A Climate Driven Model of the Water Resources of The Sacramento and San Joaquin Hydrologic Regions: Model Structure and Data Inputs Brian Joyce, Stockholm.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delta Facts Major Cities Partly Within the Delta: Sacramento, Stockton, West Sacramento, Oakley, and Rio Vista.
Advertisements

Methods for evaluating freshwater ecosystem services in support of decision making David Yates (RAP), Claudia Tebaldi (CGD), Kathleen Miller (ESIG), Susi.
Skill Analysis for Runoff Forecasts on the Western Slope of the Sierra Nevada B. D. Harrison; R. C. Bales Sierra Nevada Research Institute University of.
Water Budget Modeling: WEAP Kaan Tuncok
“Assessing Costs and Benefits of Adaptation: Methods and Data” First Regional Training Workshop – Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of Adaptation.
Fish Mercury Project Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency DEVELOPING SAFE EATING GUIDELINES.
Climate Change and Water Resources Challenge in California Francis I Chung, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Water Resources.
Climate Change and Water in Africa UNDP ACCRA. HAE Model- Integrated Assessment Climate Outcome Emission Scenario Hydrologic Response Agronomic Response.
1 Overview of Water Law and Policy University of San Francisco School of Law Water Law Class 1 January 13, 2010 David Sandino Chief Counsel California.
Sediment Removal as a Water Management Strategy 2014 Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June 13, 2014.
California Water Demand Scenarios David Groves Pardee RAND Graduate School Scott Matyac and Tom Hawkins Department of Water Resources * * * California.
Groundwater as a Statewide Resource Professor Richard E. Howitt Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Davis Professor Jay R. Lund Civil & Environmental.
Water Resource Division San Joaquin County Water Resource Management Planning Update C. Mel Lytle, Ph.D. Water Resource Coordinator San Joaquin County.
Problem Description: Developing strategies for watershed management Problem Description: Developing strategies for watershed management Proposed Solution:
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
ASSESSING POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON WATER RESOURCES: THREE WESTERN U.S. CASE STUDIES Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental.
The use and management of water in Goulburn Valley.
1 Measuring Performance of Resource Management Responses Rich Juricich (DWR) David Groves (RAND)
Drought and the Central Valley Project August 2014.
Overview of Watershed Systems
1 Regional Report San Joaquin River Hydrologic Region.
A Framework for Formulating Basins Research in Specific Settings: A Case Study of the California Water Plan David R. Purkey, Ph.D. U.S. Water Group Leader.
 Integration with other models  Evaluate simultaneous (and inter-related) policy changes  Linkage to I/O models  Motivating the analysis  Key question.
WEAP Model Development in California Water Plan Mohammad Rayej, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Engineer, W.R. California Dept. of Water Resources.
Integrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska Association of Western State Engineers Spring Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah June 9, 2015 Mahesh.
Demands, Supplies & Priorities. Demand Sectors Irrigation Livestock Mining Industrial Commercial Ecosystems Domestic Total Water Demand Major Cities.
Flow Estimation in the Wood River Sub-Basin. Study Motivation To estimate an historical record at the mouth of the Wood River. –Enables comparison of.
Alan F. Hamlet Andrew W. Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and Department of Civil and Environmental.
California Geology - 4 California Water Project California has several major rivers, canals, and aqueducts.
Overview of WEAP. Water Evaluation and Planning System WEAP A generic, object-oriented, programmable, integrated water resources management modelling.
IMPROVING MILLERTON LAKE FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS TO INCREASE WATER SUPPLY Mr. Antonio M. Buelna, P.E. Mr. Douglas DeFlitch Ms. Katie Lee October 29, 2009.
Snow Groundwater Rain What are California’s Major Sources of Water?
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
San Juan Basin. San Juan-Pagosa Springs(PSPC2) Upper ( ) Middle ( ) Lower ( ) San Juan-Pagosa Springs(PSPC2)
1 Using Scenarios in the California Water Plan. 2 Overview ● Background ● Update 2005 scenario narratives ● Analysis performed for Update 2005 ● Scenarios.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Assessment and planning of the water resources under various scenarios in the Ganges and Indus basin: Glaciers contribution and WEAP modelling Devaraj.
By: shyanne hoyt Anadelia corona Ivan Magana Diana yepez.
1 Optimizing Flexibility and Value in California’s Water System Jay R. Lund Richard E. Howitt Marion W. Jenkins Stacy K. Tanaka Civil and Environmental.
Forests and Changing Climate “Mitigation deals mostly with carbon, “Mitigation deals mostly with carbon, adaptation deals with water” John Hoklren, OSTP.
1 September 13, 2007 North-of-the-Delta Offstream Storage ACWA Regions 9 and 10 Carlsbad Water Summit North-of-the-Delta Offstream Storage ACWA Regions.
California Water Briefing APRIL 2006 Department of Water Resources.
California's Delta and the Future of State-scale Water Supplies Mike Dettinger USGS/SIO.
Drought Management Sheri Looper CVP Water Resource Specialist.
California Water Supply Overview Robert Shibatani CEO & Consulting Hydrologist The SHIBATANI GROUP, Inc.
Where does water come from? Origin of the Solar System.
Data from:CA Water Plan Update 2013 Water Use 2010.
Upper Sacramento Feather Yuba American Cosumnes Mokelumne Stanislaus Tuolomne San Joaquin Merced Kings Kaweah Tule Kern We explore methods that employ.
CABY and WEAP: Modeling to Support the IRWMP Process David R. Purkey, Ph.D. Natural Heritage Institute David N. Yates, Ph.D. National Center for Atmospheric.
Design Reservoir Water- Management Data Model By: Adel M. Abdallah Instructors: David Rosenberg and Dr. Jeff Horsburgh Oct. 16, 2012 Hydroinformatics,
Water Wars in California “Whiskey’s for drinkin’ and water’s for fighting for….” Mark Twain.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
CVSC: Beneficial Use and Objective Study Phase 1 Progress Report 10 June 2010.
River Basin Simulation with WEAP Water Evaluation and Planning System David Rosenberg NRM + IWRM.
River Basin Simulation with WEAP Water Evaluation and Planning System David Rosenberg CEE 5460 – Water Resources Engineering.
Steven Burian and Erfan Goharian Hydroinformatics Fall 2013
Water Resource Management Planning Update
CWEMF Annual Meeting March 2005
River Basin Simulation with WEAP Water Evaluation and Planning System
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Statistical Applications of Physical Hydrologic Models and Satellite Snow Cover Observations to Seasonal Water Supply Forecasts Eric Rosenberg1, Qiuhong.
California Water Project and Central Arizona Project
Water Resource Management Planning Update
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Unit: Water and the Atmosphere
Central Valley Salinity Coalition
C2VSimFG State of the IDC Calibration Dominick Amador Woodard & Curran
Systems and Components – A Process for Developing the Total Water Budget Handbook for Water Budget Development - With or Without Models CWEMF 2019 Annual.
State of Calibration for California Central Valley Groundwater-Surface Water Simulation Model (C2VSim) CWEMF 2019 Annual Meeting Folsom, CA Presenter:
Presentation transcript:

