Common Core Standards Presentation Edgewater - Leonia BOE Meeting January 31, 2013 Lorraine Cella and Joanne Megargee Superintendents Adapted from Dr.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tracey Severns, Ed.D Chief Academic Officer NJDOE
Advertisements

Madison School District Governing Board Meeting March 19, 2013.
Ohio Department of Education OCTEO Conference March 23,
Draft / Confidential 1 Common Core and PARCC : NJPSA March 30, 2012.
State Board of Education February 1 st, 2012 Penny MacCormack Chief Academic Officer.
Source: 1 NJASA February 23 rd, Our conversation today  What I bring to the NJDOE  CCSS overview  Regional Achievement Centers overview  Four.
Common Core State Standards What are they? Why do we need them? What do they mean to us? Prepared by Grace Lee-Sim.
Next Generation of Assessments November Roadmap to
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
The Parent’s Guide to The Common Core and PARCC Assessment Keansburg School District February 2015.
PARCC Update Mathematics NCSM Presentation April 25, 2012 Carrie Piper Senior Adviser, PARCC Mathematics Achieve.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers Outline of PARCC Information *Parent/Student Resources, are noted at the end of this.
1. Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including Common Core 2 The Oklahoma C 3 Standards, including the Common Core, lay the foundation toward ensuring that students.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core Summer Institutes 1.
Common Core ELA Standards Across the Disciplines Georgian Court University May 28, 2015 Kimberley Harrington Chief Academic Officer.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
SMARTER BALANCED QUESTION TYPES OVERVIEW TEXT TXT EXT Assess a broad range of content. Scoring is objective, fast, and inexpensive to score. Difficult.
Maximize Opportunities for Students & Teachers via Common Core State Standards for Math! Pat Reisdorf SSOS Math Content Specialist
April 11, 2012 Comprehensive Assessment System 1.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision of Assessment: Texts Worth Reading, Problems Worth Solving, Tests Worth Taking Overview Presented by:
Implementing the Common Core and PARCC Assessments Michael Cohen February 15, 2012.
Launching the Common Core State Standards We need to prepare our students for 21 st Century Learning in an information age with technology innovations.
New Jersey Principals and Supervisors Association Legislative Conference March 21, 2014 New Jersey Department of Education.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Common Core State Standards & MTSS Brevard Public Schools Professional Development Day February 18, 2013.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Expeditionary Learning Elementary School Meeting June 10,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Overview Dr. Karen Russo 1 As of October 1, 2014.
Ohio’s New Learning Standards English Language Arts Math Science Social Studies Fine Arts World Language Financial Literacy Physical Education Entrepreneurship.
Obstacles or Opportunities: Using the CCSS, PARCC and Educator Evaluation to Improve Student Achievement Educator Evaluation PARCC.
Launching the Common Core State Standards Embrace Initiative Presented by Brittany Austin Literacy Interventionist.
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) January 2013.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
Lee County School District January 2012 Common Core State Standards: An Overview.
Common Core State Standards
Shifting Gears Using the CCSS, PARCC and Evaluation to Drive Student Achievement Educator Evaluation PARCC Common Core Student Achievement Student Achieveme.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) December
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Common Core Implementation Update Supporting College- and Career-Readiness through Common Core Assessments and PARCC December 2012.
Oklahoma REAC 3 H Summit Laura McGiffert Slover April 4, 2012.
10/11/2015MSDE1 PARCC Assessment Update PARCC Assessment Update Day 3, Session 4.
Understanding and Using the PARCC Model Content Frameworks for English Language Arts/Literacy AFT & NEA Item Review Boot Camp Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph.D.
Reac 3 h Hub Network Training Resources April 5, 2012.
Understanding PARCC and Disciplinary Literacy November
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
NEW STANDARDS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Connecticut Common Core Standards.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
A Primer. What Are the Common Core State Standards? The Common Core State Standards identify what students need to know and be able to do in each grade.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS WINTER MEETING -- JANUARY 24, 2015 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
WALNUT HIGH SCHOOL CAASPP INFORMATION NIGHT How to Understand Your Child’s report
CCSS for School Leaders January 18,19,20 Penny MacCormack Chief Academic Officer.
Walnut Valley Unified School District “Understanding Your Child’s 2015 CAASPP Report” California Assessment and Accountability System Performance and Progress.
Thomas Suarez TED Talk. Mathematics Performance Task Planting Tulips 1.Classroom Activity 2.Student Task 3.Task Specifications 4.Scoring Rubric Smarter.
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
Common Core Key Word Insertion Activity. Common Core Standards Anchor Standard 1: Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking November, 2013.
MODEL CURRICULUM Tracey Severns, Ed.D Chief Academic Officer NJDOE.
Assessment Transition to the Common Core Georgia Performance Standards (CCGPS)
PARCC CCSS CED TRANSITIONING TO A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT Jonathan Wright ELA Teacher Manhattan Middle School BVSD Secondary ELA TOSA.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Coventry Public Schools
Presentation transcript:

Common Core Standards Presentation Edgewater - Leonia BOE Meeting January 31, 2013 Lorraine Cella and Joanne Megargee Superintendents Adapted from Dr. Tracey Severns, Chief Academic Officer NJDOE

Why a “Model” Curriculum Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Fewer, clearer, more rigorous Internationally benchmarked Commonness Leverage state and nation-wide expertise (46 States and DC) PARCC (23 States and DC) Continuous improvement Model 1.0 & 2.0

The CCSS Difference: Grade 7 ELA Before: NJCCCS (2004) 1. Produce written work and oral work that demonstrate comprehension of informational materials. After: CCSS (2010) 2. Determine two or more central ideas in a text and analyze their development over the course of the text; provide an objective summary of the text.

