Hi-Cap Magazine Distribution in California Team CarRamrod.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Airport Capacity Problem Southern California Transportation Alternatives LCDR Kirby and LT Burba.
Advertisements

Introduction to TransportationSystems. PART III: TRAVELER TRANSPORTATION.
1 Material to Cover  relationship between different types of models  incorrect to round real to integer variables  logical relationship: site selection.
The Five Most Expensive U.S. Housing Markets in 2014 Q1 Which metro areas are the most expensive places to buy a home in the U.S.?
Linear Programming.
1 1 BA 452 Lesson B.2 Transshipment and Shortest Route ReadingsReadings Chapter 6 Distribution and Network Models.
1 1 Slides by John Loucks St. Edward’s University Modifications by A. Asef-Vaziri.
Chapter 10, Part A Distribution and Network Models
1 1 Slide © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Southern California Association of Governments Where Will Our Children Live? Darin Chidsey Member Relations Officer Growth, Change and Rising Prices.
For Gun Control Hong C. Lin Section: CIS November 15, 2006.
Bay Area Bakery Group Members Kevin Worrell, Asad Khan, Donavan Drewes, Harman Grewal, Sanju Dabi Case study #1.
Introduction | LAFCO reports analyzed the viability of the San Fernando Valley and Hollywood as separate cities. The Rose Institute report examines key.
History of Legislation Gun Control. 2 nd Amendment 1791 Amendment II “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right.
A TRANSFORMATIVE INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA’S FUTURE Dan Richard, Chair California Passenger Rail Summit April 29, 2015 Sacramento, CA.
EMGT 501 HW # Due Day: Sep 14.
Matakuliah : G1184 Travel Management Tahun : 2005 Pertemuan ke-: Chapter 8 (Power Point 23.1) Pokok Bahasan : Financial Matters Materi:  Costing.
1 A Second Stage Network Recourse Problem in Stochastic Airline Crew Scheduling Joyce W. Yen University of Michigan John R. Birge Northwestern University.
1 Introduction to Industrial Engineering (II) Z. Max Shen Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research University of California.
Air Cargo Overbooking By Silvia Ito December 2 nd, 2009.
Project Coordinator, UNODC
Computing Equilibria in Electricity Markets Tony Downward Andy Philpott Golbon Zakeri University of Auckland.
ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK FOR OPERATIONAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES AT CLUSTERED AIRPORTS Loan T. Le Research Sponsors: NASA ARC, FAA.
Pan American Advanced Studies Institute Simulation and Optimization of Globalized Physical Distribution Systems Santiago, Chile August, 2013 – Case #2.
Two Discrete Optimization Problems Problem: The Transportation Problem.
The Price System The market system, also called the price system, performs two important and closely related functions: Price Rationing Resource Allocation.
UCLA Anderson School of Management Los Angeles: Long Run Challenges and Opportunities Christopher F. Thornberg Senior Economist.
Kerimcan OzcanMNGT 379 Operations Research1 Transportation, Assignment, and Transshipment Problems Chapter 7.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide © 2009 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning Slides by John Loucks St. Edward’s University.
Supply chain collaboration across multiple tiers 1/17/2008 Supplying Your Business Advantage.
LT Catherine Long LT James Koffi.  Background  Problem/Model Scenario  Network Model  Interdiction  Takeaways/Further Research  Summary/Conclusions.
MODULE -7 IT IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN
The Supply Chain Customer Supplier Manufacturer Distributor
ENGM 732 Network Flow Programming Network Flow Models.
Interdicting Tradeflow on the U.S. Rail Network LTC Brian Axelsen MAJ Steve Jones.
Network Optimization Problem
CHAPTER 2 Supply Chain Management. SCM (CSCMP Definition) The integration of key business processes from end user through original suppliers, that provides.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Modeling Attacks to Chesapeake Bay Shipping LT Sarah Watson LT Matt Yokeley.
ORF Electronic Commerce Spring 2009 April 6, 2009 Week 9 Supply Chain Management Can’t talk about e-commerce without discussing the process by which.
SAN FRANCISCO DRUG INTERDICTION SIGACT Analysis and Network Interdiction By: Adam Haupt and Austin Wang.
TEAM 1 – Airbus AXX Future of Air Transportation and Possible Air Response.
Illegal Gun Policy in the United States: Federal Gaps and State Legislative Contrasts Nina E. Vinik Legal Community Against Violence.
1 1 Slide © 2009 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning Slides by John Loucks St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Practice Final John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
SUPPLY CHAIN OPTIMIZATION IN THE MULTIPURPOSE BATCHT CHEMICAL INDUSTRY concept and software Kiril Mintchev PhD
GSCMI 2013 Case Competition 1 Sustainable Growth through Network Optimization Team Name: Consolidated Consulting Carson Corporon Xinlei Fan Petra Ghicu.
Joe Ashpari John Crain. 2 U.S. Potato Transport 3 Background Johnny Joe’s Inc  An emerging potato chip conglomerate  Potato chip plants in several.
Route and Network Planning
Network Optimization Network optimization models: Special cases of linear programming models Important to identify problems that can be modeled as networks.
IE 311 Operations Research– I
Intelligent Supply Chain Management Strategic Supply Chain Management
S UPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT B Y S HEETAL G AIKWAD. CONTENTS Introduction to supply chain Supply chain of WAL-MART Supply chain objective Supply chain management.
Kern County Water Agency – Know & Tell Josh, Jason, & Juy.
Manufacturing/Production Economics Team Project Team Members 정윤환 조윤익.
Minimum Wage Discussion Economic Development and Technology Committee October 21, 2015.
“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”- Amendment.
“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”- Amendment.
Southern California Transportation Outlook to the year 2040
The assignment problem
Supply Chain Management
Price Effects of Supply and Demand
Solar Trees in San Francisco
Understanding Supply HSCE
Marketing & Economic Principles
REVIEW FOR EXAM 1 Chapters 3, 4, 5 & 6.
INTEGRATED FIREARMS CONTROL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Hi-Cap Magazine Distribution in California Team CarRamrod

