P ROBING SIGNATURES OF MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS OF DARK ENERGY Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benasque 2012 Luca Amendola University of Heidelberg in collaboration with Martin Kunz, Mariele Motta, Ippocratis Saltas, Ignacy Sawicki Horndeski Lagrangian:
Advertisements

Dark Energy as the Gravitational Feedback of Mass-Varying Dark Matter André Füzfa* F.N.R.S. Postdoctoral Researcher GAMASCO, University of Namur, Belgium.
Massive Gravity and the Galileon Claudia de Rham Université de Genève Work with Gregory Gabadadze, Lavinia Heisenberg, David Pirtskhalava and Andrew Tolley.
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page S. Fay, S. Nesseris, L.P. gr-qc/
Dark Energy and Extended Gravity theories Francesca Perrotta (SISSA, Trieste)
Venice 2013 Luca Amendola University of Heidelberg The next ten years of dark energy research Raphael, The School of Athens, Rome.
Primordial Neutrinos and Cosmological Perturbation in the Interacting Dark-Energy Model: CMB and LSS Yong-Yeon Keum National Taiwan University SDSS-KSG.
BH perturbation in parity violating gravitational theories Hayato Motohashi & Teruaki Suyama (Research Center for the Early Universe, The University of.
Cosmological Expansion from Nonlocal Gravity Correction Tomi Koivisto, ITP Heidelberg 1. Outline Introduction 2. Nonlocalities in physics 3. The gravity.
Modified Gravity Takeshi Chiba Nihon University. Why?
Álvaro de la Cruz-Dombriz Theoretical Physics Department Complutense University of Madrid in collaboration with Antonio L. Maroto & Antonio Dobado Different.
Spherical Collapse in Chameleon Models Rogerio Rosenfeld Rogerio Rosenfeld Instituto de Física Teórica Instituto de Física Teórica UNESP UNESP 2nd Bethe.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
José Beltrán and A. L. Maroto Dpto. Física teórica I, Universidad Complutense de Madrid XXXI Reunión Bienal de Física Granada, 11 de Septiembre de 2007.
Dark energy II : Models of dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Physical Constraints on Gauss-Bonnet Dark Energy Cosmologies Ishwaree Neupane University of Canterbury, NZ University of Canterbury, NZ DARK 2007, Sydney.
Cosmic Microwave Radiation Anisotropies in brane worlds K. Koyama astro-ph/ K. Koyama PRD (2002) Kazuya Koyama Tokyo University.
The Statistically Anisotropic Curvature Perturbation from Vector Fields Mindaugas Karčiauskas Dimopoulos, MK, JHEP 07 (2008) Dimopoulos, MK, Lyth, Rodriguez,
Portsmouth 2008 of gravity Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma The dark side.
Gravity in Higgs phase Shinji Mukohyama IPMU, U of Tokyo Arkani-Hamed, Cheng, Luty and Mukohyama, JHEP 0405:074,2004. Arkani-Hamed, Cheng, Luty and Mukohyama.
Quintessence – Phenomenology. How can quintessence be distinguished from a cosmological constant ?
Coupled Dark Energy and Dark Matter from dilatation symmetry.
A model of accelerating dark energy in decelerating gravity Matts Roos University of Helsinki Department of Physical Sciences and Department of Astronomy.
Near-Horizon Solution to DGP Perturbations Ignacy Sawicki, Yong-Seon Song, Wayne Hu University of Chicago astro-ph/ astro-ph/
1 f(R) Gravity and its relation to the interaction between DE and DM Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Effective field theory approach to modified gravity with applications to inflation and dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa Hot Topics in General Relativity And.
Cosmological Post-Newtonian Approximation with Dark Energy J. Hwang and H. Noh
Self – accelerating universe from nonlinear massive gravity Chunshan Lin Kavli
Chaplygin gas in decelerating DGP gravity Matts Roos University of Helsinki Department of Physics and and Department of Astronomy 43rd Rencontres de Moriond,
Large distance modification of gravity and dark energy
Dark Energy and Modified Gravity IGC Penn State May 2008 Roy Maartens ICG Portsmouth R Caldwell.
Modified (dark) gravity Roy Maartens, Portsmouth or Dark Gravity?
BRANEWORLD COSMOLOGICAL PERTURBATIONS
Jochen Weller Benasque August, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, , 2006.
Lecture 3: Modified matter models of dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
1 Circular Polarization of Gravitational Waves in String Cosmology MIAMI, 200 7 Jiro Soda Kyoto University work with Masaki Satoh & Sugumi Kanno.
Dark Energy The first Surprise in the era of precision cosmology?
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Dark Energy and Modified Gravity Shinji Tsujikawa (Gunma National College of Technology ) Collaborations with L. Amendola, S. Capozziello, R. Gannouji,
Cosmological structure formation and dark energy Carlo Baccigalupi Heidelberg, May 31, 2005.
Claudia de Rham Dec. 18 th Why Modify Gravity in the IR ? Late time acceleration & CC problem First signs of the breakdown of GR on cosmological.
Cosmological Perturbations in the brane worlds Kazuya Koyama Tokyo University JSPS PD fellow.
Inflation and dark energy: theoretical progress over 20 years Shinji Tsujikawa Tokyo University of Science Celebration of 60 years’ old birthdays of Prof.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
 Acceleration of Universe  Background level  Evolution of expansion: H(a), w(a)  degeneracy: DE & MG  Perturbation level  Evolution of inhomogeneity:
ERE 2008September 15-19, Spanish Relativity Meeting 2008, Salamanca, September (2008) Avoiding the DARK ENERGY coincidence problem with a COSMIC.
Phenomenology of beyond Horndeski theories Kazuya Koyama University of Portsmouth.
Theoretical Aspects of Dark Energy Models Rong-Gen Cai Institute of Theoretical Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences CCAST, July 4, 2005.
Modified Gravity and Degravitation
Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, ,
Three theoretical issues in physical cosmology I. Nonlinear clustering II. Dark matter III. Dark energy J. Hwang (KNU), H. Noh (KASI)
Dark Energy in the Early Universe Joel Weller arXiv:gr-qc/
GRAVITON BACKREACTION & COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT
Has elasticity anything to do with cosmology? Angelo Tartaglia RELGRAV.
Inflation in modified gravitational theories Shinji Tsujikawa Tokyo University of Science (TUS) with Antonio De Felice (TUS), Joseph Elliston, Reza Tavakol.
Unified Dark Matter Models Daniele Bertacca Dipartimento di Fisica “Galileo Galilei”, Via Marzolo 8, Padova, Italy
Do consistent modified gravity models mimic General Relativity? S. Appleby, R. Battye. Talk based on arXiv:
THE DARK SIDE OF THE UNIVERSE Amna Ali Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata, India 9/07/2012 LPNHE,PARIS.
@ 2012 Miniworkshop for String theory and Cosmology Dec. 01st Seokcheon Lee (KIAS)
Teruaki Suyama Black hole perturbation in modified gravity Research Center for the Early Universe, University of Tokyo 公募研究 ( 計画研究 A05) 「強い重力場での修正重力理論の検証に向けた理論的研究」
Kazuya Koyama University of Portsmouth Non-linear structure formation in modified gravity models with Gong-bo Zhao (Portsmouth), Baojiu Li (Durham)
Spherical Collapse and the Mass Function – Chameleon Dark Energy Stephen Appleby, APCTP-TUS dark energy workshop 5 th June, 2014 M. Kopp, S.A.A, I. Achitouv,
``Welcome to the dark side of the world.”
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Observational Constraints on Viable f(R) Gravity Models
Centre for Theoretical Physics Jamia Millia University New Delhi
Quantum Spacetime and Cosmic Inflation
Stealth Acceleration and Modified Gravity
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Probing the Dark Sector
Presentation transcript:

P ROBING SIGNATURES OF MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS OF DARK ENERGY Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)

(Part 1) (Part 2) (Part 3)

Dark energy About 70% of the energy density today consists of dark energy responsible for the cosmic acceleration. (Equation of state around )

Theoretical models of dark energy Simplest model: Cosmological constant: If the cosmological constant originates from a vacuum energy, it is enormously larger than the energy scale of dark energy. Other dynamical dark energy models: Quintessence, k-essence, chaplygin gas, tachyon,… (i)Modified matter models (ii) Modified gravity models f(R) gravity, scalar-tensor theory, Braneworld, Galileon,…

Modified gravity models of dark energy (i) Cosmological scales (large scales) Modification from General Relativity (GR) can be allowed. This gives rise to a number of observational signatures such as (i) Peculiar dark energy equation of state (ii) Impact on large scale structure, weak lensing, and CMB. (ii) Solar system scales (small scales) The models need to be close to GR from solar system experiments. GR+small corrections Beyond GR

Concrete modified gravity models (i) f(R) gravity The Lagrangian f is a function of the Ricci scalar R: (ii) Scalar-tensor theory A branch of this theory is Brans-Dicke theory: (iv) DGP braneworld Self-accelerating solutions on the 3-brane in 5-dimensional Minkowski bulk. (iii) Gauss-Bonnet gravity (v) Galileon gravity or The field Lagrangian is restricted to satisfy the Galilean symmetry:

Recovery of GR behavior on small scales (i) Chameleon mechanism Two mechanisms are known. Khoury and Weltman, 2004 The effective mass of a scalar field degree of freedom is density-dependent. Massive (local region) Massless (cosmological region) The field does not propagate freely in the regions of high density. Effective potential:

Chameleon mechanism in f(R) dark energy models Viable f(R) dark energy models have been constructed to satisfy local gravity constraints in the regions of high density. (Starobinsky, 2007) Massive (in the regions of high density) Massless (in the regions of low density) Potential in the Einstein frame The field does not propagate freely.

