Selected Findings from the Vermont Student Mobility Project Doctoral Dissertation Research Study Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Program University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Equity - Research Reveals the What, the Where and the How November 21, 2011.
Advertisements

Has NCLB Improved Teacher and Teaching Quality for Disadvantaged Students? Laura M. Desimone Thomas M. Smith Vanderbilt University David Frisvold University.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
Achievement of Hmong Students in Saint Paul Public Schools Hmong Youth Educational Services Banquet – June 2006 Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation.
Explaining Race Differences in Student Behavior: The Relative Contribution of Student, Peer, and School Characteristics Clara G. Muschkin* and Audrey N.
Afterschool Youth Outcomes Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Leadership Institute Neil Naftzger.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
1 Standards, Curriculum, and Research Mathematically Connected Communities (MC 2 ) Adapted from a PowerPoint by Barbara A. Austin, Ph.D.
Working Toward a Statewide Information System to Track the Effectiveness of Student Aid Financial Programs in Maryland Michael J. Keller Director of Policy.
Step by Step: College Awareness and Planning for Families, Counselors and Communities.
March 2011 Children Entering School Ready to Learn: Maryland school readiness data.
March 2010 what the school readiness data mean for Harford County’s children ©
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August
Disparities in our country 83% of all low-income children fail to read on grade level at 3rd grade –74% will not catch up in later grades –Predicts: High.
Policy and implementation prevent Obesity; Lesson from USA. Kitiporn Tupsart.
Title: A study… Name Department of Early Childhood Education, University of Taipei ABSTRACT We discuss how a research-based model of the parental involvement.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
EMBARGOED UNTIL WEDNESDAY September 14, :00 AM NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNTIL EMBARGO HAS EXPIRED.
Sensitivity of Teacher Value-Added Estimates to Student and Peer Control Variables October 2013 Matthew Johnson Stephen Lipscomb Brian Gill.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
1 Standards, Curriculum, and Research Mathematically Connected Communities (MC 2 ) Adapted from a PowerPoint by Barbara A. Austin, Ph.D.
Janet M. Sloand, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network (PaTTAN)
Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education Presentation August 23, Planning for Changing Enrollment 2010 US Census Data What Does It Tell Us.
+ Voorheesville CSD Strategic Plan Community Forum September 30, 2015.
What the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children March 2008.
1 Is the Achievement Gap in Indiana Narrowing? September 19,
Presenter Disclosures (1)The following personal financial relationships with commercial interests relevant to this presentation existed during the past.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Office of Data and Accountability OCTOBER 26, 2015.
Fulton City School District CDEP Plan Implementation Update Fulton Board of Education October 27, 2015.
Review of Special Education in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts: Findings and Recommendations Dr. Thomas Hehir Silvana and Christopher Pascucci Professor.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
U SING D ATA TO ASSESS AND INFORM SCHOOL CHANGE Data for change Presenter: Judith Marty Principal Mater Academy Charter Middle High.
Ready At Five & Maryland State Department of Education.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
Baltimore County March School Readiness A child’s ability to successfully do kindergarten work. A Profound Effect Children who enter school with.
March 2013 Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report Washington County.
Allegany County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Anne Arundel County March 2013 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
EMBARGOED UNTIL WEDNESDAY September 14, :00 AM NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNTIL EMBARGO HAS EXPIRED.
Effective factors that increase academic achievement among low SES youth Alex Anley November 30, 2016.
Cecil County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Wicomico County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Prince George’s County
Washington County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Harford County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
TRANSITION AND READINESS OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL (SHS) STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE.
Mesa Union School District “A Day in the Life of Data”
Baltimore County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Baltimore City March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Dalton Middle School Data Review
Legislative Council Study Committee on the Identification and Management of Dyslexia Dee Pettack, Legislative Liaison Barb Novak, Literacy Consultant.
A place to learn, explore and grow LEI Mission: to improve the academic achievement and well-being of Latino students and their families.
Queen Anne’s County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Garrett County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Student Mobility and Achievement Growth In State Assessment Mohamed Dirir Connecticut Department of Education Paper presented at National Conference.
what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children
North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Calvert County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Worcester County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Talbot County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Opportunity Areas 5 September 2017.
Russell Elementary School By: Bridget Purdy April 2014
Anne Arundel County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Frederick County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Presentation transcript:

Selected Findings from the Vermont Student Mobility Project Doctoral Dissertation Research Study Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Program University of Vermont Presentation by Ann Morgan, Ed.D. for Research Methods in Education Saint Michael’s College October 4, 2005

Finding Mobile Children in Vermont A study by Ann Morgan Ed.D.

Student Mobility In Vermont: What is It? School enrollment change -- not due to customary promotion -- and its relationship to outcomes, for students and schools in Vermont Most research about student mobility is urban- based Student mobility projects in other states have found that the majority of these students are disadvantaged youth from low-income families Mobile students lag behind their peers academically (continued)

Student Mobility In Vermont: What is It? Academic consequences of student mobility affect their schools since NCLBA implementation sanctions influence school enrollments The need for information about rural student mobility during early NCLBA implementation is important in predominantly rural Vermont The Vermont study of student mobility was the first statewide study of outcomes of mobility for students and schools in a rural state

Findings Summary High incidence in 30% of schools (mirrors urban-based mobility) Wide achievement gap between mobile and stable students of 3-10 percentile points on standardized tests across grade levels and content areas School factors associated with mobility: Between 8% and 32% of the variation in student mobility was attributable to resources in schools and school practices (Consistent with CA study)

Relationships of Mobility to Student Outcomes An in-depth examination of mobility, achievement, demographic, and educational factors for grades 4, 8, and 10 during school year , revealed significant and disturbing relationships Mobile children performed 3-10 percentile ranks lower than their stable counterparts did across grade levels and content areas (continued)

Relationships of Mobility to Student Outcomes (continued) The performance gap between Mobile students and their peers in mathematics increased dramatically from Grade 4 to Grade 8, and it increased slightly from Grade 8 to Grade 10 The performance gap between mobile students and their peers in English language arts widened moderately from Grade 4 to Grade 8, and decreased from Grade 8 to Grade 10, leveling off at the original disparity by Grade 10

Relationships of Mobility to Student Outcomes (continued) more likely to participate in free or reduced lunch programs at school less likely to have a 504 plan in place more likely to have kept a writing portfolio for 0-1 years (versus 2+ years) more likely to have kept a mathematics portfolio 0-1 years (versus 2+ years) more likely to not meet the standard on mathematics performance tests.

Incidence of Mobility In-mobility rates for Vermont Public Schools, % or higher for 95 schools 30% or higher for 31 schools 35% or higher for 15 schools

Relationships Between Mobility and State Assessments

Acknowledgement This project was a collaborative effort involving the doctoral students in the program of Educational Leadership at the University of Vermont, the Vermont State Department of Education and the Agency of Human Services. Findings and conclusions of the studies are the sole responsibility of the author.