Historical Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure: Past, Present, and Future Jeff McLynch State Policy Director Presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FAIR REVENUES FOR VIRGINIA’S FUTURE MEG WIEHE STATE TAX POLICY DIRECTOR INSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY (ITEP) Inform + Engage Policy Summit.
Advertisements

State Fiscal Roundtable National Association of Legislative Fiscal Offices Arturo Pérez Fiscal Affairs Program National Conference of State Legislatures.
Amy Blouin, Executive Director The Missouri Budget Project Andrew Nicholas Center on Budget & Policy Priorities The State.
FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY OF STATE GOVERNMENT Presentation Prepared for the Appropriations Committee and the Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee by the.
Medicaid Opportunities & Challenges Task Force June 26, 2013 Jeff Bechtel, Senior Consultant Summary of Congressional Budget Office Reports and Analysis.
Arkansas Higher Education Financial Condition Report A Report to the Arkansas Higher Education Coordinating Board October 30, 2009.
S TATE B UDGET U PDATE More Big Challenges Ahead October 2014.
Michigan Budget Reform: Why Reform is Needed, and Key Ideas for Reform Timothy J. Bartik Senior Economist W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
Changing Alaska's Oil and Gas Production Taxes: Issues and Consequences Matthew Berman Professor of Economics Institute of Social and Economic Research.
Finance Committee Budget Overview April 26, 2010.
Georgia Budget Crisis: The Hole Gets Deeper Alan Essig Executive Director Georgia Budget & Policy Institute November 13, 2009.
Keeping it Simple: Impact of FAFSA Simplification on Federal and State Student Aid Eligibility SHEEO August 2011.
JLBC Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona October 26, 2007.
History of Arizona’s Individual Income Tax System Presentation to the Joint Task Force on Income Tax Reform August 21, 2013 JLBC.
Copyright©2004 South-Western 12 The Design of the Tax System.
Governor Taft’s Five Year Tax Reform Plan Lt. Governor Bruce Johnson Japan America Society and PricewaterhouseCoopers April 27,
Copyright©2004 South-Western 12 The Design of the Tax System.
Taxes and Spending Chapter 14. SECTION 1 Taxes Three Major Federal Taxes The government collects three major federal taxes: personal income tax, corporate.
FIVE KEY THINGS How Economics Can Inform Tax Policy Design Thomas A. Barthold Joint Committee on Taxation National Tax Association & Office of Tax Policy.
Governor Taft’s Five Year Tax Reform Plan Lt. Governor Bruce Johnson Japan America Society and PricewaterhouseCoopers April 27,
Follow the Money: Declining corporate contribution to the public good Wendy Patton, Senior Associate 4/20/2011.
Purpose of Presentation To submit that equal education and economic opportunity in America cannot be ensured unless we address three underlying issues:
Funding Education for the Long Run Tax Reform in Washington State by Marilyn Watkins Economic Opportunity Institute
The Design of the Tax System
National Center for Higher Education Management Systems 3035 Center Green Drive, Suite 150 Boulder, Colorado Financing in Sync: Aligning the Pieces.
Who Pays Understanding the impact of taxes on the poor in Pennsylvania Sharon Ward Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center July 28, 2006.
The Federal Budget and Social Security. Introduction Key Terms – Budget – A financial plan for the use of money, personnel, and property. – Balanced Budget.
UPSIDE DOWN: The $400 Billion Federal Asset Building Budget Ida Rademacher, CFED Jillien Meier, Annie E. Casey Foundation September 23, 2010.
© 2007 Thomson South-Western. “In this world nothing is certain but death and taxes.”... Benjamin Franklin Taxes paid in Ben Franklin’s.
Michigan Association of Counties Traverse City, September 19 th, 2011.
Legislative Analyst’s Office Presented to: Ryan Woolsey, Fiscal and Policy Analyst CSDA/CWDA Policy Symposium March 4, 2015.
Using BEA`s Gross State Product (GSP) Estimates George K. Downey Understanding Regional Economic Data for Policy and Planning—Dallas, Texas September 8,
Facing our Fiscal Future Mark Neuman-Lee Policy Analyst Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute.
