Water Quality Model: Flow Input Needs and Low Flow Selection December 14, 2011 Laura Weintraub.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Truckee River Water Quality: Current Conditions and Trends Relevant to TMDLs and WLAs Prepared for: Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility. City of.
Advertisements

Public Meeting: March 3, 2014 Truckee River Water Quality Standards Review.
Skill Analysis for Runoff Forecasts on the Western Slope of the Sierra Nevada B. D. Harrison; R. C. Bales Sierra Nevada Research Institute University of.
Truckee River Modeling System RiverWare User Group Meeting March 1, 2005 Tom Scott, Jeff Rieker and Shane Coors.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
1 Overview of South Yuba River Hydrology Bob Center Presented to FERC Academy on December 10, 2005.
Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney River Basin Modeling.
1 Truckee River Water Accounting Modeling Effort RiverWare User Meeting June Univ. of Colorado, CADSWES, Boulder CO.
Focus Group Meeting: August 28, 2013 Truckee River Water Quality Standards Review.
Temperature and Flow Dynamics of the Klamath River Technical Memorandum 7 Leon Basdekas Mike Deas Watercourse Engineering, Inc nd Street, Suite B.
California and Nevada Drought is extreme to exceptional.
June 26, PCWA - Middle Fork Project Project Operations
Tools For Drought Management Water Management in the face of droughts require Skilful Hydrologic Forecasting/Simulation Tool »Statistical or Hydrologic.
Chapter One Hydrologic Principles Flashlight and globe.
Alan F. Hamlet Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Model Application for WQS Review Process December 14, 2011 Laura Weintraub.
How Much Do We Have Left? Coming to Terms With the Colorado River Water Availability Study Annual Colorado Water Workshop July 21, 2010 Ben Harding – AMEC.
Hood River Basin Study Water Resources Modeling (MODSIM) Taylor Dixon, Hydrologist February 12, 2014.
Green River Water Rights Distribution Model (MODSIM) Update By Division of Water Rights
Water Quality Model Updates to Support Truckee River Nutrient WQS and TMDL Reviews December 14, 2011 Laura Weintraub.
Intervening flow forecasts (inflow between Lake Mead and Lake Powell) Inflow forecasts needs between Davis & Parker – Havasu operational limits Forecast.
Klamath Basin Water Distribution Model Workshop. OUTLINE Brief Description of Water Distribution Models Model Setups Examples of networks and inputs Demand.
Flow Estimation in the Wood River Sub-Basin. Study Motivation To estimate an historical record at the mouth of the Wood River. –Enables comparison of.
Focus Group Meeting: July 17, 2013 Truckee River Water Quality Standards Review.
Rhode Island Water Resources Board Water Availability An Overview of Water Supply and Water Resources May 5, 2011.
44 th Annual Mid-Pacific Region 2011 Water Users Conference Water Supply Outlook Reno, Nevada January 26-28, 2011.
46 th Annual Mid-Pacific Region 2013 Water Users Conference Water Supply Outlook Reno, Nevada January 23-25, 2013.
1 Real-Time Management of Irrigation Facilities in the Sevier River Basin by: Mac McKee, Director and Abedalrizq Khalil Graduate Research Assistant Utah.
WATER AVAILABILITY MODELING for the SULPHUR RIVER BASIN Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Austin, Texas Consultant: R. J. Brandes Company.
Water Right Settlement Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe.
IMPROVING MILLERTON LAKE FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS TO INCREASE WATER SUPPLY Mr. Antonio M. Buelna, P.E. Mr. Douglas DeFlitch Ms. Katie Lee October 29, 2009.
Focus Group Meeting: September 27, 2013 Truckee River Water Quality Standards Review.
Impact Of Surface State Analysis On Estimates Of Long Term Variability Of A Wind Resource Dr. Jim McCaa
WUP-FIN training, 3-4 May, 2005, Bangkok Hydrological modelling of the Nam Songkhram watershed.
Overview of the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Lisa Holts.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Modes of Sustainability Definition  In text  In aquifer-storage terms  In water-budget terms  In physical changes at the river (natural side)
Introduction 1. Climate – Variations in temperature and precipitation are now predictable with a reasonable accuracy with lead times of up to a year (
Modeling Development CRFS—Technical Meeting November 14, 2012.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake 2010 Operation Review Billings, MT January 2011 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Hydrologic Conditions Update and Outlook for Flood Season December 2013 Hydrology and Flood Operations Office Division of Flood Management Department.
WISKI Open Water and Ice Bernard Trevor, M.Eng. P.Eng. River Forecast Section Environment and Sustainable Resource Development WISKI ESRD Users Conference.
Summary The hydrology and water resources of the western U.S. are highly sensitive to climate. As part of the Accelerated Climate Prediction Initiative.
Resource allocation and optimisation model RAOM October 2003.
Fine-Resolution, Regional-Scale Terrestrial Hydrologic Fluxes Simulated with the Integrated Landscape Hydrology Model (ILHM) David W Hyndman Anthony D.
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report Modeling Results Historical Record and Instream Claims Model Accuracy Jonathan La Marche KADR Hydrologist3/11/2000.
By: shyanne hoyt Anadelia corona Ivan Magana Diana yepez.
Long-term climate and water cycle variability and change Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington.
Chatfield Reservoir Phosphorus Budget Jim Saunders and Jamie Anthony WQCD, Standards Unit 13 Dec 2007.
Water Supply and Demand in the Okanagan and Similkameen River Basins Brian Guy, Ph.D., P.Geo. National Practice Leader, Environmental Science September.
Focus Group Meeting: November 12, 2013 Truckee River Water Quality Standards Review.
Water Resources Planning and Management
Climate Change and Water Supply: Potential Hydrologic Consequences Guido Franco Technical Lead for Climate Change Research Public Interest Energy Research.
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
Surface Water Applied Hydrology. Surface Water Source of Streamflow Streamflow Characteristics Travel Time and Stream Networks.
Note: This presentation contains only preliminary research results. If you have any questions, please contact Julie Vano at Thanks.
Incorporating Large-Scale Climate Information in Water Resources Decision Making Balaji Rajagopalan Dept. of Civil, Env. And Arch. Engg. And CIRES Katrina.
June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
Yuma Agriculture Water - Rights and Supply Terry Fulp Director, Lower Colorado Region Yuma Agriculture Water Conference January 13, 2016.
Approach in developing PnET-BGC model inputs for Smoky Mountains
The effect of climate and global change on African water resources
Andrew Wood, Ali Akanda, Dennis Lettenmaier
Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS)
June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
UW Hydrologic Forecasting: Yakima R. Discussion
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Tami Thompson - MBK Engineers
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Model: Flow Input Needs and Low Flow Selection December 14, 2011 Laura Weintraub

