SWRCB Modeling I Historical Modeling Tara Smith, Delta Modeling Section Department of Water Resources Tara Smith, Delta Modeling Section Department of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CCWD: Using DSM2 Historical July20, Two Applications of the DSM2 Historical Model: Modeling Contaminant Spills and Using Salinity Fingerprints to.
Advertisements

Pilot Project Alternatives FRANKS TRACT San Joaquin River False River Old R i v e r Sacramento River Operable Gates in Three Mile Slough Alt #1 Operable.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cay Goude Ryan Olah Steve Detwiler Victoria Poage Derek Hilts U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Mike Chotkowski Lenny Grimaldo.
Upstream Boundary (Section V.1). 1. Delta boundary, daily inflow 2. Extend upstream channel by 45 miles, daily inflow 3. Hourly inflow at Freeport boundary.
Application of the Continuous Slope-Area Method for Determining Stream Discharge and Development of Rating Curves in Ephemeral Channels Navajo Nation Hydroclimate.
Blue Lakes Stream Gauge Improvement and Lake Level Stabilization Project: Summary of Dye Tracer Testing City of Twin Falls September 12, 2011.
Sacramento - San Joaquin Delta Region Karl Winkler, Chief, Central District Division of Planning and Local Assistance Department of Water Resources.
Using the minimum distance as a metric for testing is ambiguous when fish have greater than two channels to move into. Fish GPS position during each day.
Department of Water Resources Role in Water Transfers Jerry Johns, DWR
The little fish in California’s water supply: delta smelt “DRERIP” conceptual model overview Matt Nobriga and Bruce Herbold for National Academy of Sciences.
Chapter 21 Section 3 Review Page 534
METHYL MERCURY IN THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN Chris Foe Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
Framework for Assessing the Impact of Salinity on Productivity Amy Cheung University of New South Wales Workshop: “Policy Choices for Salinity Mitigation:
Hood River Basin Study Water Resources Modeling (MODSIM) Taylor Dixon, Hydrologist February 12, 2014.
You thought the CVP was large. No Bureau requirements Half a million newcomers per year West side of San Joaquin Valley needs water Some Farms 224,000.
The Brunner Island Power Plant: The Seasonal Effects of a Generated Thermal Plume on the Phytoplankton, Periphyton, and Macroinvertebrate Populations of.
Impact of SJR & South Delta Flow Diversions on Water Quality Began Review SJR Low-DO Problem Spring 1999 Supported by CVRWQCB & DeltaKeeper Directed Funds.
Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency.
Urban Water Institute Conference August 22,
SWRCB Periodic Review Topic #8  Part A – Concerns with 1999 SWRCB EIR analysis.  Part B – Concerns with San Joaquin River Base-flow Construct.  Part.
Periodic Review of the 1995 Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary Comments of The Bay Institute on.
Delta Flows: Data and Calibrations Cathy Ruhl US Geological Survey California Water Science Center, Sacramento, CA.
Searching for Reasonable Solutions to an Imperfect Situation Charles Burt, P.E., Ph.D. March 14, 2005 SWRCB Hearing – SJ River Salinity.
Study for Fish Screens at Existing Delta Facilities Dr. Leah Orloff Water Resources Manager CUWA Board MeetingJuly 24, 2009.
Draft Recommendations of the San Joaquin Water Quality Management Group Plan for Achieving Salinity/Boron and DO Objectives Plan for Achieving Salinity/Boron.
Presenting Model Results: Synergy & Opportunities Ted Swift, Ph.D. Real-Time Data & Forecasting Project, DWR Municipal Water Quality Investigations Branch.
Species or RunONDJFMAMJJAS Fall Chinook Late fall Chinook Winter Chinook Spring Chinook Steelhead Delta smelt Figure 1. Comparison of the timing of life.
DSM2 Performance Measures Tara Smith CWEMF Annual Meeting February 26, 2007 Delta Modeling Section Bay Delta Office.
Recommendations on export limits San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority.
