Incarceration & child support: A snapshot of Maryland’s caseload Presented October 25, 2006 at the 25 th Annual Training Conference of the Maryland Joint.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Criminal and Civil Justice Policy Council February 3, 2009.
Advertisements

Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Public Safety and Domestic Security Policy Committee Policy Committee October 6, 2009.
Non-Credit Data and Credit Files Washington, DC September 23, 2010 Medical Payment Data: Accuracy and Implications Mark Rukavina, Director The Access Project.
Nebraska Investment Finance Authority Housing Innovation Marketplace January, 2011 Heather Armstrong Community Corrections Improvement Association.
Economic advantage and disadvantage: women in Australia Presentation to the National Council of Women of Australia Dr Marcia Keegan Research Fellow, National.
Issues Faced by Juveniles Leaving Custody: Breaking Down the Barriers University of Oregon April 6, 2007 Pat Arthur, National Center for Youth Law.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” MLK “The time.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” - MLK.
" The Impact of Criminal Justice Policies and Practices on Minorities" 2009.
702: Leading Those Who Engage Incarcerated Parents.
Mass Imprisonment and the Life Course SOC 331 Population and Society
Presented by Cedric R. Hendricks, Associate Director Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency.
Georgia Division of Child Support Services Department of Human Services Outreach Services.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
1 Transitions to Adulthood: Comparing TANF and Foster care Youth Pamela C. Ovwigho, PhD Valerie Head, MPP Catherine E. Born, PhD Paper presented at the.
Funding the Work of Reentry Julie Boehm, Reentry Manager Missouri Department of Corrections.
Incarceration among Non-custodial Parents: Findings from Maryland Research Pamela C. Ovwigho, Ph.D. Family Welfare Research & Training Group University.
“MISSING” DOMESTIC VIOLENCE VICTIMS IN WELFARE CASELOADS: THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN SURVEY AND ADMINISTRATIVE DISCLOSURE RATES ANDREA HETLING, PhD CORRENE.
Family Support Program for Ex-Offenders (“FSP”) Presentation l Introduction and Rationale l Presentation by Clients l Program Description and Lessons Learned.
FAMILY….WHAT DOES IT MEAN? Presented by: Mary N. Ward, ACBSW, CSW Family Services Administrator NC Department of Correction, Division of Prisons.
Let’s Be Realistic. Ability to Pay Kansas Practices/Outreach Establishment of OrdersModification of Orders Collection of Arrears Incentives Agenda.
A Case Study of the Intersection Between the Child Welfare and Criminal Justice Systems Charlene Wear Simmons, Ph.D. Parental Incarceration, Termination.
Job Coaching for Offender Populations Helping tax takers become tax makers.
Incarceration among Non-custodial Parents: Implications for Welfare & Child Support Programs Pamela Caudill Ovwigho, PhD Catherine E. Born, PhD Correne.
Legislative Analyst’s Office Presented to: Ryan Woolsey, Fiscal and Policy Analyst CSDA/CWDA Policy Symposium March 4, 2015.
Children thrive in safe, caring, supportive families and communities Title IV-D Child Support DCS Child Support Bureau - Prosecuting Attorney Collaboration.
Bringing Asset-Building Services to Families Involved in the Child Support System CFED 2010 Assets Learning Conference Washington, D.C. September 22, 2010.
WORKING WITH INCARCERATED NCPS Ray Eibel EDSI ERICSA 50 th Annual Training Conference & Exposition ▪ May 19 – 23 ▪ Hilton Orlando Lake Buena Vista, Florida.
Improving Child Support Enforcement Through Transitional Jobs 2005 Statewide Conference on Housing and Community Economic Development Disincentives to.
2012 National APSE Conference Becky Hebda, Community Care of Central Wisconsin Lisa Mills, Medicaid Waiver Employment Services Consultant.
