Www.clasp.org Work Activities and TANF Elizabeth Lower-Basch Director Income and Work Supports.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rhode Islands Caseload Reduction Credit in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (RI Works) Program FFY12 [ffy11 data]
Advertisements

1 CalWORKs California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids September 2009.
APRIL 22, 2014 DAVID A. BERNS,DIRECTOR FY 2015 Community Budget Briefing.
1 Work Support Program An Individual Training Course for the Work Support Program.
TANF and W-2 Lecture 18 Today’s readings: Mead, Government Matters, Ch. 1, eReserves DeParle, Ch 15: Caseworker XM128W: Milwaukee,
Benefit Conditionality in the U.S. Welfare System and How it Applies to WIA Jason Turner, Heritage Foundation Former Chief Administrator of New York City’s.
TANF Reauthorization A New Basic Workforce Development Program?
1 VITA at Colgate: The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) VITA Presentation Nicole Simpson January 2013.
TANF 101 Working Poor Families Project June 20, 2013 Elizabeth Lower-Basch Senior Policy Analyst.
19. Income Distribution and Poverty Income Inequality in the U.S. Poverty in the U.S. Income Inequality in the U.S. Poverty in the U.S.
Chapter 12 Poverty, Welfare, and Women Poverty in the U.S. Welfare  programs  incentives  reform EITC Poverty in the U.S. Welfare  programs  incentives.
PPA786: Urban Policy Class 17: The New World of Welfare Policy.
Revisiting Work Opportunity: From Tax Credits to Subsidized Jobs Big Ideas for Job Creation in a Jobless Recovery June 16, 2011 Elizabeth.
Chapter 12: Low-Income Assistance Chapter 12 Low-Income Assistance Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
OFAO D R A F T. Other Financial Aid Options Employment - an occupation by which a person earns a living Career Solutions One Stop Center No cost assistance.
Working with Families in THP- Plus Julie Jackson, Bill Wilson Center Angela Martinez, Bill Wilson Center Amber Goggia, St. Anne’s Peggy Perry, Larkin Street.
Texas Families First Task Force Meeting Presentation by Diane Rath Chair & Commissioner Representing the Public Texas Workforce Commission October 9, 2003.
The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. Goals of Welfare Reform & Beyond: To identify the major issues and opportunities for improved.
EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS FOR THE POOR
The Quiz Show Work Activities. Federal Work Activity Categories What are the 12 federal work activity categories? What are the 12 federal work activity.
The TANF Emergency Fund and Domestic Violence March 1, 2010 Elizabeth Lower-Basch Senior Policy Analyst.
1 CalWORKs California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids October 2007.
Overview of SNAP Employment & Training Ed Bolen Senior Policy Analyst Center on Budget and Policy Priorities November 2014.
Welfare Reform TANF Work Requirements and the Family.
Introduction Module Partnership. Accountability. Training. Hope.
New CalWORKs Work Requirements Legal Services of Northern California ©2004 ACL
TANF Recipients Living with a Disability: Policy Framework, Prevalence and Service Strategies Presentation to the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities.
11 The Welfare Transition Program Work Activity Definitions 2008.
TANF Regulation: Fiscal Provisions u Funding Options u MOE Requirements u Financial Principles u Definition of Expenditure u Admin Costs u Penalties /
1 DHS BUDGET PRESENTATION TO MICHIGAN CHILD CARE TASK FORCE March 3, 2010 Jennifer M. Granholm, Governor Ismael Ahmed, DHS Director Jane Schultz, DHS Budget.
The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. Overview of the 1996 Welfare Reform Law: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program Reduction.
Introduction to Benefit Access Working Poor Families Project Policy Academy June 30, 2011 Elizabeth Lower-Basch Senior Policy Analyst.
