GTStrudl Training … Nonlinear Geometric Analysis of Structures … Some Practical Fundamentals and Insights Michael H. Swanger Georgia Tech CASE Center June,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Elements Jake Blanchard Spring 2008.
Advertisements

Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo.
FE analysis with shell and axisymmetric elements E. Tarallo, G. Mastinu POLITECNICO DI MILANO, Dipartimento di Meccanica.
Definition I. Beams 1. Definition
Element Loads Strain and Stress 2D Analyses Structural Mechanics Displacement-based Formulations.
Overview of Loads ON and IN Structures / Machines
Modeling for Analysis CE Design of Multi-Story Structures
Beams and Frames.
GTSTRUDL Users Group Annual Meeting, June 2010, page-1 Stability Analysis of 400 Ton Lifting Truss Luis M. Moreschi Hongchun Liu Peter J. Carrato Bechtel.
LECTURE SERIES on STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION Thanh X. Nguyen Structural Mechanics Division National University of Civil Engineering
Wind turbine blade design using FEM AFOLABI AKINGBE WEI CHENG WENYU ZHOU.
Finite Element Primer for Engineers: Part 2
Copyright 2001, J.E. Akin. All rights reserved. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis.
Chapter 3: ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE
ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis Non-Linear Problems in Solid and Structural Mechanics Special Topics.
Level (m-1 ) Level m h (1-c)h ch Rigid Beam x1x1 x k1k1 k2k2 knkn kHkH RC AND SRC SHEAR WALL MACRO-MODELING l Multiple Vertical Line.
DEFLECTIONS (Chapter 8) WHY? FACTORS IN DESIGN Safety Esthetics Serviceability Environment Economy DETERMINACY Determinate Structures Equations of Equilibrium.
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
INTRODUCTION INTO FINITE ELEMENT NONLINEAR ANALYSES
Classical Laminated Plate Theory
CST ELEMENT STIFFNESS MATRIX
MCE 561 Computational Methods in Solid Mechanics
2005 February, 2 Page 1 Finite Element Analysis Basics – Part 2/2 Johannes Steinschaden.
Beams Beams: Comparison with trusses, plates t
1 Before we start… Zakład Wytrzymałości Materiałów: Remarks on mutual understanding 1.There should be not a linguistic barrier:
CHAP 4 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BEAMS AND FRAMES
Introduction to Nonlinear Analysis
Beam Analysis Civil Engineering and Architecture
Beam Design for Geometric Nonlinearities
1 ME 323 Final Lecture – April 2011 Additional Topics.
ME 475 Computer Aided Design of Structures Finite Element Analysis of Trusses – Part 1 Ron Averill Michigan State University.
2004 March, 4 Page 1 Finite Element Analysis Basics – Part 2/2 Johannes Steinschaden.
Motion and Stress Analysis by Vector Mechanics Edward C. Ting Professor Emeritus of Applied Mechanics Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN National Central.
Static Pushover Analysis
Concrete 2003 Brisbane July 2003 Design Of Pre-cast Buried Structures For Internal Impact Loading.
An introduction to the finite element method using MATLAB
The Finite Element Method A Practical Course
The Finite Element Method A Practical Course
GTSTRUDL Using the GTSTRUDL Base Plate Wizard Example of Creating and Analyzing a Base Plate Rob Abernathy CASE Center GTSUG June, 2009 Atlanta, GA.
11/11/20151 Trusses. 11/11/20152 Element Formulation by Virtual Work u Use virtual work to derive element stiffness matrix based on assumed displacements.
GTSTRUDL GTSTRUDL Buckling and Nonlinear Analysis Examples Dr. Kenneth M.(Mac) Will GTSUG 2011 June 2011 Delray Beach, Florida.
Finite Element Method Brian Hammond Ivan Lopez Ingrid Sarvis.
PAT328, Section 3, March 2001 S7-1 MAR120, Lecture 4, March 2001MAR120, Section 7, December 2001 SECTION 7 CHOICE OF ELEMENTS: TOPOLOGY AND RESTARTING.
BAR ELEMENT IN 2D (TRUSS, LINK)
MECH4450 Introduction to Finite Element Methods Chapter 3 FEM of 1-D Problems: Applications.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
11 10-Jan-16 Last course Interpretations and properties of the stiffness matrix (cont’d) The DSM for plane and space trusses.
Friction Bearing Base Isolation
GTSTRUDL User’s Group BASE PLATE ANALYSIS June 23, 2011 Parimal Gandhi, PE Sr. Engineer 1 Annual Meeting
Two loading Conditions
1 Non-Linear Piezoelectric Exact Geometry Solid-Shell Element Based on 9-Parameter Model Gennady M. Kulikov Department of Applied Mathematics & Mechanics.
CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.
1 CHAP 4 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BEAMS AND FRAMES FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Nam-Ho Kim Audio: Raphael Haftka.
UNIT III FINITE ELEMENT METHOD. INTRODUCTION General Methods of the Finite Element Analysis 1. Force Method – Internal forces are considered as the unknowns.
STIFFNESS MATRIX METHOD
Unified Theory of Reinforced Concrete
Finite Element Method Weak form Monday, 11/4/2002.
11 Energy Methods.
Structures Matrix Analysis
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
Mechanics of Solids I Energy Method.
Nonlinear Analysis: Riks Analysis.
Overview of Loads ON and IN Structures / Machines
Beams and Frames.
Stresses, Strains and Deflections of Steel Beams in Pure Bending
FEA convergence requirements.
Implementation of 2D stress-strain Finite Element Modeling on MATLAB
Beams.
Equilibrium Of a Rigid Body.
Finite element analysis of the wrinkling of orthotropic membranes
Presentation transcript:

GTStrudl Training … Nonlinear Geometric Analysis of Structures … Some Practical Fundamentals and Insights Michael H. Swanger Georgia Tech CASE Center June, 2011

Lite Overview of Basic Concepts -Equilibrium Formulation -Element Nodal Forces -Element Implementation Behavior Assumptions -Tangent Stiffness Simple Basic behavior Examples -Simply-supported beam under axial load, imperfect geometry -Shallow truss arch: snap-through behavior -Shallow arch toggle: SBHQ6 model, snap-through behavior -Slender cantilever shear wall under axial load -- in-plane SBHQ plate behavior -The P-δ Question! Additional Examples Topics 2 GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FLJune 22-25, 2011

Overview of Basic Concepts Equilibrium Formulation 3 GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FLJune 22-25, 2011

Overview of Basic Concepts Equilibrium Formulation 4 GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FLJune 22-25, 2011

Overview of Basic Concepts Element Nodal Forces 5 GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FLJune 22-25, 2011

Overview of Basic Concepts Element Implementation Behavior Assumptions Assumptions related to the scope of nonlinear geometric behavior are introduced into the definition of strain and the equilibrium equation: Example: Frame Member Strain and Equilibrium 6 GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FLJune 22-25,

Overview of Basic Concepts Element Implementation Behavior Assumptions Summary of GTSTRUDL NLG Behavior Assumptions 1.Plane and Space Frame −Small strains; σ = Eε remains valid −Internal rotations and curvatures are small; θ ≈ sinθ −Member chord rotations are small −P and M are coupled −U axial and U Transverse are uncoupled −θ Torsion and U Transverse are uncoupled −Other member effects are not affected by member displacement −Member loads are not affected by member displacement 2.Plane and Space Truss −Small strains ; σ = Eε remains valid −No assumptions limiting magnitude of displacements 7 GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FLJune 22-25, 2011

Overview of Basic Concepts Element Implementation Behavior Assumptions Summary of GTSTRUDL NLG Behavior Assumptions 3.SBHQ and SBHT Plate Elements −Small strains; σ = Dε remains valid −BPH + PSH + 2 nd order membrane effects Internal rotations and curvatures are small U in-plane and U Transverse are coupled in 2 nd order membrane effects BPH and 2 nd order membrane effects are uncoupled −Element loads are not affected by element displacements 4.The IPCABLE Element −Small strains ; σ = Eε remains valid −No assumptions limiting magnitude of displacements −Regarding NLG, 2-node version and the truss are the same 8 GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FLJune 22-25, 2011

Overview of Basic Concepts The Tangent Stiffness Matrix 9 GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FLJune 22-25, 2011

GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 10 Overview of Basic Concepts The Tangent Stiffness Matrix u P PiPi P i+1 uiui u i+1 a 1 b 2 u1u1 u2u2 u 1 =u i +  u 1 u 2 =u 1 +  u 2 K T = [K σ + K u ]

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 11 Simply-supported beam under axial load, imperfect geometry Shallow truss arch: snap-through behavior Shallow arch toggle: SBHQ6 model, snap-through behavior Slender cantilever shear wall under axial load -- in-plane SBHQ plate behavior The P-δ Question! Simple Basic behavior Examples

12 GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FLJune 22-25, 2011 Simple Basic Behavior Examples Simply-supported beam under axial load, imperfect geometry 1 ft Imperfection: Y imp = -0.01sin( π x/L) ft P E = 10,000 ksi Plane Frame: Ax = in 2, Iz = in 4

