel is violated (Escobedo v. Illinois, 1964).

Ruling 5-4 ruling in favor of Miranda Police must ensure that defendants are aware of their rights before they are interrogated in custody.  They have the right to remain silent Anything they say may be used against them in court They have the right to an attorney, either retained by them or appointed by the court They may waive these rights, but they retain the right to ask for an attorney any time during the interrogation Dissenting opinion: Written by Justice Harlan who argued that the new rules did not protect suspects from police brutality. Do you think the Miranda ruling is clear? Is there anything that may be confusing or may lead to future legal questions? What is meant by “in custody?” How about “interrogation”?

How clear is Miranda? Review three case scenarios… Have kids get into groups of 3-4 to review cases and identify main arguments for prosecution and defense. Discuss results.

What does custody mean? Custody means a reasonable person believes they are not free to leave. Miranda ONLY applies when a person is in custody.

When does Miranda not apply? Physical evidence: fingerprints, DNA, handwriting samples, etc. Corporations When a defendant takes the stand in his own defense Immunity (not being prosecuted in exchange for testimony) If statute of limits has expired

Exceptions to Miranda Traffic violations When the police are preserving public safety Spontaneous remarks Routine booking questions Undercover plain clothes officers in jail Miranda—life after the case Upcoming ruling on Miranda case in Florida