Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Advertisements

1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
High Level Trigger – Applications Open Charm physics Quarkonium spectroscopy Dielectrons Dimuons Jets.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
Report from the Muon Trigger WG Aleandro Nisati On behalf of the Muon Trigger Slice Community Muon Week, April 18° 2007.
CMS High Level Trigger Selection Giuseppe Bagliesi INFN-Pisa On behalf of the CMS collaboration EPS-HEP 2003 Aachen, Germany.
Aras Papadelis, Lund University 8 th Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Nov , Lund 1 The ATLAS B-trigger - exploring a new strategy for J/  (ee) ●
28/2/2006S. Rosati - MC Workshop1 Muon Identification and Reconstruction Stefano Rosati INFN – Roma 1.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
Como, ICATPP 2009 R.Crupi 1 Roberto Crupi INFN Lecce & Physics Department, University of Salento - Italy on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 11 th ICATPP.
The ATLAS High Level Trigger Steering Journée de réflexion – Sept. 14 th 2007 Till Eifert DPNC – ATLAS group.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
Stefania.Spagnolo, Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce CERN, Nov. 2006, ATLAS Trigger and Physics week Muon Event Filter Stefania Spagnolo Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce.
Muon HLT status with emphasis on  Fast for endcap Alessandro Di Mattia MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY On behalf of the HLT Algorithm Group ATLAS TDAQ week.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Sez. di Lecce Universita` degli Studi del Salento The Muon Trigger in ATLAS Giovanni Siragusa On behalf of the ATLAS Muon Trigger group.
Manoj Kumar Jha INFN – Bologna On Behalf of ATLAS Muon Calibration Group 20 th October 2010/CHEP 2010, Taipei ATLAS Muon Calibration Framework.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
Event Filter and Trigger Menu L=10 31 cm -2 s -1 Sergio Grancagnolo on behalf of the Muon Trigger software group.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Marcello Bindi, on behalf of ATLAS Collaboration KRUGER 2010 : Workshop on Discovery Physics at the LHC 06/12/20101.
Study of L1 and HLT efficiency in VBTF Monika Jindal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Jasbir Singh (panjab University, Chandigarh), Kajari Mazumdar (TIFR,
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
Cern -April 24, 2007Atlas Data Quality Workshop M. Primavera1 Muon EF Data Quality Muon EF Data Quality M. Primavera - I.N.F.N. Lecce on behalf of Muon.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
Performance and Physics Workshop Summary: Top and Muons Sarah Allwood-Spiers Glasgow ATLAS meeting June 2008.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
T. Kawamoto1 ATLAS muon small wheels for ATLAS phase-1 upgrade LHCC T. Kawamoto (New) small wheels ? Why new small wheels for high.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
Muon Reconstruction with Moore and MuonIdentification The Moore/MUID group Atlas Physics Workshop Athens, May 2003.
Muon Event Filter Status Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the muon EF working group INFN Lecce & Salento University.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
1 Detector Performance and Physics talks at Bern (very selective!) Pete Watkins.
Status of the ATLAS first-level Central Trigger and the Muon Barrel Trigger and First Results from Cosmic-Ray Data David Berge (CERN-PH) for the ATLAS.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Tommaso Boccali SNS and INFN Pisa Vertex 2002 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 3-8 November 2002 High Level Triggers at CMS with the Tracker.
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.
Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
Di-muon decays of J/ψ mesons and Z bosons have been used to study the muon reconstruction and identification efficiency of the ATLAS detector as a function.
1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
Event Filter and Trigger Menu L=1031
Michele Pioppi* on behalf of PRIN _005 group
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Muon Trigger Software Status
Muons from light meson decays
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
M.Biglietti (Univ. Naples and INFN Naples)
Presentation transcript:

Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology and Particle Physics (ICATPP) 8-12 October 2007 Villa Olmo, Como, Italy = Trigger Element = Feature Extraction Algorithm = Feature = Hypothesis Algorithm A trigger chain example High p T muons are important for many known processes, that can be used for monitoring and calibration (Z   ) and for several new phenomena predicted at the LHC energy (Higgs, SUSY), therefore the muon trigger system is of primary importance. The ATLAS trigger system is designed to keep high efficiency for interesting events, while rejecting standard model physics low p T events, with a suppression factor of the order of 10 7, reaching the ~200 Hz data storage capability of the DAQ system. The Muon Vertical Slice consists of three main trigger steps, one hardware, level 1 (LVL1) and two software, level 2 (LVL2) and event filter (EF). Last two compose the High Level Trigger (HLT). Decision on each event is based on reduced-granularity detector data for interesting region at LVL1, full-granularity and precision, but only for same LVL1 regions, at LVL2, and full event data, as in offline, at EF. Implementation and performance of the ATLAS Trigger Muon “Vertical Slice” Toroid LVL1 trigger uses RPC in the barrel (|  |<1) and TGC in the endcaps (1<|  |<2.4) MUONROI muFast MU6MOORE MuIdSA MuIdCB MU6’ MU6’’MU6’’’ MU6’’’’ Vtx close to IP  production point p T, ,  Minimum p T  Comb  Fast B Physics processor  Tile TrigDiMuon  Isol  Comb ~2 kHz 10 ms ~ 200 Hz 2 s LVL1 Selection LVL2 Selection EF Selection RPC TGC  CTPI CTP 2.5  s barrel endcap  30% of all inefficiencies