UNDERSTANDING THE DELTA - AN ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE.
California Water Dialog March 24, 2010 Jerry Johns Deputy Director California Department of Water Resources.
Deltakeeper Other Changes for the Program of Implementation (Issue 11) SWRCB D-1641 Workshop March 2005 Deltakeeper by Dan Bowman Odenweller Fishery Biologist.
Project Status South Delta Improvements Program Project Status November 2003.
Looking upstream from the Main Street Bridge: left to right, top: June 2004 (plant dominated reach following a dry winter), June 2005 (algal takeoff after.
Changes to the 1995 Water Quality Control Plan Program of Implementation Presented by: Steve Ford Department of Water Resources.
DSM2 Analysis of Water Level and Water Quality in the South Delta Presented to California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum February 26, 2007 Fingerprinting.
SWP/CVP Operations for Delta Salinity Management John Leahigh Principal Engineer State Water Project Water Operations California Department of Water Resources.
Water Supply and Flood Forecasting with Climate Change Michael Anderson, PhD California Department of Water Resources Division of Flood Management.
In-Delta Storage Program. Background and historyBackground and history Evolution of the fish screensEvolution of the fish screens Proposed Re-engineered.
Drought Management Sheri Looper CVP Water Resource Specialist.
MODELING REVETMENT REMOVAL AND IMPLICATIONS FOR MEANDER MIGRATION OF SELECTED BENDS RIVER MILES 222 TO 179 OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER Eric W. Larsen Dept.
Data from:CA Water Plan Update 2013 Water Use 2010.
CAMT, DOSS & DJFMP Triggers, Indices, and Objectives Decision Tree Diagrams.
Introduction Joint Presentation of State Water Contractors and San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority.
8/9/2011 CV-SALTS 1 Triennial Review Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins Betty Yee, Senior Engineer 9 August 2011.
South Delta Gates and Barriers Some Slides borrowed from Mark Holderman.
Model Description Sample Results Next Steps Monitoring Data (Initial Conditions) Hydrodynamics Water Quality USGS; DWR Monitoring Data (Initial Conditions)
Slide 1 Agenda Item #15 Central Valley Water Board Meeting of 13 August 2009 Triennial Review Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins Betty Yee, Senior.
Modeling Delta Flow-Turbidity Relationships with Artificial Neural Networks CWEMF Annual Meeting April 16, 2012 Paul Hutton, Ph.D., P.E.
Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN)
CWEMF Annual Meeting March 2005
Forecasting Turbidity in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
Delta Water Conveyance — Water Project Operations and Risks
Ferguson Slide Permanent Restoration Project
SIMULATED CHANNEL MIGRATION ( ) NEAR RIVER MILES 197 TO 191 OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER Eric W. Larsen Dept. of Environmental Design University.
San Luis Drain Shutoff Simulations and Link-Node Recalibration
In-Delta Storage Program
Beta Release of Delta Channel Depletion Model (DCD v1
Methyl Mercury Concentrations and Loads in the Delta
Issue 4b - Addressing Local Degradation -
Beta Release of Delta Evapotranspiration of Applied Water (DETAW v2.0)
Triennial Review Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins Betty Yee, Senior Engineer 9 August /9/2011 CV-SALTS.
DSM2 Calibration: Optimization Weighting Scheme Using Management Objectives Marianne Guerin.
Open water area Franks Tract
San Joaquin River At Crows Landing 30 June 2010.
In-Delta Storage Program
Ajay Goyal Department of Water Resources August 9, 2007
Ajay Goyal Department of Water Resources August 9, 2007
Summary of COA and Addendum
James Gilbert, PhD Nancy Parker
Presentation transcript:

SWRCB Modeling I Historical Modeling Tara Smith, Delta Modeling Section Department of Water Resources Tara Smith, Delta Modeling Section Department of Water Resources

