DESIGN AND EUROPEAN LAW Two texts - Firstly a directive 98/71 in order to create a convergence between national laws - secondly a european protection :

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Patents Office 2007 The Unregistered Design Right - the baby grows up! Paul Sheridan Irish Patents Office.
Advertisements

5th Liaison Meeting on Trade Marks
Looking Good: Appeal of Designs in Getting Noticed by the Customer Dr. Kristina Janušauskaitė Advocate (Lithuania) WIPO TOT Program for SMEs Damascus,
Industrial Designs Tamara Nanayakkara Counsellor Small and Medium Sized Enterprises Division World Intellectual Property Organization.
Comparison and overlap between trademark and design rights and the protection by unfair competition rules Presentation for IBA Conference, European Forum.
Trademark enforcement in Belarus AIPPI Baltic, Vilnius, 2013 Darya Lando, Head of Legal Department LexPatent, Minsk, Belarus.
Design Case Law of the Court of Justice.
LICENSING EXECUTIVES SOCIETY
Genuine Use in inter partes cases 4th Liaison Meeting on Trade Marks June 2009.
What are the variety plants ? Fruits, trees, vines, plants, ornemental plants… Protection by Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community.
Overview of the Industrial Property protection in the EU The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System The Community Design (CD) System Etienne Sanz de Acedo.
DEALING WITH IP ISSUES IN A FRANCHISING AGREEMENT by Tan Tee Jim, S.C. Senior Partner, Head, IP & IT, Lee & Lee Lahore, December 2007.
RED DE PROPIEDAD INTELLECTUAL E INDUSTRIAL EN LATINOAMÉRICA PILA-Network is a project co-funded by the European Union in the framework of the ALFA programme.
China on the way to a high-technology country: The legal policy perspective Stefan Luginbuehl Lawyer, International Legal Affairs.
8th WIPO Advanced Research Forum on Intellectual Property Rights, WIPO- Geneva, May 26-28, 2014 The need for a fair referential trademark use from the.
OVERVIEW OF PATENTS: TRIPS and US PATENT EXAMINATION
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Software Protection & Scope of the Right holder Options for Developing Countries Presentation by: Dr. Ahmed El Saghir Judge at the Council of State Courts.
LAUNCHING NEW PRODUCTS - PART II Protecting forms & new models in the market INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS (updated 2006) Caroline Schwab - Program Officer Small.
Intellectual Property Specialization Course Protection from Unfair Competition 17 November 2011 Luca Ghedina.
Intellectual Property – The Basics Christine Helliwell, PhD Scottish Health Innovations Ltd 25 th October 2012.
Institut der beim Europäischen Patentamt zugelassenen Vertreter Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office Institut des.
Chapter 25 Intellectual Property Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Practical Information about Community Trade Marks and Community Designs Imogen Fowler, Alicante.
W HAT CAN BE PATENTED – AND WHAT DOES THAT MEAN ? András Jókúti Hungarian Intellectual Property Office Ankara, 25 January 2011.
Overview of the Industrial Property protection in the EU The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System The Community Design (CD) System Mark Kennedy General Affairs.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND YOUR RIGHTS Helen Johnstone Seminar 12 July 2006 EAST MIDLANDS INTERNATIONAL TRADE ASSOCIATION.
Open Competition Intellectual Property Specialists (AST 3/ AD6) OHIM, Alicante – Spain Open for application: October 31st 2013 Apply before : December.
Baker & McKenzie Presented by Gabriela Vendlova 3 December 2002 Intellectual Property Rights: Importance of Trademark Protection in the Digital World.
Intellectual property Week 19 Tom Underhill. Intellectual property Patents Registered designs/design rights Case study/Questions/update (DA). Details:
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims JUDr. Radka Chlebcová.
November Lovells Trademark and Design Right Enforcement in the European Union Part I France Marie-Aimée de Dampierre, Paris.
Fundamentals of IP Law, HANKEN, September 2015 EU Industrial Designs Law: Overview Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The.
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
Enforcement of International Registrations under the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement A Pan-European Perspective AIPLA Annual Meeting 2012 Dr. Henning.
Industrial Design Marco Marzano de Marinis SMEs Division.
1 Patent Claim Interpretation under Art. 69 EPC – Should prosecution history be used to interpret the patent? presented at Fordham 19th Annual Conference.
The Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks Kiev March Noëlle Moutout Assistant Legal Officer.
Ignite Technology Transfer Office INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Lily O’Brien IP & Commercialization Contracts Manager Ignite Technology Transfer Office.
PATENTS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS Presented By: Navdeep World Trade Organization.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 18, 2009 Class 4 Introduction to Design Protection and Trade Secrets.
IP and the working archive Issues arising from the use of Mass Observation Elizabeth Dunn Gaby Hardwicke - Solicitors & Trade Mark Attorneys.
특허청 국제상표심사과 과장 Trademark Protection by using EC Design System.
Intellectual property (IP) - What is it?. Intellectual property (IP) Refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions; literary and artistic works;
Intellectual Property and Public Policy: Application of Flexibilities in the International IP and Trade system --Limitation and Exceptions for Education.
Patent Review Overview Summary of different types of Intellectual Property What is a patent? Why would you want one? What are the requirements for patentability?
EU-China Workshop on the Chinese Patent Law 24/25 September 2008 Topic IV: Legal Consequences of Invalidity of a Patent Prof. Dr. Christian Osterrieth.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
The Community Design (RCD) System. Council Regulation (EC) nº 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community Designs (OJEC N° L3 of , p 1) Commission Regulation.
1 TOPIC III - PATENT INVALIDATION PROCEDURES EU-CHINA WORKSHOP ON THE CHINESE PATENT LAW HARBIN, SEPTEMBER 2008 Dr. Gillian Davies.
1 Seminar on the Internal Market Acquis for the Eastern Partnership Countries Nevena Mateeva Unit D2 - Industrial Property Rights, Internal Market & Services.
International Intellectual Property Prof. Manheim Spring, 2007 Trademark - Madrid Copyright © 2007.
František Nonnemann Skopje, 10th October 2012 JHA Data protection and re-use of PSI as a tool for public control–CZ approach.
Agencija za zaštitu ličnih/osobnih podataka u Bosni i Hercegovini Агенција за заштиту личних података у Босни и Херцеговини Personal Data Protection Agency.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
How to Complete a Free Trademark Search in India.
Unit 3 Seminar International Issues in IP Law. Unit 3 – International Issues in IP Law Unit 3 will focus on Chapters 8, 16 & 21 –Make sure to download.
Ip4inno 1 A.Copyright B. ‘Reputation’ and common law trade marks C. Unregistered designs D. Semiconductor topography right.
The Draft Amendment Patent Law –
International IP Roundtable UNLV, 8 April Seizure of Goods in Transit
The OHIM Sabina Rusconi, institutional affairs and external relations department, OHIM Roving Seminar on the Conmunity Trade Mark System in China,
Looking Good: Appeal of Designs in Getting Noticed by the Customer
THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS
Patent law update.
SPCs and the unitary patent package
Of Counsel Polsinelli, LLP
IP Protection under the WTO
Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
Presentation transcript:

DESIGN AND EUROPEAN LAW Two texts - Firstly a directive 98/71 in order to create a convergence between national laws - secondly a european protection : the community design (Council regulation of 12 th december 2001

Why a directive ? The national laws were too different in order to create immediately a common protection Some countries had a cumulative protection (title with registration and protection by copyright without registration). This is due to lack of complete harmonisation This plural protection was under condition in Germany, or free as in France, In Germany plurality for aesthetic creation, but only registration for non aesthetic creation, such as a a salad-bowl In some countries no plurality but the only way of a registration : USA, Italy, spain, United Kingdom

The directive has established a cumulative protection (art 17) According copyright the creation, aesthetic or non aesthtic, has to fulfill the conditions of copyright, generally originality (subjective approach) According the registrated title the creation has to be new and reveal an individual character (objective approach) Art 5 « A design shall be considered to have individual character if the overall impression it produces on the informed user differs from the overall impression produced on such a user by any design which has been made available to the public before the date of filing of the application for registration

Moreover a design right shall not subsist in features of appearance of a product which are solely dictated by its technical function. (art 9) A design right shall not subsist in a design which is contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality (art 8)

Term of protection shall be protected by a design right for one or more periods of five years from the date of filing of the application. The right holder may have the term of protection renewed for one or more periods of five years each, up to a total term of 25 years from the date of filing.(art 10)

Art 11 : Invalidity (main questions) If it is not new or has no individual character If there is a previous design protected by copyright in any country member of UE If there is a previous sign (for example a three- dimensional trademark) in any country member of UE

Rights conferred by the design right the exclusive right to use it and to prevent any third party not having his consent from using it. (art 12) Limitations of the right (art 13) (main examples) (a) acts done privately and for non-commercial purposes (b) acts done for experimental purposes; (c) acts of reproduction for the purposes of making citations or of teaching,

Article 15 Exhaustion of rights The rights conferred by a design right upon registration shall not extend to acts relating to a product in which a design included within the scope of protection of the design right is incorporated or to which it is applied, when the product has been put on the market in the Community by the holder of the design right or with his consent.

Remark 1 : nothing common regarding disputes and infringement Remark 2 : a design can be original and protected by copyright or, if not, protected by registration if it is new and reveals an individual character

The council regulation act of 12 december 2001 It creates two titles with european territory protection One with registration One without registration

The unregistered community design Why ? « those sectors produce large numbers of designs for products frequently having a short market life where protection without the burden of registration formalities is an advantage and the duration of protection is of lesser significance” (whereas 14). How ? An automatical european protection without registration (as for copyright) if the design fulfill the conditions of protection such as a registrated design, The lawyer can juggle with the rules, He can choose between national copyright if the creation is original, or community unregistered design if it has a individual character

The unregistered community design In compensation the scope of protection is less important than for a registrated design Term is only three years, but for fashion for example, it is enough, because it is a seasonal activity The infringement is restricted. Similarities are not sufficient (this is logical because there was no disclosure by registration). It needs a copy

The registered community design Why ? To get a unified form of protection A better protection for industrial design To avoid a division of internal market and to prevent from distort competition in EU A registered Community design requires the creation and maintenance of a register in which will be registered all those applications which comply with formal conditions (and not substantial conditions) To get a single place for procedure of validity for community designs. This will prevent costs and time. For disputes and infringements to prevent forum shopping between the States

The registered community design Relations with other forms of protection under national law (art 96) The provisions of this Regulation shall be without prejudice to any provisions of Community law or of the law of the Member States concerned relating to unregistered designs, trade marks or other distinctive signs, or patents. So for a design you can have several protections. It was already the case for community trademark. Idem for protection by copyright in a national country

Owner of the title * The right to the Community design shall vest in the designer or his successor in title. The employer is a successor in title, This means also that the owner will be the employer and not the creator employee (art14). * This a difference with copyright in some countries * For a freelance he will be the owner excepted if the contract with the firm established that the owner will be the firm and not the designer

Owner of the title bis There is a presumption of ownership in favour of the registered holder of the design (art 17) If registered holder makes an abuse (for example an employee making a registration for his personal name) the person entitled to it under that provision may claim to become recognized as the legitimate holder of the design Moral right : right of the designer to be cited in the register.

