Alyxia Banks ex R.Br. Alyxia rubricaulis subsp poyaensis Boiteau Alyxia rubricaulis (Baill.) Guillaumin genus: species: subspecies: Classification of specimens according to Boiteau & Allorge 1979 lectotype holotype circumscription of subspecies poyaensis circumscription of species rubricaulis 390
Alyxia Banks ex R.Br. Alyxia poyaensis (Boiteau) DJMiddleton comb.nov. Alyxia rubricaulis (Baill.) Guillaumin genus: species: Classification of specimens according to Middleton 2002 lectotype holotype subspecies:
Alyxia Banks ex R.Br. Alyxia poyaensis (Boiteau) DJMiddleton comb.nov. Alyxia rubricaulis (Baill.) Guillaumin genus: species: Classification of specimens according to Middleton 2002 subspecies: lectotype holotype described in Middletons Revision circumscription of species poyaensis circumscription of species rubricaulis
Alyxia Banks ex R.Br. Alyxia rubricaulis subsp poyaensis Boiteau Alyxia rubricaulis (Baill.) Guillaumin genus: species: subspecies: Comparison of alternative classification of specimens Alyxia poyaensis (Boiteau) DJMiddleton comb.nov synonymy Alyxia poyaensis (Boiteau) DJMiddleton comb.nov. Alyxia rubricaulis subsp poyaensis Boiteau Alyxia rubricaulis (Baill.) Guillaumin Name shared (synoymous) but concepts differ as shown by circumscription
Alyxia Banks ex R.Br. Alyxia rubricaulis subsp poyaensis Boiteau Alyxia rubricaulis (Baill.) Guillaumin genus: species: subspecies: Comparison of alternative classification of specimens Alyxia poyaensis (Boiteau) DJMiddleton comb.nov concept of Alyxia rubricaulis (Baill.) Boiteau according to DJMiddleton concept of Alyxia rubricaulis (Baill.) Boiteau according to Boiteau 390
An author can assert that synonymy exists between two concepts in separate classifications, or this can be assigned on the basis of shared circumscriptions (i.e. the similarity in the set of specimens included) (i.e. the case here with poyaensis) Because of the rules of nomenclature valid names might be shared between taxa that are not considered identical, and have different circumscriptions (the case here with rubricaulis). The Prometheus I/II integrated database holds data on described specimens and taxonomic hierarchies (and names, which can be calculated by the rules of priority etc.). Therefore it should be possible to base taxon circumscription on descriptive data (or ‘characters’). This will depend on collection of sufficient comparable high quality descriptive data.
Middleton’s distinction between A.rubricaulis and A.poyaensis (A.poyaensisis)... is close to A.rubricaulis but differs from it in the attenuate leaf base, the leaf blade apex always being mucronate even when the leaf is rounded, the fewer flowered inflorescences and the extremely flat peduncles by which it is most readily identified. Recorded evidence for this distinction Does Middleton consider deccurent to mean attenuate? mucronate is not a ‘distinguishing’ feature only one specimen is scored for this ‘distinguishing’ feature