TROM Flow Disaggregation for Input to Water Quality Modeling TROM Output: –Oct – Apr: monthly –May – Sep: bi/tri-monthly Three types of data linked to WQ models: –Reservoir releases –Diversions –TMWRF effluent discharge What spatial / temporal disaggregation of TROM flows is needed? 2

Application of TROM Flows: Time Scale Reservoir Releases, TMWRF, diversions: WARMF hydrologic calculation of tributary flow will include daily variation Check streamflows with TROM Output 3 Apply monthly / bi-monthly TROM flow directly; use step function to fill daily values

Application of TROM Flows: Spatial Scale Truckee Meadows Diversions have individual output –TROM output used directly Lower River Diversions lumped into 2 parts –Vista Gage to Derby Dam –Derby Dam to Pyramid Lake –TROM output will be “split” to correspond with correct river segments in model based on current diversion records and/or water rights 4

Use of TROM Model Output to Select Low Flow Year 100 years of predicted flows: TROM Scenarios: –Future No Action: Estimated “Buildout” Level of Development (2033) Truckee River Agreement Operations (TRA) –Future TROA: Estimated Buildout Level of Development Truckee River Operating Agreement Operations (TROA)

TROM Flow Ranking Analysis Tool for assessing flow ranking based on a variety of methods Two Scenarios: Future No Action, Future TROA Considered Six Locations –Farad, Sparks, Vista, Above Derby Dam, Below Derby Dam, Inflow to Pyramid Lake Applied Seven Ranking Methods –Minimum annual (lowest flow during the year) –Annual average –Minimum monthly (lowest average monthly flow) –Minimum Irrigation Season (Apr - Sep) (lowest flow during these months) –Average Irrigation Season Apr - Sep) –Minimum Summer (May-Sep) (lowest flow during these months) –Average Summer (May-Sept)

7

Climate Data Ranking Analysis Considered five locations from three sources of data –Truckee, CA ; (NCDC) –Tahoe City, CA (NCDC) –Independence Lake, CA (SNOTEL) –Sacramento Valley (California DWR) –San Joaquin Valley (California DWR) Three Ranking Metrics –Water Year Precipitation Sum (Truckee, Tahoe City, and Independence Lake) –Water Year River Runoff Sum (Sacramento and San Joaquin) –Water Year River Runoff Index (Sacramento and San Joaquin) Tool Assessment Methods –Percent rank and absolute rank –Compare with 10 th, 25 th, 50 th, and 75 th percentile of the data

9

Proposed Approach For Low Flow Year Selection Identify 5 – 10 candidate years based on TROM flow and climate ranking Review resulting hydrographs for each year Consider availability of supporting data –e.g., climate, solar radiation Coordinate with NDEP to select best choice for representative year Consider most appropriate TROM scenario and characterization of Truckee Canal capacity limits 10

Questions? 11