Registration, substantial conditions Novelty (art 5). A design shall be considered to be new if no identical design has been made available to the public, even in a country non UE member OHIM Invalidity Division aff It is still new in case of disclosure during the 12-month period preceding the date of filing of the application. The design shall not, however, be deemed to have been made available to the public for the sole reason that it has been disclosed to a third person under explicit or implicit conditions of confidentiality or if abuse (art 7). It won’t be new If there is a previous claim registration or a right of priority (registration in a State member of EU art 41). Right of priority is for 6 months after filing for a national or community design in a national office.

Individual character (art6). 1) It means something different 2) To measure it three factors are involved If the overall impression it produces on the informed user differs from the overall impression produced on such a user by any design which has been made available to the public. The overall impression has to be appreciated on the design but also on the product CJEU 20th oct 2011, aff Pepsico On a user. This one can be a professional or a consumer, but in any case somebody familiar with the product The degree of freedom of the designer in developing the design shall be taken into consideration. For example for a salad-bowl this degree is small. So small differences in the shape can be sufficient. But if freedom is important the difference has to be more obvious.

Registration procedure As for trademark everybody can make a registration, without condition of nationality or housing Registration can be done, either in an national office which will transfer, either directly in OHIM in Alicante (art 35) A formal control of validity is made by the examiners (art25). The control is limited : existence of a design according the definition of art 3 Invalidity If there is a previous right such as a design, a trademark or other distinctive sign, a copyright, or an improper use, or a design contrary to public policy or morality

Registration procedure bis The applicant must join a representation of the design and indicate the products in which the design is intended to be incorporated (art 32) As for trademark the classification of the products concerned must be indicated Taxes are to be paid Use of an official language of the Union In case of need the examiner will ask for correction (art 46) Because there is no full control there is no possibility of opposition for the third paries, but only the way of invalidity procedure Office shall register the application in the Community design Register as a registered Community design. (art 48)

Registration procedure ter Some special articles for seasonal products such as fashion and toys Several designs may be combined in one multiple application for registered Community designs. But the disclosure is a in incitement to infringement. How to have a monopoly while keeping the designs secret ? The applicant for a registered Community design may request, when filing the application, that the publication of the registered Community design be deferred for a period of 30 months from the date of filing the application or, if a priority is claimed, from the date of priority (art50)

Term 5 years with renewal (taxes to be paid) possible from 5 to 5 to the maximum of 25 years (art13)

Effect : Monopoly (art 19) A registered Community design shall confer on its holder the exclusive right to use it and to prevent any third party not having his consent from using it. The aforementioned use shall cover, in particular, the making, offering, putting on the market, importing, exporting or using of a product in which the design is incorporated or to which it is applied, or stocking such a product for those purposes.

Limitations to monopoly (art20) acts done privately and for non-commercial purposes acts done for experimental purposes acts of reproduction for the purpose of making citations or of teaching Exhaustion of right (art 21)

Contracts upon the rights Transfer of the registered Community design (art28) License A registered Community design may be given as security or be the subject of rights in rem (given for guarantee). A registered Community design may be levied in execution (art30). Theses acts have to be registered (art28)

Litigations Invalidity A registered Community design shall be declared invalid on application to the Office (examiners or invalidity division) in accordance with the procedure… An appeal shall lie from decisions of the examiners, the Administration of Trade Marks and Designs and Legal Division and Invalidity Divisions. It shall have suspensive effect (art 55). The appeal shall be remitted to the Board of Appeal. Then there is an appeal before the CJ court of first instance and then before CJ Any third party who proves that proceedings for infringement of the same design have been instituted against him can argue for invalidity Such procedure doesn’t exist for un unregistered community design, The national courts will therefore be competent

Litigations Invalidity bis Mainly reasons of invalidity : prior right, lack of novelty or individual character, previous copyright, abuse of the applicant (art25) Effects : invalidity is retroactive but with exceptions (decision of infringement and effects of contracts concluded before the invalidity

Litigations Infringement * The national courts are competent, including for provisional measures * Each State has to designate a small number of courts specialized