THE CONCORD COALITION Generational Outlook: The Federal Budget Now and in the Future presented by Joshua.
1 Tax Restructuring Proposal FY 2008 Budget Robert J. Kleine State Treasurer February 8, 2007.
NESTOA September 16, 2011 Scott Pattison Executive Director National Association of State Budget Officers 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 642 Washington,
Wyoming State Budget: Using the Past to Inform the Future Prepared by LSO Research Staff October 12, IP001R.
State Fiscal Outlook: Minnesota and the Nation ONE MINNESOTA January 25, 2012 Scott Pattison Executive Director National Association of State Budget Officers.
State Fiscal Outlook NABE December 15, 2009 Scott Pattison Executive Director National Association of State Budget Officers 444 North Capitol Street, NW,
Tax Options for Alaska: Distributional Implications of Major Alternatives October 5, 2002 Matt Gardner Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy 1311 L.
St. Johns County Association Roundtable June 8, 2015 Jesse Dunn Assistant Director OMB St. Johns County BCC Fiscal Year 2016: Separate Challenges Looking.
© 2007 Thomson South-Western. “In this world nothing is certain but death and taxes.”... Benjamin Franklin Taxes paid in Ben Franklin’s.
ISER Understanding Alaska State Finances: POMV and Broad Based Taxes Sharman Haley Associate Professor of Public Policy Institute of Social and Economic.
The Economy and Budget: Minnesota and the Nation Legislative Conference February 10, 2010 Scott Pattison Executive Director National Association of State.
Policy Matters Ohio Instructions for the Super Committee: a balanced approach to debt reduction That does not increase poverty.
GFOAZ Conference Public & Budget Session Prepared by: Julie A. Ghetti, MPA, CPA August 12, 2011.
Middle Management Scott Pattison Executive Director NASBO April 15, 2015.
Chapter 12 The Design of the Tax System. Objectives 2.) Understand the efficiency cost of taxation. 3.) Learn the criteria for evaluating the equity of.
State Fiscal Outlook NAMM Washington, DC May 11, 2010 Brian Sigritz Director of State Fiscal Studies National Association of State Budget Officers 444.
LAO Perspectives on the State’s Revenue Structure Legislative Analyst’s Office Presented to: Commission on the 21 st Century Economy January.
WASA 2014 Superintendent Workshop The McCleary Decision: Implications for State Revenue May 6, 2014 Dr. Bill Keim WASA Executive Director.
The Design of the Tax System Chapter 12. “ In this world nothing is certain but death and taxes. ”... Benjamin Franklin Taxes paid.
Michigan League for Human Services 1115 South Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 202, Lansing, MI (517) Fax: (517) Web site:
State Fiscal Outlook New England Board of Higher Education Boston, MA December 5, 2008 Brian Sigritz Staff Associate National Association of State Budget.
New Jersey School Boards Association – Serving Local Boards of Education Since 1914 State Budget Overview Presented by: Michael Vrancik NJSBA Director.
An Optimal Economic Growth Strategy for Alabama Dr. Sam Addy Associate Dean for Economic Development Outreach & Senior Research Economist Montgomery, AlabamaJanuary.
Texas Revenues IV April 26, The term tax incidence focuses our attention on the individuals and groups that actually bear the burden of a tax. Tax.
State of the States Brian Sigritz Director of State Fiscal Studies NASBO NASACT Middle Management April 12, 2016.
ESNA Economic Outlook 2016: Alberta’s Fiscal and Environmental Challenges “It could be worse…..” Mike Percy Ph.D. December 3,
“The Big Tax Swap, 2008 to 2016” Who has benefited? Who has paid? And what we can do about it. Statewide Assembly May 2 nd, 2016.
12 The Design of the Tax System. “In this world nothing is certain but death and taxes.”... Benjamin Franklin Taxes paid in Ben Franklin’s.
Fiscal and Economic Issues Discussion Group
4th Annual Budget Breakfast, 23 February 2017 presented by
The Design of the Tax System
ARIZONA STATE GOVERNMENT REVENUE January 2017
A SHARED OPPORTUNITY AGENDA
NWSOFA Fiscal & Economic Issues
The Big Picture about Kids Texas Center for the Judiciary F
Taxes and Fiscal Policy
May Revision CSAC.
Presentation transcript:

