Observation Assessing Teacher Practice using the Framework for Teaching.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

Conferring in the Primary Grades
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Providing Effective Feedback
Assessing Teacher Practice using the Framework for Teaching
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson 4c: Communicating with Families 1 6/12/201 3.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Teacher Orientation to the Framework for Teaching and Framework for Teaching Proficiency System.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching KACTE Spring 2014.
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Teacher interaction with students Teacher interaction with at least.
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
Making the Most of Peer Observation Stacy Noah, Effectiveness Coach Jennifer Carroll, PGES Consultant and Strategy Lead.
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
Introduction to Classroom Management Pertemuan 1 s.d 2 Matakuliah: G0454/Class Management & Education Media Tahun: 2006.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
Evaluating the school librarian using the Danielson Model
Domain II Creating and Environment for Learning
 Updated on: October 15,  Category 1 and 2 teachers  Score does not compute into the Summative Evaluation  Designed to give feedback on Instructional.
Peer Observation Grades 6-12 Presentation by Kimberly Fitch and Joseph Harris June 26, 2014.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Differentiated Supervision
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Research-Based Cutting Edge Professional Development Communicate, Connect, Collaborate, Conceptualize, Create For Results Oriented Learning Experiences.
An Introduction to Charlotte Danielson’s 2011 Framework for Teaching Laurie Gregory, Director of Curriculum January 9, 2013.
PAS…. The Second Observation Cycle Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the remaining two Observation Cycles for.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
P-12 Education in Kentucky How It All Fits Together.
Welcome to KLA Day 1 – September, KLA Process Goal #1 Provide opportunities for you to network with other administrators/leaders from across your.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
New Teachers’ Induction January 20, 2011 Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
Classroom Management Presented by Frank H. Osborne, Ph. D. © 2015 EMSE 3230 Math and Science in Education 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Bell Ringer What did you do to motivate students in the first few weeks of school?
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
A brief introduction to
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training February 27, 2012 Part 1 – Welcome Back!
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Observation Understanding the Process and Participant Roles.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
KPBSD - Phase II Effective Instructional Model Fall 2010.
From Compliance to Quality TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS IN PA: SAS Institute 2011 Debra Dendas Eric Rosendale Cristine Wagner-Deitch,
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Peer Observation Grades 6-12
Presentation transcript:

Observation Assessing Teacher Practice using the Framework for Teaching

Learning Targets I can collect evidence free of bias, based on facts, and aligned with the Framework for Teaching. I can make professional judgments about teacher practice using the Framework for Teaching. I can explain the three step systematic observation process and my role. I can explain the differences between traditional and learning focused supervision.

Bias & Personal Preference “COULD HAVE” “SHOULD HAVE” “WOULD HAVE”

BIAS: a strong opinion or feeling toward a group or behavior PERSONAL PREFERENCE: strong leanings toward some behavior or thing that suits or “works for” the individual observer

BIAS Example: Your opinion of a person with a certain accent may vary based on your previous experience. If you have previously only encountered a few smart people with this accent, you may assume when meeting someone new with that same accent that this person is also likely to be smart.

PERSONAL PREFERENCE Example Your preference for classroom structure is one of quiet students working independently. You believe that this format avoids the opportunity for some students to "coast" on the efforts of others, and it also prevents any special needs of students from being masked by the work of others in a group setting. You believe your preferred classroom structure also serves to keep student conversations on-task.

Considering Bias & Personal Preference AppearanceQuiet Classroom Effort/Work EthicHygiene GenderAge PersonalityClassroom Appearance Organization of InstructionRace/Ethnicity

Discuss your prioritized list with your elbow partner and share your rationale to the extent that you are comfortable. Share one item from your lists with the whole table.

EVIDENCE “Facts” ”Artifacts” “Observations”

Types of Observation Evidence FACTS: Statements by Teacher or Students - “Could one person from each table collect materials?” Actions by Teacher or Students - The teacher stood by the door, greeting students as they entered. Three of the eighteen students offered nearly all of the comments during discussion. ARTIFACTS: Resources Primary documents used by students during the lesson Features of the Classroom Student work is posted in the room or hallways

Evidence or Opinion?

The Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating With Students Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Engaging Students in Learning Using Assessment in Instruction Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness Domain 2: The Classroom Environment Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Establishing a Culture for Learning Managing Classroom Procedures Managing Student Behavior Organizing Physical Space

Using the handout titled “Evidence or Opinion”, complete the following steps. Try to complete the task independently, but feel free to consult with an elbow partner if needed. 1. Read each statement and circle whether you believe it to be an example of Evidence or Opinion. 2. Reference Domains 2 and 3 of the Framework for Teaching and determine with which domain and component each statement best fits. 3. For statements that you believe to be opinions, rewrite each one so that it would be an example of actual evidence. 4. Be prepared to share with the large group.