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 13 Simple Basic Behavior Examples Simply-supported beam under axial load, imperfect geometry P e = kips

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 14 Simple Basic Behavior Examples Simply-supported beam under axial load, imperfect geometry Push-over Analysis Procedure UNITS KIPS LOAD 1 JOINT LOADS 21 FORCE X $ Load P NONLINEAR EFFECTS GEOMETRY MEMBERS EXISTING PUSHOVER ANALYSIS DATA INCREMENTAL LOAD 1 MAX NUMBER OF LOAD INCR 200 MAX NUMBER OF TRIALS 20 MAX NUMBER OF CYCLES 100 LOADING RATE $ f 1 CONVERGENCE RATE 0.8 CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE COLLAPSE CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE DISPLACEMENT END PERFORM PUSHOVER ANALYSIS f1Pf1P Displacement Load P 1

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 15 Simple Basic Behavior Examples Simply-supported beam under axial load, imperfect geometry Push-over Analysis Procedure UNITS KIPS LOAD 1 JOINT LOADS 21 FORCE X NONLINEAR EFFECTS GEOMETRY MEMBERS EXISTING PUSHOVER ANALYSIS DATA INCREMENTAL LOAD 1 MAX NUMBER OF LOAD INCR 200 MAX NUMBER OF TRIALS 20 MAX NUMBER OF CYCLES 100 LOADING RATE $ f 1 CONVERGENCE RATE 0.8 CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE COLLAPSE CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE DISPLACEMENT END PERFORM PUSHOVER ANALYSIS f1Pf1P (2f 1 )P Displacement Load P 1 2

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 16 Simple Basic Behavior Examples Push-over Analysis Procedure UNITS KIPS LOAD 1 JOINT LOADS 21 FORCE X NONLINEAR EFFECTS GEOMETRY MEMBERS EXISTING PUSHOVER ANALYSIS DATA INCREMENTAL LOAD 1 MAX NUMBER OF LOAD INCR 200 MAX NUMBER OF TRIALS 20 MAX NUMBER OF CYCLES 100 LOADING RATE $ f 1 CONVERGENCE RATE 0.8 CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE COLLAPSE CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE DISPLACEMENT END PERFORM PUSHOVER ANALYSIS Simply-supported beam under axial load, imperfect geometry f1Pf1P (2f 1 )P (3f 1 )P Displacement Load P 1 3 2

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 17 Simple Basic Behavior Examples Push-over Analysis Procedure UNITS KIPS LOAD 1 JOINT LOADS 21 FORCE X NONLINEAR EFFECTS GEOMETRY MEMBERS EXISTING PUSHOVER ANALYSIS DATA INCREMENTAL LOAD 1 MAX NUMBER OF LOAD INCR 200 MAX NUMBER OF TRIALS 20 MAX NUMBER OF CYCLES 100 LOADING RATE $ f 1 CONVERGENCE RATE 0.8 $ r CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE COLLAPSE CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE DISPLACEMENT END PERFORM PUSHOVER ANALYSIS Simply-supported beam under axial load, imperfect geometry f1Pf1P (2f 1 )P (3f 1 )P Displacement Load P (2f 1 + rf 1 )P

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 18 Simple Basic Behavior Examples Shallow truss arch: snap-through behavior E = 29,000 ksi Plane Truss: Ax = 1.0 in 2

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 19 Simple Basic Behavior Examples Shallow truss arch: snap-through behavior

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 20 Simple Basic Behavior Examples Shallow arch toggle: SBHQ6 model, snap-through behavior SBHQ6 Arch Leg, 20 x 4 Θz = 0

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 21 Simple Basic Behavior Examples Shallow arch toggle: SBHQ6 model, snap-through behavior Note: P buck = lbs (linear buckling load)

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 22 Slender cantilever shear wall under axial load -- in-plane SBHQ plate behavior Simple Basic Behavior Examples 0.01 kips P Mesh = 2X50 Material = concrete POISSON = 0.0 Thickness = 4 in 100 ft 2 ft

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 23 Slender cantilever shear wall under axial load -- in-plane SBH plate behavior Simple Basic Behavior Examples P buck (FE) = kips (P e (SF) = kips)

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 24 The P-δ Question Does GTSTRUDL Include P-δ? E = 10,000 ksi, Plane Frame: Ax = in 2, Iz = in 4 No Mid Span Nodes 1 Mid Span Node

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 25 The P-δ Question

June 22-25, 2011GTSUG, 2011, Delray Beach,FL 26 The P-δ Question M tot = M 0 + Pδ mid