Historical Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure: Past, Present, and Future Jeff McLynch State Policy Director Presentation to the AEA Education and the Economy Summit August 24, 2009

What is past is prologue…

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure Overview Introduction The Present Arizona’s tax structure is both inadequate and inequitable. The Past Changes in tax policy over the past two decades have exacerbated both of these conditions. The Future “Whereof what’s past is prologue; what to come, in yours and my discharge”

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure Introduction – Hello, My Name is ITEP  Founded in 1980  Based in Washington, DC  Research focuses primarily on state tax issues, with an emphasis on tax fairness and adequacy  In the past five years, conducted studies of state tax systems in KY, LA, MD, MS, IN, AR, IL, MO, and NY  Conducted hundreds of smaller-scale tax analyses in over 40 states  In conjunction with Citizens for Tax Justice, publishes a weekly newsletter, the Tax Justice Digest, that reviews the latest developments in federal and state tax policy

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure Introduction – Key Concepts in Tax Incidence Taxes may be progressive, proportional, or regressive. For instance:

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Present: AZ’s tax structure is inadequate. Arizona’s revenue shortfalls arise from both current economic conditions… JLBC – Monthly Fiscal Highlights – July 2009 “…the largest dollar and percentage decline in revenues in records going back to World War II…” Change, FY08 to FY09Lowest point since … Personal Income Tax–24.6%FY 2004 Corporate Income Tax–24.5%FY 2004 Sales Tax–13.7%FY 2005 TOTAL COLLECTIONS–18.4%FY 2005

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Present: AZ’s tax structure is inadequate. Arizona’s revenue shortfalls arise from both current economic conditions… Source: Rockefeller Institute CHANGE IN STATE TAX COLLECTIONS Arizona & United States, 1 st qtr 2008 v. 1 st qtr 2009

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Present: AZ’s tax structure is inadequate. Arizona’s revenue shortfalls arise from both current economic conditions… Source: Rockefeller Institute

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Present: AZ’s tax structure is inadequate. Arizona’s revenue shortfalls arise from both current economic conditions… Source: Joint Legislative Budget Committee, March 2009

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Present: AZ’s tax structure is inadequate. Arizona’s revenue shortfalls arise from both current economic conditions … and from long-term policy choices. STATE & LOCAL TAXES AS A SHARE OF PERSONAL INCOME Arizona & United States, FY 1987 – FY 2006 Source: Census Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Present: AZ’s tax structure is inadequate. Arizona’s revenue shortfalls arise from both current economic conditions … and from long-term policy choices. STATE & LOCAL TAXES AS A SHARE OF PERSONAL INCOME – FY06 ■ >12% of income ■ 11.5% to 12% ■ 10.75% to 11.5% ■ >10.25% to 10.75% ■ <10.25% Source: Census Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Present: AZ’s tax structure is inequitable. Arizona’s tax structure requires low- and moderate-income individuals and families to devote much larger shares of their incomes to taxes than the affluent. ■ TOTAL (net offset) ■ Sales & excise taxes ■ Property taxes ■ Income taxes ■ Federal offset

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Present: AZ’s tax structure is inequitable. Arizona’s tax structure requires low- and moderate-income individuals and families to devote much larger shares of their incomes to taxes than the affluent. The poorest fifth of Arizonans – individuals and families with incomes of less than $20,000 in 2007 – pay 12.3 percent of their incomes in taxes on average (after taking the “federal offset” into account). Middle-income residents – whose incomes range from $32,000 to $50,000 – pay 9.4 percent on average. The wealthiest 1 percent of Arizonans – taxpayers whose average incomes reached nearly $1.5 million in 2007 – pay 4.9 percent on average. In short, relative to their incomes, the most affluent Arizona residents pay less than half as much as poor and middle-income residents.

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Present: AZ’s tax structure is inequitable. Arizona has one of the least equitable tax structures in the nation.

