Konstantinos Agrafiotis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seismic Design of Buried Structures
Advertisements

Passive Vibration Control
CALCULATED vs MEASURED ENERGY DISSIPATION.
Finite element seismic analysis of a guyed mast
1 LESSLOSS Sub Project 7 Techniques and Methods for Vulnerability Reduction Barcelona 18 th May 07 – Lisbon 24 th May 07 LESSLOSS Dissemination Meeting.
Seismic Performance Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Bridges
An-Najah National University
1 Application and Analysis of Helical Piers in Frozen Ground He Liu, Ph.D., P.E. Daniel Schubert, P.E. Hannele Zubeck, Ph.D., P.E. Sean Baginski.
Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift Marios Panagiotou Assistant Professor, University of.
 Submitted by: MAHESH CHAND SHARMA M.TECH. –III SEM ( ) (2010PST116)  Guided by: Dr. M.K.Shrimali Dr. S.D. Bharti Department of Structural Engineering.
Yahya C. Kurama University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana, U.S.A
사장교의 지진 응답 제어를 위한 납고무 받침의 설계 기준 제안
Friction Damper with Coned disc springs August, 2001 Obayashi Corporation.
Record Processing Considerations for Analysis of Buildings Moh Huang California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program California Geological Survey Department.
SEISMIC ANALYSIS Stability of a slope can be affected by seismicity in two ways: earthquake and blasting. These seismic motions are capable of inducing.
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Earliest approach taken to seismic hazard analysis Originated in nuclear power industry applications Still used for.
Nonlinear response- history analysis in design practice RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE November 2007 Joe Maffei.
Dynamics Free vibration: Eigen frequencies
Ground Motion Parameters Measured by triaxial accelerographs 2 orthogonal horizontal components 1 vertical component Digitized to time step of
1 HOMEWORK 1 1.Derive equation of motion of SDOF using energy method 2.Find amplitude A and tanΦ for given x 0, v 0 3.Find natural frequency of cantilever,
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
Streamlined Process for Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Nuclear Facilities Utilizing GTSTRUDL and MTR/SASSI Wei Li, Michael Perez, Mansour Tabatabaie,
Fifth Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering REN Xiangxiang Research Institute of Structural engineering and Disaster Reduction 2015/05/04 Dynamic.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Elastic and inelastic relations..... mx+cx+Q(x)= -ma x Q x Q Q=kx elasticinelastic.
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Static Pushover Analysis
Concrete 2003 Brisbane July 2003 Design Of Pre-cast Buried Structures For Internal Impact Loading.
Bentley RM Bridge Seismic Design and Analysis
The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Predicting characteristic loads for jackets and jack-ups Shallow water location – quasi-static approach Problem.
University of Palestine
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
Semi-active Management of Structures Subjected to High Frequency Ground Excitation C.M. Ewing, R.P. Dhakal, J.G. Chase and J.B. Mander 19 th ACMSM, Christchurch,
PAT328, Section 3, March 2001MAR120, Lecture 4, March 2001S14-1MAR120, Section 14, December 2001 SECTION 14 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS.
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
IMPACT OF FOUNDATION MODELING ON THE ACCURACY OF RESPONSE HISTORY ANALYSIS OF A TALL BUILDING Part II - Implementation F. Naeim, S. Tileylioglu, A. Alimoradi.
PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES By Ed Wilson Draft dated 8/15/14 September SEAONC Lectures #2.
C ONSIDERATION OF C OLLAPSE AND R ESIDUAL D EFORMATION IN R ELIABILITY-BASED P ERFORMANCE E VALUATION OF B UILDINGS Chiun-lin WU 1, Chin-Hsiung LOH 2,
Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST, Korea 1 A Comparative Study on Aseismic Performances of Base Isolation Systems for Multi-span Continuous.
Response of MDOF structures to ground motion 1. If damping is well-behaving, or can be approximated using equivalent viscous damping, we can decouple.
1 Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST 사장교의 면진 성능 향상을 위한 납고무 받침의 설계 기준 제안 Guidelines of Designing L.R.B. for a Cable-Stayed Bridge to Reduce.
Base Isolation Strategies
Friction Bearing Base Isolation
CABER Project Update February 22, 2008
SCHEDULE 8:30 AM 10:30 AM Session I 11:00 AM Break 12:15 PM Session II 1:30 PM Lunch 2:45 PM Session III 3:15 PM 4:30 PM Session IV.
Kyu-Sik Park Kyu-Sik Park, Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Hyung-Jo Jung Hyung-Jo Jung, Research Assistant Professor, KAIST, Korea In-Won Lee In-Won Lee,
Davide Forcellini, Univ. of San Marino Prof. Ahmed Elgamal, Dr. Jinchi Lu, UC San Diego Prof. Kevin Mackie, Univ. of Central Florida SEISMIC ASSESSMENT.
Kang-Min Choi, Kang-Min Choi, Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Hyung-Jo Jung Hyung-Jo Jung, Professor, Sejong National University, Korea In-Won Lee In-Won.
ISEC-02 Second International Structural Engineering and Costruction Conference September 22-26,2003, Rome “EVALUATION AND RESULTS’ COMPARISON IN DYNAMIC.
Vulnerable Structural Elements
Basics of Earthquakes Frequency
Presentation Overview
Finite element method for structural dynamic and stability analyses
Aristotelis Charalampakis and Vlasis Koumousis
Divisional Engineer/East/Ranchi South Eastern Railway
Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II
년도 한국지진공학회 춘계학술발표회 Hybrid Control Strategy for Seismic Protection of Benchmark Cable-Stayed Bridges 박규식, 한국과학기술원 토목공학과 박사과정 정형조, 한국과학기술원.
Th 11 International Conference on Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures Protection of Masonry Housing in High Seismic Zones with Low-Cost Rubber.
NUMERICAL SEISMIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF RC BRIDGES WITH HOLLOW PIERS
2 Master of the Department of Civil Engineering, NTUT, Taipei, Taiwan.
Dead zone analysis of ECAL barrel modules under static and dynamic loads for ILD Thomas PIERRE-EMILE, Marc ANDUZE– LLR.
VIBRATION CONTROL OF STRUCTURE USING CMAC
Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington
Assessment of Base-isolated CAP1400 Nuclear Island Design
Aristotelis Charalampakis and Vlasis Koumousis
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis
Robust Hybrid Control System
a Bang-Bang Type Controller
CALTRANS SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA Version 1.7 November 2012
Presentation transcript:

Konstantinos Agrafiotis PROJECT PRESENTATION Comparison of different types of modeling for seismic isolation devices Application to a typical bridge structure Konstantinos Agrafiotis Major Professor : Gary Dargush

Basic principles of seismic isolation Lead Rubber bearings CONTENTS Basic principles of seismic isolation Lead Rubber bearings Mechanical Characteristics of Lead Rubber Bearings Important parameters for modeling LRB Application of a LRB to a typical highway concrete bridge Modeling LRB with bilinear spring Modeling LRB with equivalent linear Keff and constant numerical damping Friction Pendulum Bearings Principles of Friction Pendulum bearings, and points under consideration. A simple friction model. Application of FPS to a typical bridge Modeling FPS with bilinear spring elements (ABAQUS) Modeling FPS with coupled velocity dependent friction properties and post-slip stiffness in the shear direction Investigation on the importance of each parameter into modeling

Lead Rubber Bearing Stiffness and damping

Comparison between the two models 2.5 sec

Friction Pendulum Bearings (FPS) Articulated Slider Spherical Concave Surface “stopper” Stainless steel

Function of Inverse Pendulum Force-Displacement Diagram R R W Κp= W /R μW Fo=μW W cosθ  W θ W sinθ  W /R μ W cosθ  μ W

Consideration on modeling friction pendulum bearings (FPS) Effect of temperature on the coefficient of friction (Constantinou et al 1999) Effect of pressure on the coefficient of friction

Effect of velocity on the coefficient of friction Constantinou et al. 1990

Methods of modeling Friction Pendulum Bearings Equivalent linear model with viscous damping Bilinear model using spring elements Dynamic friction + Spring element for the modeling of restoring force Gap element with friction properties K=W/R

Simple Friction Preliminary Analysis μ = 0,1 Fmax = µdNSdsign(db)

Simple Friction Preliminary Analysis

Simple Friction Preliminary Analysis

Simple Friction Preliminary Analysis

Simple Friction Preliminary Analysis

Simple FPS Preliminary Analysis Friction properties (velocity dependent μ)

Application to the typical Highway Concrete Bridge Finite Element Model Beam elements 0.5m mesh on the deck and the piers Different types of elements for modeling seismic isolation devices Non linear behavior of piers based on the moment-curvature relation. Fixed pier at base Βάθρα πακτωμένα στην βάση τους

Friction Pendulum Bearings Analysis For a FPS bearing a number of models are going to be tested in time history analyses: FPS model as a linear spring Modeling FPS with non linear element springs. With a friction element, linear spring for the restoring force, velocity dependent coefficient of friction and coupling between the two horizontal direction. The analyses that were conducted are aimed to show the importance of each one of parameters included in each model mention above: The importance of velocity dependent coefficient of friction. The importance of coupling between the two horizontal directions. (bidirectional or unidirectional modeling). If modeling friction with bilinear springs gives close to friction model results. The important of numerical damping in the direct integration methods used from the analyses. Earthquake Histories used for the analysis The MCEER west-coast ground motion were used. For the purposes of the conducted analyses 6 earthquake histories were selected from the bin of 2% probability of exceedance. The 6 earthquake histories were selected from the two first scenarios on the bases that they include considerable acceleration response for periods near 3 sec.

