Office of Portfolio Management May 16, 2013 District 30 Middle School Rezoning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
York School Boards Cornell Ratepayers Association January, 2013 Adam McDonald York Catholic District School Board (YCDSB) Jessica Peake York Region District.
Advertisements

Middle School Admissions
1 The Middle School Choice Process Fall 2013 Stacey Katz, Guidance Counselor Randy St. Germain, Parent Coordinator.
Rezoning Study -Committee Meeting 2- November 15, 2011.
UNIT 5 REDISTRICTING COMMUNITY FORUM mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011.
UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT RISK MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES John Gavens Managing Principal.
Office of Portfolio Management September 22, 2011 Draft of Rezoning presented to CEC D2.
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
Magnet Program Audit for Baltimore County Public Schools Presentation of Key Findings and Recommendations November 19, 2013 Marilyn Zlotnik, Vice President.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.
Projecting Student Enrollment MoAsbo Spring Conference, 2001 Copies of all handouts/worksheets/presentation also found at Park Hill’s Web Site
1 Middle School Admissions Process Office Of Student Enrollment Fall 2009.
GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT ASSIGNMENT BOUNDARIES Board of Education Meeting Eugene Street Board Room July 12, 2011.
Presented to the Board of Trustees Davis Demographics & Planning, Inc. Riverside, California February 10 th, 2009 Upland Unified School District.
Our recommendations were informed by an initial screen of all schools, community feedback and impact analyses, building walkthroughs, program assessments.
WCA Facilities Planning February WCA Request 2 Educational Program: The Charter School’s educational program has unique facilities needs. Key.
1 Office of Portfolio Management CEC 31 Meeting – July 8, 2013 For discussion purposes.
- 0 - Community Forums OUSD School Admissions and Attendance Boundary Policies Spring 2008.
SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ZONES. QUESTION? SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS based on ATTENDANCE ZONES.
Arlington Public Schools Whom are we serving? Who is providing the services? What is changing? How are the services provided? October 2006.
District Realignment Education Committee June 7,
Analysis of Salvador and El Centro School Boundaries SEPTEMBER 16, 2015.
1 Guidelines for Kindergarten Admissions
Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education Presentation August 23, Planning for Changing Enrollment 2010 US Census Data What Does It Tell Us.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
2015 School Impact Fees April 29, Changes since March o Updated number of square feet per elementary student to 120 sq ft / pupil o Updated the.
Saint Croix Central Task Force Findings May 2, 2012.
Excellence for All Children Elementary Rezoning Follow-up parent/community input meetings.
Brookings School District All Day Kindergarten Update Presentation Contains Projected Data.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
Ridgefield School District Capital Facilities Plan March 9, 2010.
Charter School Accountability Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education The Office of Charter Schools and School Redesign 75 Pleasant.
Warren Township Study To Examine Enrollment Project (STEEP) Project Plan & Criteria High Level Timeline Sub-Committee Goals & Deliverables Revised October.
Agenda Overview of the Middle School Admissions Process Student eligibility Student priorities Types of schools The matching process Application process.
Alton Village School Boundary Review April 17, 2012 FINAL REPORT 1.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Student Reassignment Survey Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools October 1 – November 1, 2012.
No existing PS199 student will be forced to transfer schools Why is Re-Zoning of PS199 Proposed? Ease overcrowding/right-size enrollment Eliminate or reduce.
Opening of Schools Report Opening of Schools Report Fall Housing Counts: Actuals vs. Projections All numbers are as of 9/30/08 6,294 students.
Elementary/Middle School Boundary Presentation.
Opening of Schools Report Information Services October 15, 2007.
Huntsville City Schools Enrollment & Facilities Planning April 13,
PERRIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent’s Advisory Attendance Area Advisory Committee Report December 10, 2015.
March 8, Presentation Overview  Review of the Past  Board Motions:  January, February, November – 2015  February – 2016  Education Act and.
Student Reassignment Analysis for the Lexington Public Schools Project Introduction & Update for the LPS School Committee February 2, 2016.
Schools of Choice Board of Education Presentation March 7, 2011
SCHOOL #1 BALLOT QUESTION AND PROPOSAL Fall, 2016.
Field Analyst Support Team (FAST) School Finance Division
February 24, 2011 Board of Education Workshop
High School Admissions
School #1 Ballot Question and Proposal
Proposed Policy Changes
Dalton Public Schools Special Project Team
Applying to NEST+m for Grades K - 3
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Instructions: Submitting the RFF interest form
MPO’s School Transportation Working Group
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Introduction to Middle School Admissions
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
Majority – to – Minority
High School Admissions
DRAFT Buffer Zone Policy
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Rezoning Proposal Fall 2019
Contracts for Excellence FY 2019 Proposed Plan CEC August 2018.
Pillager Public School District Community Survey Results
D15: large classes, overcrowding, and what can be done
Leonie Haimson, Class Size Matters February 29, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Office of Portfolio Management May 16, 2013 District 30 Middle School Rezoning