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Present: AZ’s tax structure is inequitable. Arizona places a greater responsibility for funding public services on low-income residents than any other state in the region. TAXES IN THE SOUTHWEST

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Present: AZ’s tax structure is inequitable. The regressive nature of AZ’s tax structure is attributable to the mix of taxes used … Source: Census Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Present: AZ’s tax structure is inequitable. The regressive nature of AZ’s tax structure is attributable to the mix of taxes used …

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Present: AZ’s tax structure is inequitable. The regressive nature of AZ’s tax structure is attributable to the mix of taxes used … and to the design of those taxes.

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Past: Changes in tax policy have made AZ’s tax structure less fair over time.  JLBC lists over 230 changes in tax policy (affecting General Fund Revenue) enacted by the Legislature between 1988 and Of these:  Approximately 1/4 were tax increases  Roughly even split between progressive and regressive revenue sources, but half of income tax changes due to federal conformity.  Some of most notable increases of past 2 decades – the sales tax rate increase of 2000 and the cigarette tax increases of 2003 and 2006 – not included, as they don’t affect general fund revenue.  Roughly 3/4 were tax cuts  Again, a roughly even split between progressive and regressive sources, but cuts in progressive revenue sources considerably larger.  The magnitude of tax cuts catalogued by the JLBC is much greater than the size of tax increases. Of the 21 fiscal years included in the JLBC report, 15 saw a reduction in tax revenue due to prior year changes.

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Past: Changes in tax policy have made AZ’s tax structure less fair over time.

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Future: For legislative leadership, what is past is more than prologue. INDIVIDUAL IMPACT OF TAX ELEMENTS IN ‘JULY 31’ BUDGET PLAN assumes all changes fully implemented in 2009

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Future: For legislative leadership, what is past is more than prologue. COMBINED IMPACT OF TAX ELEMENTS IN ‘JULY 31’ BUDGET PLAN assumes all changes fully implemented in 2009

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Future: For legislative leadership, what is past is more than prologue. TEMPORARY VS. PERMANENT TAX ELEMENTS IN ‘JULY 31’ BUDGET PLAN assumes all changes fully implemented in 2009

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Future: For legislative leadership, what is past is more than prologue. GENERAL FUND BALANCE UNDER ‘JULY 31’ BUDGET PLAN Source: Joint Legislative Budget Committee, August 2009

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Future: For legislative leadership, what is past is more than prologue. AVERAGE TAX CUT $8,000 (0.7% of income)

What to come, in yours and my discharge …

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Future: What to come? In your discharge… STATE AND LOCAL TAXES IN ARIZONA – FY 2006 Source: US Census Bureau

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Future: What to come? In your discharge… IMPACT OF REPEALING ALL ITEMIZED DEDUCTONS – TY 2009 Proposals to broaden the income tax base can be structured to improve tax fairness. Eliminating all itemized deductions would affect less than 40% of AZ taxpayers, but would generate close to $700 million.

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Future: What to come? In your discharge… The proposed tax increase would generate close to a billion dollars per year when fully implemented; options for generating the same amount of revenue in a progressive fashion are available.

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Future: What to come? In your discharge… Tax incentives, like appropriations, should be continuously evaluated to ensure they are achieving their intended goals in a cost-effective manner. This is especially true during difficult fiscal times. ■ up to $25,000 ■ $25,000 to $50,000 ■ $50,000 to $100,000 ■ $100,000 to $200,000 ■ over $200,000 Source: Office of Economic Research & Analysis, ADOR; all data are for TY 2003; dollar amounts are federal adjusted gross incomes

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure The Future: What to come? In your discharge… While it would not necessarily improve tax equity, taxing additional services would generate significant new revenue and ensure the long- term sustainability of the sales tax. Source: Federation of Tax Administrators

Perspective on Arizona’s Tax Structure Review  At present, Arizona’s tax structure is among the most regressive in the nation, due to a heavy reliance on sales & excise taxes and to the structure of the income tax.  This situation is the result of over 170 tax cuts – both large and small – enacted over the past two decades.  Looking to the future, policymakers seem intent on repeating the past, but options for improving both the equity and adequacy of Arizona’s tax system are available.