Sharing Our Stories, Improving Our Service, Declaring Our Relevance Reviewing Assessment Data Creating an Assessment Rubric Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

READ Overview and Relevance for ‘All Children Reading by 2015’ Marguerite Clarke The World Bank All Children Reading by 2015: From.

Advertisements

Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.

Performance Management Review FAQs

MSJC – B.O.T. Self Evaluation (FA08) June 11, 2009 Goals of the Board Self Evaluation: 1.WASC Accreditation Standard Requirements 2.Evaluation of Board.

Montse Moharra; Antoni Parada on behalf of WP8 of the EUnetHTA project Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research EUnetHTA HANDBOOK ON.

The Carnegie Classification for Institutions Engaged with Community: Challenges, Benefits, and Understandings from the Documentation Process Amy Driscoll,

The quality framework of European statistics by the ESCB Quality Conference Vienna, 3 June 2014 Aurel Schubert 1) European Central Bank 1) This presentation.

The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.

Collecting Artifacts: Showcasing Your Best Work!

The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August

Teaching Quality Indicators Project Aims of today’s session: To consider the scope of ‘Institutional Climate and Systems’ To consider indicators as defined.

The Soft Topics in Software Engineering Mark Ardis Stephen Chenoweth Frank Young.

Sharing Knowledge: Using the Wiki Tool to Instruct & Inform Lori Dekydtspotter The Lilly Library Indiana University, Bloomington Ohio Valley Group of Technical.

11 STUDENT SUCCESS 2020 Felicia Patterson Vice President, Learner Support Services Anne Arundel Community College ACCT New and Experienced Trustees Governance.

Certified Business Process Professional (CBPP®)

Choosing Your Primary Research Method What do you need to find out that your literature did not provide?

ARL perspectives on accuracy in web analytics reporting on digital libraries CNI Fall 2013 Task Force Meeting Washington, DC December 9, 2013.

A Strategy for Assessment PORTFOLIOS Jones, M., Shelton, M. (2011). Developing Your Portfolio--Enhancing Your Learning and Showing Your Stuff: A Guide.

Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.

Departmental Learning Assessment Developing Strategies to Assess Value NMLA Annual Conference, April 19, 2013.

ASSESSMENT WHERE WE ARE AND WHERE WE ARE GOING…...

Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,

Library Assessment in North America Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia American Library Association Mid-Winter.

The Assessment Environment in North American Research Libraries Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia 7th Northumbria.

Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.

Storyboard Presentation February 26-27, 2008 Clearwater, Florida ® Stage-Gate is a registered trademark of Product Development Institute Inc. and member.

Proposition: Digital Collections Are Easier to Find and Use through DLF Aquifer’s American Social History Online Katherine Kott, Aquifer Director Library.

Deconstructing Standard 2c Dr. Mike Mahan Gordon College 1.

Website to Access Presentation WACY Landscape Report A preliminary look at the distribution of resources for children and youth in Washtenaw County.

Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.

Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.

…and how to give it to them What CEOs Want Patti Phillips, Ph.D.

Foundations of Assessment I Understanding the Assessment Process.

Engaging Student Affairs Professionals in Division-Wide Assessment Lisa Garcia-Hanson,University of Washington Tacoma Charlotte Tullos, Central Washington.

BPK Strategic Planning: Briefing for Denpasar Regional Office Leadership Team Craig Anderson Ahmed Fajarprana August 11-12, 2005.

The Impact of Health Coaching

+ Integrated Planning − What Does It Take? AASHE 2012 Phyllis Grummon, PhD Society for College and University Planning.

Dr. Maria-Carme Torras i Calvo Chair, IFLA Information Literacy Section Dr. Sharon Mader Secretary, IFLA Information Literacy Section Global Partnerships.

Florida Education Center Tallahassee, Florida December 3, 2003 Dr. R. E. LeMon Vice Chancellor for Academic and Student Affairs 1 Florida Board of Governors.

MS 219 Historical Data. M.S. 219 Quality Review Recommendations ( ) 1. Further develop all teachers’ skills, knowledge, and understanding of.

EFFECTIVE PRACTICES: RETENTION PLANS Presented to AIHEC 40 th Anniversary Conference August 9, 2013 Institute of American Indian Arts and Ilisagvik College.

Student Outcomes Assesment for CTE Programs. Student Outcomes Assessment and Program Review  In 2004, the Program Review process was redesigned based.

From SMART Goals to Action!. SMART Goals S – Specific M – Measurable A – Achievable R – Relevant T – Time-bound.

March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.

Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.

