Public Perceptions of Scientists: Questionable Research Practices Nov 21, 2014 Ed Krug BioE room 101 876-2404

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter Nine: Ethical Issues for Criminal Prosecutors
Advertisements

The standard economic model of consumer behavior and its weaknesses
IMRaD: The Format for Scientific Writing
Rimas Norvaiša 30 June 2011
HEARINGS COMMITTEE 6 elected members Must have permanent tenure when elected.
 Scientific misconduct is the violation of the standard codes of scholarly conduct and ethical behavior in professional scientific research.scholarly.
Edwin L. Cooper, Ph.D., Sc.D. Chair Professor Taipei Medical University 2009 Distinguished Professor, Laboratory of Comparative Neuroimmunology Department.
1 Checks and Balances. 2 Why? 3 IF You Are in Lab.
The regulation of research by funding bodies: an emerging ethical issue for the alcohol and other drug sector? Peter Miller 1, David Moore 2 and John Strang.
AP Psychology. 1. Psychological studies almost always come to conclusions that affirm human intuition. 2. Psychological studies almost always come to.
Readings High Points Key Points From Each Article Day I.
Ethics in Biostatistics Jessie McKinney Richard Kennedy.
Introduction to Research
BPS - 5th Ed. Chapter 91 Producing Data: Experiments.
MUSC College of Graduate Studies Postdoctoral Retreat on the Responsible Conduct of Research “Misconduct & Whistleblower Protection” Ed Krug BioE
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Journey Into Self-Awareness “Know Thyself.” ~ Socrates.
Rethinking Undergraduate Publication: Pacific Northwest Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities James J. Butler Co-Managing Editor Professor.
Research Methods Key Points What is empirical research? What is the scientific method? How do psychologists conduct research? What are some important.
MUSC Biomedical Trainee Retreat on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Career Development August 20st, 21 st and 28 th, 2015 Retreat Facilitator: Ed.
Teaching RCR to undergraduate and graduate audiences: college sophomores, seniors and graduate students Julio F. Turrens, Ph.D. Associate Dean College.
By Reaz Uddin, Ph. D. Dr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University.
Research Ethics November 2nd 2005 Kirsten Ribu.
©Sideview Ethical research publication: who’s responsibility is it? Liz Wager PhD Publications Consultant, Sideview
Psychology Ch. 1 From Myers, Psychology 8e From Myers, Psychology 8e.
MUSC College of Graduate Studies Biomedical Trainee Retreat on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Career Development “Effective Communication Strategies”
Abnormal Psychology, Eleventh Edition by Ann M. Kring, Gerald C
MODULE 2 PSYCHOLOGY & SCIENCE. ANSWERING QUESTIONS Researchers tend to use three methods Each one provides different kinds of information  Survey  Case.
Interaction Effects and Theory Testing Kaiser et al. (2006) social identity theory –tested hypotheses about attention to prejudice cues in the environment.
Why editors need to be concerned about publication ethics Elizabeth Wager, PhD Chair, Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
MUSC College of Graduate Studies Postdoctoral Retreat on the Responsible Conduct of Research “Misconduct & Whistleblower Protection” Ed Krug
Results of Poor Design Inaccurate assessment of the prevalence of homosexuality based on human sexuality research by Kinsey, et al.
WHAT I CAME TO BELIEVE Main Claims. Make It Argumentative A strong Main Claim invites skepticism and counterargument and it requires reasons and evidence.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
September 23, 2010 Objective: Describe the methods scientists use when trying to solve a problem Drill: List steps scientists may use when trying to.
Ethical Issues in Journal Publication Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
Recognition and Response Further Understanding barriers to recognition and response 1 P26.
Excavating Human Behaviors.  Pretend you are a Psychologist and briefly describe how you would study the following:  1. The life & culture of the “urban.
Unit 2 – Public Health Epidemiology Chapter 4 – Epidemiology: The Basic Science of Public Health.
Writing up results. Results are divided into two main sections, usually Descriptive Statistics – Include frequencies for nominal/categorical variables.
Original Research Publication Moderator: Dr. Sai Kumar. P Members: 1.Dr.Sembulingam 2. Dr. Mathangi. D.C 3. Dr. Maruthi. K.N. 4. Dr. Priscilla Johnson.
Publication and Research Misconduct Stephanie Harriman Deputy Medical Editor.
Psychology I Fri, 3/2  Please get out your textbook, Ch 2, Sec 2 Outline, & Ch 1 Summative Assessment Did you know?? Scientific research does not always.
CAN WE STUDY THE MIND? PSYCHOLOGY – THE STUDY OF BEHAVIOR AND MENTAL PROCESSES AND HOW THEY ARE AFFECTED BY AN ORGANISM’S PHYSICAL/MENTAL STATES AND THEIR.
Scientific investigations.  Question/problem –What do you want to know  Hypothesis- logical prediction for the question or problem  Variables- Factors.
Hugo Horta Center for the Advancement of Higher Education, Tohoku University Japan CIES-ISCTE, Portugal.
Understanding the Basics of Research Methods Part I.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 2 Tools of Positive Analysis.
CHAPTER 9 Producing Data: Experiments BPS - 5TH ED.CHAPTER 9 1.
1 Future Research Leaders Program Research Integrity and Codes of Conduct : How to add scenery to the roadmap?
1 Foundations for RCR Talked presented at the Conference on: Mentoring and Supervision for the Responsible Conduct of Research Washington University School.
BPS - 5th Ed. Chapter 91 Producing Data: Experiments.
Linking Data with Action Part 2: Understanding Data Discrepancies.
Ethical Conduct of Research for New Faculty, Post-Docs and Graduate Students Brief Overview.
Producing Data: Experiments BPS - 5th Ed. Chapter 9 1.
1 Apply What You Know to a Problem You Have Never Seen: How AP Students Apply Statistical Reasoning to Solve a Task Using Empirical Data Robin Rider, East.
MUSC College of Graduate Studies Postdoctoral Retreat on the Responsible Conduct of Research “Moral Reasoning” “Moral Reasoning” Ed Krug BioE room 101.
By Nancy Ghattas S Integral part of children and adult lives Average amount of playing time is around 13 hrs per week Most popular games contains.
Challenges in Promoting RCR: Reflections from a Public Funder´s Perspective Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research [Canadian Institutes of Health.
PSY2014M: A Theory of Everything Dr David A. Ellis.
Exploring The Comparative Communications Effectiveness of Advertising and Media Placement Initial Findings An Experimental Study Conducted By: Dr. David.
SOCIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION. THREE WAYS OF DOING SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH Positivist Sociology Interpretive Sociology Critical Sociology.
What is holding us back in the prevention of QRPs? Lex Bouter.
Adolescent Psychology
Questionable practices and misconduct in science
Defamation.
MUSC College of Graduate Studies
MUSC College of Graduate Studies
Public Perceptions of Scientists: Questionable Research Practices
Educating Competent, Responsible, and Successful Researchers
How can good publication standards influence research integrity Sabine Kleinert Vice-Chair of COPE Senior Executive Editor The Lancet First World Conference.
Presentation transcript:

Public Perceptions of Scientists: Questionable Research Practices Nov 21, 2014 Ed Krug BioE room

“…fabricating more than a decade’s worth of scientific data on obesity, menopause and aging, much of it while conducting clinical research as a tenured faculty member at the University of Vermont.” d=all&_r=0 “A charge of widespread scientific fraud, involving 26 articles published in 11journals, was leveled by…” University Suspects Fraud by a Researcher Who Studied Red Wine dipak-k-das-a-university-of-connecticut-researcher.html An Unwelcome Discovery Lack of integrity leading to findings of research misconduct are increasingly in the news

Is unethical behavior in conducting research getting worse or … is there a greater awareness of its impact? scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/35543/title/Opinion--Ethics- Training-in-Science/

Actual incidence of research misconduct (FFP) is rather low – about findings published per year nationally (out of ~400 investigations) – but occurrence of at least one “questionable” practice is quite high – about 25% of all investigators (includes students, postdocs, and faculty)

Research-Practices.aspx Examples of QRP: Neglecting negative outcomes Using inappropriate statistics to support one’s hypothesis Inappropriate research design Leaving out relevant controls Inappropriate re-use of controls Removal of ‘outliers’ Conscious bias Unethical experimentation Peer review abuse

Martinson et al. (2005). Nature 435: Questionable Research Practices Survey

LK John et al. (2012). Psychol. Sci. 23: n = 2,155 Self-admission of questionable research practices by academic psychologists

Prevalence of doubting the integrity of research by others LK John et al. (2012). Psychol. Sci. 23:

“Consistent with the notion that latitude for rationalization is positively associated with engagement in QRPs, our findings showed that respondents who admitted to a QRP tended to think that their actions were defensible.” LK John et al. (2012). Psychol. Sci. 23: The ability to rationalize questionable research practices … do the ends justify the means?

tegrity jpg blago1_cst_feed_ _16_28_37_1500h 400w306.jpeg VS. “The truth of the matter is that you always know the right thing to do. The hard part is doing it.” General Norman Schwarzkopf

Evolution of the AIDS pandemic involved questionable research practices

“And the Band Played On” Main Characters

Make two lists as you watch the video: Actions by individuals that seem wrong or questionable Conflicts between individuals or groups that may have had the greatest impact on facilitating the current AIDS epidemic