USE OF TANF FUNDS: OPPORTUNITIES
FINAL RULES FOR STATE TANF PROGRAMS TIP For additional advice see Dale Carnegie Training® Presentation Guidelines.
Meeting “Our” Two-Parent Participation Rate Regional Conference Call September 7, 2006.
National Association of State Liaisons for Workforce Development Winter Meeting Setting a New Course for State Welfare Programs January 22, 2007.
Countdown to Implementation of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 Agency for Workforce Innovation Spring 2006 Training.
USING THE TANF EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY FUND IN ARRA TO HELP POOR FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN Select Committee on Federal Stabilization Funds March 12, 2009 Celia.
Ohio Commission on Fatherhood Legislative Discussion September 24, 2015.
Poverty Programs. NEW DEAL REFORMS Created during the Depression President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Strategies Working With Two-Parent Families August 2007.
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org CSHB 3759 Testimony House Human Services Committee April 19, 2007 Celia Hagert, Senior Policy Analyst
10/27/20151 Introduction to Family Studies Welfare Reform.
Welfare Reform TANF Work Requirements and the Family.
Promoting Work Supports: Background, Issues, Opportunities June 17, 2005 Mark Greenberg Director of Policy Center for Law and Social Policy th.
Providing a Safety Net. Why Households Differ One of the main reasons why household income differs is because the number of household members who work.
STATE TANF PROGRAMS TIP For additional advice see Dale Carnegie Training® Presentation Guidelines.
WorkFirst WorkFirst WorkFirst can help you support your family.
1 Participation Rate Basics. 2 The Agreement FEDERAL Federal government provides a TANF block grant to states = $562,340,120 Florida is also one of 17.
ork ork Work – Part 261 ä Individual Responsibility ä State Accountability ä Work Activities ä Caseload Reduction Credit ä Work Penalties ä Waivers ä.
Negotiating Compromises between income provision (adequacy), work incentives, and cost minimization Today’s readings: DeParle, Ch 16: Boyfriends: Milwaukee,
Family/Case Progression Analysis Using the Looking Glass Forecasting Tool Presented by: Kevin Hamler-Dupras Self-Sufficiency Research Analyst DHS Office.
Welfare Reform TANF Work Requirements and the Family.
WORK AND PENALTIES General Session. Potential Penalties u Misuse of TANF funds u Intentional misuse of TANF funds u Failure to report required data u.
3/8/20161 Family Sociology Welfare Reform. 3/8/20162 Families & Poverty  The percentage living below poverty has changed little over the past 20 years.
Serving Public Assistance Recipients and Other Disadvantaged Populations under WIOA.
Negotiating Compromises between income provision (adequacy), work incentives, and cost minimization Today’s readings: DeParle, Ch 16: Boyfriends: Milwaukee,
TANF in the “Great Recession” and Beyond Elizabeth Lower-Basch CLASP July 16, 2009 CCD Webinar.
Human Services and Social Polilcy HN 300 Unit 5 Seminar-Helping the Needy Madelyn Harvey, PhD.
PPA786: Urban Policy Class 17: The New World of Welfare Policy.
Welfare Assistance GOVT Module 16.
Class 17: The New World of Welfare Policy
Overview of Income Redistribution Programs
EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS FOR THE POOR
Moderator: Charlotte Harris Workforce Analyst Department of Labor
Welfare Assistance December 7, 2017.
USING THE TANF EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY FUND IN ARRA TO HELP POOR FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN Select Committee on Federal Stabilization Funds March 12, 2009.
Work Activities and TANF
Flexible Funding in TANF HSFO 2014 Louisville, KY
Family Engagement: Two-Parent Service Delivery
Presentation transcript:

Work Activities and TANF Elizabeth Lower-Basch Director Income and Work Supports

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families 2 TANF Block Grant and MOE Cash Assistance and Work Activities

“welfare reform” replaced AFDC with TANF. Replaced uncapped matching funds with a fixed block grant ($16.5 billion a year) and maintenance of effort (MOE) requirement for state funds Block grant and MOE can be used for broad range of benefits and services aimed at 4 purposes of TANF  TANF funds can also be transferred to CCDBG or SSBG or used for activities authorized under prior law.

1.Provide assistance to needy families so that children can be cared for in their own homes or in the homes of relatives; 2.End dependence of needy parents on government benefits through work, job preparation, and marriage; 3.Reduce the incidence of out-of-wedlock pregnancies; and 4.Promote the formation and maintenance of two- parent families. 4

States must certify in state plan that they impose a work requirement on parents within 24 months and must sanction for non-participation, but have flexibility to define activities, exemptions.  All states impose participation requirements immediately, or even during the application process  States must sanction “in proportion” to non- compliance, can include removing adult from grant, but most eventually impose full-family sanctions. 5

States must meet the work participation rate  Does not apply to individual recipients, but to a state’s caseload as a whole  When people say an activity is “not allowed” under TANF, usually mean “not countable toward the WPR” Two types of countable activities  Core – primary activities  Non-core – only countable when combined with 20 hours per week of a core activity 6

ActivityTime LimitsCounts Toward the WPR Caps Unsubsidized employment Subsidized employment On-the-job training Work experience Community service Child care for recipients in community services None Yes None Vocational education trainingLimited to 12 months in a lifetime YesLimited to 30% of counted individuals (along with education for teen parents) Job skills training Education related to employment Secondary school attendance or GED ® classes for recipient without HS degree or equivalent None Can only be counted when combined with core activities None Job readiness and job search assistance Limited to 4 consecutive weeks and 6 or 12 weeks total per year YesNone 7

8

To be counted toward the WPR, recipients must average 30 hours per week of work participation  Reduced to 20 hours per week if single parent of child under 6  Higher hours requirement to be counted toward the two-parent rate. Daily supervision and documentation requirements – must be actual hours of participation, not just scheduled hours. No partial credit 9

Target rate is officially 50% for all families, 90% for two parent families But target is reduced due to caseload reduction credit (CRC) for decreases in caseload States can also get credit toward CRC for spending more MOE than required About half of states serve no two-parent families in TANF/MOE programs due to separate rate  Many provide assistance through solely state funded programs; others provide no assistance 10

National WPR achieved has been about 30%  States rates vary widely, but most states have “passed” WPR due to reduced targets  Number of states “failing” jumped in FY 2008 due to changes made by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, but most have adjusted. 6 states, DC, Guam and Puerto Rico failed in FY 2011  States may enter into “corrective compliance plan” rather than paying the penalties. 11

Often treated as primary measure of state TANF performance States that fail are subject to financial penalties  up to 5% of block grant for first year of failure, maximum penalty increases by 2% each year. Even if penalties are waived through corrective compliance, failure results in nasty headlines, Governor is unhappy 12

Measure of time in chair – does not measure whether services are effective in helping people achieve self-sufficiency. Forces caseworkers to focus on documenting participation, rather than on helping families. Incentivizes caseload reduction  Caseload reduction credit  Often easier to remove someone who is not participating from the caseload (and thus from the WPR) than to engage them in countable activities. 13

Very limited ability to count “barrier removal” activities – mental health, substance abuse treatment.  Even a few hours of counted participation uses up a week of “job readiness” Basic education, ESL not countable as a stand- alone activity (except for teen parents) Full-time vocational education limited to 12 months – often not enough to get a credential leading to a good-paying job. 14

Many states do not need to worry about the WPR due to caseload reduction credit. States have other tools they can use to meet WPR, including solely state funded programs and supplemental payment to working families. Many states are not taking full advantage of the ability to count education and training toward the work rate. Increased interest in demand-driven job training and work-based learning 16

Effective Standards

Solely state funded programs  Costs are not claimed as Maintenance of Effort  Many states serve two parent families, individuals with disabilities, students. Providing income supplements to low-income working families  Can be limited to former TANF recipients or broader 18

Many states have “work first” approach – job search not education and training Misconceptions about how restrictive the federal WPR rules are Belief that education doesn’t work for this population Inertia -- many states have not changed rules since 1996  Economy has changed since then  We know more about effective training programs 19

20

21 Lesley Turner The Returns to Higher Education for Welfare Recipients: Evidence from Colorado, 2011

High intensity, with clear connection to employment and skills valued by employers  Focus on credentials with economic payoff  Even participants with low basic skills start working on vocational skills quickly  “Stackable” credentials minimize tradeoff between short-term and long-term goals Addresses students’ overburdened lives  Supportive services  Flexible scheduling 22

Subsidized jobs, on the job training, apprenticeships Minimizes tradeoff between need to earn wages and skill building Many states successfully ran subsidized employment programs under the TANF Emergency Fund Attention from the workforce side 23

24

For more information: Elizabeth Lower-Basch th St, NW Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036