Acknowledgements Bob Suits Jim Wilde Parviz Nader- Tehrani Bijaya Shrestha

Background Cease and Desist Hearings – Fall 2005 –Approach Investigated Water Quality Degradation from Vernalis to Brandt Bridge Modified SWP Exports for Historical DSM2 Simulations Southern Delta Salinity Workshop – Winter 2007 –Approach Provided Different Visuals to Help Explain Flow Patterns and Water Quality Expanded CDO Modified Historical Simulations to Include Increased Sacramento Flow Simulations and No Barrier No Export Simulations Modified Planning Simulations to Demonstrate Flow Patterns for Export Variations, Barrier and Permanent Gate Installations, and Increased Sacramento Flow

Objective of Presentation Investigate whether State operations (changing Sacramento River Flow and/or Pumping) can influence the South Delta Salinity –Show flow patterns in the Delta –Show the effects of drastic changes in project operations

Flow Pattern Without Exports (no temporary barriers)

Exports downstream of objective locations Influence of Sacramento River downstream of objective locations

Flow Pattern With Exports (no temporary barriers)

Exports downstream of objective locations Influence of Sacramento River downstream of objective locations

Flow Pattern With Exports (with two agricultural temporary barriers and barrier at Head of Old River)

Flow Pattern With Exports (with three agricultural temporary barriers)

Modeled SWP Export Effects on Salinity (as Compared to Modeled Historical) DSM2 Modeling StudyWith BarriersWhen Barriers are not Installed Increase and Decrease in SWP exports by 500 cfs ( ) No significant differences. (Decreases in exports do not always result in degradation). Elimination of SWP Exports (2002)Slight degradation then improvement at Old River at Tracy. No significant differences at Brandt Bridge or Old River at Middle River No significant differences Elimination of SWP Exports (2003)Slight degradation at Old River at Tracy. No significant differences at Brandt Bridge or Old River at Middle River. No significant differences Can affect but can’t control salinity by changing SWP exports

Modeled Export, Barriers, and Sacramento Flow Effects on Salinity DSM2 Simulations (Appendix C) –2002 Historical simulation –No CVP or SWP exports and no temporary barriers (modified 2002 historical) –No SWP exports and no temporary barriers (modified 2002 historical) –Additional Sacramento Flow of 5000 cfs,Apr through Aug (modified 2002 historical) Why 2002? –Builds upon work presented previously –See how well the model performs (results can be compared with observed data)

Observed DSM2 Historical Temporary Barrier Installation DSM2 Simulations and Observed Data

DSM2 Simulations Four Simulations –DSM Historical –No SWP and CVP exports, no barriers –No SWP exports and no barriers –Additional Sacramento Flow (5000 cfs)

No SWP,CVP exports; no barriers, April 1 –15 Historical Simulation (exports, no barriers) April Old River at Tracy Road

No SWP,CVP exports; no barriers, April 15 – May 24 Historical Simulation (exports, barriers) April 15- May 24 Old River at Tracy Road

No SWP,CVP exports; no barriers, June 7-30, 2002 Historical Simulation (exports, barriers) June 7-30, 2002 Old River at Tracy Road

DSM2 Simulations (cont) RMID040 (one mile downstream of Old River at Middle River) –Differences reflect movement of water upstream due to barriers

DSM2 Simulations (cont) Brandt Bridge –No Significant difference in results between the four simulations

Conclusions Water Quality in the South Delta is primarily dominated by the San Joaquin River and in Delta Sources Reduction in exports and/or additional Sacramento flows alone cannot cause significant changes in water quality at the south Delta objective locations. Circulation of “Sacramento side” water can be moved upstream to affect the water quality at two of the three objective locations by the use of temporary barriers or permanent gates. Water Quality at Brandt Bridge cannot be significantly affected by changes in Sacramento flow, export reduction, or gates

Extra Slides

No Exports

Extra Sacramento Flow