NCAMPO Meeting May 2012. 2 SMZ’s- 2577 MPO Areas-Aggregated Zones RPO Areas-Census Blocks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Using the Parkride2.mac Macro to Model Park and Ride Demand in the Puget Sound Region 22 nd International Emme Users Conference September 15-16, 2011,
SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES ATHENS 2004 ATTIKO METRO S.A. Anna Anastasaki.
July 22, Model Objectives Forecast ADT on the Rural State Highway System Autos & Trucks Autos & Trucks Arterial System Arterial System Complement,
Highways and Sprawl in North Carolina David T. Hartgen Professor of Transportation Studies UNC Charlotte A Report for the John.
Prepared for: The 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5-9, 2013 Columbus, Ohio Phillip J. Mescher, AICP, Iowa Department.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.
A Toll Choice Probability Model Application to Examine Travel Demand at Express and Electronic Toll Lanes in Maryland.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Development of a New Commercial Vehicle Travel Model for Triangle Region 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference, Columbus, Ohio May 7, 2013 Bing Mei.
TRB Planning Applications Conference Columbus, OH May 7, 2013 ANALYZING LONG-DISTANCE TRUCK TRAVEL FOR STATEWIDE FREIGHT PLANNING IN OHIO Presented by:
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Transportation Planning Modeling with EMME/2. Interconnectedness.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
About this presentation Target audience: Prepared for Dr. Mitsuru Saito’s BYU graduate level class. Feb Please contact Mike Brown at
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
GEOG 111/211A Transportation Planning UTPS (Review from last time) Urban Transportation Planning System –Also known as the Four - Step Process –A methodology.
Norman W. Garrick CTUP. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers.
Trip Generation Modeling
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
Using Aggregated Federal Data and Local Shipping Data to Model Freight Alabama Michael Anderson Civil Engineering The University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Transportation Planning and Traffic Estimation CE 453 Lecture 5.
18 May 2015 Kelly J. Clifton, PhD * Patrick A. Singleton * Christopher D. Muhs * Robert J. Schneider, PhD † * Portland State Univ. † Univ. Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Development of the Idaho STDM Trip Matrices Using Cell Phone OD Data
Modelling Intermediate Stops Presented at 15 th Applications Conference Atlantic CityMay 2015 William G. Allen, Jr., PE Consultant, Windsor, SC Anna Hayes.
Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG Presentation For IOWA TMIP Peer Review March 30 – April 1, 2004.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Hybrid Freight Model from Truck Travel.
The Development of a Direct Demand Non-Home Based Model for Urban Rail Travel Rhett Fussell, PE –PB Americas Bill Davidson-PB Americas Joel Freedman-PB.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Trip Generation Review and Recommendations 1 presented to MTF Model Advancement Committee presented by Ken Kaltenbach The Corradino Group November 9, 2009.
Use of Establishment Surveys to Estimate Non Resident Travel in Urban Areas Chris Simek Ed Hard David Pearson Stacey Bricka Stella Nepal Columbus, Ohio.
In this presentation, we will: 1.Describe each step the Compass model and show comparable steps in the IRM. Compass = What,, Where, How IRM= Who, What,
 Focus Model Application to Colfax Ave  Initial Contact with FTA  Evaluation Process and Results  Next Steps.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
Utilizing Advanced Practice Methods to Improve Travel Model Resolution and Address Sustainability Bhupendra Patel, Ph.D., Senior Transportation Modeler.
September, 2012An Activity Based Model for a Regional City1.
May 20, 2015 Estimation of Destination Choice Models using Small Sample Sizes and Cellular Phone Data Roberto O. Miquel Chaitanya Paleti Tae-Gyu Kim, Ph.D.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
AKA: How does Geography affect history?.  North Carolina has 3 different geographic regions.  The mountain(s) region covers 12% of the state.  The.
Travel Demand Modeling Experience Bellevue-Kirkland-Redmond Travel Demand Modeling Experience Jin Ren, P.E. City of Bellevue, Washington, USA October 19,
Tour-Based Model for a Small Area Presented at 11 th Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno, NV May 2011 William G. Allen, Jr., PE Consultant.
Income-Based Work Trip Stratification within the Puget Sound Regional Council Travel Model Framework 20 th International Emme Users’ Conference Montreal,
Regions of NC.
ECIA A Regional Response to Local needs Travel Demand Forecasting Model for DMATS Area Chandra Ravada.
Tri-level freight modeling: A simulation of trucks going near and far Rolf Moeckel Parsons Brinckerhoff Sabya Mishra University of Maryland TRB Planning.
FHWA TRAVELER ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK Auto, Air, and Rail Tables March 18, 2013 Krishnan Viswanathan, CDM Smith Colin Smith, RSG Bhargava Sana, RSG.
Lecture 4 Four transport modelling stages with emphasis on public transport (hands on training) Dr. Muhammad Adnan.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Trip Generation CE 451/551 Grad students … need to discuss “projects” at end of class.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks.
Preliminary Evaluation of Cellular Origin- Destination Data as a Basis for Forecasting Non-Resident Travel 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Generation CE331 Transportation Engineering.
War of the Forecasts: Model vs Project Dan Thomas, P.E. NCDOT - Transportation Planning Branch March 6, 2008 Tennessee Model Users Group.
MPO DEMOGRAPHICS Public Meetings June 26 & 27, 2006 North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department.
Validating Trip Distribution using GPS Data
TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL UPDATE
Johnson City MPO Travel Demand Model
Transportation Demand Analysis
Trip Distribution Review and Recommendations
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Trip Generation I Meeghat Habibian Transportation Demand Analysis
Model Work Trips Appropriately Based on Travel Behavior and Change Pattern Differences 2016HTS Characteristics and Changes vs. 2006HTS 16th TRB National.
Presentation transcript:

NCAMPO Meeting May 2012

2 SMZ’s MPO Areas-Aggregated Zones RPO Areas-Census Blocks

3 317 NMZs Total of 2894 NCSTM Zones

Links 162K Total 102K in NC Centroid Connectors-10,000

5 Population Household Population Households Group Quarters Ave HH Income Workers Military Group Quarters Population Household Population Households Group Quarters Ave HH Income Workers Military Group Quarters 2010 Census Data Woods & Poole Adjustments

NCSTM Employment 6 % of Employment Industrial14.22% High Industrial9.33% Retail13.04% High Retail10.83% Service22.68% Office13.88% Gov't6.93% Education7.11% Hospital1.97% Sources INFOUSA Woods & Poole Employment Security Commission

7 National Model Statewide Model Socio-Economic Data Trip Generation Destination Choice Mode Choice Trip Generation Trip Distribution Multi-class Assignment Disaggregation Trucks Trips Person Trips Flow Extraction EI/IE/ EE trips II trips Trip Extraction NHTS Long- Distance NHTS Add-on Sample NC Triangle truck survey FAF3 Disaggregation

8

Classification Four Household Sizes – 1,2,3,4+ Five Income ClassificationsClassifications < $20,000 $20,000-$35,000 $35,000-$55,000 $55,000-$80,000 >$80,000 Three Area Types- – Urban, Suburban, Rural Three North Carolina RegionsRegions 9

Five Trip Purposes Defined – Home-Based Work (by five income classes) – Home-Based Other – Home-Based Shop – Non-Home Based (places other than work) – Non-Home Based Work (from Work sites) 11

12 % Productions of Total - all purposes EstimatedObserved HBO39%40% HBS15%14% HBW17% NHB17% NHBW12%11% Estimate/Observed HBWTotalHBOHBSNHBAWNHBSUM Sum

13 NCSTM Productions and Attractions by MPO Actual Urban Model Values NCSTM vs Urban Model MPOProductionsHHsP's /HHProductionsP's/HHProd% Diff Asheville 1,541, ,577, , % Fayetteville 1,216, ,066, , % Goldsboro 292, , , % Greenville 480, , , % Hickory 1,045, NA Jacksonville 427, , , % Metrolina 7,063, ,496, , % Rocky Mount 298, , , % Triad 4,151, ,020, , % Triangle 6,002, ,003, % Wilmington 897, , , %

Region HBWHBOHBSNHBAWNHBSUM 1Eastern Piedmont Mountains

hbw1 = (1*[Retail Employees] *[High Retail Employees] *[Office Employees] *[Service Employees] *[Government Employees] *[Education Employees] *[Hospital Employees] *[Military Employees] *[Industrial Employees] *[High Industrial Employees]) * exp( *GeneralizedCost+ -0.1*Distance *Distance 2 )) +DistanceK

17 Survey Avg DistanceModel Avg DistanceCoincidence Index

18 Survey Avg DistanceModel Avg DistanceCoincidence Index

20 EI IE II EE

Data collected by IEM

Freight flows between 3,241 counties FAF 3 data County Employment Freight flows NCSTM Zones NC Zonal Employment Payload factors Truck trip O/D matrix 25 Empty-Truck Rate Truck trip O/D matrix with empty trucks

26 Distribution Center Truck Intermodal Facility Air/Rail/Water

27 Data collected by IEM Port of Morehead City Port of Wilmington RDU GSO CLT

2/1/2 012 NCSTM-TRC Meeting 29 TRUCKCLASSEMPLOYMENT TYPEGTR TRIP RATEQRFM TRIP RATEDIFFERENCE AUTOGov0.143 (474) % High Industrial0.381 (423) % Industrial0.105 (114) % Office0.168 (396) % Retail0.143 (757) % Service0.486 (998) % SUTGov0.105 (325) % High Industrial0.272 (304) % Industrial0.158 (148) % Office0.477 (187) % Retail0.112 (559) % Service0.379 (780) % MUTIndustrial0.272 (320) % Service0.411 (266) %

GTR Total Trucks QRFM Total Trucks

In urban regions, transit share is based on MPO/Regional models. Activity density is used to allocate transit share to NCSTM zones Between urban areas, r 3 logit models mode choice explicitly.

Fayetteville Raleigh Charlotte Winston- Salem Greensboro

Person Trip AutoTransit Drive- Alone HOV2HOV3HOV4+BusRailAir

Model applied for long-distance trips > 50 miles Transit access is assumed to be drive-access only (Who walks to the airport?) Variables that drive r 3 logit: AutoTransit Auto travel timeAuto access travel timeAuto egress travel time Auto travel distance Boarding time (incl. security check) Transit fare Auto operating costsTransit travel time Auto egress timeNumber of transfers Parking cost (currently set to 0) Deboarding time (incl. baggage claim)

5/3/ Wilmington 2Fay North 3Morehead City 4Raleigh East 595 Upper 695 Lower 7Outer Banks 8Central EW Upper 9Triad West 10Asheville East 11Charlotte North 12NC Upper 77/52 13Triad North 14Charlotte South 15Triad South

40 1Wilmington 2Fay North 3Morehead City 4Raleigh East 595 Upper 695 Lower 7Outer Banks 8Central EW Upper 9Triad West 10Asheville East 11Charlotte North 12NC Upper 77/52 13Triad North 14Charlotte South 15Triad South

6 Models Ohio Oregon Maryland

45 Calibration Adjustments Mid-June Future Year Coding End of summer

47 2/1/2 012 Can Run All Steps, Stages (groups of steps), or Individual Steps

48 2/1/2 012 “Reports” button for each step provides results from each step – such as district- district trips or VMT by County

49 2/1/2 012 District-District Home- Based Shopping Trips Productions and Attractions summed to MPO Model Areas

50 2/1/2 012 Vehicle-Miles Traveled, Vehicle-Hours Traveled, and other information by Selected Summary Levels COUNTYFAC_TYPEVMTVHTAve V/C 00112,105,50764, ,49918, ,558,16750, ,06923, , , ,1732, ,77920, ,21035, ,47110, , ,6477, ,6898, ,53625, ,1802, ,46730, ,46110, ,021,81330, , ,9114, ,28911, ,024,50648, ,9376,

51 2/1/2 012