Stress distribution around door-opening Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I. Lavassas, G. Nikolaidis, P.Zervas Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vessel Design.
Advertisements

What FEA can be used in:. The whole tower analysis
1 Challenge the future Subtitless On Lightweight Design of Submarine Pressure Hulls.
Design of Steel and Composite-Structures for Seismic Loading – Safety Requirements, Concepts and Methods – Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH) Institute of Steel Structures Prof. C.C Baniotopoulos Iakovos Lavasas Civil Engineer Padelis Zervas Dr. Civil.
Stress and Strain TUTORIAL 6 to answer just click on the button or image related to the answer.
WORKSHEET 5 PROPERTIES OF SECTIONS AND DEFLECTIONS
Case study: sockets (1) Established within the GROWTH project GRD "Improvement of Service Life and Reliability of Cold Forging Tools with respect.
2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT BEAM
Evaluation of shell thicknesses Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I. Lavassas, G. Nikolaidis, P.Zervas Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki,
WORKSHEET 7 AXIALLY LOADED MEMBERS. Q1 Are tension structures or compression structures more efficient when loaded axially ? tension structures tension.
Design of stiffening rings Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I. Lavassas, G. Nikolaidis, P.Zervas Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki,
Preloaded anchors (WP 1.4 background document presentation) Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki.
Piston Assembly Gas and Inertia forces are applied. Gas and Inertia forces are applied. Both of these forces are variable in Both of these forces are variable.
4-Chapter Allowable stresses. contents Introduction 2.6.1(p8) Compression element, Axial or bending2.6.1(p8) Compression element, Axial or bending Axial.
Some Features of the European Norm for Cold-Formed Steel Design in comparison with the AISI Specification S. Ádány*, B. Schafer** *Budapest University.
Two-Span LRFD Design Example
Project #3: Design of a MEMS Vertical Actuator Jianwei Heng Alvin Tai ME128 Spring 2005.
Seismic design for the wind turbine tower (WP1.5 background document presentation) Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki.
Case study: tripods and cross-joints (1) Established within the GROWTH project GRD "Improvement of Service Life and Reliability of Cold Forging.
Parameteres thickness= Boost: 4.5g’s * shelf 1: 4540kg 2: 1588kg 3: 680kg 4: 4536kg surface: 12400kg Parafoil Deployment: 4g’s * surface: 12400kg.
ENGR 220 Section
Home Work #4 Due Date: 18 Mar, 2010 (Turn in your assignment at the mail box of S581 outside the ME general office) The solutions must be written on A4.
ENGR 220 Section 13.1~13.2.
 2005 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd TUTORIAL-1 : UNIAXIAL LOAD 1 PROBLEM-1 1 m P A composite A-36 steel bar shown in the figure has 2 segments,
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
WORKSHEET 2 FAILURE, STRESS AND STRAIN
Chapter 6 Plate girder.
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
University of Palestine
 2005 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd TUTORIAL-1 : UNIAXIAL LOAD 1 PROBLEM-1 1 m P A composite A-36 steel bar shown in the figure has 2 segments,
Redesign of the STOL CH 701 Landing Gear Strut
Structural option for the Jinping neutrino central detector Contributor : Yuanqing Wang, Zongyi Wang Speaker : Zongyi Wang Department of civil engineering,
ENT 153 TUTORIAL 1.
 2005 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd TUTORIAL-1 : UNIAXIAL LOAD 1 PROBLEM-1 1 m P A composite A-36 steel bar shown in the figure has 2 segments,
Task 2.2 – Identification of most suitable face-sheets and optimization of panel properties Duration: month 1 to month 12 Partners involved: MOTULAB (WP.
1 BEAM-COLUMNS PROF. V. KALYANARAMAN Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai
6- Calculation of shear stress at composite interface: A)Under service load: Strain and stress distributions across composite beam cross- section, under.
Pure Tungsten HCal: ‘staircase’ design Structural analyses and possible optimizations.
J.Cugnoni, LMAF/EPFL,  Goal: ◦ extract natural resonnance frequencies and eigen modes of a structure  Problem statement ◦ Dynamics equations (free.
Unit-5. Torsion in Shafts and Buckling of Axially Loaded Columns Lecture Number-5 Mr. M. A.Mohite Mechanical Engineering S.I.T., Lonavala.
1C8 Advanced design of steel structures
Wind Turbine Power Plant. Sources ●
Stresses and Deformations in 14 T Nb 3 Sn Solenoid of 0.8 m I.R. and 1.0 m O.R. & Half Length Bob Weggel 10/7/10.
Chapter 5 Introduction to Axially Loaded Compression Members.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Deformations and stresses in the flux return yoke A.Efremov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov Darmstadt,
4. Local strength calculation
Status of DCH Mechanical Structure 13 Dec S. Lauciani2 Summary Proposal for a mechanical structure of DCH Stringing strategy and analysis of deformations.
PRESSURE VESSEL. 1.Determine the bursting steam pressure of a steel shell with diameter of 10 inches and made of ¼ in thick steel plate. The joint efficiency.
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
Torsion of opened cross sections.
Present status of the flux return yoke design
55th ASMR National Scientific Conference
Imperial College OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE Department of Aeronautics Failure Analysis of a Composite Wingbox with Impact Damage:- A Fracture.
From: A Novel Elastic Squeeze Film Total Hip Replacement
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Mechanical results on the double aperture Version V20ar
WIND TURBINE GENERATORS.
Cryostat design and heat loads
Physical-Model-Based Data Interpretation
Outline CH1.Introduction CH2.Preliminary Design CH3.3D Model.
Fatigue to Failure: FEA Predictions of Limit Conditions for Axial Fatigue Loading of Generic Coronary Stent Designs Part 2: Geometry 1 with EP correction.
Evaluation of shell thicknesses Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I. Lavassas, G. Nikolaidis, P.Zervas Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki,
What FEA can be used in:. The whole tower analysis
Mechanics of Materials Engr 350 – Lecture 38 Columns
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, All Rights Reserved
Iakovos Lavasas Civil Engineer Padelis Zervas Dr. Civil Enginner
Anomalous Flexural Behaviors of Microtubules
Design of stiffening rings. Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I. Lavassas, G
Stress distribution around door-opening. Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I
Presentation transcript:

Stress distribution around door-opening Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I. Lavassas, G. Nikolaidis, P.Zervas Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki, Greece

Stress distribution around door opening Main objectives to check: a)Stress distribution around the door opening b)Shell buckling at door position Linear static analysis has been performed in all cases Wind load direction x+ (producing maximum compressive stresses to the door position) Ideal stress distribution around door opening

Buckling analysis – no ring at all Buckling analysis a)No stiffening at all causes 1 st to 7 th buckling modes to appear in door position b)When stiffening the door by any type (thick ring, comb type stiffeners), no one of the first 10 buckling modes stands on the door.

No stiffeners – Vm stress distribution Max σ vm ~= 300 Mpa for the tower (excluding door position) In this case: Max σ vm =565 Mpa >> f y around the opening

A: Stiffening with a rigid ring (d=70 mm) around the door (existing case) Max σ vm ~= 300 Mpa for the tower (excluding door position) In this case: Max σ vm =335 Mpa around the opening First 10 eigenmodes appear to the upper part of the shell

Max σ vm ~= 300 Mpa for the tower (excluding door position) In this case: Max σ vm =320 Mpa around the opening Max σvm =450 to the ring >> f y  needs redesign First 10 eigenmodes appear to the upper part of the shell (identical to A:) B: Stiffening with a weak ring (d=30 mm) around the door and additional stiffeners of comb type

Even with presence of stiffeners, ring needs to be at least 60 mm thick Max σ vm ~= 300 Mpa for the tower (excluding door position) In this case: Max σ vm =320 Mpa around the opening Max σ vm =337 to the ring First 10 eigenmodes appear to the upper part of the shell (identical A: & B:) Stress state is almost identical to A: C: Stiffening with a ring (d=60 mm) around the door and additional stiffeners of comb type

Door stiffening comparison on another 45 m high 1 MW turbine tower a) Weak ring + comb type stiffeners + vertical stiffeners : Max σ vm ~= 311 Mpa b) Weak ring + comb type stiffeners : Max σ vm ~= 345 Mpa c) Only one rigid ring: Max σ vm =335 Mpa around the opening