Disclaimer The following is a hypothetical scenario. The group members do not engage in, nor condone engaging in the trade of banned products.

CA Law (a) Any person in this state who does any of the following is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year or in the state prison: (2) Commencing January 1, 2000, manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, or lends, any large-capacity magazine.... (c) (25) As used in this section, "large-capacity magazine" means any ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds, but shall not be construed to include any of the following: (A) A feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it cannot accommodate more than 10 rounds. (B) A.22 caliber tube ammunition feeding device. (C) A tubular magazine that is contained in a lever- action firearm.

Motivation Law largely unenforceable o No outright prohibition of possession o No way to prove if magazine manufactured after 2000 Bad guys have them o Not illegal in most other states o Hard to control flow into CA So should you o Home invasions o Civil Unrest

LA Riots 1992: Koreatown 45% of all property damage 5 of 53 deaths Police nowhere to be seen Store-owners banded together on rooftops Defended themselves against much larger crowds using “Assault Weapons” and High-Capacity Magazines

Concept Procure High-Capacity magazines from another state Distribute by airplane, flying out of Watsonville Municipal Airport Distribute to large cities (Pop > 150,000) via small airports

The Market The Market

Assumptions/Constraints (General) Cities o California cities with populations over 150k are considered Population drives largest profit with widest distribution o 36 (of 482) cities meet population limit and are analyzed o Only 20 cities will be supplied Airports o Only airports considered small/medium by the FAA are considered o Only airports within 50 miles of each city are considered o 550 out of 1007 total California airports are analyzed Network o Start Node: Watsonville; End Node: Market o 2305 total arcs (Watsonville->Airport->City->Market) o 588 total nodes (Watsonville->Airport->City->Market)

Assumptions/Constraints (Resources) Season lasts 20 workdays (1 month, per year) Cities will be supplied only once per season Each airport will supply only 1 city AR-15 high-capacity magazines o 7.5”x2.75”x1”,.25 lbs 1 airplane will be used (Cessna Super CargoMaster) o 452 cubic feet of storage; (4500 lbs/.25 lbs) = 18,000 Magazines (180 cases) o $2.29/nm fuel cost o 871 nm range Supplier (out of State) o Able to supply in excess of the air transport constraint (20*180=3600 cases).

