SEPDAC March 2, 2007. Reducing the Achievement Gap in Ohio: Implementing OISM to Prepare Graduates of Youngstown State University to Meet the Needs of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P-20 Data Collaborative Grant University/College Work Group February 24, 2010.
Advertisements

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Connecticut Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform (CEEDAR) Grant.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
COE Office of Assessment and Accreditation Department of Elementary and Middle Grades Education COE Office of Teacher Education College of Education East.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
_________ Public Schools Developing a Focused Monitoring Theory of Action Plan __________,
Albany Unified School District Strategic Plan Board Study Session June 21, 2011.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
This work was supported in part by MSP grant # through the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Dr. Kathleen Magiera & Dr. Rhea Simmons Fredonia The State University of New York OSEP Project Directors’ Meeting Washington, D.C. July 23, 2014.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
GUIDANCE SYSTEM OF SUPPORT COLLEGE AND CAREER READY FOR ALL Guidance and Counseling Fall 2011.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Muskingum Valley County ESC Dwight Groce ∙ Sept. 16, 2013.
Implementing Change: A Holistic Approach to Developmental Education Sue Cain, Director Transition and University Services Eastern Kentucky University.
July 2011 Apr Dec May-June Aug. 2011June Winter 2010 Mar Board Study Session on Equity that included student panel, Q&A and.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Investigating K-12/University Partnerships: A Case Study Analysis Zulma Y. Méndez, Ph.D. Rodolfo Rincones, Ph.D. College of Education Department of Educational.
1 A Response to Intervention in Closing the Achievement Gap for All Children Dr. Sylvia J. Imler Dr. Sally A. Lewis Youngstown State University Youngstown,
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006.
1 International Conference on School Reform Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada December 14, 2006.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Massachusetts Tiered System of Supports State Personnel Development Grant National Meeting Fall 2014 Madeline Levine
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
Presented to:Bellefontaine City Schools RECOGNIZING TEACHING EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
 Is unique to Nebraska with its self- assessment process.  Is intended to be a component of your district’s School Improvement Process.  Is an ongoing.
OCTEO October 26, Reducing the Achievement Gap in Ohio: Implementing OISM to Prepare Graduates of Youngstown State University to Meet the Needs.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21 st Century Teaching and Learning Institute Pennsylvania Department of Education Upper Dublin School District.
*1 Foreign Language in the Elementary Schools (FLES) Proposal Sharon Public Schools: January 21, 2015.
MTSS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT A LOOK AT THE SYSTEMS TODAY IN CALIFORNIA GAIL LANCASTER –ASSOCIATE FACULTY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY/FRESNO CAMPUS RESOURCE.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
325K: COMBINED PRIORITY FOR PERSONNEL PREPARATION Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
College Success Program John Cowles, Ph.D. Dean of Student Success and Retention Grand Rapids Community College Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Michael Kelly, Ed. D. Virginia Tech
Eastern’s Assessment System
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Comprehensive Planning
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
February 21-22, 2018.
Proficiency & Achievement
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Introduction Introduction
Presentation transcript:

SEPDAC March 2, 2007

Reducing the Achievement Gap in Ohio: Implementing OISM to Prepare Graduates of Youngstown State University to Meet the Needs of All Students: Phase I Youngstown State University Beeghly College of Education Department of Counseling and Special Education

Grant Writing Team Dr. Sylvia J. Imler, PI Dr. Sally A. Lewis Dr. Marianne K. Dove Dr. Kenneth Miller Committee Members for Phase I of Grant Mrs. Michele DiMuzio Mr. Ron Hockman Mr. Paul Rorhbaugh Dr. Margaret Briley

ACTION PLAN Goals Procedures Timeline Target Audience Outcomes Evaluation

Goals 1.History and development of OISM. 2.Development & impact of new educator standards (principal, teachers, PD). 3.Assess the components of OISM across all licensure programs. 4.Collaborate with RSIT & SERRC partners to identify district needs. 5.Collaborate with RSIT & SERRC to utilize district data to develop action plan.

Goals 6.Collaborate with district RSIT & SERRC to develop an aligned system 7.Align OISM for academic and behavior supports with SPAs, accreditation agencies, state standards and the BCOE CF 8.Present the history and development of OISM to BCOE candidates 9.IHE faculty & university supervisors (along with NEOSERRC, Lincoln Way, and Columbiana County ESC) will identify potential sites 10.Identified/purchased library resources needed to integrate OISM 11. Evaluate whether or not goals and objectives were accomplished.

Target Audience BCOE administrators, full & part-time faculty & support staff  Middle childhood  Early childhood  School counseling  Ed Admin  Administration Grant team, RSIT, SERRC Student teacher candidates Early/Middle Childhood TEC candidates STEP (Special Teacher Education Program) Adolescent/Young Adult candidates School Counseling candidates Ed Administration Candidates Ed Majors

OUTCOMES Knowledge of OISM to promote integration of OISM into curricula OISM statement inclusive in course syllabi Exhibit model of OISM icon throughout BCOE

Youngstown State University: Reducing the Achievement Gap in Ohio: Implementing OISM to Prepare Graduates of Youngstown State University to Meet the Needs of All Students Dr. Sylvia J. Imler, Principal Investigator

Outcomes continued…. Understand the impact of new educator standards for teachers, principals & PD at the pre-service level. Assessment data will inform changes in BCOE policies, curricula and instructional strategies Identify district needs Develop an effective OISM plan for candidates and interns to implement. Revise BCOE program curricula PD opportunities Placement at sites Library resources to implement the six elements of OISM

EVALUATION *Presentations Syllabi to insure OISM statement included *Post OISM graph throughout BCOE Evaluate college/dept. policies, etc. for evidence of changes based on data and syllabi Triangulate data findings (RSIT/SERRC/District/YSU OISM grant team)

EVALUATION cont… Alignment of preparation/PD goals Alignment with SPAs & accrediting agencies Inclusion of OISM components in TWS & IWS CT & US evaluation forms of candidates Library Holdings updated to implement elements of OISM

Pretest Posttest Mean Mean a. I can accurately assess the academic needs of all students b. I can accurately assess the behavioral needs of all students c. I can accurately analyze data on student academic performance d. I can accurately analyze data on student behavior e. I can make effective decisions based on accurate interpretations of data f. I can take necessary steps to insure academic progress for all students g. I can create effective academic interventions based on assessment data h. I can create effective behavioral interventions based on assessment data i. I can implement scientifically-based practices in working with students j. I can effectively engage in collaborative, strategic, planning processes to address student needs Notes: N=262. Responses were made on a Likert scale: 1=Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Agree, 4=Strongly Agree BCOE Teacher Candidate Pre and Post Survey Comparison

BCOE Faculty Evaluation of BCOE Graduates’ Abilities to Implement the OISM Elements Every graduate of my department is able to: Standard Mean Deviation a. accurately assess the academic needs of all students b. accurately assess the behavioral needs of all students c. can accurately analyze data on student academic performance d. can accurately analyze data on student behavior e. can make effective decisions based on accurate interpretations of data f. can take necessary steps to insure academic progress for all students g. can create effective academic interventions based on assessment data h. can create effective behavioral interventions based on assessment data i. can implement scientifically-based practices in working with students j. can effectively engage in collaborative, strategic, planning processes to address student needs Notes: N=17. Responses were made on a Likert scale: 1=Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neither Disagree or Agree, 4=Agree, 5= Strongly agree (45% completed survey)

University Supervisor Evaluation of BCOE Student Teacher Candidates’ Abilities to Implement the Ohio Integrated Systems Model (OISM) Standard Mean Deviation a. accurately assessed the academic needs of all students b. accurately assessed the behavioral needs of all students c. accurately analyzed data on student academic performance d. accurately analyzed data on student behavior e. made effective decisions based on accurate interpretations of data f. took necessary steps to insure academic progress for all students g. created effective academic interventions based on assessment data h. created effective behavioral interventions based on assessment data i. implemented scientifically-based practices in working with students j. effectively engaged in collaborative, strategic, planning processes to address student concerns Notes: N= 75 Responses were made on a Likert scale: 1=Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neither Disagree or Agree, 4=Agree, 5= Strongly agree

Cooperating Teacher Evaluation of BCOE Student Teacher Candidates’ Abilities to Implement the Ohio Integrated Systems Model (OISM) Standard Mean Deviation a. accurately assessed the academic needs of all students b. accurately assessed the behavioral needs of all students c. accurately analyzed data on student academic performance d. accurately analyzed data on student behavior e. made effective decisions based on accurate interpretations of data f. took necessary steps to insure academic progress for all students g. created effective academic interventions based on assessment data h. created effective behavioral interventions based on assessment data i. implemented scientifically-based practices in working with students j. effectively engaged in collaborative, strategic, planning processes to address student concerns Notes: N = 75. Responses were made on a Likert scale: 1=Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neither Disagree or Agree, 4=Agree, 5= Strongly agree

International Conference on School Reform, Vancouver, BC. Photo taken by: Kenneth Miller