ARREARS LEVERAGING PILOT PROJECT: OUTCOMES ACHIEVED & LESSONS LEARNED Pamela C. Ovwigho, PhD Correne Saunders, BA Catherine E. Born, PhD Paper presented.
1 THE MINISTRY OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL Office of the Correctional Investigator Royal Canadian Mounted Police Solicitor General Department National Parole.
Criminal Justice Reform in California Challenges and Opportunities Mia Bird Northern California Grantmakers Annual Conference – From Ideas to Action May.
Probation and Parole in the United States Your presenter:
Housing: A Significant Reentry Barrier Nicole E. Sullivan NC Department of Correction Office of Research and Planning.
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
DC Child Support and the Fatherhood Movement. The New Face Of Child Support ENFORCER SUPPORTER.
Timebanking and Poverty: Creating Abundance in a Challenged Economy.
Ursula Hill February 2012 Notre Dame-AmeriCorps Mid-Year Conference.
1 Things That May Affect Estimates from the American Community Survey.
1 Voluntary Paternity Acknowledgements Who Signs Them? What Difference Does It Make? Workshop presented at the 25 th Annual Training Conference Maryland.
Arrears Management Two States, Two Ways
Up with Children – Down by the Boardwalk 1 48 th Annual Training Conference & Exposition Atlantic City, New Jersey May 22-26, 2011 Proof is in the Performance:
Things that May Affect the Estimates from the American Community Survey Updated February 2013.
Methods Data for this NIDA-funded HIV prevention trial (Project WORTH) were drawn from 337 women offenders under community supervision, who reported using.
Using Credit SSEPF4.a, SSEPF4.b, SSEPF4.c. Loans and Credit Cards: Buy Now, Pay Later The U.S. economy runs on credit. Credit – The ability to obtain.
Introduction to the Tribal Child Support Enforcement Program.
Learning to Reduce Recidivism: A 50-state analysis of postsecondary education policy Wendy Erisman Institute for Higher Education Policy Washington, DC.
Belonging Everywhere & Nowhere: Correne Saunders, MPP Catherine E. Born, Ph.D. Pamela C. Ovwigho, Ph.D. Paper presented at the 48 th annual workshop of.
Assessing Housing Barriers Donna Harrison Community Placement Coordinator Virginia Department of Corrections Welcome Home: Addressing Today’s Challenges.
Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Age 19 Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago.
Barriers to Independence Among TANF Recipients: Comparing Caseworker Records & Client Surveys Correne Saunders Pamela C. Ovwigho Catherine E. Born Paper.
A Strategic Approach to Managing Existing Arrears Paula Roberts Center for Law and Social Policy October 4, 2006.
Working with Incarcerated Obligors CSDA Conference October 6, 2010 San Quentin State Prison.
How Do Child Support Order Amounts Affect Payments and Compliance? Optimizing Reliability and Collections Finding the ‘Win-Win’ for both parents.
“ Child Support Services and Parents Working Together for Children” Tehama County Child Support Services.
THE JOB AHEAD Recognized the Impact of Current Policy and Practice on Low-income Parents and Their Families.
Family and Fatherhood Program McNeil Island Corrections Center “Keeping Communities Safe” Presenters: Rick Jordan, MICC Representative Sylvia Peterson,
Federal Performance Measures New Directors Orientation Child Support Directors Association.
When Discrimination is Legal: The Social Costs of Felony Convictions
“The time is always right
Placing Ex-Offender Populations into Jobs
Graduate School of Social Work
Child Support Trends Including 2002 Data Vicki Turetsky
Adding an evidence-based family strengthening program
Incarcerated Veterans
Trends in Chronic Homelessness among Single Adults in Hennepin County
Connecting TANF to Career Pathways with HPOG
Incarcerated Veterans
Presentation transcript:

incarceration & child support: A snapshot of Maryland’s caseload Presented October 25, 2006 at the 25 th Annual Training Conference of the Maryland Joint Child Support Council This research was funded by The Maryland Department of Human Resources, Child Support Enforcement Administration Dr. Catherine E. Born University of Maryland School of Social Work

The policy issue: RISING ARREARS, BUT FEW COLLECTIONS  Despite steady improvements in current support collections, child support arrears remain large and continue to grow.  Nationally, arrears totaled $107 billion in 2005; in Maryland, $1.45 billion.  Even with strong enforcement tools in place, arrears collection rates remain low.

The policy IMPLICATION: NEW APPROACHES ARE NEEDED  Some have concluded that arrears may be the single biggest challenge facing the child support program.  States are thinking creatively about how to reduce current arrears balances and prevent the build-up of additional arrears.  In particular, there has been growing interest in arrears prevention and reduction strategies for incarcerated obligors, because:

The PROBLEM: PREVALENCE OF INCARCERATION  The number of prisons in federal or state adult correctional facilities increased by 79% between 1990 and  The vast majority of prisoners are male and at least three-fifths of them are parents.  It is estimated that 7 million children have a parent in prison or jail or under parole or probation supervision.

 Recent cross-sectional studies assessed the overlap between child support caseloads and prison populations:  It is estimated that the majority of the prisoners are parents of minor children, and roughly half of incarcerated parents have an open child support case.  Typically, incarcerated obligors represent 4 to 6% of total state caseloads, and account for 3 to 5% of state unpaid child support arrears.  On average, prisoners owe $15,933 in arrears and parolees have an average debt of $13,472. The Problem: Incarceration and child support Sources: Thonennes, N. (2002). Child support profile: Massachusetts and paroled parents. Fathers in the criminal justice system: A collaboration between child support enforcement and criminal justice agencies in Massachusetts. Denver: Center for Policy Research. Pearson, J. & Hardaway, C. (2000). Designing programs for incarcerated and paroled obligors. Washington, DC: Welfare Information Network. Retrieved January 31, 2005 from Esther, G. & Pearson, J. (2003). Twelve reasons for collaboration between Departments of Correction and child-support enforcement. Corrections Today, 65(3), p.87.

Incarceration and Child support Implications for child support programs  While in prison, most parents will not be able to pay their child support obligations and will accumulate arrears.  After release, ex-offenders face a number of challenges to securing employment.  High current support obligations and/or large arrears balances may discourage obligors from participating in the formal economy and/or deteriorate already fragile family relationships.

Policy options: Some New Approaches  Provide inmates with education and services related to child support issues.  Suspend or reduce child support orders to a minimal amount when a non-custodial parent enters prison.  Provide reintegration and employment services for ex- offenders.

Program options: Laying the foundation  In order to address the issues for incarcerated non-custodial parents, administrators need information about how much of their caseload is affected by incarceration.  Unfortunately, while anecdote abounds, there is very little “hard” data on the child support-incarceration issue.  In order to fill this information gap, our study aims to understand the extent of this problem in Maryland.

Our study: Research questions  How many non-custodial parents are or were incarcerated?  What are their characteristics?  How much do they owe in arrears?  To what extent do they pay after they are released from prison?

Our study: methods  Sample  Random sample of 2,375 individuals who were listed as a non- custodial parent in an active child support case in Maryland in September  95% confidence interval and a + 2% error rate.  Data Sources  Data on incarceration in Maryland prisons and the Baltimore City Detention Center –extract file developed by the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services specifically for this study.*  Underestimates because data does not include information on local jails in Maryland’s 23 counties. *Research Disclaimer: Data was supplied for this study by the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services. Although the Department is unable to certify the accuracy and completeness of the data with regard to each subject of this Study, the researchers have nonetheless made every attempt to accurately and appropriately interpret the data supplied.

Findings: Obligor and case characteristics

Currently & previously incarcerated individuals account for at least 13% of Maryland’s child support obligors & 16% of its cases. Maryland’s Caseload:

All DPSCS Division of Corrections (18 mos or more ) Incarceration is more common among Baltimore City cases. Maryland’s Caseload

Incarceration is twice as common among current and former TANF cases.

