LibQUAL+ The Arizona State University Libraries’ Experience.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Using LibQUAL+ to Develop Accountability with Key Stakeholders Raynna Bowlby Based upon presentation made w/co-presenter Dan O’Mahony (Brown U. Library)

Advertisements

The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.

the UNCG University Libraries ASERL Meeting November 13, 2012 Atlanta, GA Kathryn Crowe Associate Dean for Public Services

Qatar University Library Presented by Kira Litvin Coordinator, Library Planning & Assessment.

Assessing Library Contributions to University Outcomes 9th Northumbria International Conference University of York, England Joe Matthews August 2011.

Bound for Disappointment Faculty and Journals at Research Institutions Jim Self University of Virginia Library USA 7 th Northumbria Conference Spier, South.

Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010

Using Assessment Data to Improve Library Services Christopher Stewart Dean of Libraries, Illinois Institute of Technology Charles Uth, Head of Collection.

Colorado State University Libraries Where we are, Where we're going

Kent State University LIBRARIES and MEDIA SERVICES Priorities Presentation Wednesday, March 17, 2004 Priorities Presentation Wednesday, March 17, 2004.

Two Decades of User Surveys The Experience of Two Research Libraries from 1992 to 2011 Jim Self, University of Virginia Steve Hiller, University of Washington.

2006 LibQUAL+ Survey Results Information Services Concept Review on Assessment November 9, 2006.

NMSU Library: Welcome Graduate Assistants!. What We’ll Cover Physical Library Accessing Resources Research and Teaching Support Questions.

1 Wymagania informacyjne uzytkownikow bibliotek akademickich 21 wieku Maria Anna Jankowska University of Idaho Library Biblioteki XXI wieku. Czy przetrwamy?

Web-scale discovery services: searching the library in the era of Google Katie Dunn Technology & Metadata Librarian Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Slides:

E-Resources in Your Library MnPALS User Group Meeting October 23, 2012.

TAMU 2012 Enrollment Undergrads40,100 Graduates9,600 Professional527 Faculty3,810 TAMU HSC 2012 Enrollment Undergrads206 Graduates959 Professional1,121.

LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively 23 rd June 2008 Dr Darien Rossiter.

1 The Gateway to Information: Simplifying Access to Library Resources Fred Roecker Head Instruction The Ohio State University Libraries

Collections Support at UMKC Libraries Faculty Library Advisory Committee October 15, 2013.

23-24 February 2006 Sharing Best Practices among Universities - Thessaloniki, Greece 1 UOM Library Sharing Best Practices Anna Fragkou UNIVERSITY OF MACEDONIA.

LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.

Focus on Readers Service for Education How to Use Library Services and Resources Effectively Sophier Su USST Library

UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2008 LIBQUAL RESULTS. Number of Respondents UAAAPU Undergraduate1,388 Graduate267 Faculty233 Library Staff33 Staff157 Total2,078.

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY LibQUAL+ ® Training Practical Lessons Drawn From Ten Years of Library Service Quality in a Research Library ALA Boston Midwinter 2010.

 Large-scale, web-based, user-centered assessment of library service effectiveness across multiple universities.  Co-developed by ARL and Texas A&M University,

New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.

Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.

LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.

Collection Map Frank R. Walkup Library John Muir High School Pasadena, California Submitted for review October, 2011.

Transitions: From High School to Academic Libraries Presented by: Randy Williams, Bishop Strachan School Mark Bryant, Humber College Cecile Farnum, Ryerson.

January 22, 2007 ALA Midwinter, Seattle Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College LibQUAL+ Results: What Now? Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.

1 How to Make 19 Academic Libraries Work as One MERLOT International Conference Nashville, TN July 25-28, 2005 Tennessee Board of Regents Virtual Library.

Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.

LIBQUAL+ and Library Summit: The Clemson Experience.

ALL SATISFACTION IS LOCAL: USING A TACTICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL TO GAUGE STUDENT SATISFACTION AND AS THE BASIS FOR ON-THE-FLY PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS U sing a.

UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2011 LIBQUAL RESULTS APU Faculty Assembly – February 15, 2012.

Using LibQUAL+™ Results Observations from ARL Program “Making Library Assessment Work” Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries ARL Visiting Program.

Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.

2008 Wisconsin County Health Rankings Online Webinar Available November 14, 2008 Kyla Taylor.

LibQUAL+ and the Library Summit Concept London February 3, 2006 Fred Heath Vice Provost and Director, University of Texas Libraries

LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library ALA Conference Washington DC June 25, 2007.

