B-ELL Leadership Professional Development Oregon Reading First October 2 nd, 2008 University of Oregon © 2008 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RtI Response to Intervention
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Seeing Change Through to the Classroom Principal Leadership Academy November 2012.
1 Houghton Mifflin Deep Training Cohort B June 23, 2005 Carol Dissen, ORRF Regional Coordinator Toni Fisher, ORRF Coach, Beaverton.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Cathy Mrla Jen Mahan-Deitte
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
1 Reading First at Oak Grove Elementary School Medford School District 549C Julie York – District Person Julie Evans – Principal Barbara Low – Reading.
Tools for Classroom Teachers Scaffolding Vocabulary activities Graphic organizers Phonics games Comprehension activities Literature circles.
1 Using Data to Plan Interventions: Determining Student Needs and Making Instructional Recommendations Kathryn Howe Trish Travers
Building Our 90 Minute Reading Block Westside Elementary Maria Randle, Reading Coach
High Benchmark Reading Instruction Regional Coaches’ Meeting Oregon Reading First February 19 & 21, 2008.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Core Program Analysis Coaches’ State Conference Winter 2009.
Thank you for joining us for Small Group Instruction The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS.
Oregon Reading First Cohort B B-ELL Leadership Session Jorge Preciado University of Oregon March 5th, 2009 © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
Reading First Site Visits Jane Granger Meadows, M.S. Lisa A. Slover, M.S. Mary Raiford Mickey McKinnes 2006 Just Read, Florida! Leadership Conference.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
1 Meeting Students’ Diverse Learning Needs: Full Implementation of HM Core Reading K-6 Part 2: Universal Access Time and Beyond Lodi Unified School District.
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
Follow-up to Fall Statewide Coaches’ Observation System Training for Veteran Cohort A Coaches Cohort A Fall 2005 Regional Coaches’ Meeting: © 2005 by the.
Work Sample Seminar1 Work Sample Seminar Screening Assessments, File Review, & Context Part 1 Portland State University.
Effective Differentiated Instruction for All Students
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Worthington City School District Third Grade Guarantee Update Curriculum Liaison Council Jamie Lusher, ELA Coordinator.
MTSS Multi-Tiered System of Support School Intervention Plan St. Patrick School Ed 515 Mary Staley.
RTI: Response to Intervention An Evidence-Based Practice.
School-wide Data Analysis Oregon RtI Spring Conference May 9 th 2012.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Moving Research into Classrooms: Hillsboro School District’s Plan for Multi-tiered Literacy Instruction K-12 College of Education Center on Teaching and.
1 October 24, 2006 Doris Baker Rachell Katz Jorge Preciado B-ELL Leadership Session © 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Leap Into Literacy Centers By Leigh Ann Roderick And Buffalo Jones Staff.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
November & December 2008 Laura Kintz. Kimberly Miles, & Christie Petersen.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Literacy Centers In-Service January 3, 2007 Facilitator: Amy Lack, Reading Coach.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
READING FIRST IN ACTION Knowing and Acting: A Practical 8-Week System to Improve Achievement By Betsy Eaves and Jessica Evans.
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
T ier 4 – Specially Designed Learning IN ADDITION TO TIERS 1-3, targeted students receive specialized programs, methodologies, or instruction Greater frequency.
T ier 4 – Specially Designed Learning IN ADDITION TO TIERS 1-3, targeted students receive specialized programs, methodologies, or instruction Greater frequency.
Response to Instruction and Intervention. The Big Picture Anita L. Archer, Ph.D. Educational Consultant
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
FINDING THE PATH AND STAYING ON IT Sue Howell August 12 & 13, 2010.
By Jody Rogers and Ben Dickson.  Connect Instructional Shifts and Standards to small group instruction  Review the components of reading development.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Using Data and Grouping to Teach All Students All the Time—Differently!
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
February 19, 2013 EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION.  After achieving a working knowledge and components of explicit instruction, teachers will self-assess their.
Overview of Video Presentations: Unveiling Critical Features of Instruction Enhancement Training © 2007 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Referral Made Like any other disability determination under IDEA, can’t be based on any single criterion – meaning a single test, assessment, observation,
New Lesson Plan Template 2012 Major Divisions of the Lesson Plan Objectives Assessment Methods Lesson Overview.
1 Putting it All Together: Building an Effective 90 Minute Reading Block 22.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
IMPLEMENTING RTI Critical Features: Practices & System Components.
Small Group Instruction
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Data Review Team Time Fall 2013.
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Evidence-Based Practices: Tier 1
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
English Language Arts Program Update
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
Presentation transcript:

B-ELL Leadership Professional Development Oregon Reading First October 2 nd, 2008 University of Oregon © 2008 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning

Overview  Celebrations  Critical features of effective instruction  Principal Walk Throughs  Focus Groups  Templates/Lesson Maps  BELL Report  Fall Leadership Webinar

Critical Features of Effective Instruction 1. Instructor models instructional tasks when appropriate. 2. Lead 3. Test 4. Instructor provides explicit instruction. 5. Instructor engages students in meaningful interactions with language.

