Chief Michael Daly Marin County Probation Kevin O’Connell, Analyst, CPOC

 Identify aggregate data elements that all 58 counties can track and submit from October 1, 2011  Focused on: ◦ Movement of Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) population back to counties ◦ Sentencing of 1170h (non3, non-non-non, local prison) offenders  Disseminate in useful formats  Disseminate in a timely way

Receive Data from counties and run statistical quality control Send data back to counties for quality control Send final data report to Chiefs of Probation Make data publicly available via dashboards and reports

 PRCS offenders released  PRCS warrant-before appearance  Active PRCS offenders  Active PRCS warrant-after appearance at probation

 99% of expected PRCS cases statewide  7% of PRCS failed to appear within 72 hours

 ~23,000 active offenders as of March 31  4% of active PRCS cases are wanted on warrants Statewide average of 4%

 1170h (a) jail only sentences  1170h (b) split sentences  1170h (b) no jail sentences  Active 1170 (b) offenders

~15, h sentences as of March 31 34% above initial estimates

22% of 1170h sentences were split sentences 29% of split sentences have started mandatory supervision and are out of custody

 PRCS Closures (6-12months) ◦ How many PRCS offenders were closed  PRCS Closures (1 year) ◦ How many PRCS cases were closed at 1 year by law as they had no return to custody  Recidivism ◦ Of those terminated, how many had a felony conviction during supervision  PRCS Closures after more than 18 months ◦ PRCS offenders who spent more than 18 months on local supervision

 Updated data from 9 months don’t show significant changes from 6months at first glance  Too early to draw systematic or county level conclusions  Data has to drive the discussion  All CCP partners should submit data to the conversation  Evidence based programming and practices needs to be the benchmark