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY LibQUAL+ ® Training Practical Lessons Drawn From Ten Years of Library Service Quality in a Research Library ALA Denver Midwinter 2009.

June 25, 2007 ALA Washington, DC Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College Using Your LibQUAL+ Results Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.

Preserving our Past: Creating our Future A Proposal Group #4.

User Needs Assessment to Support Collection Management Decisions Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries For ALCTS-CMDS.

Columbia University. Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions.

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES Colleen Cook, Texas A&M University Martha Kyrillidou, Association of Research Libraries.

Persuasive Proposals for Increasing Your Electronic Resources and Services Virginia Cairns Jan Lewis ERIL conference Feb. 23, 2007.

Library Satisfaction Survey Results Spring 2008 LibQUAL Survey Analysis User Focus Team (Sharon, Mickey, Joyce, Joan C., Paula, Edith, Mark) Sidney Silverman.

Mandatory Fee: Library Tuition and Fee Proposal Committee Presentations For the Academic Years and

General information Literacy Developments June 24, 2008 Grace F. Bulaong Library Director New Jersey City University.

LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,

GPO National Plan Discussion Arlene Weible Oregon Regional Coordinator Oregon State Library August 7, 2014.

A Coded Analysis of Student Feedback and Implications for Bibliographic Instruction Programs U N I V E S I T Y L I B R A R I E S Tina Budzise-Weaver &

LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.

Monmouth University LibQUAL Survey Results Lead to Improvements in Library Services October 31, 2007 Eleonora Dubicki

Using LibQUAL+ to Rethink Public Services June 2003.

NU LIBRARY TEAM REPORT Contents Organizational Work Collection Development Electronic Resources Library Catalog Digitization Reference Services.

Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.

A half decade of partnership and the love affair continues….. LibQual+: A Total Market Survey with 22 Items and a Box ALA Midwinter Meeting January 17,

Data Collection and Beyond Assessment at the U.Va. Library

Library Assessment Tools & Technology

The old LIS Library.

Reading Radar Charts.

Using the LibQUAL+ Survey to Inform Strategic Planning

Knowing Our Users Deriving Value from the Ithaka S+R Local Surveys at the University of Missouri Jeannette E. Pierce Associate University Librarian for.

LibQual+ Survey Results 2002

Collecting Library Statistics for Management Decision-making

Laura Horne-Popp Social Sciences & Humanities Librarian

Presentation transcript:

LibQUAL+ The Arizona State University Libraries’ Experience

What Will Be Covered? Overview – Arizona State University (ASU) – ASU Libraries LibQUAL+ results spanning five years What we learned

Arizona State University (ASU) Comprehensive public research university – Four campuses in metropolitan Phoenix – >60,000 students Tempe campus – ~52,000 students – ~2,300 instructional faculty

ASU Libraries Tempe campus – Hayden Library Social Sciences, Humanities, Special Collections – Noble Science and Engineering Library – Music Library – Architecture and Environmental Design Library

Library Facts Total Volumes: 4,287,919 Databases: 319 E-Journals: 32,791 E-Books: 281,588

Library Facts Website: 2,693,155 Virtual Visits Building Use: 2,037,390 In-Person Visits Reference: 141,087 Instruction: – # Classes: 994 – # Attendees: 24,391 Circulation: 1,107,316

Why LibQUAL+? Assess impact and usefulness of library services Collect and interpret user feedback over time Make comparable assessments with peer institutions

Overall Satisfaction with Library

Information Literacy Mean Scores

LibQUAL+ Dimensions Library as Place Information Control Affect of Service

Undergrad Students Trend for Information Control

Graduate Students Trend for Information Control

Faculty Trend for Information Control

Information Control Direct Feedback from Users Library Student Advisory Council – Google much easier to use than online catalog and database interfaces – Market services Faculty Focus Group – Amazon.com interface is preferred over online catalog and database interfaces – Market services

Service Adequacy: Peer Comparison

Service Superiority: Peer Comparison

What did we learn? Improved in Information Literacy Need to put resources into improving in Information Control Need to develop a marketing plan for the library Surpass peers and LibQUAL+average at Library as Place

Conclusion As we map our future, we must measure our overall performance Each library employee contributes to the overall performance Results used to improve and prioritize services Goal is to meet end user’s desired level of service