Continued 6. Instructor provides multiple opportunities for students to practice. 7. Instructor provides corrective feedback after initial student responses. 8. Instructor encourages student effort. 9. Students are engaged in the lesson during teacher-led instruction.

Continued 10. Students are engaged in the lesson during independent work. 11. Students are successful completing activities at a high criterion level of performance. 12. Unison responses 13. Behavior Management Support

Walk Throughs During Reading Instruction  Have a purpose/goal for conducting observations  Have an established format/routine  Walk throughs are more effective conducted as a team  Walk throughs are more effective when teachers are given immediate verbal feedback  What is the next best thing?

Continued  Take Spanish literacy coach with you when observing Spanish reading instruction  Remember that critical features of effective instruction also pertain to Spanish Reading Instruction  Focus on student responses  Opportunities to respond  Correct student responses  Error corrections  Re-teaching concepts

Walk Through Feedback  How is this done?  What is the most effective way?  How do you keep track of polishers?  What follow up/support is given to teachers?  Are polishers tied to data?  How often should walk throughs be conducted?

Planning Differentiated Instructional Focus Groups

Instructional Focus #1 Description: Students who significantly exceed grade level Benchmarks based on DIBELS and pass all sections of the Unit/Theme Skills Assessments. Instructional Focus: Reading material at student’s instructional level, mastery of critical skills at student’s instructional level, strategies from student’s instructional level, advanced vocabulary when appropriate.

High benchmark students will benefit from systematic grade level Core instruction (particularly explicit vocabulary and comprehension instruction) in addition to coordinated and well-planned enrichment reading activities. Do not remove your students from the grade- level core program!!

Recommended Criteria for Identification of “High” Benchmark Students The High Benchmark Student has achieved the following data goals:  met the end-of-year DIBELS benchmark goal for their grade level.  passed grade-level sections of a Phonics Screener.  passed all previous Unit/Theme Skills Assessments.  consistent high performance throughout their years in school. You may also want to consider:  parent input supporting a “high” benchmark status.  appropriate classroom behavior skills.

Instructional Focus #2 Description: Students who have been classified with a Benchmark Instructional Recommendation based on DIBELS and pass all sections of the Unit/Theme Skills Assessments. Instructional Focus: Mastery of grade-level core program.

Theme Skills Assessments

Instructional Focus #3 Description: Students who have been classified with a Benchmark Instructional Recommendation based on DIBELS and fail one or more sections of the Unit/Theme Skills Assessments. Instructional Focus: Additional explicitness and practice (pre-teaching and re-teaching) to achieve mastery of grade level Core program.

Instructional Focus #4 Description: Students who have been classified with a Strategic Instructional Recommendation based on DIBELS and pass all sections of the Phonics/Decoding Screening Assessment. Instructional Focus: Mastery of grade level Core program with explicit small group fluency, vocabulary and comprehension instruction and practice opportunities.

Using Data to Develop Instructional Plans: Phonics Screeners  Phonics screening tools are used to identify students’ phonics gaps to better target instruction.  Example: Houghton Mifflin Phonics Decoding Screener

Instructional Focus #5 Description: Students who have been classified with a Strategic Instructional Recommendation based on DIBELS and fail one or more sections of the Phonics/Decoding Screening Assessment. Instructional Focus: Additional explicitness and practice (pre-teaching and re-teaching) to achieve mastery of grade level Core program and explicit small group instruction to re-teach critical deficient decoding skills. Include extra practice to become fluent with the skills once they have been mastered.

Instructional Focus #6 Description: Students who have been classified with an Intensive Instructional Recommendation based on DIBELS Instructional Focus: Explicit small group instruction to master basic phonemic blending and segmenting, letter/sound associations, basic blending and decoding skills. They will also need vocabulary and comprehension instruction. Include extra practice to become fluent with the skills once they have been mastered.

Templates Overview/Critical Features  Big Ideas When Teaching Templates (1-11)  Model, Lead, Test (MLT)  One of the best ways to ensure student success is for teachers to instruct using the MLT format. Why is this important? The MLT format helps students to receive appropriate scaffolding support, before attempting to provide a response to a given stimulus. Students are given an opportunity to hear, practice, and understand new concepts/skills before ultimately providing individual responses.

Continued  Clear and Consistent Signal  Always remember to use a clear and consistent signal when instructing. Why is this important? Providing a clear and consistent signal elicits timely responses from students. When signals are inconsistent or altered, students have a difficult time discriminating between when to respond or when to attend to the teacher’s instruction/directions. A clear and consistent signal allows students to focus on concepts and not on irrelevant features.

Continued  Error Corrections  Everyone needs feedback! It is so much easier to correct errors as soon as they occur than waiting for prolong periods of time before correcting errors. The more we wait, the longer it will take to correct. Errors should be corrected immediately, swiftly, and with limited teacher talk. Why is this important? This is important because students should always practice academic skills correctly, teachers should always keep in mind to maintain a good pace while teaching (students are more likely to stay on task), and limiting teacher talk ensures more time devoted to teaching and student learning.

Continued  Big Ideas When Teaching Templates (12- 17)  Teaching fluency “big ideas”  Teaching vocabulary “big ideas”  Teaching comprehension “big ideas”

B-ELL Report