The CCSS Difference: Grade 8 Math 1. Understand and apply the Pythagorean Theorem. After: CCSS (2010) 1. Explain a proof of the Pythagorean Theorem and its converse. 2. Apply the Pythagorean Theorem to determine unknown side lengths in right triangles in real-world and mathematical problems in two and three dimensions. 3. Apply the Pythagorean Theorem to find the distance between two points in a coordinate system.

The CCSS Difference: Grade 3-5 ELA: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 Compare and contrast the most important points and key details presented in two texts on the same topic Integrate information from two texts on the same topic in order to write or speak about the subject knowledgably Integrate information from several texts on the same topic in order to write or speak about the subject knowledgably.

College Readiness : Grade 11 ELA  Write arguments to support claim(s) in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence  Introduce precise knowledgeable claims(s), establish the significance of the claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that logically sequences claim(s), counterclaim(s), reasons and evidence.  Develop claim(s) and counterclaim(s) fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both in a manner that anticipates the audience’s knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases.

Limitations of Textbooks and Programs  CCSS requires the re-evaluation of textbooks, materials and programs  Rubrics for evaluating resources can be found at the NJDOE website under CCSS

Common Standards require Common Assessments Common Core State Standards: critical - but just the first step Common Assessments: state comparisons will increase pressure for performance Quality Implementation required for actual improvement in student achievement

Claims Driving Design: ELA/Literacy Students are on-track or ready for college and careers Students read and comprehend a range of sufficiently complex texts independently Reading Literature Reading Informational Text Vocabulary Interpretation and Use Students write effectively when using and/or analyzing sources. Written Expression Conventions and Knowledge of Language Students build and present knowledge through research and the integration, comparison, and synthesis of ideas. 9

Solve problems involving the major content for their grade level with connections to practices Solve problems involving the additional and supporting content for their grade level with connections to practices Express mathematical reasoning by constructing mathematical arguments and critiques Use the modeling practice to solve real world problems Demonstrate fluency in areas set forth in the Standards for Content in grades 3-6 Claims Driving Design: Mathematics Students are on-track or ready for college and careers 10

PARCC Assessment Design English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics, Grades 3-11 End-of-Year Assessment Innovative, computer- based items Required Performance-Based Assessment (PBA) Extended tasks Applications of concepts and skills Required Diagnostic Assessment Early indicator of student knowledge and skills to inform instruction, supports, and PD Non-summative Speaking And Listening Assessment Locally scored Non-summative, required 2 Optional Assessments/Flexible Administration Mid-Year Assessment Performance-based Emphasis on hard- to-measure standards Potentially summative 11

12 Assessment Transition Timeline Spring 2012 NJ ASK Aligned to NJCCCS Spring 2013 NJ ASK Aligned to the CCSS (except gr 6-8 Math) Spring 2014 NJ ASK Aligned to the CCSS SY Full administration of PARCC assessments “Transitional Assessments”

Instructional Leadership 1. Set a compelling vision 2. Develop a plan for meeting the vision with measurable goals, aligned strategies and a plan to monitor progress 3. Use data to inform a climate conducive to learning 4. Develop a culture of high expectations 5. Ensure standards-aligned curriculum and assessment is implemented with fidelity 6. Ensure formative and summative data is used to inform classroom practice 7. Use informal and formal observations to improve instruction 8. Develop a schedule that supports learning 9. Employ staffing practices that support school goals

Informal and Formal Observations “What gets measured gets managed”  Lesson plans  Walkthroughs and evaluations: feedback on standards-aligned instruction  Data reports: Unit assessment data, walkthrough data

Use informal and formal observations to improve instruction Effective Instruction  Clear learning objective aligned to the curriculum (teacher & student)  Engaging and aligned instructional strategies  Engaging and appropriately rigorous standards- aligned student work  Quality and timely checks for understanding  Appropriate adjustment based on student understanding  Effective assessment of learning objective to inform next lesson

Effective PLC A Staff members meet on a regular basis to discuss their work, work together to problem solve, reflect on their jobs, and take responsibility for what students learn. B Instructional leaders create time for teacher collaboration through scheduling and programming, and guide that collaboration.

Effective PLC 1. Provide time to allow on-going collaboration. 2. Create agendas that focus on the “right work.” 3. Monitor progress by regularly attending meetings and providing feedback on their work.

Activities to Promote Understanding of the CCSS  Review the CCSS ELA anchor standards.  Study the K-12 development of a single anchor standard for math and ELA.  Study the CCSS math practices and use the grade level overviews when visiting classes.  Analyze the Model Curriculum SLOs and Unit Assessments. (SLO is now SGO)

NJDOE Resources to Support Implementation of the CCSS  Resources  Model Curricula for K-12 Mathematics and ELA  Unit Assessments  Scaffolds for ELL and Special Education  Model lessons, units, videos, materials and resources  Assessment bank

Obstacles and Opportunities  Culture  Capacity  Coherence  Courage