1 Miami Dade College Reclassification Study Presented by the Division of Human Resources February 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DELEGATION AUTHORITY. Agencies Delegated: Classifications Classifications Hire Above Minimum Hire Above Minimum Temporary Salary Adjustments Temporary.
Advertisements

Compensation & Classification Study Brevard Public Schools Compensation & Classification Study Brevard Public Schools July 17, 2007 Employee Orientations.
June 17,  Title Conversion  Career Service Pay Plan (Pay Grid)  Differentials  Initial (Partial) Implementation  Accessing Future Pay.
Classification and compensation Analysis Pilot Project MU Staff Job Title and Salary Study Office Administration and Support.
Staff Council Presentation You and Your PSD “Position Source Document” Human Resources Eduardo Salaz Associate Vice President and Chief Human Resources.
Oklahoma State University Human Resources 106 Whitehurst (405) Pay Possibilities Pay Possibilities.
1 Miami Dade College Reclassification Study Facilities Presented by the Division of Human Resources February 2007.
DENTON ISD Pay Study Design
© Prentice-Hall, Inc., 2001 Chapter Nine Building Pay Structures That Recognize Individual Contributions.
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
PAYING THEM RIGHT: TOOLS FOR SALARY ADMINISTRATION HR Liaison Network Spring Meeting Texas A&M University, Human Resources DIVISION OF FINANCE February.
Copyright © 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. City of Sierra Vista, AZ. City Council Presentation August 12, COMPENSATION AND.
The Catholic University of America Staff Compensation Study Town Hall Meeting February 12, 2003.
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
1 Strategic Staffing & Compensation Your NU Values Partner … “Committed to understanding and delivering value-added customer service that contributes to.
No 1 REVIEW OF ACADEMIC STRUCTURE PROPOSED GENERAL STAFF STRUCTURE 3 June 2008.
1 Compensation Update Lori Dougherty Director of Compensation December 8, 2009 Brandeis University pays competitive base market salaries as part of a total.
For Professional Staff Bloomington, East, Indianapolis, Kokomo, Northwest, South Bend, Southeast Compensation Program (CSI)
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Structure & Administration
Update on Job Reclassification System Redesign Project Civil Service Senate Patti Dion, Employee Relations Director Sheila Reger, OHR Consulting Team Manager.
Non Student, Non Regular (NSNR) Employees How to Hire Staff Temporary Employees.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Salary Survey Report January 30, 2007 State of Kansas.
classification and compensation Analysis Pilot Project
STAFF COMPENSATION PROGRAM TOWN HALL MEETINGS FEBRUARY 2004.
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
Career Banding Overview and Plan for Implementation.
What is the Global Grading Project
1 Attract, Develop and Engage the Workforce of the 21 st Century New Job Classification System (JCCS) Manager Preparation Session February 2011.
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
SECCP Salaried Employees Compensation and Classification Program June, 2005.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
1 APPENDIX A Cluster 1 Modifications and Cluster 2 Design September 2009 HR Solutions Center.
2005 Supervisory and Professional Salary Survey Final Report September 14, 2005.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
Classification & Compensation Study Outside firm (BCC) was hired to perform: Classification Study Internal Equity Pay equity compliance Study.
Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview
1 Fall Managing TXSTATE For Supervisors Office of Human Resources 601 University Drive Suite340 J. C. Kellam Bldg San Marcos, Texas Classification.
JOB EVALUATION & SALARY STRUCTURE DESIGN
Agenda Review Major Changes from January 8 Presentation of Draft Preliminary Results Review Final Recommendations Other Progress to Date  
 Compensation Philosophy  Implementation Policies and Procedures  Survey  Timing, Position Descriptions, Pay Plan Relationships, Cost  Additional.
Recommendations Recommendation 1: Regrade the ten classifications found to be 20 percent or more below market midpoint to be in alignment with the market.
Compease Staff Salary Administration Program. Compease - General A fully qualified and effective work force is essential to the College’s success Fundamental.
MAG Management Advisory Group, Inc.
Classification and compensation Analysis Pilot Project MU Staff Job Title and Salary Study Implementation Update.
Agenda Study Process Outreach Summary Salary Quartile Analysis
CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION. Classification & Compensation Position Classification Career Banding / Broadbanding Competency Assessments PeopleAdmin.
City of Missoula July 26,  FY07 compensation and classification plan  25 Pay Grades  Entry level, midpoint and maximum  30% spread from entry.
2011 Salary Administration Process Review TOM Presentation May 31, 2011.
Human Resources, Development, and Engagement Classification & Compensation Information September 17 th – 24 th.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Fair Pay for Northern California Nonprofits: The 2016 Compensation & Benefits Survey HIGHLIGHTS AND TRENDS May 12, 2016 Sponsored by CompassPoint Nonprofit.
Town of Carolina Beach Executive Summary for the Town Council Classification and Pay Study March 2015.
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Proposed Changes CALS May 24, 2016 Kelly Delforge, SPHR, SHRM-SCP Director, HR Solutions and Consulting Division of Human.
New Mexico Highlands University
1 Compensation Overview Council Budget Work Session #2 Dianne Randall Foster Director of Human Resources March 7, 2007.
2012 COMPENSATION STUDY RESULTS July 18, 2012 Board of Aldermen Worksession.
Classification and Compensation
Staff Compensation Structure
About the Study 1 Summary 2 Market Study Results 3 Recommendations 4.
Iredell County Classification and Compensation Study August 15 –
Classification & compensation Study
Pay and Classification Report Carolina Beach, North Carolina
VP for Administration and CFO VP for Academic Affairs
Working Title Guidelines
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Staff Compensation Update
Job Evaluation Salary Administration Program
Career Banding Program for North Carolina State Government Employees
FVP Review and Presentation of the SCPS Evergreen Study to the Spotsylvania County Board of Supervisors.
Classification and Compensation Department of Human Resources
Presentation transcript:

1 Miami Dade College Reclassification Study Presented by the Division of Human Resources February 2007

2 Purpose Present approved Reclassification Study Present approved Reclassification Study Communicate clearly the process, overall results, and how you will be affected. Communicate clearly the process, overall results, and how you will be affected.

3 Brief History Based on recommendations of: Based on recommendations of: Executive Committee Executive Committee Support Staff Council Presidents Support Staff Council Presidents College President College President Areas selected for review: Areas selected for review: Admissions/Registration Admissions/Registration Financial Aid Financial Aid Public Safety Public Safety Campus Services (Custodial, Mail Room and Copy Center) Campus Services (Custodial, Mail Room and Copy Center) Facilities (Maintenance, Groundskeepers and Quick Jobs) Facilities (Maintenance, Groundskeepers and Quick Jobs)

4 Brief History (Cont…) HR reviewed and analyzed 60 jobs according to staffing levels, using appropriate ratios and compensation surveys HR reviewed and analyzed 60 jobs according to staffing levels, using appropriate ratios and compensation surveys Based on feedback received, College Provost for Operations requested a formal reclassification review Based on feedback received, College Provost for Operations requested a formal reclassification review Human Resources Human Resources Engaged external consultant to complete study Engaged external consultant to complete study Reviewed findings, recommendations and completed cost/benefits analysis Reviewed findings, recommendations and completed cost/benefits analysis

5 Project Scope Validate/compare job duties with job descriptions (assisted by a Deans/Area Heads Task Force) Validate/compare job duties with job descriptions (assisted by a Deans/Area Heads Task Force) Compare jobs from previous MDC staffing study Compare jobs from previous MDC staffing study Apply Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Tests Apply Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Tests Conduct Salary Survey of Market (local, regional and national) Conduct Salary Survey of Market (local, regional and national)

6 Surveys Surveys with 2006/2007 data were utilized: Surveys with 2006/2007 data were utilized: Watson Wyatt (Colleges & Universities) Watson Wyatt (Colleges & Universities) Economic Research Institute (FIU, UM, BCC, specific to Miami area and State of Florida) Economic Research Institute (FIU, UM, BCC, specific to Miami area and State of Florida) Miami-Dade County Pay Plan (local government) Miami-Dade County Pay Plan (local government) CUPA Administrative Compensation Survey CUPA Administrative Compensation Survey Local surveys (FL Community Colleges, local public sector employers including MDCPS) Local surveys (FL Community Colleges, local public sector employers including MDCPS)

7 Findings Survey results reflected the College structure is within 94% of the current market salaries (2006/2007 market data) Survey results reflected the College structure is within 94% of the current market salaries (2006/2007 market data) Determined to be “acceptable” Determined to be “acceptable” Job groups below 90% of the current market salaries were recommended for: Job groups below 90% of the current market salaries were recommended for: Classification upgrade Classification upgradeor In-grade salary adjustment In-grade salary adjustment

8 College & Campus Registrar Market Data Summary Below 90% : Below 90% : Information Specialist II 87% Information Specialist II 87% Student Services Assistant II86% Student Services Assistant II86% Assistant Supervisor84% Assistant Supervisor84% At or above 90% : At or above 90% : Clerk II96% Clerk II96% Data Entry Clerk97% Data Entry Clerk97% Clerk III94% Clerk III94% Student Services Assistant I103% Student Services Assistant I103% Clerk Senior94% Clerk Senior94% Clerk Administrative97% Clerk Administrative97%