1. The students in Mr. T’s biology class don’t seem to like him. Opinion 2A – Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Rewrite: ____________________________

2. Mr. J said, “Boys shouldn’t take family and consumer science.” Evidence 2B – Establishing a Culture for Learning

3. The teacher took too long to take attendance. Opinion 2C – Managing Classroom Procedures Rewrite: _____________________________

4. The teacher asked five yes/no questions in rapid succession. Opinion (with some factual information) 3B – Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Rewrite: _____________________________

5. The last activity, discussion of the key scene, was rushed. Opinion 3C – Engaging Students in Learning (Structure and Pacing) Rewrite: _____________________________

Observe, Record, Interpret INTERPRETATION DATA EVIDENCE FOR A COMPONENT JUDGMENT

Observe and Record Notes from the observation Time Actions & Statements/questions by Teacher & Students Component 8:05 T greets SS at the door T “Brandon, how did you do on your driver’s test?” Ss not sure what to do when materials handed out Ss asks “What are we supposed to be doing?” T ignores question T refers to students by name T “Have any of you ever worked in a pen factory?” … “Do any of you feel you have some kind of expertise that exceeds regular 9 th grade expertise on pens?” “No, so you’re qualified to do this?” No smile.

Remain, Reflect, Record Observer should stay in seat for 5 minutes following the lesson Reflect on the lesson Record any evidence you didn’t have time to capture Record any questions you have

Observe and Record Notes from the observation Time Actions & Statements/questions by Teacher & Students Component 8:05 T greets SS at the door T makes SS feel like she cares about them personally T “Brandon, how did you do on your driver’s test?” Ss not sure what to do when materials handed out Ss ask people around them “What are we doing? What is this for?” Ss asks “What are we supposed to be doing?” T ignores question T refers to students by name T “Have any of you ever worked in a pen factory?” … “Do any of you feel you have some kind of expertise that exceeds regular 9 th grade expertise on pens?” “No, so you’re qualified to do this?” No smile. 2a 2c 3a 2a

Teaching is a performance. Performances are measured using rubrics. Record & Interpret Domain 2: The Classroom Environment 2a: Creating an environment of respect and rapport ElementIneffectiveDevelopingAccomplishedDistinguished Teacher interactions with students Student interactions with other students Patterns of classroom interactions, both between the teacher and students and among students, are mostly negative, inappropriate, or insensitive to students' ages, cultural backgrounds, and developmental levels. Interactions are characterized by sarcasm, put-downs, or conflict. Teacher does not deal with disrespectful behavior. Patterns of classroom interactions, both between the teacher and students and among students, are generally appropriate but may reflect occasional inconsistencies, favoritism, and disregard for students' ages, cultures, and developmental levels. Students rarely demonstrate disrespect for one another. Teacher attempts to respond to disrespectful behavior, with uneven results. The net result of the interactions is neutral, conveying neither warmth nor conflict. Teacher-student interactions are friendly and demonstrate general caring and respect. Such interactions are appropriate to the ages of the students. Students exhibit respect for the teacher. Interactions among students are generally polite and respectful. Teacher responds successfully to disrespectful behavior among students. The net result of the interactions is polite and respectful, but impersonal. Classroom interactions among the teacher and individual students are highly respectful, reflecting genuine warmth and caring and sensitivity to students as individuals. Students exhibit respect for the teacher and contribute to high levels of civil interaction between all members of the class. The net result of interactions is that of connections with students as individuals. Evidence: T greets Ss at door. “Brandon, how did you do on your driver’s test?” T “Have any of you ever worked in a pen factory?” … “Do any of you feel you have some kind of expertise that exceeds regular 9 th grade expertise on pens?” “No, so you’re qualified to do this?” No smile. T “Thank you, group, you may have a seat.” T “So…there’s this guy, Eli Whitney…” S answers questions from T incorrectly. Another S gives correct answer. S who answered incorrectly and other students exchange smiles. T gives directions, “obviously include the word” and T rolls eyes. T says “When I was in the 7 th grade, I broke 4 pairs of glasses.” T gives directions, “When you get to the stop sign, predict. What are you going to do?” “STOP,” T rolls eyes Ss do not talk or make facial expressions when other ss are speaking. T “Very nice, thank you.” T “Nice job. I think you are starting to get it.” T stands outside of classroom collecting exit card. “Thank you, you guys are great…have a good day.“ Comments rattled off quickly with no expression.

Administrator’s Role Peer Observer’s Role Arrange pre-observation conference Hold pre-observation conference Conduct observation Complete observation form and send copy to teacher with post-conference date/time Hold post-observation conference and complete appropriate forms Meet with teacher to provide formative feedback Conduct observation Arrange observation time with peer being observed Hold pre-observation conference Complete observation form and send copy to teacher with post-conference date/time

Promoting Professional Learning

Traditional Learning Focused

Traditional Observation Process Administrator initiates formal observation. Pre-observation conference held Administrator takes the lead Formal observation conducted Administrator collects evidence Post-observation evaluation completed by Administrator Post-observation conference held Administrator takes the lead

“Learning is done by the learner” Charlotte Danielson The person who does the analyzing and judging about the lesson is the person who is learning. What do teachers DO in the evaluation process that causes them to learn? Nature of Learning

Learning Focused Observation Process Administrator initiates formal observation Teacher completes planning form Pre-observation conference held Teacher takes the lead Formal observation conducted Administrator collects evidence Post-observation form (rubric) completed by Administrator and Teacher separately Post-observation conference held Teacher takes the lead

“Of all the approaches available to educators to promote teacher learning, the most powerful is that of professional conversation.” Talk About Teaching! Charlotte Danielson 2009, Corwin Press

Learning Targets I can collect evidence free of bias, based on facts, and aligned with the Framework for Teaching. I can make professional judgments about teacher practice using the Framework for Teaching. I can explain the three step systematic observation process and my role. I can explain the differences between traditional and learning focused supervision.