CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION1. 2 When teachers succeed, students succeed. Research has proven that no school-level factor matters more to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Special Education Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Technology Integration and the Common Core Linda Jones, Coordinator/Instructor, The Eighth Floor Technology and Learning Center.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Connecticut State Department of EDUCATION
System Office Performance Management
Performance management guidance
GOAL SETTING CONFERENCES BRIDGEPORT, CT SEPTEMBER 2-3,
System Office Performance Management
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
 State Standards Initiative.  The standards are not intended to be a new name for old ways of doing business. They are a call to take the next step.
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data Overview of the SLO Process April 7,
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Every Student READY. North Carolina Educator Evaluation A process for professional growth.
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION1 A Professional Conversation with Connecticut Technical Educators.
ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM DAY 4 Summer 2013 {Insert Trainer/Facilitator Name} July 2,
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Educator Evaluation and Development System * Adopted by Middletown Public Schools, iddletown.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
KVEC Principal Goal Development July 29, Administer Val-Ed (Refer to CEP-District Timeline and number of administrations ) Site-Visit by Superintendent.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION1. 2 When teachers succeed, students succeed. Research has proven that no school-level factor matters more to.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Bridgeport Public Schools Administrator Evaluation and Support Plan
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
System Office Performance Management Human Resources Fall 2015.
Teacher Evaluation Overview
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
EVAAS for Teachers: Overview and Teacher Reports Every Student READY.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Best Practices in CMSD SLO Development A professional learning module for SLO developers and reviewers Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Kristen Sikora, ELA Assistant Office of Curriculum & Instruction, NYSED.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Support for (rather than Evaluation of) Administrators Delaware Academy for School Leadership.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
Implementing Race to the Top
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
Presentation transcript:

CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION1

2 When teachers succeed, students succeed. Research has proven that no school-level factor matters more to students’ success than high-quality teachers and leaders.

CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 3 …we need to define effective practice. To support teachers… …we need accurate, useful information about teachers’ strengths and areas in need of development. …we need to provide on-going opportunities for growth throughout the career continuum through effective professional learning and other types of support. …we must develop systems for meaningful recognition of accomplishment throughout the career continuum.

Based on multiple standards-based measures of performance Promote both professional judgment and consistency Foster professional dialogue about student learning Aligned to effective, evaluation-based professional learning, coaching, and feedback to support teacher growth and development Ensure feasibility of implementation CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION4 Educator Evaluation Design Principles

CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION5 Teacher Evaluation Categories

ANNUAL TEACHER RATING CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION6 OUTCOME RATING Teacher Evaluation Categories PRACTICE RATING

Teacher Evaluation Process  Orientation on process  Teacher reflection and goal-setting  Goal-setting conference  Review goals and performance to date  Mid-year conferences  Teacher self- assessment  Scoring  End-of-year conference CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION7 Goal-Setting & Planning Mid-Year Check-in End-of-Year Review By November 15, 2012January/February 2013By June 30, 2013* *If state test data may have a significant impact on a final rating, a final rating may be revised by September 15 when state test data are available.

Why evaluation matters Supporting great educators – Key to developing, supporting and improving the effectiveness of educators as well as recognizing the outstanding performance of our most effective teachers and leaders Teachers have a profound influence – An effective teacher can change the course of a student’s life. Research shows that one of the most important school-based factors influencing a student’s achievement is the quality of his or her teacher. Focus on regular feedback – When the feedback is specific and actionable and delivered in a constructive, non- confrontational manner, the individual comes away feeling valued and appreciated, which results in a higher level of satisfaction in their work – all of which contribute to higher quality academic performance. Multiple measures of effectiveness – To determine overall educator effectiveness, the Connecticut System for Educator Evaluation considers four components: Professional Performance and Practice, Student Learning Outcomes, Parent or Peer Feedback and Whole-school or Student Feedback. CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION8

Setting Student Learning Objectives Planning Cycle CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION9 Learn about students Set goals for student learning Monitor students’ progress Assess student outcomes Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4

What are Student Learning Objectives? CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION10 A long-term academic goal Broad statements about the knowledge and skills that students will demonstrate as a result of instruction; Address the central purpose of the teacher’s assignment; Take into account baseline data on student performance; Pertain to a large proportion of a teacher’s students; Reflect content mastery or skill development; Reflect attainable but ambitious goals for student learning; and Are measured by indicators of academic growth and development (IAGDs).

What are IAGDs? CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION11 Measurements of student outcomes Are based on results of assessments, which may include standardized and non-standardized measures; May require consultation with colleagues with more expertise to determine appropriate measures and targets; Indicator statements for the teacher evaluation should follow SMART Goal language: Specific/Strategic, Measurable, Aligned/Attainable, Results-Oriented and Time-Bound; and There must be at least one IAGD per SLO.

Principals that support effective SLOs CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION12 SLOs are most effective when they fully support the goal of raising achievement for all students Informed by and help drive district priorities An integral part of an educator’s practice Encourages systematic and strategic instructional decisions Measures of student learning should be fair and comparable across all educators Rigorous and ambitious SLOs used with data = higher academic performance

Measuring student outcomes CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION13

What IS Assessment? CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION14

So…What is Assessment? CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION15

Effective assessment will… CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION16

Think, pair, share… What assessments are you currently using? CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION17

Linking Common Core Standards To be ready for college, workforce training, and life in a technological society students need the ability to gather, comprehend, evaluate, synthesize, and report on information and ideas, to conduct original research in order to answer questions or solve problems, and to analyze and create a high volume and extensive range of print and nonprint texts in media forms old and new. *Research and media skills and understandings are embedded throughout the Standards rather than treated in a separate section. CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION18

SLO Approval Priority of Content Quality of Indicators Rigor of Objective/Indicators CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION19

Levels of Performance CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION20 Exemplary 4 Substantially exceeding indicators of performance Proficient 3 Meeting indicators of performance Developing 2 Meeting some indicators of performance but not others Below Standard 1 Not meeting indicators of performance Each district shall define effectiveness and ineffectiveness utilizing a pattern of summative ratings derived from the new evaluation system..

Stefan Pryor Commissioner, CT State Department of Education 21CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Dr. Sarah Barzee Director for Leadership Development Dr. Diane D. Ullman Chief Talent Office Emily Byrne Director of Strategic Initiatives Contact the CSDE Talent Office Hotline at: or Visit us online: