Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT The Economic Evaluation of Transport Projects Seminar Madrid, 15-16 November 2010 Current.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Green Growth, Green Economy and the SEEA 17 th London Group Meeting Stockholm, Sweden September 2011.
Advertisements

1 Seminar on the economic evaluation of transport projects The rationale for economic evaluation in Europe The case of EU regional policy A.Mairate, European.
The Land Market. Is the market for land different from that of other goods? Is there a fixed supply of land?
1 Public Economics South African research topics Andrew Donaldson National Treasury August 2009.
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT UCL Seminar - Catalysing development through transport investment – the role of appraisal and decision.
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT SINTROPHER Workshop Bruges th April 2013 Making the Case for Urban Public Transport – the.
2009 Priorities & issues John Dickie Crossrail 2 Supporting London’s growth.
INTRODUCTION TO APPLIED WELFARE ECONOMICS AND BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS.
Making the Economic case for Investment Philipp Thiessen, Head of Appraisal scrutiny.
Theoretical Framework REVENUE Stef Proost (KULeuven) Based on work Adpc, CERAS, IWW,TIS and KULeuven.
Financial Management F OR A S MALL B USINESS. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2 Welcome 1. Agenda 2. Ground Rules 3. Introductions.
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT Appraisal Practice; The Crossrail Approach Tom Worsley.
Economic Analysis Concepts. 2 Is the project justified ?- Are benefits greater than costs? Which is the best investment if we have a set of mutually exclusive.
Distillate Workshop DfT Thoughts. There’s a lot going on (even more than usual) There’s a lot I’m not directly involved in I’ll try to take quick.
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT When to invest in High Speed Rail Links and Networks Chris Nash Research Professor
Selecting and Applying Indicators for Transport Project Appraisal Dr Greg Marsden

AGEC 608 Lecture 15-16, p. 1 AGEC 608: Lecture Objective: Discuss use of “plug in” values and construction of shadow prices in developing country.
Macroeconomic Themes:81 Tax Policy Analysis Using a General Equilibrium Model.
ACT CANADA 2014: Using Business Cases To Get Great Projects Financed and Delivered December 1, 2014| Michael Sutherland.
Chapter 11: Cost-Benefit Analysis Econ 330: Public Finance Dr
FDM11 Capital investment apprasal 3 Capital investment appraisal 3.
 Homework #8 due Next Thursday  Group Outline due Nov. 11 (next Thurs.)
Urban Transportation 6. Introduction The major problem facing the transportation is congestion. The major problem facing the transportation is congestion.
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT When is high speed rail economically justified? Chris Nash
Humber Bridge Review Results from the HUMBER ESTUARY TRANSPORT MODEL.
Linking Transport to Employment Creation and Poverty Reduction Professor Ronald McQuaid Employment Research Institute and Transport Research Institute.
Patrick DeCorla-Souza, P3 Program Manager, FHWA
Crossrail – Jobs, Housing and Funding Bridget Rosewell: Consultant Chief Economist GLA Economics.
Transport and Regional Integration: European Experience Stephen Perkins 20 October 2011, Tokyo.
ECONOMICS Johnson Hsu July 2104.
The Basis for Decisions on UK Major Transport Projects
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
The Economics of Marine Renewable Energy Peter McGregor Fraser of Allander Institute, Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde Second Forum on.
PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.
Development Economics 1, KU Lecture 25 Project appraisal and cost-benefit techniques.
Rail and the West Midlands Economy EMTA Conference Birmingham, 11/11/11 Peter Sargant Head of Rail Development, Centro.
WLI REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE WORKSHOP ON DECISION-SUPPORT TOOLS AND MODELS SEPTEMBER, 2013, JERBA, TUNISIA Economic analysis of improved water.
Large Starts Issues for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking New Starts/Small Starts Listening Session and Seminar San Francisco, CA February 15-16, 2006.
Chapter Outline 12.1Risk Identification and Evaluation Identifying Exposures Property Loss Exposures Liability Losses Losses to Human Capital Losses from.
INSTITUTIONAL SECTOR ACCOUNTS Peter van de Ven Head of National Accounts OECD Short Course on National Accounts IARIW-conference, August 23 – 24, 2014.
Transport spending: Getting more from less Paul Godier Transport Planning Society 26 th January 2011.
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS- PUBLIC SECTOR INVESTMENTS Lucky Yona.
Background Key Influencing factors Budget Strategy Key issues facing Middlesbrough Central Government Funding Budget (Assumptions) Budget (Projections)
Finance: The Critical Link The Transportation – Land Use – Environment Connection Brian D. Taylor October 2003 Institute of Transportation Studies.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
Cost-Benefit Analysis A presentation by Robin Sherbourne of the Institute for Public Policy Research to the Ministry of Finance 24 June 2003.
INVESTMENT DECISION Types of Investment Business Environment - Economic - Political - Social - Technological Resources Available - Human - Managerial -
Economic Significance of the Border: A Perspective at the Regional and National Levels for both Passenger and Freight Movements Bruno Penet HDR | Decision.
IPART’s review of CityRail’s regulatory framework – stakeholder roundtable 31 July 2008.
9th November 2010 ICEA 1 Jim Steer Director, Greengauge 21 Director, Steer Davies Gleave ICEA 9 th November 2010 The case for High Speed Two (and three.
Chapter Outline 12.1Risk Identification and Evaluation Identifying Exposures Property Loss Exposures Liability Losses Losses to Human Capital Losses from.
1 Cost-Benefit Analysis Public Economics Minda DC. Eduarte.
The Impacts of Government Borrowing 1. Government Borrowing Affects Investment and the Trade Balance.
NATA Refresh, Progress, Stakeholder Involvement and Congestion TIF Paul O’Sullivan – Department for Transport.
Cost benefit analysis (COBA) is a technique for assessing the monetary social costs and benefits of a capital investment project over a given time period.
UNECE – SC2 Rail Security Analysis and economic assessment of rail transport security 1st October 2009 Andrew Cook.
Integrating SEA into Decision Making: An Economic Approach Dan Biller The World Bank East Asia and Pacific Region.
Copyright © 2014 Nelson Education Ltd. 11–1 PowerPoint Presentations for Finance for Non-Financial Managers: Seventh Edition Prepared by Pierre Bergeron.
© EIPA – Robin Smail / Ex-ante Project Appraisal & project selection 1 Robin Smail Senior Lecturer CoR / DG Regio Open Days 28 September 2004 Steps for.
Social cost benefit analysis of Delhi Metro
Is your project investable? Key tips to make sure it is. 15 th March 2016 A Presentation at Power and Electricity World Africa conference, Sandton Convention.
Urban Institute Ireland/University College Dublin School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Policy, Dublin, Ireland Eda Ustaoglu.
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT When to invest in High Speed Rail Chris Nash
HS2 - What tests should be applied in evaluating the final business case ? Chris Nash.
EWG Study Tour, Galway, 18/09/2006
Financial Analysis - Cost Benefit Analysis
National Accounting 28/04/2019 Dr. Amr Nazieh.
RTPI /TRICS Transport & Development Planning Conference
Cost Benefit Analysis in the Transport Sector… …and Evaluations
Presentation transcript:

Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT The Economic Evaluation of Transport Projects Seminar Madrid, November 2010 Current debates on the cost-benefit analysis of transport projects in Great Britain. Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds

Outline 1.Introduction 2.Current British Approach to Transport Appraisal 3.Optimism Bias 4.Value of Time 5.Wider Economic Benefits 6.Accessibility 7.Decision criteria 8.Distribution of costs and benefits 9.Conclusions

New Approach to Transport Appraisal (NATA) 1998 To be applied to all decisions: -Road investment -Public transport investment -Subsidies Move to 3.5% discount rate and 60 year time horizon

NATA objectives Environment Economy Safety Accessibility Integration Note. DASTS (2008) replaces accessibility with equality of opportunity and abandons integration

Transport Economic Efficiency Table User Benefits (time, operating costs, user charges, delays during construction) Private Sector Provider Impact (revenues, costs, grants and subsidies) Other Impacts Net Business Impact Total

Public Accounts Table Local Government Funding Central Government Funding (inc. impact on tax revenues) Total

Monetarised Costs and Benefits Table (adds in) Noise Local air quality Greenhouse gases Journey ambience Reliability Interchanges Option Values

Appraisal summary table Environment Noise Local Air Quality Greenhouse Gases Landscape Townscape Heritage of Historic Resources Biodiversity Water Environment Physical Fitness Journey Ambience

Appraisal summary table CTD Safety Accidents Security Economy Public Accounts Transport Economic Efficiency Reliability Wider Economic Impacts Accessibility Option values Severance Access to the Transport System Integration Transport Interchange Land-Use Policy Other Government Policies

Valuation of costs and benefits – key issues Optimism bias Value of time (esp business travel and small time savings) Wider Economic Benefits Accessibility Decision Criterion Distribution

Risk and Optimism Bias Adjustments for Capital Expenditure Project Development Level 1. Prefeasibility66% 2. Project Definition50% 3. Option Selection40% 4. Single option refinement with QRA 18% 5. Design development with QRA6% Source: WEBTAG

Value of Time Savings for rail Passengers in the UK Standard Valuations(£ per hour, 2002 market prices) Leisure4.46 Commuting5.04 Business39.96 Source: DfT: WEBTAG Unit (

Wider economic benefits from generated traffic Causes? Agglomeration externalities Imperfect competition in output markets Labour supply Magnitude up to 30% of direct benefits?

Crossrail CBA (£mPV) Time savings Crowding 2889 Other transport benefits 372 Wider economic benefits 7161 Total benefits Total costs13902 Less revenues Plus tax loss 1207 Cost to government 8960 BCR2.6 (1.8 excl Wider economic benefits)

Draft WebTAG guideline Option values for commuter services Mode / Package Value per household per annum Option value and non-use value Sensitivity tests Excluding non-use value Value of mixed mode package Train£170£ Bus£90£54--- Train and bus £170£102£260

Decision Criterion and Value for Money BCR < 1Poor(None) 1 to 1.5Low(Very few) 1.5 to 2Medium(Some) > 2High(Most) NB Negative costs and positive benefits implies high value for money

Treatment of distribution Need to forecast final impact of costs and benefits (note - they may be passed on through land prices, wage rates, prices of goods in shops) Then apply weighting system NB Jubilee line extension to Docklands raised property values by £1.5b!

Quantitative Significance of Possible Weighting Systems Weights relative to mean income INCOMEβ LEVEL0+1+2 ¼ ỹ1416 ½ ỹ124 ỹ111 2 ỹ1½¼ 4 ỹ1¼ 1/16 i.e. w i may just reflect differences in MU y or may reflect this and equity weights

Conclusions British transport appraisal is state of the art BUT Problem of estimating costs Still concerns about value of time Uncertainty over wider economic benefits Treatment of accessibility Issue over capital rationing Inadequate treatment of distribution General treatment of uncertainty and robustness