are due to feet and elevator sector  No RPC hit Low-p T plane missing High-p T plane missing Level 2 Trigger Level 1 Trigger Core algorithm is muFast, that confirm/reject LVL1 result and refine muon p T evaluation, using MDT precision measurements. muFast resolutions in the barrel and in the endcap for low p T and high p T muons To refine the muFast p T, muComb uses Inner Detector (ID) data, allowing to sharpen the threshold at low p T. Following steps are to be achieved within the 10 msec latency time: “Global Pattern Recognition” involving trigger chambers and positions of MDT tubes (no use of drift time); “Global Pattern Recognition” involving trigger chambers and positions of MDT tubes (no use of drift time); “Track fit” involving drift time measurements, performed for each MDT chamber; “Track fit” involving drift time measurements, performed for each MDT chamber; Fast “p T estimate” via a Look-Up-Table with no use of time consuming fit methods. Fast “p T estimate” via a Look-Up-Table with no use of time consuming fit methods. Event Filter MOORE and MuId are two object oriented offline packages written in C++, already integrated in the ATLAS software framework: ATHENA. Imported in the trigger environment, they become TrigMOORE. The Muon Event Filter consists of three algorithms: MOORE, MuId StandAlone and MuId Combined. The role of MuId StandAlone is to extrapolate MS tracks to the production point using calorimetric information. Muon momenta are measured with a resolution  p T /p T < 10% up to 1 TeV. TrigMOORE can work in two different modes, wrapped, scanning full detector data, and seeded, starting from RoI seeded by LVL2 (full trigger chain) or alternatively by LVL1 (for trigger studies). In-flight decays of pions and kaons are the main source of LVL1 trigger rate at low p T. One goal of the muon HLT is to reject such fake muons while having high selection efficiency on prompt muons. Trigger software works with objects called Trigger Elements (TE). Feature Extraction Algorithms (FEX) are activated by input TE produced by previous trigger levels. FEX are able to access the detector data and compute physical quantities, Features, that are then attached to the output TE. Selection is done in Hypothesis Algorithms, that can validate or reject TE that do not satisfy trigger requirements. Sergio Grancagnolo (University of Salento & INFN Lecce - Italy) on behalf of the ATLAS Muon HLT group Tracks are reconstructed also in the ID by a dedicated software (newTracking). MuId Combined uses these informations, thus enhancing momentum resolution for p T up to 50 GeV and allowing good discrimination of muons in jets. ID improves resolution at low p T, MS at high p T. LVL1 selects active detector regions (Region of Interest, RoI), in each event. Coincidence windows are defined on the allowed geometrical roads with their center corresponding to the infinite momentum track. At p T =6 GeV threshold, barrel efficiency is 83%, rate ~11 kHz (lumi=10 33 cm -2 s -1 ), at p T =20 GeV efficienc is 79% and the rate is ~2 kHz (lumi=10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) The Muon Spectrometer (MS) is the detector dedicated to the identification of muons. It consists of RPC and TGC trigger chambers and MDT and CSC precision chambers. Full bandwidth Total latency time TrigMoore MOORE MuId SA MuId COMB MS CALO ID 3-station coincidence trigger efficiency of TGC Endcap 6 GeV 20 GeV 75 kHz Low p T rates: muons from pions and kaons Differential cross-section for production of muons from pions and kaons production of muons from pions and kaons One of the main sources of muons at low p T are in flight decays of light mesons. A track from such decays appears with a kink, and the  2 of the fit is worse than prompt muon tracks. All possible kinematic parameters and statistical techniques must be used in order to reject such tracks. Different kinds of physic events need to share available bandwidth, that is limited. Flexible trigger menus allow to avoid saturation from few processes, and guarantee the possibility to organize the analysis depending from luminosity conditions. When the rates are too high, prescale factors can be applied to low p T thresholds at LVL1, and leave the HLT in pass through mode. The HLT capabilities are studied flagging the events without rejection. Express streams, not prescaled, at fixed thresholds, are used for calibration and monitoring purposes. Trigger Menus A typical Muon Trigger Menu for luminosity (LHC startup). (*) mu_4 is a totally open threshold used for cosmic data limited by cabling only. (*) 1/p T resolution for EF algorithms. Single muons |  |<2.5 MuidStandAlone TrigMoore MuidCombined |  |<1.05 MuId COMB efficiency wrt LVL2 p T = 20 GeV threshold p T = 6 GeV threshold Barrel efficiencies vs p T for MuId combined 6 GeV 8 GeV 20 GeV40 GeV 6 GeV cm -2 s -1 Barrel (Hz) Endcap (Hz) beauty charm top W  /K TOTAL GeV cm -2 s -1 Barrel (Hz) Endcap (Hz) beauty charm90130 top W  /K TOTAL GeV cm -2 s -1 Barrel (Hz) Endcap (Hz) beauty68110 charm2644 top W2233  /K 4645 TOTAL GeV cm -2 s -1 Barrel (Hz) Endcap (Hz) beauty charm top W  /K TOTAL EF trigger rates estimated with single muon sample. Muons are present in many standard model processess. Resolution and efficiencies are evaluated on single muon samples generated at different p T values. Rates are then estimated using the theoretical contribution from different sources, heavy and light mesons, top, W, etc. End Cap Barrel Efficiency from Z   sample Tag combined triggered muon ID+MS p T > 20 GeV |η| < 2.4 Probe ID track p T > TPcut |Mμμ - MZ| < 10 GeV Δφ > 0.3 Method to evaluate performance directly from data, using one  reconstructed in both ID and MS as a tag, and the other requiring only the ID as a probe. This method can be applied to extract MS trigger efficiency Tag Probe TPcut = 20 GeV trigger measurement over threshold TPcut = 1 GeV for integrated trigger efficiency Allows threshold trigger efficiency measurements with good precision wrt to MC generator.