“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review September 17, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs and Michael Dufel Jericho Systems Corporation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S&I Framework Testing HL7 V2 Lab Results Interface and RI Pilot Robert Snelick National Institute of Standards and Technology June 23 rd, 2011 Contact:
Advertisements

PDMP & HITI IG Development Workgroup Session August 14, 2014.
Cross Domain Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
Candidate Standards Analysis by Transaction 0 SDC Solution Diagram.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session Charter Discussion – 9:30am – 10:00am October 18, 2011.
Cross Domain Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
Data Provenance –Use Case (Discovery) Ahsin Azim– Use Case Lead Presha Patel – Use Case Lead 1.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review June 18, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review July 9, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
Data Provenance –Use Case (Discovery) Ahsin Azim– Use Case Lead Presha Patel – Use Case Lead 1.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review July 16, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
1.View Description 2.Primary Presentation 3.Element Catalog Elements and Their Properties Relations and Their Properties Element Interfaces Element Behavior.
IHE Profile – SOA Analysis: In Progress Update Brian McIndoe December 6, 2010.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Electronic Determination of Coverage (eDoC) Home Health User Story January 28, 2015.
Cross-Enterprise User Assertion IHE Educational Workshop 2007 Cross-Enterprise User Assertion IHE Educational Workshop 2007 John F. Moehrke GE Healthcare.
Query Health Operations Workgroup HQMF & QRDA Query Format - Results Format February 9, :00am – 12:00am ET.
PDMP & HITI Solution Planning/IG Workgroup Session July 3, 2014.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review April 9, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review April 23, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
Data Access Framework All Hands Community Meeting February 5, 2014.
Data Segmentation for Privacy Agenda All-hands Workgroup Meeting May 9, 2012.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
“Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review April 16, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review August 27, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
EDOS Workgroup Update May 21, 2013 Laboratory Orders Interface Initiative.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review May 7, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
Data Provenance Community Meeting August 21st, 2014.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review May 14, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
Structured Data Capture (SDC) Pilots Template Insert the Name of Your Pilot / Organization Here MM/DD/YYYY.
Health eDecisions Use Case 2: CDS Guidance Service Strawman of Core Concepts Use Case 2 1.
Ongoing/Planned Activities for Week of 4/29 Final UCR Crosswalk due COB 4/30 Hold two working sessions to complete UCR Crosswalk on 4/30 Hold working session.
Data Provenance –Use Case (Discovery) Ahsin Azim– Use Case Lead Presha Patel – Use Case Lead 1.
IG Development Working Session September 4 th, 2013.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review May 21, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
Data Segmentation for Privacy November 16 th, 2011.
Data Access Framework All Hands Community Meeting April 23, 2014.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG) LCC All Hands Meeting April 4,
Data Access Framework All Hands Community Meeting 1 November 4, 2015.
The Patient Choice Project Project Kickoff December 14 th, 2015.
Ongoing/Planned Activities for Week of 4/22 Initial feedback on UCR Crosswalk due COB 4/23 Hold working session to continue filling out the UCR Crosswalk.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review June 25, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
Data Provenance Community Meeting May 15 th, 2014.
Data Access Framework All Hands Community Meeting 1 November 18, 2015.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review June 4, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
Ongoing/Planned Activities for Week of 4/29 Final UCR Crosswalk due COB 4/30 Hold two working sessions to complete UCR Crosswalk on 4/30 Hold working session.
Data Provenance Community Meeting July 17 th, 2014.
The Patient Choice Project Use Case Working Session January 8 th, 2016.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review May 28, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
Data Access Framework All Hands Community Meeting April 9, 2014.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review August 13, 2013 Presented by: Michael Dufel and David Staggs Jericho Systems Corporation.
The Patient Choice Project Use Case Working Session February 12 th, 2016.
The Patient Choice Project Use Case Working Session February 5 th, 2016.
The Patient Choice Project Use Case Working Session January 22 nd, 2016.
The Patient Choice Project Use Case Working Session January 29 th, 2016.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Data Access Framework All Hands Community Meeting April 16, 2014.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, May 23, 2013.
Data Provenance –Use Case (Discovery) Ahsin Azim– Use Case Lead Presha Patel – Use Case Lead 1.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review April 30, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
PDMP & HITI Solution Planning Workgroup Session June 26, 2014.
Cross Community Access Profile Karen Witting IBM Co-chair ITI technical committee.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review June 11, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review November 5, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
Data Access Framework All Hands Community Meeting 1 May 4, 2016.
Data Access Framework All Hands Community Meeting 1 April 20, 2016.
Data Access Framework All Hands Community Meeting April 16, 2014.
Structured Data Capture (SDC) FHIR SDC Pilots Template
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, April 25, 2013.
EHR System Function and Information Model (EHR-S FIM is based on EHR-S FM R2.0) AS.4.1 Manage Registry Communication aka S.1.1 in EHR-S FM R1.1
US Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI): Data Provenance IG
Presentation transcript:

“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review September 17, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs and Michael Dufel Jericho Systems Corporation

209/17/2013 Agenda Administrative issues Pilot scope Pilot data flow Test scenarios Transaction and Document tests Discussion Pilot Timeline Plan of Action

309/17/2013 Pilot Administrivia This pilot is a community led pilot –Limited support provided by the ONC Johnathan Coleman (Security Risk Solutions) Zachary May (ESAC) Penelope Hughes (ONC) Libbie Buchele (ONC Sponsor) In conjunction with DS4P bi-weekly return of an All Hands meeting Access to DS4P Wiki, teleconference, and calendar Meeting times: Tuesdays 11AM (ET) –Dial In: Access code: URL: d= d=

409/17/2013 Scope of the Pilot 1.Define the exchange of HL7 CDA-compliant PCD between a data custodian and a PCD repository that includes a report on the outcome of the request to the healthcare consumer (subject). 2.Additional goal: use identifiers to identify the subject/ PCD repository for use in reporting the outcome of the “secondary user” request use case to subject by subsequent EHR custodians. 3.Stretch goal: mask and/or redact the clinical document based on data segmentation and PCD choices retrieved from the PCD repository.

509/17/2013 Pilot Data Flow Custodian of Data being Provided at  Patient PCD Repository 2 nd Requestor 1 st Requestor   B ,  = Clinical data A,B = PCD data = audit record And Subsequent Custodian of Data being Provided at 

Test Approach Sections included in each test scenario in the DS4P Pilot Execution Script: 1.Scenario 2.Actors 3.Preconditions 4.Test steps 5.Test results 6.Log Capture 7.Data Set Verification 09/17/20136

Test Cases 09/17/20137 DS4P Pilot Execution Script: 1.Consent To Patient Discovery : No Consent 2.Consent To Patient Discovery : 1 st Requestor (1 st ) 3.Consent To Patient Discovery : 2 nd Requestor (2 nd ) 4.Consent To Document Query : No Consent 5.Consent To Document Query : 1 st To PC - Allow 6.Consent To Document Query : 2 nd To PC - Deny 7.Consent To Document Query : 2 nd to SC - Deny 8.Consent To Document Retrieve : No Consent 9.Consent To Document Retrieve : 1 st to PC - Allow 10.Consent To Document Retrieve : 2 nd To PC - Deny 11.Consent To Document Retrieve : 2 nd to SC - Deny 12.Consent To Document Retrieve : With Segmentation

Test Cases (Visual Representation) 09/17/20138 ScenarioPCDITI-55ITI-38ITI-39 1 st Requestor → PCY259 2 nd Requestor → PCY nd Requestor → SCY711 1 st Requestor → PCN148 Clinical Data SegmentationY12 PC = Primary Custodian SC = Secondary Custodian

Original Query & Response 909/17/2013 Complete solution must retrieve PCD during ITI 55, ITI 38, ITI 39

J-UT Pilot Sequence Detail (A) 09/17/ Retrieving & applying PCD, reporting during patient discovery

J-UT Pilot Sequence Detail (B) 09/17/ Retrieving & applying PCD, reporting when returning document list

J-UT Pilot Sequence Diagram (C) 09/17/ Retrieving & applying PCD, reporting when returning a clinical document

