Abstract In the fall of 2006, grapevines from two separate vineyards in Southern New Mexico exhibited leaf scorch and dieback symptoms consistent with.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Techniques Made Simple: Polymerase Chain Reaction
Advertisements

Xylella fastidiosa biology and ecology
Using a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) to Predict Bitter Tasting Ability Carolina Kit.
Determination of Extra-Pair Fertilization and Inbreeding Using Microsatellite Genotyping in a Captive Population of Zebra Finches Lindsay Miller, Julia.
COMPUTER EXERCISE Design of PCR and PCR-RFLP experiments This presentation shows all steps of a PCR-RFLP experiment and is a companion of the computer.
University of Sulaimani
Practical #2: Extraction of genomic DNA from E.Coli Practical #3: Agarose Gel Electrophoresis Bertrand Ong Chan JianPeng Salanne Lee.
Abstract Chitalpa is a common landscape plant used in the desert southwest United States. In the summer of 2006, Xylella fastidiosa, a xylem-limited bacterium.
Visual Basic and Perl Applications for Genome Project Management. Svetlana N.Yurgel* 1, Brenda K. Schroeder 1, Hao Jin 2 and Michael L. Kahn 1,3. Institute.
Definition of PCR Requirements for PCR PCR Process Agarose gel electrophoresis.
Introduction to DNA.
Genetic Research Using Bioinformatics: WET LAB:
Genomic DNA purification
Plant virus infections induce tremendous economic losses for agricultural production each year in the U.S. Accurate and reliable diagnosis of the pathogens.
An efficient and rapid method for DNA extraction from formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tissues suitable for analysis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Zachary Bendiks. Jonathan Eisen  UC Davis Genome Center  Lab focus: “Our work focuses on genomic basis for the origin of novelty in microorganisms (how.
Kamila Balušíková.  DNA – sequence of genes, repetitive sequence of noncoding regions  RNA  Proteins gene expression.
Variants of PCR Lecture 4
An optimized DNA extraction and multiplex PCR for the detection of Fasciola sp. in lymnaeid snails. Reference: - Caron, Y., Rondelaud, D., Losson, B.,
Laboratory: Unit 3: PCR (pages 54-55) Lecture: PCR & primer stock preparation In-Class Writing: abstract for AEM 63: , 1997 (page 68) Hand In: abstract.
Laboratory: Unit 3: agarose gels & sequencing template preparation (page 56) Lecture: review & agarose gel electrophoresis In-Class Writing: practice exam.
Our ongoing study has been to survey local deer tick populations in a mile radius of Eau Claire for the presence of Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria.
CULTURE INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS OF MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES IN SOIL
KEYS Lab Training DNA Barcoding: Identification of Species
 It is the methods scientist use to study and manipulate DNA.  It made it possible for researchers to genetically alter organisms to give them more.
Abstract Little is known about the reproductive habits of paddlefish, a threatened species in Wisconsin and Minnesota. Biologists studying paddlefish spawning.
Introduction Nitrogen is one of the most essential nutrients for plant growth and development. However, plants are unable to use nitrogen in its natural.
By: Kelly and Kathryn PCR. What exactly is PCR? PCR stands for “polymerase chain reaction” and is a lab technique used to clone segments of DNA. Two main.
Rapid detection of pathogenic bacteria in surface water by bacteria universal primer The increase of urban population often results in higher percentage.
 It is the methods scientist use to study and manipulate DNA.  It made it possible for researchers to genetically alter organisms to give them more.
Amplifying DNA. The Power of PCR View the animation at
TEAM 1 Investigation of bacteriophages of the bird pathogen, Bordetella avium.
Chapter 14: DNA Amplification by Polymerase Chain Reaction.
Genetics 6: Techniques for Producing and Analyzing DNA.
The focus here is on best techniques for distinguishing strains of the same species.
Biotechnology What does it mean? Tools and Technologies Selected Applications Biotechnology 1: any method based on knowledge of biological processes that.
The polymerase chain reaction
Practical training: Test for the presence of a pathogen in a wash water potato by PCR.