Scenario#1 (7.5 km, 6.6 Mw)

Scenario#1 (7.5 km, 6.6 Mw)

Scenario#2 (5.7 km, 6.8 Mw)

Scenario#2 (5.7 km, 6.8 Mw)

Friction-pendulum isolator with unidirectional bilinear spring (ABAQUS model) A bilinear spring is applied in each global horizontal direction A large initial stiffness is selected corresponding to 10-4 displacement for F=μw The post-stiffness is equal to W/R. W have been found from static analysis for each pier

Friction-pendulum isolator with unidirectional bilinear spring (ABAQUS model)

Friction-pendulum isolator with unidirectional bilinear spring (ABAQUS model)   Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) g Spectral Acceleration Sa (g) Maximum relative displacement (m) Scenario#1 Event#1 0.93 0.34 0.08 Scenario#1 Event#4 0.79 0.31 0.04 Scenario#1 Event#10 1.09 0.32 0.11 Scenario#2 Event#2 0.85 0.46 0.26 Scenario#2 Event#4 0.83 0.48 0.29 Scenario#2 Event#8 0.98 0.43

Park, Wen with A=1 and β=γ=0.5 ,otherwise Biaxial friction-pendulum isolator with velocity depended coefficient of friction (SAP2000) This friction model is based on the hysteretic behavior proposed by Wen (1976), and Park, Wen and Ang (1986), and recommended for base-isolation analysis by Nagarajaiah, Reinhorn and Constantinou (1991). ,if du1<0 Park, Wen with A=1 and β=γ=0.5 ,otherwise The frictional force-deformation relationship:

Full SAP2000 Model

Full SAP2000 Model

Comparison between the two models: ABAQUS vs SAP2000 Sources of differences between the two models The SAP2000 model takes into account that the coefficient of friction depend on the velocity. In the SAP2000 model the two directions are coupled. At the ABAQUS model the friction is model with the use of a bilinear spring. The SAP2000 model takes into account the variation of the axial load. In ABAQUS model axial load is presumed constant in the calculation of stiffness. Finally there are many differences in the solution of the direct integration that the two programs are using.

Comparison between different models

Importance of Coefficient of Friction depend on Velocity

Importance of Coupling between the two orthogonal directions

Can FPS modeled with a bilinear spring ??

The importance of Numerical method used in the direct time history Integration The integration method used in SAP2000 is Hilber-Hughes-Taylor alpha” (HHT) method : Uses a single parameter called alpha, -1/3≤ α ≤ 0 For alpha = 0, the method is equivalent to the Newmark method with gamma = 0.5 and beta = 0.25 (highest accuracy)

Hysteretic Loops of different models

Maximum relative displacement of the bearing (m) Comparison between different models MODEL Maximum relative displacement of the bearing (m) ABAQUS 0.26 SAP 2000- FULL MODEL 0.39 SAP2000-Constant μ- with coupling 0.34 SAP2000-Constant μ- uncoupled 0.27 SAP2000-Bilinear Spring (high numerical damping) (no numerical damping) 0.46 (very small numerical damping) 0.23

Conclusions For Lead Rubber Bearings: For Friction Pendulum System: Equivalent linear model with viscous damping is inappropriate for modeling LRB in dynamic analysis. Vertical excitation role is negligible to the response of model with LRB as long as there is no uplift at the bearing. For Friction Pendulum System: Equivalent linear model with viscous damping is inappropriate for modeling FPS in dynamic analysis The effect of vertical excitation to the friction properties of a simple model with no vertical damping is important. Modeling of FPB with bilinear springs provides very good preliminaries results but more precise analysis should be pursue. The bilinear spring model can be used in order to model simple friction pendulum bearing (constant coefficient of friction, no coupling between the two directions) with considerable success.

Conclusions For Friction Pendulum System: Velocity dependent coefficient of friction alter the response of structures and should be included in analysis. Coupled plasticity in two direction provide more accurate results especially if the properties of the bearing and the excitation in two directions are significant different. Simplified non-linear time history analyses that do not consider non-constant coefficient of friction, coupling between the two directions are not conservative. On contrast their results should be treated with caution. The variation of the axial load should be included in analysis since the post yield stiffness depends on the axial load. Variation of axial load is small for bridge structure under consideration, but may be significant for other structures ( ex. Building structure). The numerical method for the time history integration is of great importance and should be treated with extreme caution. More specifically the numerical damping introduced into the model should be investigated in every conducted analysis.

THANK YOU ! QUESTIONS