Arizona CTE Assessment System Helen Bootsma, Director, Development and Innovations Group, Career and Technical Education Division, Arizona Department of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Teacher Performance Assessment for State Licensure and District Evaluation Raymond Pecheone, Stanford University Peter Youngs, Stanford University National.
Kansas Accreditation Model – Focusing on Relevance Curriculum Leaders Meeting January 10, :30-2:00 p.m. Scott Myers, Ed.D. Vicki Seeger,, NBCT, Ph.D.
AGRISCIENCE CURRICULUM REVIEW Ginnie Bushong A ED 615 Investigations and Studies in Applied Research.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Transforming Education in Kentucky EPSB and TEK 1.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
Nevada CTE & CTECS: Programs, Standards, Assessments & Credentials January, 2014 Nevada Department of Education Office of Career, Technical and Adult.
The Maryland Co-teaching Framework
Reaching and Preparing 21st Century Learners
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Evaluating Educational Technology and Integration Strategies By: Dakota Tucker, Derrick Haney, Demi Ford, and Kent Elmore Chapter 7.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
Maryland Technology Grant “ Our goal is to ensure that all Maryland teacher candidates are proficient in integrating technology in the classroom for teaching.
KRISTEN SHAND, PH.D. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY EDUCATION Project-Based Learning Intel © Essentials Online.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
By Nanette Chapa.  To realize the benefits of technology, schools must develop a plan for integrating technology into the curriculum. An effective technology.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Ranada Smith Lamar University Conroe ISD Technology Plan
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
Why 21st Century Skills & STEM? Research indicates students across all grade-levels lack competencies in math and science. New demands have been placed.
David Militzer, Education Program Consultant California Department of Education Dan Blake Director, Innovation & Partnerships Sonoma County Office of Education.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
Arizona Department of Education in partnership with Arizona State University Using Technical Skill Attainment Data.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
January 26, 2011 Careers Conference, Madison, Wisconsin Robin Nickel, Ph.D. Associate Director, Worldwide Instructional Design System.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Evidence-based Research. Think Innovation…. The Day 8:30 am Introductions – Orientation for the Day – Expectation: Scenarios Three things about you,
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta.
NACTEI PORTLAND MAY 16, 2012 HELEN BOOTSMA CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CTE Data Works for Arizona Arizona Department.
_Macros Learning in the 21st Century Learning in the 21 st Century – Students as Self-Directed and Self-Assessing Learners PowerPoint Slides at.
STRUCTURE STANDING COMMITTEES - CURRENT, COMPREHENSIVE CURRICULUM AVAILABLE TO ALL INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF IN A USER-FRIENDLY, ONLINE FORMAT EXTERNAL ALIGNMENT.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Strategic and School Improvement Plans: WPS 2021 Wareham Wakes up the World! Every Student Every Day.
Bridging the Gap through the Power of Data Project Lori Rubino-Hare, June 27, 2012.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
8 th Grade Technology Competency Test Michelle Obert Instructional Technology Specialist
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
CIAS Program Level Assessment Office of Educational Effectiveness Assessment September 6, 2016.
A Productive Partnership
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Handout: Sign-in Sheet
Identifying Multiple Measures and Defining Significance
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
February 21-22, 2018.
The Teacher Work Sample: An Authentic Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Arizona CTE Assessment System Helen Bootsma, Director, Development and Innovations Group, Career and Technical Education Division, Arizona Department of Education,  Designed to meet end-of-program requirements: Federal Perkins technical skill attainment State legislation re: Joint Technical Education Districts

Partnerships  Arizona Department of Education Career and Technical Education  Arizona State University Workforce Education Development Office  Vocational Technical Education Consortium of States  Tech Fluency E-SESS  Corporate Education Consulting

Assessment Implementation  Spring programs  Fall programs  Spring 2009 – 30 programs  Fall programs

Vision  Current industry-validated standards  No cost to students  Online delivery  Documentation of skill attainment  Valued by all stakeholders

Valued by Stakeholders  Stakeholders Committee representing users of the system provide input  Valid and reliable approach  Arizona had used competency checklists for Perkins III requirement  Online assessment system has implications for curriculum and instruction

How to Drive Instruction Using the CTE Online Assessment System  Retrieving Assessment Results  Using Results to Improve Student Achievement Kathy Prather, CTE Director, Tucson Unified School District, Cathie Raymond, CTE Director, Marana Unified School District,

Introduction  Assessment process will provide a skills assessment system that documents CTE program skill attainment.  Using assessment results, instructors can improve program instruction resulting in improved student achievement.  Passing the program assessments, provide CTE students with industry-validated certificates to authenticate their technical skill.

Retrieving Assessment Results  Reports provide immediate feedback on assessment results.  Types of reports include:  Student  Class  Program

The Assessment Site

Individual Student Report  This report provides performance of individual students on standards/measurement criteria. Students can print results IMMEDIATELY.

Example of Individual Summary Total Percent Correct

From the ESSESS site Report summary, criteria can be selected to be included the report.

Instructor feedback by program/site  Example of site results

Report by site/district  Example of district program results

Making the Connection Among Assessment, Data, and Instruction-- Using Results to Improve Student Achievement Data Instruction Assessment

Making the Connection…  During assessment window, CTE central staff helps in all facets of assessments: scheduling, student registration, test administration and proctoring.  Acknowledging individual teacher and site support.  Providing “busy instructors” with report instructions.

Assessment Connection--Next step  To provide additional information, program data was refined into spreadsheet information that was more “user-friendly”. Reports were prepared to include district and site data by program.

Sample

Assessment and Instruction— Building the Bridge  Districts take the lead providing support to instructors to begin using the data.  Collaborative, team curriculum development with PCJTED and selected programs Including curriculum mapping Formulating Unit Plans/Daily lessons Providing a systematic approach

Instructional Tools include:  Galileo online--Pre-assessment vocabulary Access to online vocabulary and lessons. SAMPLE: v.us/YMJiPPXwP20MQU%24NQOMC1g%3 D%3D30869http://attachments.wetpaintser v.us/YMJiPPXwP20MQU%24NQOMC1g%3 D%3D30869 WIKI-Curriculum Sharing

WIKI-Curriculum SHARING  Over 50 days old, the wetpaint site develops

Widening the FOCUS--Beyond Assessments  Instructors need to continue to enhance curriculum and evaluation to most accurately measure student performance. What other measurements provide instructional measurements, authentic assessments?.

Authentic Assessment  Authentic Assessment Defined: Authentic Assessment measures students’ abilities in real-world contexts. Rote learning and typical true/false or multiple choice tests are not examples of Authentic Assessment. True Authentic Assessment focuses on the student’s ability to analyze information and integrate what they have learned into the creation of a finished product. In the course of Authentic Assessment, students show the ability to work collaboratively with other students in the classroom or online environments and to demonstrate their written and oral skills. The learning process is just as important as the finished product.  Authentic Assessment:  Allows students to develop their own responses rather than select from predetermined options  Requires students to engage in higher level thinking  Uses samples of student work that is found in portfolios that has been collected over an extended time period  Uses a Rubric that clearly states the criteria students will need for the completion of their completion. Students are given the rubric ahead of the assignment of the assessment.  Has a closer relationship to what has been taught and learned in the classroom  Teaches students to evaluate their own work and the work of other students through the use of a rubric  For more information about Authentic Assessment, visit the following Web site Authentic Assessment Toolbox

Beyond assessments  Continue to develop instructional experiences incorporating the critical skills needed to meet the daily challenges of the 21st century.

21 st Century skills and Program Standards Crosswalk

In Closing  Other questions need to be addressed by instructional leaders that may be deeper than test scores. The broad spectrum of evidence includes school climate issues, attendance and their influence on student achievement  (Preble and Taylor. Ed. Leadership, Jan 09.)

References  Educational Leadership, December 2008/January 2009www.ascd.org  Dynamic Interventions Systems, John R. Bergan, Ph.D., online.com/galileoK12/K12Research.h tmlhttp:// online.com/galileoK12/K12Research.h tml  Authentic Assessment- Jon Mueller, edu/toolbox/index.htm edu/toolbox/index.htm  Partnership for 21 st Century Skills,