Simplest modified gravity: Brans-Dicke theory (i) (original BD theory, 1961) Solar system constraints give (ii) As long as the potential is massive in the regions of high density, local gravity constraints can be satisfied by the chameleon mechanism. f(R) gravity ( ): Cappozzielo and S.T. : n > 0.9 p > 0.7 S.T. et al. with the field mass:

(ii) Vainshtein mechanism Scalar-field self interaction such as allows the possibility to recover the GR behavior at high energy (without a field potential) This type of self interaction was considered in the context of `Galileon’ cosmology (Nicolis et al.) The field Lagrangian is restricted to satisfy the `Galilean’ symmetry: The field equation can be kept to second-order. The field can be nearly frozen in the regions of high density.

Observational signatures of modified gravity From the observations of supernovae only, it is not easy to distinguish modified gravity models from the LCDM model. Other constraints on dark energy Large-scale structure Weak lensing CMB Baryon oscillations The evolution of matter density perturbations can allow us to distinguish modified gravity models from the LCDM. The modification of gravity leads to the modification of the growth rate of perturbations.

Matter perturbations in general dark energy models This action includes most of dark energy models such as f(R) gravity, scalar-tensor theory, quintessence, k-essence,… For most of modified gravity theories the Lagrangian takes the form: where We can define two masses that come from the modification of gravity and from the scalar field. Gravitational: Scalar field: For quintessence ( )

On sub-horizon scales (k>>aH), the main contribution to the matter perturbation equation is the terms including Matter perturbations under a quasi-static approximation We then obtain S.T., 2007 De Felice, Mukohyama, S.T., to appear. whereand Massive limits:

Brans-Dicke theory with Brans-Dicke parameter The effective gravitational coupling is where The GR limit ( ) or massive limit ( ) During the early matter era The massless limit ( ) During the late matter era In f(R) gravity ( ), Modified growth rate

Matter power spectra P k [h/Mpc] LCDM Starobinsky’s f(R) model with n=2 BD theory with the potential (Q=0.7, p=0.6) ( Q is related with via )

Gravitational potentials Perturbed metric in the longitudinal gauge We introduce the effective gravitational potential Under the quasi-static approximation we have Whenit follows that In the massless regime in BD theory one has (matter era) in f(R) gravity

The effect of modified gravity on weak lensing Let us consider the shear power spectrum in BD with the potential: where LCDM Larger Q The shear spectrum compared to the LCDM model is where (S.T. and Tatekawa, 2008) (Q: coupling between field and matter in the Einstein frame)

Field self-interaction in generalized BD theories (without the field potential) The de Sitter solution exists for the choice The BD theory corresponds to n=2. The viable parameter space (i) Required to avoid the negative gradient instability and for the existence of a matter era. (ii) Required to avoid ghosts. (iii) Required to realize the late-time de Sitter solution.

Background cosmological evolution The field is nearly frozen during radiation and matter eras. The GR behavior can be recovered by the field self interaction.

The field propagation speed Allowed region The dotted line shows the border between the sub-luminal and super-luminal regimes.

Distinguished observational signatures The effective gravitational potential can grow even if the matter perturbation decays during the accelerated epoch. Kobayashi, Tashiro, Suzuki, 2009 This can provide a tight constraint on this model in future observations. Anti-correlations in the cross-correlation of the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe Effect and large-scale structure LCDM Anti- correlation

Gauss-Bonnet gravity A. De Felice, D. Mota, S.T. (2009) where Considering the perturbations of a perfect fluid with an equation of state w, the speed of propagation is Negative for

(i) f(R) gravity Summary of modified gravity models of dark energy It is possible to construct viable models such as The modified growth of matter perturbation gives the bound ( ii) Brans-Dicke theory One can design a field potential to satisfy cosmological and local gravity constraints (through the chameleon mechanism) (iii) Gauss-Bonnet gravity and Incompatible with observations and experiments (iv) Generalized Bran-Dicke theory with a field self interaction Anti-correlation of the ISW effect and LSS can distinguish this model. (v) DGP model Incompatible with observations, the ghost is present.

Conclusions and outlook Modified gravity models of dark energy are distinguished from other models in many aspects. In particular the growth rate of matter perturbations gets larger than that in the LCDM model. in the LCDM model In viable f(R) models the growth index today can be as small as For Brans-Dicke model with a potential, is even smaller than that in f(R) gravity. The joint observational analysis based on the LSS, weak lensing, ISW-LSS correlation data in future will be useful to constrain modified gravity models.