Table of Contents 2 Slide # I.Rationale for Rezoning II.Overview of the Rezoning Process III.Guiding Policies and Principles IV.Methodology a.Determining the Target 6 th Grade Zone Size b.Determining the Zone Lines V.Schools Affected by Rezoning VI.Impact of Rezoning VII.Scenario Zone Lines VIII.Contact Information for Comments IX.Appendix a.Admissions Process

OPM conducts analysis and works with DPC and CEC to assess the need to rezone OPM derives the ideal Kindergarten zone size of any impacted schools OPM develops and discusses scenario map with key stakeholders OPM and Superintendent presents proposal before CEC at public meeting Superintendent collects feedback and submits proposal for approval CEC collects feedback and votes on proposal within 45 days of submission Overview of Rezoning Process

Guiding Policies and Principles 4 Pending approval by the CEC, the proposed changes would take effect for the academic year. Pending approval by the CEC, the proposed changes would only impact incoming sixth grade students or new students to the system. All currently enrolled students may remain in their school until graduation. See Appendix A for the admissions process as outlined in the Chancellor’s regulation A-101. The Office of Pupil Transportation (OPT) will follow standard procedure to determine bus service eligibility of general education students, as outlined by Chancellor’s regulation A-801.

Methodology – Determining the Target 6 th Grade Zone Size 5 Seat Supply: What is the capacity of each school? Specifically, how many instructional sections can each building accommodate? We assess capacity based on: The number of full-size classrooms available in the building; The number of specialty rooms to which a school is entitled; and Historical enrollment increases and decreases at each grade level. Seat Demand: How many students do we anticipate? We assess demand – both from inside and outside the zone – based on: The historical number of sixth grade students living in the zone; Historical average class sizes; Historical zone retention rates (the percent of students who live in the zone and attend their zoned school); Historical zone enrollment rates (the percent of enrolled students who are also zoned to that school); and Anticipated sixth grade growth, based on current/future housing developments.

Methodology – Determining the Zone Lines 6 To the extent possible, we draw zone lines in a way that: Achieves the targeted sixth grade zone size for all affected schools; Addresses overcrowding and other concerns of the community; Aligns zoning at the elementary and middle school grade levels; Accounts for grade reconfigurations as well as other programmatic offerings at impacted schools (e.g. expansions, magnet, etc.); Avoids forcing students to cross geographic barriers (e.g. highways, railroads, etc.); Accounts for residential construction and population growth within the affected areas; Centrally locates the school within the zone, wherever possible; Minimizes the distance students must travel to attend their zoned school; and Maintains the diversity of schools.

Rationale for Rezoning 7 To alleviate overcrowding at I.S To create a zone for Hunters Point Community Middle School (30Q291), the new school in building Q404, located at st Avenue, that will open in September To account for the new capacity of new building Q297, located at th Avenue, that is slated to open in September To utilize excess middle school capacity in D30 to serve D30 residents. To align zoning at the elementary and middle school levels.