Human Genomics. Writing in RED indicates the SQA outcomes. Writing in BLACK explains these outcomes in depth.
The polymerase chain reaction
CLONING DNA PART II. REVIEW: CHALLENGE REMEMBER THIS?
Introduction to PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction
PUC 19 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ PCR -I pUC 19 specific primers Amplicon purification PCR -II 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ Composite pUC 19 primers.
HRM REAL TIME PCR Presented by: Dadkhah Fahimeh SNP genotyping by HRM REAL TIME PCR.
Lecturer: Bahiya Osrah Background PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) is a molecular biological technique that is used to amplify specific.
Bacterial Infection in the Dungeness Crab, Cancer magister Sarah Dunn, Hannah Pramuk, David Scholnick and Györgyi Nyerges Pacific University, Department.
Identification of Genetically Modified Organisms in Foodstuffs.
Research Techniques Made Simple: Polymerase Chain Reaction
Introduction to PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction
ASSESSMENT OF GENETIC VARIATION IN CACAO CLONES COLLECTION OF
PCR Basics A review.
RAW MILK CONSUMPTION : A CAUSE FOR CROHN'S DISEASE ????
Comparison of WGA methods for genotyping fetal nucleated red blood cells for the application of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis Zhouwei Huang­­1, Angela.
MOLECULAR DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL PROBIOTIC LACTIC ACID BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM FERMENTED OLIVES Saxami Georgia1, Panagou Efstathios2,
Overview Wednesday Thursday Labs 12, 13 & 14 due March 7th
Identification of nifH and nodC genes from Rhizobium aegyptiacum
PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY & GENETIC ENGINEERING (3 CREDIT HOURS)
Listeria Experiment Name:PCR nr 114_05_listeria_hly
Oligose - Primers Qiagen Dneasy Polymerase Chain Reaction What Does it all Mean? Maria Brown October 22, 1009.
DNA EXTRACTION Protocol and notes 9/17/2018.
by Karen Reue, Robert D. Cohen, and Michael C. Schotz
BIOTECHNOLOGY BIOTECHNOLOGY: Use of living systems and organisms to develop or make useful products GENETIC ENGINEERING: Process of manipulating genes.
PCR How does PCR work?: Separation of two strands
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Degradation by Stratum Corneum Proteases Prevents Endogenous RNase Inhibitor from Blocking Antimicrobial Activities of RNase 5 and RNase 7  Arby Abtin,
S. Savocchia, R. Billones-Baaijens, A. Cimmino, A. Evidente
Giorgio Sirugo, Kenneth K. Kidd  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Principles of Quantitative PCR
Research Techniques Made Simple: Polymerase Chain Reaction
Presentation transcript:

Abstract In the fall of 2006, grapevines from two separate vineyards in Southern New Mexico exhibited leaf scorch and dieback symptoms consistent with Pierce’s disease. ELISA, PCR, and culturing assays all detected the presence of Xylella fastidiosa, the causal agent of Pierce’s disease, in symptomatic tissue from both vineyards confirming that Pierce’s disease is present in New Mexico. Preliminary phylogenetic analysis indicates that these New Mexico grape strains are closely related to X. fastidiosa strains recently found in chitalpa, an ornamental landscape tree, planted throughout the southwestern United States. This finding of Pierce’s disease in New Mexico has prompted a larger survey of New Mexico vineyards to determine the extent of the disease in the state. Additionally, work is ongoing to determine the genetic relationship of strains from grape and chitalpa compared with known strains of X. fastidiosa. Methods and Materials Collection of grape samples. Samples from two different vineyards in Southern New Mexico were randomly selected in late September of The grape plants in these two vineyard exhibited leaf scorch type symptoms. Samples from these plants consisted of stems and leaves. The samples were placed in individual plastic bags which were labeled and stored at 4°C. ELISA of symptomatic grape plants. The presence of X. fastidiosa was first determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). To perform this assay, 0.3 grams of leaf petioles and the mid-veins were crushed using the mini-bead beater 96+ (Biospec products inc.) with 3 ml of extraction buffer (Agdia) at room temperature. ELISA assays were performed on 100 ul of