PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS Gizem ERDOĞAN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A 2 -MAC: An Adaptive, Anycast MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Hwee-Xian TAN and Mun Choon CHAN Department of Computer Science, School of Computing.
Advertisements

S-MAC Sensor Medium Access Control Protocol An Energy Efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks.
Medium Access Control in Wireless Sensor Networks.
Topology Control Presenter: Ajit Warrier With Dr. Sangjoon Park (ETRI, South Korea), Jeongki Min and Dr. Injong Rhee (advisor) North Carolina State University.
Presented by: Murad Kaplan.  Introduction.  Design of SCP-MAC.  Lower Bound of Energy Performance with Periodic Traffic.  Protocol Implementation.
What is a Wireless Sensor Network (WSN)? An autonomous, ad hoc system consisting of a collective of networked sensor nodes designed to intercommunicate.
Investigating Mac Power Consumption in Wireless Sensor Network
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs)
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) Advanced Computer Networks.
U LTRA -L OW D UTY C YCLE MAC WITH S CHEDULED C HANNEL P OLLING Wei Ye, Fabio Silva John Heidemann Present By: Eric Wang.
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin -- Adapted the authors’ Infocom 2002 talk.
PEDS September 18, 2006 Power Efficient System for Sensor Networks1 S. Coleri, A. Puri and P. Varaiya UC Berkeley Eighth IEEE International Symposium on.
1 Sensor MAC Design Requirements:  Energy efficiency  Simple operations  Working with a large number of sensors  Fair share of the channel among competing.
DOT3 Radio Stack Jaein Jeong, Sukun Kim Nest Retreat January 16, 2003.
1 Ultra-Low Duty Cycle MAC with Scheduled Channel Polling Wei Ye Fabio Silva John Heidemann Presented by: Ronak Bhuta Date: 4 th December 2007.
An Energy-efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
Distributed systems Module 1 -Basic networking Teaching unit 1 – LAN standards Ernesto Damiani University of Bozen-Bolzano Lesson 4 – Ethernet frame.
Performance Evaluation of IEEE
Studying Local Area Networks Via Media Access Control (MAC) SubLayer
Adaptive Self-Configuring Sensor Network Topologies ns-2 simulation & performance analysis Zhenghua Fu Ben Greenstein Petros Zerfos.
A Transmission Control Scheme for Media Access in Sensor Networks Alec Woo, David Culler (University of California, Berkeley) Special thanks to Wei Ye.
On the Energy Efficient Design of Wireless Sensor Networks Tariq M. Jadoon, PhD Department of Computer Science Lahore University of Management Sciences.
Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks Joseph PolastreJason HillDavid Culler Computer Science Department University of California,Berkeley.
Networks: Local Area Networks1 LANs Studying Local Area Networks Via Media Access Control (MAC) SubLayer.
Computer Networks: Local Area Networks 1 LANs Studying Local Area Networks via the Media Access Control (MAC) SubLayer.
Medium Access Control With Coordinated Adaptive Sleeping for Wireless Sensor Networks Debate 1 - Defense Joseph Camp Anastasios Giannoulis.
Radio-Triggered Wake-Up Capability for Sensor Networks Soji Sajuyigbe Duke University Slides adapted from: Wireless Sensor Networks Power Management Prof.
Efficient MAC Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks
1 Energy Efficient Communication in Wireless Sensor Networks Yingyue Xu 8/14/2015.
Presenter: Abhishek Gupta Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
1 Radio and Medium Access Control 2 Radio Properties.
Low Power Wireless Design Dr. Ahmad Bahai National Semiconductor.
A Transmission Control Scheme for Media Access in Sensor Networks Alec Woo and David Culler University of California at Berkeley Intel Research ACM SIGMOBILE.
1 An Adaptive Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks The First ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys 2003) November.
Signal Propagation Propagation: How the Signal are spreading from the receiver to sender. Transmitted to the Receiver in the spherical shape. sender When.
An Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks “S-MAC” Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin Presentation: Deniz Çokuslu May 2008.
BMAC - Versatile Low Power Media Access for Wireless Sensor Networks.
RT-Link: A Time-Synchronized Link Protocol for Energy-Constrained Multi- hop Wireless Networks Anthony Rowe, Rahul Mangharam and Raj Rajkumar CMU SECON.
† Department of Computer Science – University of Rome “Sapienza” – Italy Protocolli MAC per reti di sensori Sistemi Wireless, a.a. 2009/2010 Un. of Rome.
Why Visual Sensor Network & SMAC Implementation Group Presentation Raghul Gunasekaran.
Data and Computer Communications Ninth Edition by William Stallings Data and Computer Communications, Ninth Edition by William Stallings, (c) Pearson Education.
Presenter: Abhishek Gupta Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Versatile Low Power Media Access for Wireless Sensor Networks Sarat Chandra Subramaniam.
Data Collection and Dissemination. Learning Objectives Understand Trickle – an data dissemination protocol for WSNs Understand data collection protocols.
A SURVEY OF MAC PROTOCOLS FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS
Network and Systems Laboratory nslab.ee.ntu.edu.tw Branislav Kusy, Christian Richter, Wen Hu, Mikhail Afanasyev, Raja Jurdak, Michael Brunig, David Abbott,
An Adaptive Energy-Efficient and Low- Latency MAC for Data Gathering in Wireless Sensor Networks Gang Lu, Bhaskar Krishnamachari, and Cauligi S. Raghavendra.
Adaptive Sleep Scheduling for Energy-efficient Movement-predicted Wireless Communication David K. Y. Yau Purdue University Department of Computer Science.
SMAC: An Energy-efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Networks
A+MAC: A Streamlined Variable Duty-Cycle MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks 1 Sang Hoon Lee, 2 Byung Joon Park and 1 Lynn Choi 1 School of Electrical.
SEA-MAC: A Simple Energy Aware MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks for Environmental Monitoring Applications By: Miguel A. Erazo and Yi Qian International.
KAIS T Medium Access Control with Coordinated Adaptive Sleeping for Wireless Sensor Network Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin 2003 IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS.
A Multi-Channel Cooperative MIMO MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks(MCCMIMO) MASS 2010.
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Speaker: hsiwei Wei Ye, John Heidemann and Deborah Estrin. IEEE INFOCOM 2002 Page
Link Layer Support for Unified Radio Power Management in Wireless Sensor Networks IPSN 2007 Kevin Klues, Guoliang Xing and Chenyang Lu Database Lab.
Utilization Based Duty Cycle Tuning MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Shih-Hsien Yang, Hung-Wei Tseng, Eric Hsiao-Kuang Wu, and Gen-Huey Chen Computer.
0.1 IT 601: Mobile Computing Wireless Sensor Network Prof. Anirudha Sahoo IIT Bombay.
CS541 Advanced Networking 1 Contention-based MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Neil Tang 4/20/2009.
Energy-Efficient, Application-Aware Medium Access for Sensor Networks Venkatesh Rajenfran, J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, and Katia Obraczka Computer Engineering.
Toward Reliable and Efficient Reporting in Wireless Sensor Networks Authors: Fatma Bouabdallah Nizar Bouabdallah Raouf Boutaba.
Wireless Sensor Networks M Homework #1. Part 1 Consider two sensor devices (one transmitter and one receiver) IEEE standard- compliant. Assume.
Power-Efficient Rendez- vous Schemes for Dense Wireless Sensor Networks En-Yi A. Lin, Jan M. Rabaey Berkeley Wireless Research Center University of California,
MAC Protocols for Sensor Networks
Wireless Sensor Networks Wake-up Receivers
MAC Protocols for Sensor Networks
IHP: Innovation for High Performance Microelectronics
Ultra-Low Duty Cycle MAC with Scheduled Channel Polling
Data Collection and Dissemination
Investigating Mac Power Consumption in Wireless Sensor Network
Presentation transcript:

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS Gizem ERDOĞAN

WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS Wireless Battery powered Ad-hoc Sense & monitor : temperature, humidity, light intensity, voltage, current, volume, acceleration, sound, pressure,etc. Various application fields: military, health care, traffic control, scientific monitoring Important aspects: Energy efficiency, self configuration

S TUDIES OF ANASTASI ET AL. Berkeley family motes (a) mica2 (b) mica2dot 4-Mhz, 8-bit Atmel microprocessor 512 KB of non-volatile flash memory 32-KHz clock RFM ChipCon Radio bit rate of 19.2 Kbps CSMA/CA TinyOS

E XPERIMENTAL ENVIRONMENT Different traffic conditions Outdoor environment Temperature Humidity Fog Rain 10 replicas in different times Average values as well as upper &lower bounds Virtual ground Limits reflection and bad electromagnetic wave’s perturbation

P ARAMETERS VALUES

DEFINITIONS Transmission Range ( TX_range ): the range within which a transmitted frame can be successfully received the transmission power the radio propagation properties Carrier Sensing Range ( CS_range ) :the range within which the other sensor nodes can detect a transmission sensitivity of the receiver the radio propagation properties

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AVAILABLE BANDWIDTH Maximum size message 56 bytes 18-byte preamble 2-byte synchronization + 36 bytes data Theoretical throughput

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AVAILABLE BANDWIDTH CONT. m : the amount of data to be transmitted. For maximum size frame 36 bytes Tframe : time required to transmit a MAC data frame at 19.2 Kbps. 56*8 /19.2 * = ms; ( B min + IB max)/2 : the average backoff time ( )/2=41.65 ms Expected throughput : 4.43 Kbps Estimated throughput: 4.4 Kbps

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS POWER CONSUMPTION

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS POWER CONSUMPTION CONT.

Real World Application Mica2 motes Sample the light in every 1 second Transmit 8 byte message to another node When no messages to be sent, the radio turns off and the motes power down. Leaked current while sampling is 20mA Leaked current while transmitting 18mA. Leaked current when powered down 10uA. Average current leaked in a cycle 0.19 mA, Average power consumption 0.19*3=0.57mW Lifetime of the network: more than a year!

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS TRANSMISSION RANGE Two sensor nodes with the antennas in a back to back disposition Sequence numbers in each packet transmitted Vary the distance between the nodes, keep the track of the number of lost packets Assume threshold as the distance at which the percentage of received packets are below 85% Transmission range is approximately 55 m for mica2 and 135 m for mica2dot.

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS TRANSMISSION RANGE CONT.

Factors that may affect the transmission range Transmission power Orientation of the antenna Data rate Sensor nodes location with respect to the ground Environmental conditions Transmission power: more than linear increase this increase for both kinds of motes. At the maximum transmission power 5dBm transmission range: 70 m for mica2 Transmission range: 230 m for mica2dot

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS TRANSMISSION RANGE CONT. Influence of the antenna Change the relative antennas’ disposition to see the effect of the communication quality in terms of received packets mica2 antennas are very directional mica2dot nodes are resistant

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS TRANSMISSION RANGE CONT. Influence of the data rate Inversely proportional in IEEE wireless networks Does not have a significant influence on in mica2 and mica2dot Different scale of data rates Motes: Kbps whereas IEEE stations: Mbps.

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS TRANSMISSION RANGE CONT.

Effect of sensor node’s height When the nodes are close to the ground under 1 meter, significant power loss. This loss is due to the interference between the ground.

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS TRANSMISSION RANGE CONT. Influence of environmental conditions Slight variations of temperature or humidity do not have any significant influence In the presence of fog or rain, we saw that transmission range decreased significantly Due to signal attenuation caused by the interference of fog and rain particles with the electromagnetic waves

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS CARRIER SENSING RANGE Fixed distance between the nodes in a couple Vary the distance between the two couples Until no correlation is measured between the couples Until Throughput achieved =4.4 Kbps

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS CARRIER SENSING RANGE 275 m :end of the carrier sensing range Minor interference 450 m: interference becomes negligible

MAC PROTOCOLS S-MAC Reduce energy consumption caused by idle listening Schedule coordinated transmission and listen periods Overhead due to coordination and schedule maintenance. B-MAC Wake up for a very small time and sleep for a longer time. Poll the channel, if nothing interesting, go back to sleep Long preamble guaranteed to intersect with polling SCP-MAC Ultra-low duty cycle Synchronizing the polling times

DATA DISSEMINATION PUSH BASED STRATEGY Nodes detecting the interesting event broadcast the relevant information Efficient when there is constant need of information Broadcast bandwidth is wasted when the demand for the information is low PULL BASED STRATEGY Querier broadcasts a query for the information when it is needed. Nodes that have the relevant information send the information back. Communication takes place only when it is needed.

DATA DISSEMINATION CONT. COMB-NEEDLE STRATEGY Integrates both push and pull based techniques Each sensor node pushes its data through some number of The querier pulls the data in a certain neighborhood In most cases it is more efficient than both pure push and pure pull strategies.

A NY Q UESTIONS ? THANK YOU!