Assumptions/Constraints (Formulation) Demand (Capacity): o (.0525*Population)/100 o Range: o 21% of CA population own firearms* 21% used in model (conservative) o 50% of gun-owners don’t support high-capacity magazine ban** 25% used in model (conservative) Probability (of capture, relatively): o ((Distance/50)*1.24)*(CrimeRate*12) o Ranges: (Distance: ), (CrimeRate: ) Highest relative probability: 50 miles from Oakland: 97% o Not a function of population Price (Cost): o log(population(.0525)/1000)*$30 $30: Upper-end price of name-brand magazine in legal state o Range($ $68.97)

Airports U= Plane (180) Cities Cost = Prob of Getting Caught U= Inf Cost = - Revenue Cost = Flight price U = City Demand The Model Watsonville Market

Optimizing Parameters: o Probability : log (1-P ij ) o Revenue : Y ij * C ij Method Of Optimization: o Probability as a Constraint o Probability in Objective Function

Under The Hood Constraint: MaxProb.. sum((i,j), log(1-arcdata(i,j, 'Probb'))*P(i,j)) =g= log(.90) ; Objective Function: OBJECTIVE.. Zprimal =e= SUM(arcs(i,j),(arcdata(i,j,'Cost') *Y(i,j) )) + (Weight)*probab + nC/2*SUM(j,UnsatisfiedDemand(j)) ;

Results (.90) Probability = 0.90 Revenue from LosxAngeles -> is Revenue from SanxDiego -> is Revenue from SanxJose -> is Revenue from Fresno -> is Revenue from Sacramento -> is Revenue from LongxBeach -> is Revenue from Oakland -> is Revenue from Bakersfield -> is Revenue from Anaheim -> is Revenue from SantaxAna -> is Revenue from Riverside -> is Revenue from Stockton -> is Revenue from ChulaxVista -> is Revenue from Fremont -> is Revenue from Irvine -> is Revenue from SanxBernardi -> is Revenue from Modesto -> is Revenue from Oxnard -> is Revenue from Fontana -> is Revenue from Glendale -> is SupplyDemand that could not be moved on node Watsonvillex is SupplyDemand that could not be moved on node Market is total Revenue =

Results (.70) Probability = 0.70 Revenue from LosxAngeles -> is Revenue from SanxDiego -> is Revenue from SanxJose -> is Revenue from SanxFrancisc -> is Revenue from Fresno -> is Revenue from Sacramento -> is Revenue from LongxBeach -> is Revenue from Oakland -> is Revenue from Bakersfield -> is Revenue from Anaheim -> is Revenue from SantaxAna -> is Revenue from Riverside -> is Revenue from Stockton -> is Revenue from ChulaxVista -> is Revenue from Fremont -> is Revenue from Irvine -> is Revenue from SanxBernardi -> is Revenue from Modesto -> is Revenue from Oxnard -> is Revenue from Fontana -> is SupplyDemand that could not be moved on node Watsonvillex is SupplyDemand that could not be moved on node Market is total Revenue =

Results (.96) Probability = 0.96 Revenue from SanxDiego -> is Revenue from SanxJose -> is Revenue from Fresno -> is Revenue from Sacramento -> is Revenue from LongxBeach -> is Revenue from Bakersfield -> is Revenue from Anaheim -> is Revenue from Riverside -> is Revenue from Oxnard -> is Revenue from Fontana -> is Revenue from Oceanside -> is Revenue from ElkxGrove -> is Revenue from Corona -> is Revenue from Torrance -> is SupplyDemand that could not be moved on node Watsonvillex is SupplyDemand that could not be moved on node Market is total Revenue =

Results

Conclusion Results: o Market changed with different threshold values for Probability of capture. What could we have done better given more time? o More realistic model No shipping by air from Watsonville to San Jose, etc. Capability to ship to more than 20 cities (longer contract) o More realistic constraints Better Probability Function Better Demand Function