Hypothetical Syllogism

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Philosophy 148 Chapter 3 (part 2).
Advertisements

Truth Tables The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to construct truth tables and use them to test the validity of arguments. Go To Next Slide.
TRUTH TABLES The general truth tables for each of the connectives tell you the value of any possible statement for each of the connectives. Negation.
Truth Functional Logic
Hypotheticals: The If/Then Form Hypothetical arguments are usually more obvious than categorical ones. A hypothetical argument has an “if/then” pattern.
Rules of Inferences Section 1.5. Definitions Argument: is a sequence of propositions (premises) that end with a proposition called conclusion. Valid Argument:
An overview Lecture prepared for MODULE-13 (Western Logic) BY- MINAKSHI PRAMANICK Guest Lecturer, Dept. Of Philosophy.
Sentential Logic. One of our main critical thinking questions was: Does the evidence support the conclusion? How do we evaluate whether specific evidence.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5. ” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage.
Chapter 22: Common Propositional Argument Forms. Introductory Remarks (p. 220) This chapter introduces some of the most commonly used deductive argument.
Use a truth table to determine the validity or invalidity of this argument. First, translate into standard form “Martin is not buying a new car, since.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, even further more, expanded, Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Deduction Induction Fallacies.  The basic aim of deductive reasoning is to start with some assumption or premise and extract from it a conclusion—a logical.
Valid Arguments An argument is a sequence of propositions. All but the final proposition are called premises. The last statement is the conclusion. The.
The Conditional Syllogism otherwise knows as: The Hypothetical Syllogism “If I had a millions dollars, then I’d buy you a house” The Barenaked Ladies.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Logic. what is an argument? People argue all the time ― that is, they have arguments.  It is not often, however, that in the course of having an argument.
PHIL 120: Jan 8 Basic notions of logic
Proving the implications of the truth functional notions  How to prove claims that are the implications of the truth functional notions  Remember that.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Copyright © Peter Cappello Logical Inferences Goals for propositional logic 1.Introduce notion of a valid argument & rules of inference. 2.Use inference.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Patterns of Deductive Thinking
Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications
Date Variations of Syllogisms. 2 2 Enthymeme -an enthymeme is an abridged form of syllogism in which a premise or a conclusion is missing. -there are.
Logical Arguments. Strength 1.A useless argument is one in which the truth of the premisses has no effect at all on the truth of the conclusion. 2.A weak.
The Science of Good Reasons
Deductive Arguments.
Today’s Topics Review of Sample Test # 2 A Little Meta Logic.
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
Chapter Four Proofs. 1. Argument Forms An argument form is a group of sentence forms such that all of its substitution instances are arguments.
1 DISJUNCTIVE AND HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISMS DISJUNCTIVE PROPOSITIONS: E.G EITHER WHALES ARE MAMMALS OR THEY ARE VERY LARGE FISH. DISJUNCTS: WHALES ARE MAMMALS.(P)
The construction of a formal argument
Propositional Logic A symbolic representation of deductive inference. Use upper case letters to represent simple propositions. E.g. Friday class rocks.
Apologetics: Other Syllogisms Presented by Eric Douma.
Logic The Lost Art of Argument. Logic - Review Proposition – A statement that is either true or false (but not both) Conjunction – And Disjunction – Or.
6.6 Argument Forms and Fallacies
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Thinking Critically 1C Discussion Paragraph 1 web 88. State Politics 89. US Presidents 90. Web Venn Diagrams.
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
Syllogisms and Three Types of Hypothetical Syllogisms
Hypothetical Syllogism If/Then Statements. Parts Major Premise: Two-part statement: – 1) "if," statement, known as the antecedent; – 2) consequent Minor.
Sentential Logic.
Chapter 7 Evaluating Deductive Arguments II: Truth Functional Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Arguments Arguments: premises provide grounds for the truth of the conclusion Two different ways a conclusion may be supported by premises. Deductive Arguments.
Mathematics for Comter I Lecture 2: Logic (1) Basic definitions Logical operators Translating English sentences.
Symbolic Logic ⊃ ≡ · v ~ ∴. What is a logical argument? Logic is the science of reasoning, proof, thinking, or inference. Logic allows us to analyze a.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Lecture Notes Chapter 7.
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
1 Propositional Proofs 1. Problem 2 Deduction In deduction, the conclusion is true whenever the premises are true.  Premise: p Conclusion: (p ∨ q) 
Formal logic The part of logic that deals with arguments with forms.
L = # of lines n = # of different simple propositions L = 2 n EXAMPLE: consider the statement, (A ⋅ B) ⊃ C A, B, C are three simple statements 2 3 L =
Deductive reasoning.
Deductive Arguments.
Logical Inferences: A set of premises accompanied by a suggested conclusion regardless of whether or not the conclusion is a logical consequence of the.
Disjunctive Syllogism
Proof Techniques.
Rules of Inference Section 1.6.
6.1 Symbols and Translation
Logical Inferences: A set of premises accompanied by a suggested conclusion regardless of whether or not the conclusion is a logical consequence of the.
TRUTH TABLE TO DETERMINE
Logical Forms.
CS 220: Discrete Structures and their Applications
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Statements of Symbolic Logic
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Hypothetical Syllogism

Hypothetical syllogism -a deductive argument which asserts the sequential relation between the two elements of a hypothetical proposition -its main premise is a hypothetical proposition

Analysis of a hypothetical prop. If it rains, then the roof is wet C-consequent A-antecedent + A + C + C ? A - C - A - A ? C

Example If public officials committed serious lapses, then they will be charged administratively. Some police officers committed serious lapses. Hence, they will be charged administratively. +A Valid +C

- C Valid - A +C + A Invalid Joe will not comeback unless he loves Michelle Joe will come back Ergo, he loves Michelle If you truly love a person, you don’t stifle her growth. Mickey lets go of Minnie to give her space for growth. Thus, Mickey truly loves Minnie - C Valid - A Invalid +C + A

Types of Hypothetical Syll. Conditional Simple Conditional If… then… Unless… Reciprocal Conditional Only if C, A

Types of Hypothetical Syll. Conditional Biconditional If and only if… Pure conditional If B, then C If A, then B Ergo, if A, then C.

Reciprocal conditional Only if students are treated as mature persons will they act responsibly But students are treated as mature persons. Hence, they will act responsibly. +C Invalid + A

Biconditional +A +C + C + A - C - A - A - C -A Valid - C If and only if Perf is a millionaire will Cath marry him Perf is not a millionaire Hence, Cath will not marry him. -A Valid - C +A +C + C + A - C - A - A - C

Pure conditional If A is B, then X is Y. If X is Y, then C is D. Ergo, if A is B, then C is D. Rule: The common element must be used once as antecedent and consequent. If Nolan is honest, then he will tell the truth. If he will tell the truth, then he will implicate the officials behind illegal gambling. Thus, if Nolan is honest, then he will implicate the officials behind illegal gambling. _________ Common Element _________

Pure conditional If the president is sincere in stopping corruptions, she will investigate the COMELEC. If she will investigate the COMELEC, she will discover the anomalous transactions on election automation. Hence, if the president is sincere in stopping corruptions, she will discover the anomalous transactions on election automation. If Filipinos live a truly Christian life, then they will take care of their environment. If Filipinos show true concerns for the environment, then they will take care of their environment. Thus, if Filipinos show true concerns for the environment, then they live a truly Christian life.

Disjunctive Syllogism -a type of hypothetical syllogism whose main premise is a disjunctive proposition (Either… or…) Types of Disjunctive Perfect Disjunctive -the main premise contains alternatives that cannot be both affirmed and denied. Either he is telling the truth or he is telling a lie. ________________ _____________ +B - A B +A +A -B - A +B

Perfect Disjunctive Valid Jie’s necklace is either rare or common. Matt is either a theist or an non-theist. He is not a non-theist. Therefore, he is a theist. Jie’s necklace is either rare or common. Jie says it is rare. Hence, it is not common B + A Valid + A - B Valid

Disjunctive Syllogism Types of Disjunctive Imperfect Disjunctive -the main premise contains alternatives that cannot be both denied but can be both affirmed Either you try or you won’t succeed. _______ ______________ +A ?B +B ? A - A +B - B +A

Imperfect Disjunctive Jeff will either return to Malaysia or go to Singapore. He is not going to Singapore. So, he will return to Malaysia Either he will engage in business or he will continue being an employee. Georg will engage in business. So, he will not continue being an employee. B + A Valid + A - B Invalid

Conjunctive Syllogism -a type of hypothetical syllogism whose main premise is a conjunctive proposition (cannot be both… and…) -the main premise contains alternatives that cannot be both affirmed but can be both denied. Pierre cannot be both in Albay and in Alcoy atst. ______ ________ A ?B +A -B +B - A B ?A

Conjunctive Syllogism Fred cannot both be a civil servant and a private businessman at the same time. He is not a civil servant at this time So, he is a private businessman. No government prosecutor can both vigorously do his job and receive bribe at the same time. Some state prosecutors are not doing their jobs vigorously. Thus, they are receiving bribes. A + B Invalid - A + B Invalid

Valid Invalid Invalid The accused is either innocent or guilty. Guevarra claims he is innocent. Hence, he is guilty. Either the president will not support population control program or Church groups will criticize him. Many pro-Life Church groups are criticizing the president. So, he is supporting population control. One cannot be both a Muslim and Christian altogether. Derek is not a Muslim. So, he is a Christian. + A - B Valid Perfect Disjunctive Imperfect Disjunctive + A - B Invalid Conjunctive Invalid - A + B