Standard 1 School Library Media Coordinators Demonstrate Leadership Staff development documentation Newsletters Conference documentation Websites School.

CCC Planning & Assessment “Wrap Up” Findings & Recommendations By: Diane Drebin, Kate Gray and Judy Redder (a.k.a.“The Wrappers”) 06/02/08.

LIBECON NEGOTIATING SUCCESSOR TO LIBECON2000 IPF COORDINATOR WEBSITE

Data Teams. Data Teams in Action Medical/Education connections Double Entry Journal MVP – Most Valuable Point Explain one MVP with a partner and then.

Sponsorship on Quality The final report Zsuzsanna Kovács Expert Group Meeting on National Quality Assurance Frameworks UNSD, New York, September.

Key Leader Orientation 3- Key Leader Orientation 3-1.

CAPSTONE. Capstone What is a “Capstone” ? culminating activity completed in senior year project focused on a student’s personal interest, career path.

Post University. INSTITUTION: Post University, Waterbury,CT NAMES of Team members: Dylan Clyne, Maura Bozeman and Randal Streck VISION – Our departmental.

Raising the Bar for Oregon. Why Now?  New Mathematics Content Standards were adopted for grades K-8 in 2007 and high school in Oregon Statewide.

Three year implementation plan Consultation Implementation Planning Ongoing Support and Progress Monitoring Partnership for Sustainability.

Deconstructing Standard 2c Laura Frizzell Coastal Plains RESA 1.

Developing a Strategic Framework for Early Intervention: Children, Young People and Families Faith Mann Director of Targeted and Early Intervention Services.

AACTE Bortner Data Initiatives Sungti Hsu Director State Affiliates and Partnership Support Yupin Bae Manager Professional Education Data System.

Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.

EVBB annual conference in Brussels 21th-24th October 2015  Erasmus + project  Key Action: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of good practices.

AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.

Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:

Come and be a member of our website.

Sam Houston State University

Enterprise/Security Alignment Review

Institution Name.

Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute

Mandate of the Eurostat Working Group

Sam Houston State University

Presentation transcript:

Sharing Our Stories, Improving Our Service, Declaring Our Relevance Reviewing Assessment Data Creating an Assessment Rubric Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria Library Assessment Conference August 2011

 Problem: Is it wise; is it possible to standardized assessment activities and reporting? What assessment is shared on our websites? Share our Stories, Proclaim our Value Question: Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

What is assessment?. Assessment is the tool(s), the data, and the analysis that shapes continuous program improvement. Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

What we did 1. Review124 Association of Research Libraries member websites 2. Examine publically available assessment data 3. Examine Data Sets  Service Quality  Information Literary (IL)  Organizational Data 4. Create Data Points Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

Results: Service Quality Benchmarking Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

Results: Service Quality Professionally Recommended Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

Results: In-house Service Quality  Organizational  Collections  Existing Data  Website data  Departmental data Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

Results: IL Benchmarking Assessment Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

Results: In-house IL Assessment Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

Results: Organizational Data Sets Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

Results: Organizational Data Sets Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

Findings 1. Data is all over the place 2. No standards in reporting 3. Most positions are relatively new 4. Drive for accountability relatively new Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

Recommendation Assessment rubric Provides Process Provides Standard Provides Self-evaluation Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

Rubric Self-Evaluation Assessment Rubric Target Indicators & Categories Category 1: Project Development Benchmark 1 Milestones 2 3 Capstone 4 Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

Rubric Target Indicators & Categories Category 1: Project Development Question: Category 2: Project Implementation Category 3: Project Wrap-up Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

Rubric Category 1: Project Development Benchmark 1 Milestones 2 3 Capstone 4 Question: Developed a focused question. What is the question? What is the need? Question or assessment need is vague. Unclear where to get data or how to create data. Begins to define assessment question or need by correlating question to library need;. Defines the scope of assessment question or need by correlating question to library need; to library strategic plan; to parent institutions strategic plan and goals. Effectively defines the scope of the assessment question or need. Ties question to direct need in the library; to library strategic plan; to university strategic plan and goals. Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

Rubric Category 3: Project Wrap-up Benchmark 1 Milestones 2 3 Capstone 4 Analysis Reporting Has not reported out the results and/or analysis of assessment project. Has created preliminary report regarding the results and/or analysis of assessment project. Creates a report regarding the results and/or analysis of assessment project. Effectively creates a complete report regarding the results and/or analysis of assessment project and considers the audience for the report. Action plan Review Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011

Questions? Sharing Our Stories Passonneau & Lewin Northumbria 2011