Schools Affected by Rezoning 8 DBNSchool Name Current Grade Span Grade Span at Scale Total Enrollment 1 Total Org Capacity 2 Utilization % 30Q145I.S. 145 Joseph Pulitzer6-8 2,0731,740119% 30Q230I.S % 30Q010I.S. 010 Horace Greeley ,04388% 30Q126 Albert Shanker School for Visual and Performing Arts % 30Q204I.S. 204 Oliver W. Holmes ,04767% 30Q291 Hunters Point Community Middle School New School6-8New School (1)Based on the Audited Register as of October 26, (2)Based on the Blue Book Capacity. In the current school year:

Impact of Rezoning – 6 th Grade Zone Size 9 School Name Current 6 th Grade Zone Size 1 Planned 6 th Grade Zone Size 2 Change in 6 th Grade Zone Size I.S. 145 Joseph Pulitzer ↓ I.S ↑ I.S. 010 Horace Greeley ↑ Albert Shanker School for Visual and Performing Arts ↑ I.S. 204 Oliver W. Holmes ↓ Hunters Point Community Middle School New School New School (1)The current zone size is based on the Audited Register data as of October 26, (2)The planned zone size accounts for residential growth based on new construction data provided by the SCA. (3)The planned zone size accounts for approximately 145 additional 6 th grade students in new residential construction. Based on the Audited Register data as of October 26, 2012, there are only approximately th grade students residing within the planned zone.

Impact of Rezoning – 6 th Grade Sections 10 Current 1 Planned 2 ` School Name # of GE/ICT 6 th Grade Sections GE/ICT 6 th Grade Enrollment # of GE/ICT 6 th Grade Sections GE/ICT 6 th Grade Enrollment Change in 6 th Grade Enrollment I.S. 145 Joseph Pulitzer ↓ I.S ↑ I.S. 010 Horace Greeley ↑ Albert Shanker School for Visual and Performing Arts ↑ I.S. 204 Oliver W. Holmes Hunters Point Community Middle School New School New School (1)The 6 th grade enrollment is based on the Audited Register as of October 26, (2)The planned 6 th grade section counts and enrollment take into account all programmatic offerings, such as G&T, magnet programs, etc. These figures are subject to change based on revisions to the proposed zones.

District 30 Zone Line Scenario 11

Zone Line Scenario – IS

Zone Line Scenario – IS

Zone Line Scenario – IS 10 14

Zone Line Scenario – IS

Zone Line Scenario – IS

Zone Line Scenario – IS

Contact Information for Comments 18 OPM Office of Portfolio Management Community Superintendent CEC Community Education Council Phone: (718) 391 – Subject: District 30 Zoning Subject: District 30 Zoning Subject: District 30 Zoning

Appendix A – Admissions Process¹ 19 Students will be enrolled in New York City middle schools by the following priority: a.Students with a zoned middle school have a priority to attend that school if they rank it on their middle school application. During the middle school admissions process, available seats (determined by OSE) at zoned schools will be available for non-zoned students who apply once all of the zoned students have been accommodated in the application process. Zoned students who do not apply to their zoned school no longer have a priority to attend that school. Zoned students who have applied will be accommodated before non-zoned students on appeal as space is available. b.Fifth-grade students attending a K-8 school maintain a priority for the 6th grade middle school admissions process if they rank the continuing K-8 school on their middle school choice application. During the middle school admissions process, available seats (determined by OSE) at K-8 schools will be available for non- continuing students who apply once all of the continuing students have been accommodated in the application process. Continuing students who do not apply to their current school no longer have a priority to attend that school for 6th grade. Continuing students will be accommodated before non-continuing students on appeal as space is available. c.When students receive a non-zoned or non-continuing school placement as a part of the middle school choice process, the students no longer have any entitlement to return to their zoned or K-8 school for the duration of middle school. Any requests for the zoned or K-8 school must be expressed through the PER or transfer process. (1)Please refer to Chancellor’s Regulation A-101 for further information.