1309/17/2013 Transaction Tests (Last Meeting) NwHIN messages o Test messages must comply with NwHIN specification Request for PCD from Document Custodian o ITI 55: Data Set A o ITI 38: Data Set B o ITI 39: Data Set C ATNA audit record from Document Custodian o ITI 55: Audit data Set A o ITI 38: Audit data Set B o ITI 39: Audit data Set C

1409/17/2013 Document Tests HL7 Documents o HL7 Documents must comply with HL7 specification Clinical document from Document Custodian o Must include a reference to the patient consent repository PCD document from PCD Repository o Must follow HL7 Privacy Consent Directive o Must include specific elements

1509/17/2013 Discussion Review of J-UT DS4P Test Document Draft o Overview o Scenario Tests o Transaction Tests o Document Tests o Appendixes: Test Results

1609/17/2013 Pilot Timeline General Timeline, conditioned on agreement of stakeholders

17 Plan of Action Upon agreement of the participants the POA is: Identify the elements available from previous DS4P pilots Scope level of effort, decide on extended scenario Determine first draft of functional requirements Review standards available for returning information on requests Determine any gaps or extensions required in standards Stand up information holders and requestors Create XDS.b repository holding PCD Identify remaining pieces, create test procedures Document and update IG with results of our experience 09/17/2013

1809/17/2013 Backup Slides

DS4P Standards Material Location of DS4P Standards Inventory: Location of DS4P Standards Mapping Issues: xlsx/ /Copy%20of%20DataMappingsIssues% xlsx General Standards Source List: %20Analysis.xlsx/ /General%20SI%20Framework%20Standards%20A nalysis.xlsx Standards Crosswalk Analysis monizationhttp://wiki.siframework.org/Data+Segmentation+for+Privacy+Standards+and+Har monization (at bottom of page, exportable) Implementation Guidance 20Guidance_consensus_v1_0_4.pdf/ /Data%20Segmentation%20Impl ementation%20Guidance_consensus_v1_0_4.pdf 09/17/201319

2009/17/2013 DS4P References Use Case: ases ases Implementation Guide: nsensus nsensus Pilots Wiki Page: +Pilots+Sub-Workgroup +Pilots+Sub-Workgroup

2109/17/2013 Pilot Data Flow Custodian of Data being Provided at  Patient PCD Repository 2 nd Requestor 1 st Requestor   B ,  = Clinical data A,B = PCD data = audit record And Subsequent Custodian of Data being Provided at 

2209/17/2013 Pilot Data Flow Custodian of Data being Provided at  Patient PCD Repository 2 nd Requestor 1 st Requestor Clinical exchange #  Clinical exchange #  B ,  = Clinical data A,B = PCD data = audit record And Subsequent Custodian of Data being Provided at  Fetch PCD Send audit

2309/17/2013 Pilot Data Flow (1) Custodian of Data being Provided at  Patient PCD Repository 2 nd Requestor 1 st Requestor  ,  = Clinical data A,B = PCD data = audit record

2409/17/2013 Pilot Data Flow (2) Custodian of Data being Provided at  Patient PCD Repository 2 nd Requestor 1 st Requestor  ,  = Clinical data A,B = PCD data = audit record

2509/17/2013 Pilot Data Flow (3) Custodian of Data being Provided at  Patient PCD Repository 2 nd Requestor 1 st Requestor  B ,  = Clinical data A,B = PCD data = audit record And Subsequent Custodian of Data being Provided at 

2609/17/2013 Pilot Data Flow (4) Custodian of Data being Provided at  Patient PCD Repository 2 nd Requestor 1 st Requestor  ,  = Clinical data A,B = PCD data = audit record And Subsequent Custodian of Data being Provided at 

2709/17/2013 Pilot Data Flow (5) Custodian of Data being Provided at  Patient PCD Repository 2 nd Requestor 1 st Requestor ,  = Clinical data A,B = PCD data = audit record And Subsequent Custodian of Data being Provided at 

2809/17/2013 Pilot Data Flow (updated) Custodian of Data being Provided at  Patient PCD Repository 2 nd Requestor 1 st Requestor   B ,  = Clinical data A,B = PCD data = audit record And Subsequent Custodian of Data being Provided at 