Mathematics Developmental Education in Texas Institutions of Higher Education Survey of Best Practices Adoption January 2003 Texas Higher Education Coordinating.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Effective is Your Science Program? Really? How to do a district-wide science program evaluation. George W. Stickel & Sally Creel Cobb County Public.
Advertisements

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
A Guide to Implementation
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
Learning Teams (LT): Building Capacity to Sustain High Quality, Site-Based, Professional Development.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
Campus Improvement Plans
Strengthening Institutions Programs Title III
Identifying Promising Practices Promising Practices for Community College Student Success A FIRST LOOK.
Developmental Education: Program Components A Presentation Based on Hunter Boylan’s Work Marilyn Mays and Ruth Dalrymple June 12 – 13, 2003.
Group Seminar Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of.
Foundation Fundraising Update June Goal seek external, foundation funding for consortial, collaborative project(s) which will advance the organization’s.
The Impact of Immersion in a Local Research Problem on Technology Skills and Use CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY PREPARING TOMORROW’S TEACHERS TO USE TECHNOLOGY.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Be a Part of Something Great! Learning Communities at Wayne State.
Clara Fowler University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Group Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of consistent.
The District Technology Plan The District Technology Plan Melanie & David Dillard Melanie & David Dillard
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Implementing Change: A Holistic Approach to Developmental Education Sue Cain, Director Transition and University Services Eastern Kentucky University.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Communicating Between the Silos: Using Alternative Methods to Meet Students’ Needs Stephanie DumontGolden West College Laura HopeChaffey College.
The Chaffey College Success Centers Laura Hope – Interim Dean, Instructional Support Cindy Walker– Instructional Specialist, Language Success Center.
DEV. ED. IN TRANSITION Academic Support Center. What We Have: ASC Vision and Mission Vision Statement  The Academic Support Center will engage and empower.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Hollywood High School Testing Data Results WASC Goals and Instructional Focus October 6, 2009.
Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees have developed a new system that integrates these two.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees integrated their two assessment processes.
Megan Healy Virginia Community College System. VIRGINIA’S COMMUNITY COLLEGES 23 colleges on 40 campuses 287,000+ Annual Headcount Students 128,000+ Annual.
What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education A Presentation by Ruth Dalrymple and Marilyn Mays based on Hunter R. Boylan’s work.
Linked Courses: General Education with Developmental Education Redesign Alliance Conference Orlando, FL March 28-30, 2010 Dr. Leslie Kimberling Jones University.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
PROMOTING STUDENT SUCCESS: WHAT WE’RE LEARNING ABOUT WHAT MATTERS MOST Kay McClenney Director, Center for Community College Student Engagement The University.
SETRC network guide for assessment of programs.  Assessing quality of district program and practice in areas of literacy  Determining priority need.
In the Trenches at Colorado State University Innovation 2008 Breckenridge, Colorado April 14-15, 2008.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
EPortfolio Task Group (ePTG) Chair: Ellen Murphy, Director of Online Curriculum,
Transformation and Coordination of Developmental Education Programs Strengthening Student Success Conference 2007 San Jose, California.
S AN D IEGO AND I MPERIAL V ALLEY B ASIC S KILLS N ETWORK Dr. Lisa Brewster.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Office of Service Quality
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
Tier 3 Intervention The Most Intense Level of Intervention!!!
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Curriculum Overview May 2011 Travis Bracht Director of Student Learning.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
SAS CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY Professional SAS Strand Rubrics December 14, 2009 DRAFT 1.0 Curriculum Design PAGE 0.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Developmental Education – Learning Skills
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Mathematics Developmental Education in Texas Institutions of Higher Education Survey of Best Practices Adoption January 2003 Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Organization and Administration 1. We have a centralized developmental education program. 13.7%17.7%28.4%40.1% 2. We have a highly coordinated developmental education program 5.7%19.4%38.0%37.0% 3. Expectations for developmental education are well-managed 5.2%13.9%43.0%38.0% 4. There is collaboration between developmental education and other campus units. 6.2%18.6%44.0%31.3%

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Organization and Administration 5. Our developmental program has a clearly defined statement of mission, goals, and objectives. 4.5%10.7%35.1%49.7% 6. Developmental education is an institutional priority. 6.7%13.5%38.6%41.1% 7. The institution provides comprehensive services in support of developmental education. 4.2%11.0%40.6%44.1% 8. Grant funds are used to support innovation in developmental education. 9.4%25.6%41.5%23.6% 9. Developmental education is integrated with campus outreach services in the community. 11.0%36.1%38.6%14.2%

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Program Components 10. Assessment is mandatory for all entering students. 1.5%3.3%25.4%69.7% 11. Placement in courses is mandatory based on assessment. 2.5%5.2%30.3%62.0% 12. A systematic plan is in place for the evaluation of developmental education courses and services. 4.3%19.2%37.6%38.8% 13. Formative evaluation is used by developmental educators to refine and improve courses and services. 5.9%16.1%48.3%29.8% 14. Professional development for developmental educators is consistently supported. 7.0%16.7%38.0%38.3%

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Program Components 15. Tutoring is provided to developmental students in all basic skills subjects. 2.3%5.9%28.9%62.9% 16. Tutors working with developmental students are required to participate in training activities. 10.0%28.3%38.8%22.9% 17. Developmental educators are regularly involved in their professional associations. 6.0%24.2%44.1%25.6% 18. Adjunct faculty are treated as an important resource for developmental education. 5.9%11.4%37.6%45.2% 19. Student performance is systematically monitored by faculty and advisors. 3.0%12.0%41.8%43.1%

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Program Components 20. A written philosophy statement guides the provision of developmental education courses and services. 4.7%19.4%39.3%36.6% 21. Classrooms and laboratories are well integrated. 6.5%15.6%41.1%36.8%

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Instructional Practices 22. Learning communities are provided for developmental students. 8.2%35.1%39.0%17.7% 23. A wide variety of different instructional methods are used in developmental courses. 3.5%13.9%43.1%39.5% 24. Students are tested at least 10 times a semester in developmental courses. 12.4%36.3%29.4%21.9% 25. Technology is used primarily as a supplement for instruction in developmental courses. 3.8%11.4%52.7%32.1% 26. Feedback is frequently provided on a regular basis in developmental courses. 2.3%9.4%43.5%44.8%

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Instructional Practices 27. Mastery learning is a common characteristic of developmental courses. 5.0%21.7%42.8%30.4% 28. Systematic efforts are made to link the content of developmental courses to the rest of the curriculum. 4.0%15.4%45.3%35.3% 29. Instructional strategies are regularly shared among developmental instructors in some systematic way. 9.4%29.3%40.6%20.7% 30. Critical thinking is taught in all developmental courses. 5.0%18.7%46.5%29.8%

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Instructional Practices 31. Learning strategies are either embedded in developmental courses or taught as a separate course. 4.0%11.9%50.3%33.8% 32. All developmental instructors regularly use active learning techniques in their courses. 4.3%26.3%43.3%26.1% 33. All developmental instructors regularly utilize Classroom Assessment Techniques in their courses. 7.0%29.3%44.5%19.2%