9 Financial Aid Market Data Summary Below 90%: Below 90%: Assistant Supervisor 84% Assistant Supervisor 84% Student Services Assistant II 86% Student Services Assistant II 86% At or above 90%: At or above 90%: Clerk II 96% Clerk II 96% Data Entry Clerk 97% Data Entry Clerk 97% Clerk III 94% Clerk III 94% Student Services Assistant I 103% Student Services Assistant I 103% Clerk Senior 94% Clerk Senior 94% Clerk Administrative 97% Clerk Administrative 97%

10 Campus Services Market Data Summary Below 90%: Below 90%: Copy Center Supervisor 83% Copy Center Supervisor 83% Lead Dispatcher 85% Lead Dispatcher 85% Public Safety Officer/Assist. Chief 86% Public Safety Officer/Assist. Chief 86% At or above 90%: At or above 90%: Mailroom Clerk I 95% Mailroom Clerk I 95% Custodian 103% Custodian 103% Public Safety Officer I 108% Public Safety Officer I 108% Copy Center Technician 93% Copy Center Technician 93% Mailroom Clerk II 106% Mailroom Clerk II 106% Public Safety Officer II 108% Public Safety Officer II 108% Custodian Head 97% Custodian Head 97% Campus Services Supervisor I 116% Campus Services Supervisor I 116% Campus Services Supervisor II 114% Campus Services Supervisor II 114% Campus Services Supervisor III 105% Campus Services Supervisor III 105%

11 Reclassification Methods Reclassification upgrades for specific positions Reclassification upgrades for specific positions 10% increase or the minimum of the new salary range whichever is greater up to the midpoint; 10% increase or the minimum of the new salary range whichever is greater up to the midpoint; Employees at or above the new midpoint will not be eligible for any type of salary change Employees at or above the new midpoint will not be eligible for any type of salary change Title changes Title changes Consolidation of several job levels Consolidation of several job levels In-grade salary adjustments for eligible positions In-grade salary adjustments for eligible positions 5% increase up to the midpoint of the salary range 5% increase up to the midpoint of the salary range Employees at or above the midpoint will not be eligible for any type of salary change Employees at or above the midpoint will not be eligible for any type of salary change Standardization of job descriptions college-wide Standardization of job descriptions college-wide

12 Admissions/Registration/Financial Aid Information Specialist (87% of market) Information Specialist (87% of market) Change from Pay Grade 6 to 8 Change from Pay Grade 6 to 8 Assistant Supervisor (84% of market) Assistant Supervisor (84% of market) Change from Pay Grade 7 to 9 Change from Pay Grade 7 to 9 New Title – Student Services Assistant I New Title – Student Services Assistant I Student Services Assistant II (86% of market) Student Services Assistant II (86% of market) Remain at same Pay Grade 10 Remain at same Pay Grade 10 In-grade adjustment In-grade adjustment Clerk Administrative (97% of market) Clerk Administrative (97% of market) Remain at same Pay Grade Remain at same Pay Grade New Title – Administrative Supervisor New Title – Administrative Supervisor

13 Campus Services Lead Dispatcher (85% of market) Lead Dispatcher (85% of market) Change from Pay Grade 9 to 10 Change from Pay Grade 9 to 10 Title change to Dispatcher Title change to Dispatcher Assistant Chief (86% of market) Assistant Chief (86% of market) Change from Pay Grade 10 to 11 Change from Pay Grade 10 to 11 Copy Center Supervisor (83% of market) Copy Center Supervisor (83% of market) Change from Pay Grade 9 to 11 Change from Pay Grade 9 to 11 Quick Copy Coordinator (83% of market) Quick Copy Coordinator (83% of market) Change to Copy Center Supervisor Change to Copy Center Supervisor Change from Pay Grade 10 to 11 Change from Pay Grade 10 to 11 Copy Center Technician (93% of market) Copy Center Technician (93% of market) Consolidate all levels into Pay Grade 7 Consolidate all levels into Pay Grade 7 Copy Tech I, Pay Grade 4 Copy Tech I, Pay Grade 4 Copy Tech II, Pay Grade 5 Copy Tech II, Pay Grade 5 Copy Tech III, Pay Grade 7 Copy Tech III, Pay Grade 7

14 Implementation Recommendations approved by College President retroactive to January 1, 2007 Recommendations approved by College President retroactive to January 1, 2007 Implementation Plan Implementation Plan Meetings with employees Meetings with employees Individual meetings with personalized memoranda to affected employees Individual meetings with personalized memoranda to affected employees Changes in pay, pay grades & title changes, if applicable, will be reflected by the following pay dates: Changes in pay, pay grades & title changes, if applicable, will be reflected by the following pay dates: 3/23/07 or 4/5/07 (depending on pay calendars) 3/23/07 or 4/5/07 (depending on pay calendars) 5/4/07 Retroactive pay (Regular & OT) 5/4/07 Retroactive pay (Regular & OT)

15 Questions???