Maryland’s Caseload On average, incarcerated obligors have more cases and more children on those cases than never-incarcerated obligors.

$$$$$$ $$$$ $$$$ Currently & previously incarcerated obligors have lower orders for current support than never incarcerated obligors. Maryland’s caseload

Cases with a currently incarcerated obligor are more likely to require establishment. Maryland’s caseload

Findings: Employment, Payments, and Arrears

Employment Non-custodial parents who have been previously incarcerated are just as likely to be employed in a MD-UI covered job as those never incarcerated. ** Percent employed in *** Previously incarcerated includes only those who were released before October 1, 2003.

Earnings Avg. Quarterly EarningsAvg. Yearly Earnings On average, previously incarcerated non-custodial parents earn about half of what never incarcerated non-custodial parents earn. * Includes only those with quarterly employment in the time period. ** Previously incarcerated includes only those who were released before October 1, 2003.

Incarcerated Mean: $9, % with Arrears Mean: $17, % with Arrears Mean: $22, Previously & currently incarcerated obligors are more likely to owe arrears and have higher average child support debts. * Excludes cases needing establishment. Incarcerated NeverPreviouslyCurrently 96.8% with Arrears Arrears Owed:

Previously & currently incarcerated obligors are two times more likely to owe arrears to the state than those who’ve never been incarcerated. Arrears Owed: Custodian vs. state-owed arrears

Never Incarcerated Previously Incarcerated Currently Incarcerated Avg. Amount Owed to the Custodian $7,815.90$12,868.72$17, Avg. Amount Owed to the State $7,795.64$10,281.94$11, Arrears owed: On average, previously & currently incarcerated obligors owe more to both the state and the custodian than those who’ve never been incarcerated.

At least one-quarter of arrears owed on Maryland cases are owed by previously & currently incarcerated obligors. Two-fifths of Baltimore City arrears are owed by obligors who are or have been incarcerated. Incarceration and Total Arrears

On average, an estimated two-fifths of previously & currently incarcerated obligors’ arrears accumulated while they were in prison. Arrears Accumulation

Support Paid 10/03-9/04Previously IncarceratedNever Incarcerated % paying any support***61.0%79.1% Total amount paid (mean)***$2,210.78$3, % of current support paid (mean)*** 53.5%75.1% Previously incarcerated obligors are less likely to pay support & pay less than never incarcerated obligors. However, most still pay something. *p <.05 **p<.01 ***p <.001 ** Previously incarcerated obligors are only included if they were released before October 1, Child support payment

 There is significant overlap among incarceration, child support, & welfare programs.  Child support cases for children currently receiving TANF are twice as likely to have a non-custodial parent with an incarceration history than cases for children who have never received TANF. Conclusions & implications IMPLICATION: Policy, program, research, and inter-agency attention should continue to be paid to the intersection of incarceration, child support, and welfare programs.

Conclusions & Implications Obligors with current or previous imprisonment:  Have more child support cases per obligor, and more children per case;  Are less likely to have an order in place; and  Almost certainly owe support arrears. IMPLICATION: Collaborative efforts between the child support & public safety programs should be undertaken to educate & engage incarcerated non-custodial parents in providing financial support for their children.

Arrears are correlated with non-custodial parent incarceration:  The average amount owed is roughly twice the average amount owed by those with no history of incarceration.  Obligors with past and present incarceration account for a disproportionate share of total arrears, state-owed arrears, and arrears owed to the custodian.  One-quarter of Maryland arrears & just over two-fifths of arrears on Baltimore City cases are owed by persons who are or were incarcerated. IMPLICATION: Agencies should partner to identify currently incarcerated non-custodial parents and possibly modify their orders. Outreach to custodial parents may also be needed. Conclusions & Implications

 The effects of incarceration on child support payments linger after an obligor is released from prison.  Obligors with an incarceration history are significantly less likely to pay support.  When payments are made, they are significantly lower, and represent a smaller percentage of current support obligations. Conclusions & Implications IMPLICATION: Develop or expand programs for non-custodial parents who are about to be released or have recently been released from prison.

To obtain a copy of the full The Intersection of Incarceration and Child Support: A Snapshot of Maryland’s Caseload report visit our website: For more information on this study, please Thank you !