Miranda v Arizona Escobedo v Illinois By Austin Lallier.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supreme Court Case Review The Rights of the Accused
Advertisements

Click on the arrow to begin the quiz.. Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) Texas v. Johnson (1989) Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Katz v. United.
Christina Ascolillo.  Who was involved: Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona.  When:  Where: Phoenix, Arizona  Why: Arrested and charged.
The Warren Court Jill St. Laurent Carley Denis. Earl Warren 14 th Chief Justice Very Liberal vs Conservative Appointed by Eisenhower Racial Equality.
What would society look like if Eric Cartman was a police officer.
The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.
Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco
Rights of the Accused th – Amendment Presumption of innocence Presumption of innocence Manzanar –one of our big failings Reasonable doubt Reasonable.
Do you know your civil rights?
By: Megan Devin Political Science December 4, 2014.
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?
Miranda v. Arizona.
BY: KATIE LOSINIECKI Miranda v. Arizona. Facts Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1966 for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old woman After being interrogated.
1966 Chief Justice Warren’s handwritten notes about the case.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.
Miranda vs. Arizona 1966.
Daniel Moody PD. 3 3/25/10 Miranda VS. Arizona 1966.
Cases and Terms – Chapter 8 – Rights of the Accused Module 8 Amendments 4 -7.
Objective 29L Analyze he rights of the accused as set forth in the 4 th,5 th,6 th,8 th, and 14 th Amendments, including but no limited to such cases as.
Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.
Objective 29l-Analyze the rights of the accused Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois.
By: Holden Luce.  Mapp was accused of harboring a criminal involved in a bombing case.  The Officers confronted Mapp at her home and demanded that she.
{ Criminal Trial Procedure What happens when the police arrest a criminal suspect?
Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F Government 4 th Hour Mr. Baker.
An Overview of The Mapp, Gideon, Escobedo, and Miranda cases. Copyright 2010; The Nichols Law Firm, PLLC; By Atty. Brendon G. Basiga.
Chapter 1 The Pursuit of Justice Unit #1 Notes Packet.
Miranda v Arizona Rights of the Accused. Citations 384 U.S. 436 (1966) oDocket # 759 oArgued February 28, 1966 o Decider June 13, 1966.
Call To Order Complete the following statement: You have the right to remain silent… And take out your homework!!!
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
Ashley Nine March 25, 2010 Period 7.  Poor living immigrant from Mexico living in Arizona.  He was charged with rape and kidnapping.  He was arrested.
Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona
Homework: Read/OL 14.3 for Monday FrontPage: Have 3 worksheets on your desk.
Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.
Arrests and Miranda.  Right to a grand jury  Protection against double jeopardy  Protection against self-incrimination  Right to due process  Custody.
Miranda v. Arizona GREYSON PETTUS PLS 211 MR. NOEL DECEMBER 2ND, 2015.
Miranda V. Arizona By: Elise Kloppenburg. Facts of the Case Phoenix, Arizona 1963 Ernesto Miranda, 23 years old Arrested in his home Taken to the police.
Welcome to Unit 4!! Kaplan University. Graded items: 1. Discussion Board 2. Quiz 3. Seminar Unit 3 recap.
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
Land Mark Supreme Court Cases Assignment
Supreme Court Cases of the 60s. Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 What happened? - illegal search of home found “obscene materials”. Mapp was convicted. Brought to court.
Miranda: Its Meaning and Application Chapter 6 Basic Criminal Procedures, 3/E by Edward E. Peoples PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle.
The Warren Court and judicial activism “The biggest damn fool mistake I ever made”, Dwight D. Eisenhower on Earl Warren, quoted in 1977 Chief Justice,
 Dates: Debated: Feb. 28, March 1 and 2, 1966 Decided: June 13, 1966  Ruling: The prosecution could not use Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal.
Miranda v. Arizona By Alexis Toombs December 1, 2014.
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda Rights.
Warm-up Has anyone tried to get you to confess to something you didn’t do? How did this happen? Have you ever confessed to something and then regretted.
Miranda Rights Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F
John F. Kennedy
Defining the meaning of the terms in the warning
Tori Roupe and Haley Leavines
Aim: What are the protections offered by the case of Miranda vs
By Michael Cleary Period 8 10/3/13 College Business Law Mr. Como
Miranda v. Arizona (1966).
Important Court Cases of the 20th Century
Miranda Warnings.
The Warren Court By Rebecca Johnson.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966.
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) The Warren Court.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Defendants’ Rights Edgenuity Lessons 3.4 and 3.5.
by Marcos Cardona-7th period
5th, 6th, 7th Amendment Rights
Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.
The Warren Court AP US History.
By: Michaela Hull and Elena Butler
The 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments
Presentation transcript:

Miranda v Arizona Escobedo v Illinois By Austin Lallier

THESIS In the 1960s two major cases changed the way law enforcement could interrogate defendants in custody, they defined and articulated the rights that were given to all citizens nearly 200 years earlier.

Warren Courts Court cases during 1960’s Went against criminal justice and police Rights of the accused Shifted power out of justices and police officers hands Mapp v. Ohio, 1961, Gideon v. Wainwright, 1963, and Escobedo v. Illinois, 1964, Miranda v. Arizona ng2011/2011/03/page/2/

Escobedo v Illinois Danny Escobedo arrested for suspected murder of brother in law While questioned was denied the right to a lawyer After 14 hours gave evidence of knowledge of murder Lawyer went to court house but still denied.

Court Case Later not convicted because didn’t follow 5 th and 6 th amendment Police lost control of rights Escobedo was released from jail and his confession did not count

Miranda v Arizona Ernesto Miranda On March 13, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested linking him to the kidnapping and rape of an 18- year-old girl ten days earlier. After two hours of interrogation by police officers, Miranda signed a confession to the rape charge Miranda was convicted of rape and kidnapping and sentenced to 20 to 30 years imprisonment on each charge, with sentences to run concurrently.

Created Miranda rights which are “The person in custody must, prior to interrogation, be clearly informed that he has the right to remain silent, and that anything he says will be used against him in court; he must be clearly informed that he has the right to consult with a lawyer and to have the lawyer with him during interrogation, and that, if he is indigent, a lawyer will be appointed to represent him.”

Effects of both cases This effected the power law enforcement could interrogate suspects It limited their ability to gain convictions on likely suspects of horrible crimes which caused corruption in the police force to seek justice. cases.html

Questions How are these two cases simular concerning the rights of the accused? How do these court cases effect the rights of the police force? What are the slight differences concerning the two cases? What is the Warren Court, and how is Warrens opinion represented in the two cases?

Works Cited procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to-israel/police- interrogation-and-confessions/escobedo-v-illinois/ procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to-israel/police- interrogation-and-confessions/escobedo-v-illinois/