A Climate Driven Model of the Water Resources of The Sacramento and San Joaquin Hydrologic Regions: Model Structure and Data Inputs Brian Joyce, Stockholm Environment Institute (530)

Supported by California Department of Water Resources In Collaboration with: –David Yates National Center for Atmospheric Research –David Groves RAND Corporation –Andy Draper Montgomery-Watson-Harza

Sacramento/San Joaquin Valley WEAP Model

Level of Analysis Planning Areas (PA’s) –11 PA’s in Sacramento River Hydrologic Region 4 “Rim” PA’s 7 “Valley” PA’s –10 PA’s in San Joaquin Hydrologic Region 4 “Rim” PA’s 6 “Valley” PA’s –Also include 1 “Valley” PA in the Tulare Lake Hydrologic Region

Watersheds Sacramento Hydrologic Region –4 “Rim” Planning Areas 15 Watersheds San Joaquin Hydrologic Region –4 “Rim” Planning Areas 11 Watersheds North Coast Hydrologic Region –1 “Rim” Detailed Analysis Unit 1 Watershed Pitt River Feather River Yuba River Bear River American River Cosumnes River Merced River Mokelumne River Stanislaus River Tuolumne River Trinity River Stony Creek Cache Creek Putah Creek San Joaquin River Thomes/Elder Creek

500 m Elevation Bands

Two-Bucket Approach

Land Use Classification Hydrology module is applied for each land class within a catchment object Estimates streamflow, as well as snow accumulation/melt

Irrigation and Refuge Demands Sacramento River Hydrologic Region –7 “Valley” PA’s 9 Agricultural Demand Areas 8 Managed Wetlands San Joaquin Hydrologic Region –6 “Valley” PA’s 9 Agricultural Demand Areas 2 Managed Wetlands Tulare Lake Hydrologic Region –1 “Valley” PA 1 Agricultural Demand Area 0 Managed Wetlands

Land Use Based Demands

Irrigated Areas Hydrology module estimates irrigation demands for 20 crop types –Input requirements: Crop schedule, Kc, Rooting depth, Soils data Also, estimates water demand for Outdoor Urban –Input requirements: same as crops

Managed Wetlands Wetlands use same catchment object and hydrology routine as irrigated areas. Also includes “ponding” and “flow through” requirements

Urban Indoor Demands

Urban Indoor Single Family and Multi Family demands estimated as function of water use per household Industrial and Commercial demands estimated as a function of water use per employee

System Operations Reservoir releases and water deliveries “operated” using –Storage Priorities –Storage Buffers –Supply Preferences –Transmission Constraints Priority = 17 Priority = 15 Preference = 3 Preference = 1 Limit = 50% Demand Limit = 40% Demand Limit = 100% Demand

System Operations In-Stream Flow Requirements (IFR) are treated as demand objects. Assigned priorities relative to agricultural and urban water demands. 21 IFR’s in model. Includes AFRP, Delta Outflow, and others

System Operations Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Water quality considerations: –Use GMOD for Delta salinity standards –Use Kimmerer-Monismith to estimate required net Delta outflow to maintain X2 Delta exports –Constrained by VAMP, E/I Ratio –Target San Luis filling Sep-Mar

Questions Brian Joyce Stockholm Environment Institute (530)