extract according to kit instructions. ELISA plates were read on a Bio-Tek KC4 plate reader at 620 nm. At least four negative control samples were included in the plate. Test sample values were considered positive when they exceeded the negative control average by at least three times the standard deviation of the negative control samples, and borderline if they were at three standard deviations above the negative control average and negative when they were below three standard deviations of the negative control samples. Bacterial plating from grape leaf tissue. The surfaces of the leaves were surface sterilized by submerging in 70% ethanol for two minutes followed by submerging the leaf in 30% bleach (1.5% sodium hypochlorite) for two minutes. The leaves were then rinsed in water twice. Leaf sections were then finely chopped on sterile filter paper and placed in an eppendorf tube with 600 microliters of sterile succinate-citrate-phosphate buffer. This is then ground by using a homogenizer for 30 seconds (Wistrom and Purcell, 2005 and Zintzun, 2006). Ten microliters of this extract is then added to 90 microliters of sterile succinate-citrate-phosphate buffer and plated on XfD2 media (Almeida et al., 2004). The plates were then placed in a 28°C incubator for three weeks prior to seeing growth. Genomic DNA extractions from grape plants. Genomic DNA was extracted from grape plants using the Qiagen Plant DNAeasy kit. The quality of the genomic DNA was verified on a 1% agarose gel and by amplification of actin as an internal control. Actin amplification was performed using actin gene specific primers, actin A:GGACTCTGGAGATGGTG; actin B:GCAGCTTCCATTCCGATC. The components to the PCR reaction included 1X PCR Buffer (100mM Tris-HCl, 500mM KCl, pH 8.3), 1.5mM MgCl 2, 0.2mM dNTP’s, 0.1 ng of each primer, and two units of Taq Polymerase and 1ul of a 1:10 dilution of the genomic grape DNA. The reaction conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation step of 95°C for 2 minutes, thirty cycles of the following: 95°C for 45 seconds, 51°C for 45 seconds, and 72°C for 2 minutes, with a final elongation step of 72°C for 5 minutes. The 350 bp actin band was then visualized on a 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under ultraviolet light with the Kodak Image 2000R Station. PCR analysis to determine the presence of X. fastidiosa with both genomic DNA preparations and Bacterial colonies. The and external and internal primers for nested PCR were utilized to determine the presence of X. fastidiosa as previously described by Pooler et al., The PCR components for this reaction consisted of 1X PCR Buffer (100mM Tris-HCl, 500mM KCl, pH 8.3), 1.5mM MgCl 2, 0.2mM dNTP’s, 0.1 nmol of each primer, and two units (?) of Taq Polymerase and 1ul of a 1:10 dilution of the genomic grape DNA or a “touch” of the bacterial colony for whole cell PCR. The reaction conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation step of 95°C for 2 minutes, thirty-five cycles of the following: 95°C for 45 seconds, 55°C for 45 seconds, and 72°C for 2 minutes, with a final elongation step of 72°C for 5 minutes. The products were then separated on a 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under ultraviolet light with the Kodak 2000R Station. The resulting products from the nested reaction and were then labeled using Big Dye Terminator (ABI) and purified using Bio Edge System columns prior to sequencing on ABI-3100 (NMSU-LiCor facility). The sequences were analyzed using the sequence scanner software (BioRad). Sequences of five of the nested PCR products obtained from the grape samples were analyzed using Blast from the NCBI website and Geneious Pro for alignments and construction of phylogenetic trees. General Conclusions  First description of Xylella fastidiosa in New Mexico. Presence of XF in NM grape demonstrated by ELISA, PCR, and growth of XF bacterial colonies.  Blast Analysis of PCR products indicate that the XF found in infected NM grape are most closely related to the NM-1 isolate from Chitalpa. Future Directions  Intensive monitoring of NM vineyards.  Insect surveys to determine if there is an insect vector population in southern NM.  Screening potential reservoirs of XF such as Chitalpa.  Testing of NM XF isolates for their potential to cause disease in other species such as pecan, oleander, and alfalfa. Pierce’s Disease Detected in New Mexico Grapevines J. J. Randall 1, M. Radionenko 1, J. M. French 2, N. P. Goldberg 2, S. F. Hanson 1. Department EPPWS 1, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003; Department of Extension Plant Sciences 2, Las Cruces, NM Acknowledgements We would like to thank Bernhard Maier, John Kemp and Mary Olsen for thoughtful discussions. This work was supported by USDA grant # and by NIGMS grant #S06 GM SAMPLEELISAPCRBacterial Colony ABorderlinePositive B CNegativePositive H INegativePositiveNegative JPositiveNegative KBorderlinePositiveNegative LPositive Negative MPositive Negative NPositive Negative ONot testedNegative PNot testedNegative Data from symptomatic grape samples. The ELISA test was considered positive if the absorbance (620 nm) as read by the plate reader was above 3 standard deviations from the average of the four negative controls on the ELISA plate. A borderline result indicates that the absorbance was right at the three standard deviation cutoff. Negative results indicate that the absorbance was below the three standard deviation cutoff mark. PCR was determined to be positive or negative by the presence of a product at the correct size on an agarose gel. The bacterial colony column refers to those samples which yielded X. fastidiosa colonies when cultured. Symptomatic Chardonnay grape vine (A) and leaves (B) from a southern New Mexico vineyard. This vine was dead in September Amplified products from genomic grape samples. (A) X. fastidiosa nested PCR products amplified from grape samples were separated on a 1% agarose ethidium bromide stained gel. The resulting 450 bp band is denoted with an arrow. (B) Actin PCR products were separated on a 1% agarose ethidium bromide stained gel. The resulting 350 bp band is visualized with an arrow. M is the molecular weight, A through P are grape samples and – is a negative control. XF ACTIN Multiple sequence alignment indicates similarity and differences in DNA sequences of nested PCR products amplified from symptomatic grape samples. Alignment performed using Geneious Phylogram illustrating relationships among sequences of X. fastidiosa amplified from symptomatic grape samples in southern New Mexico (B, C, H, I, and L) versus other reported X. fastidiosa isolates. Sequences from NM grape samples are most closely related to NM 1 isolate from chitalpa. INTRODUCTION Xylella fastidiosa is a gram negative bacterium that lives endophytically within the xylem of plants species and is responsible for severe disease problems in many important crop and ornamental species. X. fastidiosa is transmitted by xylem feeding insect vectors such as the glassy-winged sharpshooter, leafhoppers, and spittle bugs (Redak, et al., 2004). Colonization of xylem by Xylella fastidiosa is thought to cause disruption of xylem function and associated disease symptoms which can include leaf necrosis, chlorosis, inedible fruit and eventual death of the plant (Hill and Purcell, 1995). Arid land agriculture is a major portion of New Mexico’s economy and NM intensively grows several X. fastidiosa sensitive crops. In particular, NM has a robust grape and wine industry and is among the top producers of Pecans in the nation. In addition, oleander is a widely utilized ornamental in NM. Given the potential for serious disease problems and geographic proximity to other heavily affected areas, NM growers have been concerned about the potential for X. fastidiosa to establish itself in NM. Limited testing in previous years has never detected any X. fastidiosa infected plants (N. Goldberg, pers. Comm.) It has not been clear if the lack of X. fastidiosa caused disease in NM has been due to environmental conditions, the lack of suitable vectors, or simply the absence of the pathogen. We recently reported on the discovery of X. fastidiosa strains related to those known to cause Pierce’s disease in chitalpa, a common landscape ornamental plant in southern NM. X. fastidiosa infected chitalpa are widespread in southern NM (manuscript in preparation) suggesting a potential reservoir of X. fastidiosa that could affect crop production in NM. In this report we show that Pierce’s disease was detected in NM for the first time this year and that the strains of X. fastidiosa found in affected grapevines appear to be closely related to a X. fastidiosa strain we recently reported in landscape chitalpa plants (Randall et. al, 2007).